It is currently 20 Nov 2017, 06:58

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In the Business program at a university, all candidates for

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 05 Apr 2012
Posts: 22

Kudos [?]: 10 [2], given: 12

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2012, 19:41
2
KUDOS
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

75% (hard)

Question Stats:

52% (01:24) correct 48% (01:24) wrong based on 749 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In the Business program at a university, all candidates for the MBA in International Business who entered the program after 1990 took a seminar on Microeconomics, and all candidates for the MBA in International Business who entered the program after 1994 took a seminar on Applied Economics.

If a student in the Business program described above took a seminar on Microeconomics but did not take a seminar on Applied Economics, which of the following must be true?

A. The student entered the Business program prior to 1995.
B. The student entered the Business program after 1990 and prior to 1995.
C. If the student was a candidate for the MBA in International Business, then the student entered the program prior to 1994.
D. If the student was a candidate for the MBA in International Business, then the student entered the program prior to 1991.
E. If the student was a candidate for the MBA in International Business, then the student entered the program after 1990 and prior to 1995.

Please explain why it is C.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 10 [2], given: 12

Retired Moderator
Affiliations: PMI, ASQ
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 119

Kudos [?]: 1299 [1], given: 21

GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2012, 19:43
1
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED

Kudos [?]: 1299 [1], given: 21

Intern
Joined: 05 Apr 2012
Posts: 22

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 12

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2012, 20:06
Can somebody give better explanation?

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 12

Retired Moderator
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1628

Kudos [?]: 1120 [0], given: 109

Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2012, 21:52
+1 C

Inside the group of students, there is a subset: the candidates for the MBA in international business.
So, A and B are not clear with that.
Because we don't know in which year the course of microeconomics began to be taught to all students, we cannot infer anything related to D and E.
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1120 [0], given: 109

Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4311

Kudos [?]: 8171 [2], given: 364

Location: India
WE: Education (Education)

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2012, 23:09
2
KUDOS
The crucial factors here are; 1. Students should join a business program in MBA International Business. 2. Prior to 1991, there is no hint that microeconomics was necessary. Prior to 1995 does not mean, it is after 1991.

A. The student entered the Business program prior to 1995…. It could be even before 1991, in which case, he need not have taken even microeconomics. Wrong
B. The student entered the Business program after 1990 and prior to 1995. …. It is just not Business Program; it should be Business Program of MBA in International Business. Wrong
C. If the student was a candidate for the MBA in International Business, then the student entered the program prior to 1994…. Prior to 1994 does not imply, the joining was after 1991. So C is gone
D. If the student was a candidate for the MBA in International Business, then the student entered the program prior to 1991….. Prior to 1991, there was no need for microeconomics seminar
E. If the student was a candidate for the MBA in International Business, then the student entered the program after 1990 and prior to 1995. --- Precisely fixes the joining between the two ends; correct choice.

_________________

Can you solve at least some SC questions without delving into the initial statement?

Narendran 98845 44509

Kudos [?]: 8171 [2], given: 364

Senior Manager
Status: Now or never
Joined: 07 Aug 2010
Posts: 343

Kudos [?]: 298 [0], given: 27

Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
GPA: 3.5
WE: Consulting (Consulting)

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2012, 23:45
Here goes the explanation:

After 1990 means 1991 onwards and after 1994 means 1995 onwards

1990 ---1991
ME
1994---- 1995
AE

(ME - Microeconomics , AE Applied Eco)
Student took a seminar on ME , so he was there in 1991 but cant be sure about other years , only choice C fits in . Try to fit in the diagram . I got this question wrong first time but was hell bent to solve it next time without looking at explanation
_________________

Please press KUDOS if you like my post

Kudos [?]: 298 [0], given: 27

GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 1340

Kudos [?]: 2004 [1], given: 6

### Show Tags

19 Aug 2012, 12:19
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
Some of the posts above seem not to capture the logic of the question. The only relevant fact is this: if someone joined the International Business program after 1994, they took Applied Economics. So (taking the contrapositive) if someone didn't take Applied Economics, they didn't join the International Business program after 1994. So the answer is C (though C needs to say 'prior to 1995', and not 'prior to 1994' to be perfectly correct).

