It is currently 19 Sep 2017, 06:46

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In the country of Veltria, the past two years' broad

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 28 Sep 2011
Posts: 82

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 15

Re: In the country of Veltria [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Oct 2011, 20:16

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 15

Manager
Status: Next engagement on Nov-19-2011
Joined: 12 Jan 2011
Posts: 79

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 5

Location: New Delhi, India
Schools: IIM, ISB, & XLRI
WE 1: B.Tech (Information Technology)
Re: In the country of Veltria [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Oct 2011, 10:36
"C"

After elemination left with C
_________________

Preparation for final battel:
GMAT PREP-1 750 Q50 V41 - Oct 16 2011
GMAT PREP-2 710 Q50 V36 - Oct 22 2011 ==> Scored 50 in Quant second time in a row
MGMAT---- -1 560 Q28 V39 - Oct 29 2011 ==> Left Quant half done and continued with Verbal. Happy to see Q39

My ongoing plan: http://gmatclub.com/forum/550-to-630-need-more-to-achieve-my-dream-121613.html#p989311

Appreciate by kudos !!

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 5

Director
Joined: 28 Jun 2011
Posts: 880

Kudos [?]: 243 [0], given: 57

Re: In the country of Veltria [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Oct 2011, 14:31
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED

Kudos [?]: 243 [0], given: 57

Manager
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 54

Kudos [?]: 1164 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2012, 10:55
In the country of Veltria, the past two years' broad economic recession has included a business downturn in the clothing trade, where sales are down by about 7 percent as compared to two years ago. Clothing wholesalers have found, however, that the proportion of credit extended to retailers that was paid off on time fell sharply in the first year of the recession but returned to its prerecession level in the second year.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the change between the first and the second year of the recession in the proportion of credit not paid off on time?

(A) The total amount of credit extended to retailers by clothing wholesalers increased between the first year of the recession and the second year.
(B) Between the first and second years of the recession, clothing retailers in Veltria saw many of their costs, rent and utilities in particular, increase.
(C) Of the considerable number of clothing retailers in Veltria who were having financial difficulties before the start of the recession, virtually all were forced to go out of business during its first year.
(D) Clothing retailers in Veltria attempted to stimulate sales in the second year of the recession by discounting merchandise.
(E) Relatively recession-proof segments of the clothing trade, such as work clothes, did not suffer any decrease in sales during the first year of the recession.

Kudos [?]: 1164 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 01 Apr 2012
Posts: 25

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 11

Re: In the country of Veltria, the past two years' broad [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Sep 2012, 02:02
what about A? the argument is on proportion. Retired/total credit: If total increased between year one year two, the ratio would decrease in the first year. Infact, donot know about the second year. Need help on this

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 11

VP
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 1413

Kudos [?]: 152 [0], given: 916

Re: In the country of Veltria, the past two years' broad [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Feb 2013, 01:37
I also go to c but spend a lot of time , nearly 3 minutes.

the reason for time consumingness is

the answer choices are long and are time consuming.
_________________

visit my facebook to help me.
on facebook, my name is: thang thang thang

Kudos [?]: 152 [0], given: 916

Intern
Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Posts: 1

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

04 Aug 2013, 22:40
Hi everybody, I have seen following question on many threads but what I want is to understand the later part of this question. The part which is in bold is difficult for me to understand. Can anybody put it in layman/simple English. Thank you.

In the country of Veltria, the past two years' broad economic recession has included a business downturn in the clothing trade, where sales are down by about 7 percent as compared to two years ago. Clothing wholesalers have found, however, that the proportion of credit extended to retailers that was paid off on time fell sharply in the first year of the recession but returned to its prerecession level in the second year.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the change between the first and the second year of the recession in the proportion of credit not paid off on time?

(A) The total amount of credit extended to retailers by clothing wholesalers increased between the first year of the recession and the second year.
(B) Between the first and second years of the recession, clothing retailers in Veltria saw many of their costs, rent and utilities in particular, increase.
(C) Of the considerable number of clothing retailers in Veltria who were having financial difficulties before the start of the recession, virtually all were forced to go out of business during its first year.
(D) Clothing retailers in Veltria attempted to stimulate sales in the second year of the recession by discounting merchandise.
(E) Relatively recession-proof segments of the clothing trade, such as work clothes, did not suffer any decrease in sales during the first year of the recession.