All of the detail about Microeconomics is simply irrelevant. It is certainly possible that some International Business students took Microeconomics prior to 1990, which is why E is wrong.
_________________

GMAT Tutor in Toronto

If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

Kudos [?]: 2004 [1], given: 6

Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4311

Kudos [?]: 8171 [1], given: 364

Location: India
WE: Education (Education)

### Show Tags

19 Aug 2012, 23:01
1
KUDOS
Ian wrote

Quote:
All of the detail about Microeconomics is simply irrelevant. It is certainly possible that some International Business students took Microeconomics prior to 1990, which is why E is wrong.

Quote:
If a student in the Business program described above took a seminar on Microeconomics but did not take a seminar on Applied Economics, which of the following must be true?

Can we see miss the reference to Microeconomics in the question? On the contrary, the question is not mentioning anything Applied Economics. I think AE is not part of the concern of the question, while ME is very much

Let us look t the temporal order.

Before 1991: neither ME nor AE
1991 to 1194: only ME
1995 onwards: Only AE

Now where can you fix a person with ME? You can’t anywhere other than between 1990 and 1995. That is the reason E prevails.

C. If the student was a candidate for the MBA in International Business, then the student entered the program prior to 1994.
This simply means that if a student took MBA in International business, he should have entered before 1994. Does that imply that the University stopped its program of MBA in International Business after 1994?

C has too many logical holes, while E can be sustaned.
_________________

Can you solve at least some SC questions without delving into the initial statement?

Narendran 98845 44509

Kudos [?]: 8171 [1], given: 364

GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 1340

Kudos [?]: 2004 [1], given: 6

### Show Tags

19 Aug 2012, 23:26
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
daagh wrote:
Let us look t the temporal order.

Before 1991: neither ME nor AE
1991 to 1194: only ME
1995 onwards: Only AE

Now where can you fix a person with ME? You can’t anywhere other than between 1990 and 1995. That is the reason E prevails.

No, the answer is not E, and the information about Microeconomics is indeed irrelevant. There is nothing at all stated in the question about what courses people took prior to 1991. Maybe they took Microeconomics, maybe they took Applied Ecomonics, maybe they took both or maybe they took neither. You seem to be assuming they took neither - that information is not found anywhere in the question.
_________________

GMAT Tutor in Toronto

If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

Kudos [?]: 2004 [1], given: 6

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10127

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Re: In the Business program at a university, all candidates for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Oct 2013, 11:15
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Dec 2012
Posts: 329

Kudos [?]: 188 [0], given: 291

Re: In the Business program at a university, all candidates for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Nov 2013, 03:54
Okay so we have a verbal expert who says its E and we have a GMAT instructor who says it isn't E. So what we do from here?

Kudos [?]: 188 [0], given: 291

Intern
Joined: 04 Mar 2011
Posts: 15

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 2

Re: In the Business program at a university, all candidates for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 May 2014, 01:01
I chose 'E'.Can someone just help clarify. I somehow feel 'c' is not the correct answer. The lack of consensus between the verbal expert and the gmat tutor has added to my confusion. Someone please help with this!

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 2

Senior Manager
Joined: 27 Oct 2013
Posts: 253

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 79

Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT Date: 03-02-2015
GPA: 3.88
Re: In the Business program at a university, all candidates for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 May 2014, 21:36
I think E is the correct option.

In option C, it's mentioned the student entered the university prior to 1994.
Case 1 - Say student entered in the year 1992, it satisfies the argument. Hence true.
Case 2 - Say student entered in the year 1988. The argument gets false.

Can someone please post the OE?

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 79

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7738

Kudos [?]: 17814 [1], given: 235

Location: Pune, India
Re: In the Business program at a university, all candidates for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Mar 2015, 07:38
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
nirakrish wrote:
In the Business program at a university, all candidates for the MBA in International Business who entered the program after 1990 took a seminar on Microeconomics, and all candidates for the MBA in International Business who entered the program after 1994 took a seminar on Applied Economics.

If a student in the Business program described above took a seminar on Microeconomics but did not take a seminar on Applied Economics, which of the following must be true?

A. The student entered the Business program prior to 1995.
B. The student entered the Business program after 1990 and prior to 1995.
C. If the student was a candidate for the MBA in International Business, then the student entered the program prior to 1994.
D. If the student was a candidate for the MBA in International Business, then the student entered the program prior to 1991.
E. If the student was a candidate for the MBA in International Business, then the student entered the program after 1990 and prior to 1995.

Please explain why it is C.

Responding to a pm:

What we know from the argument:
- All candidates who entered the program after 1990 took a seminar on Microeconomics (we don't know anything about candidates who entered in 1990 or before. Just that those that entered after 1990 definitely took Microeconomics. So if someone entered after 1990, we can say that he took a seminar on Microeconomics. But if we know that someone took a seminar on Microeconomics, can we say that he entered after 1990? No. Someone could have taken this seminar in 1990 or before too.)

- All candidates who entered the program after 1994 took a seminar on Applied Economics (same logic as above)

A student took Microeconomics seminar but not Applied Economics.

C. If the student was a candidate for the MBA in International Business, then the student entered the program prior to 1994.
Had he entered in 1994 or after, he would have taken the Applied Economics seminar. He did not take it means he entered prior to 1995. The option needs to say 1995, not 1994. So I don't like this as the answer.

E. If the student was a candidate for the MBA in International Business, then the student entered the program after 1990 and prior to 1995.
Can we say that he entered after 1990? Not necessary, right? As we discussed above, if someone took the Microeconomics seminar, it doesn't mean he entered after 1990. He could have entered at any time. This is not correct for sure.

So, if I had this question in the exam as is (which I don't like), I would have gone for (A). Note that the question says "If a student in the Business program described above" - I would take it to mean "MBA in International Business". Option (A) correctly uses prior to 1995 and I would hence take it to be true.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for \$199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Kudos [?]: 17814 [1], given: 235

Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2014
Posts: 60

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 241

Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 550 Q44 V21
WE: Analyst (Investment Banking)

### Show Tags

09 Mar 2015, 09:34
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
nirakrish wrote:
In the Business program at a university, all candidates for the MBA in International Business who entered the program after 1990 took a seminar on Microeconomics, and all candidates for the MBA in International Business who entered the program after 1994 took a seminar on Applied Economics.

If a student in the Business program described above took a seminar on Microeconomics but did not take a seminar on Applied Economics, which of the following must be true?

A. The student entered the Business program prior to 1995.
B. The student entered the Business program after 1990 and prior to 1995.
C. If the student was a candidate for the MBA in International Business, then the student entered the program prior to 1994.
D. If the student was a candidate for the MBA in International Business, then the student entered the program prior to 1991.
E. If the student was a candidate for the MBA in International Business, then the student entered the program after 1990 and prior to 1995.

Please explain why it is C.

Responding to a pm:

What we know from the argument:
- All candidates who entered the program after 1990 took a seminar on Microeconomics (we don't know anything about candidates who entered in 1990 or before. Just that those that entered after 1990 definitely took Microeconomics. So if someone entered after 1990, we can say that he took a seminar on Microeconomics. But if we know that someone took a seminar on Microeconomics, can we say that he entered after 1990? No. Someone could have taken this seminar in 1990 or before too.)

- All candidates who entered the program after 1994 took a seminar on Applied Economics (same logic as above)

A student took Microeconomics seminar but not Applied Economics.