Last edited by Zarrolou on 04 Aug 2013, 23:06, edited 1 time in total.
Merging similar topics.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 1

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10157

Kudos [?]: 253 [0], given: 0

Re: In the country of Veltria, the past two years' broad [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Aug 2014, 09:42
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 253 [0], given: 0

Current Student
Joined: 17 Mar 2014
Posts: 40

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 34

Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V44
WE: Medicine and Health (Health Care)
Re: In the country of Veltria, the past two years' broad [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Sep 2014, 02:01
The explanation by KeepingUp is awesome.
Attachments

a33.JPG [ 73.83 KiB | Viewed 5445 times ]

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 34

CEO
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2588

Kudos [?]: 377 [0], given: 177

Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Schools: Stanford '20
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE: General Management (Transportation)
Re: In the country of Veltria, the past two years' broad [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Sep 2014, 12:57
In the country of Veltria, the past two years' broad economic recession has included a business downturn in the clothing trade, where sales are down by about 7 percent as compared to two years ago. Clothing wholesalers have found, however, that the proportion of credit extended to retailers that was paid off on time fell sharply in the first year of the recession but returned to its prerecession level in the second year.

ok, so in first year, a lot of companies went bankrupt, hence the proportion of credit that was paid off fell. As a result, only big/financially stable companies remained in the business. These company could pay in time so therefore in the second year, the PROPORTION was not that low as in first year.

that's how I got to the C, although I chose D first time.

Kudos [?]: 377 [0], given: 177

Manager
Joined: 25 Apr 2013
Posts: 66

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 12

Re: In the country of Veltria, the past two years' broad [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Feb 2015, 06:03
Many clothing retailers in Veltria were having financial difficulties before the start of the recession. So, this obviously resulted in the proportion of credit extended to retailers that was paid off on time, fall sharply in the first year of the recession.

However, according to C, such clothing retailers were forced to go out of business during its first year.

So, there is reason to believe that those clothing retailers who were left, were relatively better off. Hence, the proportion of credit extended to retailers that was paid off on time returned to its prerecession level in the second year.

So, C seems to explain this paradox.

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 12

Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Jun 2015
Posts: 270

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 91

Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V29
Re: In the country of Veltria, the past two years' broad [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Feb 2016, 08:54
It has to be option C. The correct answer must indicate why the proportion rises. This is possible only when those who cannot repay the credit leave the business.
_________________

" The few , the fearless "

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 91

Intern
Joined: 03 Mar 2015
Posts: 7

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V32
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V39
GMAT 3: 710 Q49 V38
GPA: 3.53
Re: In the country of Veltria, the past two years' broad [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Apr 2016, 18:23
I specifically crossed out C since it mentioned retailers who were "having financial difficulties before the start of the recession", which seems too narrow in scope. I was even thinking to myself "I will be so mad if it is C since it's such an attractive answer, but the answer choice loaded it with an obvious disqualifier"

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 17 Sep 2015
Posts: 54

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 14

Location: United Kingdom
GMAT 1: 640 Q42 V38
GPA: 3.1
Re: In the country of Veltria, the past two years' broad [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 May 2016, 10:14
When there is proportion or ratio in the stimulus attack the Proportion or the relationship.

Here, Repaid Debt/Total Debt is in question.

Only c addresses that is retailers went out of business the the denominator goes off, yes it still is unpaid debt .

This is the best explanation i came up with.

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 14

Intern
Joined: 05 Jan 2017
Posts: 26

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 18

Location: India
GMAT 1: 540 Q35 V29
Re: In the country of Veltria, the past two years' broad [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Feb 2017, 23:04
I chose D - thinking they stimulate the sale by way of discounting the marchandise. However, OA is c. One question - if the weaker section of retailers have gone out of business during the first year - how can it take credit repayment back to prerecession level? when the weaker section of retailers are going out of business, it reduces the number of retailers who are actually going to repay the credit compare to prerecession level?

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 18

Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Sep 2015
Posts: 479

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 18

Location: India
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: In the country of Veltria, the past two years' broad [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Mar 2017, 12:46
In the country of Veltria, the past two years' broad economic recession has included a business downturn in the clothing trade, where sales are down by about 7 percent as compared to two years ago. Clothing wholesalers have found, however, that the proportion of credit extended to retailers that was paid off on time fell sharply in the first year of the recession but returned to its prerecession level in the second year.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the change between the first and the second year of the recession in the proportion of credit not paid off on time?