C. If the student was a candidate for the MBA in International Business, then the student entered the program prior to 1994.
Had he entered in 1994 or after, he would have taken the Applied Economics seminar. He did not take it means he entered prior to 1995. The option needs to say 1995, not 1994. So I don't like this as the answer.

E. If the student was a candidate for the MBA in International Business, then the student entered the program after 1990 and prior to 1995.
Can we say that he entered after 1990? Not necessary, right? As we discussed above, if someone took the Microeconomics seminar, it doesn't mean he entered after 1990. He could have entered at any time. This is not correct for sure.

So, if I had this question in the exam as is (which I don't like), I would have gone for (A). Note that the question says "If a student in the Business program described above" - I would take it to mean "MBA in International Business". Option (A) correctly uses prior to 1995 and I would hence take it to be true.

Thanks for explanation, Karishma. So, here are we assuming unstated assumption that there was Seminar on Microeconomics even before 1990 and seminar on Applied Economics before 1994 ? As this is not stated in whole stimulus anywhere..this is really a confusing one

Again, thanks for your help !

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 241

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7738

Kudos [?]: 17814 [0], given: 235

Location: Pune, India
Re: In the Business program at a university, all candidates for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Mar 2015, 20:46
GauravSolanky wrote:
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
nirakrish wrote:
In the Business program at a university, all candidates for the MBA in International Business who entered the program after 1990 took a seminar on Microeconomics, and all candidates for the MBA in International Business who entered the program after 1994 took a seminar on Applied Economics.

If a student in the Business program described above took a seminar on Microeconomics but did not take a seminar on Applied Economics, which of the following must be true?

A. The student entered the Business program prior to 1995.
B. The student entered the Business program after 1990 and prior to 1995.
C. If the student was a candidate for the MBA in International Business, then the student entered the program prior to 1994.
D. If the student was a candidate for the MBA in International Business, then the student entered the program prior to 1991.
E. If the student was a candidate for the MBA in International Business, then the student entered the program after 1990 and prior to 1995.

Please explain why it is C.

Responding to a pm:

What we know from the argument:
- All candidates who entered the program after 1990 took a seminar on Microeconomics (we don't know anything about candidates who entered in 1990 or before. Just that those that entered after 1990 definitely took Microeconomics. So if someone entered after 1990, we can say that he took a seminar on Microeconomics. But if we know that someone took a seminar on Microeconomics, can we say that he entered after 1990? No. Someone could have taken this seminar in 1990 or before too.)

- All candidates who entered the program after 1994 took a seminar on Applied Economics (same logic as above)

A student took Microeconomics seminar but not Applied Economics.

C. If the student was a candidate for the MBA in International Business, then the student entered the program prior to 1994.
Had he entered in 1994 or after, he would have taken the Applied Economics seminar. He did not take it means he entered prior to 1995. The option needs to say 1995, not 1994. So I don't like this as the answer.

E. If the student was a candidate for the MBA in International Business, then the student entered the program after 1990 and prior to 1995.
Can we say that he entered after 1990? Not necessary, right? As we discussed above, if someone took the Microeconomics seminar, it doesn't mean he entered after 1990. He could have entered at any time. This is not correct for sure.

So, if I had this question in the exam as is (which I don't like), I would have gone for (A). Note that the question says "If a student in the Business program described above" - I would take it to mean "MBA in International Business". Option (A) correctly uses prior to 1995 and I would hence take it to be true.

Thanks for explanation, Karishma. So, here are we assuming unstated assumption that there was Seminar on Microeconomics even before 1990 and seminar on Applied Economics before 1994 ? As this is not stated in whole stimulus anywhere..this is really a confusing one

Again, thanks for your help !

No. Look, here is the important point - We don't know. We cannot infer anything about Microeconomics and that is why it cannot be a part of our conclusion.

Take another example:
If you go to Danny's place after 5:00 pm, you will find him dancing.

This tells us that after 5, you will definitely find him dancing. Does it mean that you CANNOT find him dancing at 4:00 pm? No, it doesn't. We don't know anything about 4:00 pm. He may or may not be dancing at that time. So say you went to Danny's place and saw him dancing. Can you say that you went after 5:00 pm? Not necessary, right? We don't know at what all times he dances. All we know is that he certainly dances after 5:00 so if you go to his place after 5:00, you will see him dancing. He could be dancing at other times also, we don't know.

The argument is exactly the same here: After 1990, everyone must have taken the Microeconomics seminar. But do we know whether they took it in or before 1990 too? No, we don't know. So can we say whether he entered after 1990 or before? No, we don't know. Hence, your conclusion should not have the 1990 part and hence (E) is wrong.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for \$199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Kudos [?]: 17814 [0], given: 235

Manager
Joined: 25 Mar 2014
Posts: 167

Kudos [?]: 60 [0], given: 48

Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Finance
GMAT Date: 05-10-2015
GPA: 3.51
WE: Programming (Computer Software)
Re: In the Business program at a university, all candidates for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Mar 2015, 10:00
Key to the answer holds in reading the question with all conditions applied on students. Statements are said about those students who entered in Business program for " International Business". So, the answer is C.
_________________

Please give Kudos to the post if you liked.

Kudos [?]: 60 [0], given: 48

Manager
Status: A mind once opened never loses..!
Joined: 05 Mar 2015
Posts: 222

Kudos [?]: 125 [0], given: 259

Location: India
MISSION : 800
WE: Design (Manufacturing)
Re: In the Business program at a university, all candidates for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2015, 03:45
Am not convinced by the explanations above..! The question is not correct otherwise.
It's clearly written Miro after 1990 and eco after 1994
Prior to 1990 is out of the preview (not stated in the argument).
May be no one took Micro prior to 1990. In that case "C" is wrong

So "E" is the best choice
_________________

Thank you

+KUDOS

> I CAN, I WILL <

Kudos [?]: 125 [0], given: 259

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7738

Kudos [?]: 17814 [0], given: 235

Location: Pune, India
Re: In the Business program at a university, all candidates for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2015, 21:37
dpo wrote:
Am not convinced by the explanations above..! The question is not correct otherwise.
It's clearly written Miro after 1990 and eco after 1994
Prior to 1990 is out of the preview (not stated in the argument).
May be no one took Micro prior to 1990. In that case "C" is wrong

So "E" is the best choice

Note that it has been mentioned above that (C) is not correct since the given year should be 1995, not 1994 (in-the-business-program-at-a-university-all-candidates-for-137491.html#p1496269)

Also, option (E) is absolutely incorrect. Check the explanation here: in-the-business-program-at-a-university-all-candidates-for-137491.html#p1496555

As it is, the "best" or the "least bad" choice is (A).
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for \$199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Kudos [?]: 17814 [0], given: 235

Intern
Joined: 12 Feb 2012
Posts: 1

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 2

Re: In the Business program at a university, all candidates for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Aug 2015, 19:14
IanStewart wrote:
Some of the posts above seem not to capture the logic of the question. The only relevant fact is this: if someone joined the International Business program after 1994, they took Applied Economics. So (taking the contrapositive) if someone didn't take Applied Economics, they didn't join the International Business program after 1994. So the answer is C (though C needs to say 'prior to 1995', and not 'prior to 1994' to be perfectly correct).

All of the detail about Microeconomics is simply irrelevant. It is certainly possible that some International Business students took Microeconomics prior to 1990, which is why E is wrong.

Nothing is mentioned of that possibility, nor can we assume by the argument that some international business students might have taken microeconomics prior to 1990. Why can't it be equally assumed that some student might have taken AE before 1990. I think E is far better. On top of that , C should not have sad prior to 1994.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 2

Re: In the Business program at a university, all candidates for   [#permalink] 11 Aug 2015, 19:14

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 37 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by