(A) The total amount of credit extended to retailers by clothing wholesalers increased between the first year of the recession and the second year.
(B) Between the first and second years of the recession, clothing retailers in Veltria saw many of their costs, rent and utilities in particular, increase.
(C) Of the considerable number of clothing retailers in Veltria who were having financial difficulties before the start of the recession, virtually all were forced to go out of business during its first year.
(D) Clothing retailers in Veltria attempted to stimulate sales in the second year of the recession by discounting merchandise.
(E) Relatively recession-proof segments of the clothing trade, such as work clothes, did not suffer any decrease in sales during the first year of the recession.

*********************************************************************************************************************

=======================================================================
PreThinking:In Resolve the Paradox question the one needs to link the opposite premises by providing a fitting reason.
=======================================================================

A:Out of scope.
B:It will increase the paradox further.
C:Correct answer .Since most of the retailers were forced to go out of business the remaining were sufficinet to fulful the lowered demand and maintianed better business.
D:The attempt results are not provided so cannot be considered.
E:limited scope does not provide impact data.

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 18

VP
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Posts: 1100

Kudos [?]: 1037 [0], given: 375

Location: Malaysia

### Show Tags

14 Apr 2017, 00:44
gurpreet07 wrote:
In the country of Veltria, the past two years' broad economic recession has included a business downturn in the clothing trade, where sales are down by about 7 percent as compared to two years ago. Clothing wholesalers have found, however, that the proportion of credit extended to retailers that was paid off on time fell sharply in the first year of the recession but returned to its prerecession level in the second year.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the change between the first and the second year of the recession in the proportion of credit not paid off on time?

(A) The total amount of credit extended to retailers by clothing wholesalers increased between the first year of the recession and the second year.
(B) Between the first and second years of the recession, clothing retailers in Veltria saw many of their costs, rent and utilities in particular, increase.
(C) Of the considerable number of clothing retailers in Veltria who were having financial difficulties before the start of the recession, virtually all were forced to go out of business during its first year.
(D) Clothing retailers in Veltria attempted to stimulate sales in the second year of the recession by discounting merchandise.
(E) Relatively recession-proof segments of the clothing trade, such as work clothes, did not suffer any decrease in sales during the first year of the recession.

Situation

Two years of recession in Veltria included a downturn in the clothing trade where sales are down 7 percent from two years ago. Yet, in the second year of the recession, the proportion of credit extended from clothing wholesalers to retailers that was paid off on time has returned to its prerecession level, after having fallen sharply during the first year.

Reasoning

Which option would most help to explain the change between the first and second year in the proportion of credit paid off on time? The apparent discrepancy in the passage that needs explaining is between the downturn in the clothing trade over the last two years and the return to prerecession rates in the proportion of credit extended to clothing retailers that was paid on time. How can the proportion this past year be similar to what it would be in a normal year? After all, one would expect retailers to have a harder time paying off credit in a recession. And what changed in the past year to bring this about? If the first year of the recession drove out of business many of the retailers who were most apt to get behind in their payments to wholesalers, then that would explain how the rate at which credit was being paid on time could be as high in the second year of the recession as it was before the recession.

(A) The fact that the absolute amount of credit that was extended to retailers went up in the second year does not help to explain why the proportion that was paid on time also went up.
(B) If anything, this would suggest that more retailers would have trouble paying their credit to wholesalers on time.
(C) Correct. This is the option that most helps to explain the phenomenon.
(D) Just because retailers tried to stimulate sales does not mean that they succeeded, and the passage tells us that the downturn in sales in the clothing trade continued into the second year.
(E) This does not change the fact that there was a downturn in sales of clothing during the first year. Furthermore, the question is why the rate of unpaid credit dropped in the second year of the recession.

GMATNinja, Could you help to explain in a simplified language? It is too complicated to visualize.
_________________

"Be challenged at EVERY MOMENT."

“Strength doesn’t come from what you can do. It comes from overcoming the things you once thought you couldn’t.”

"Each stage of the journey is crucial to attaining new heights of knowledge."

Kudos [?]: 1037 [0], given: 375

Intern
Joined: 29 Sep 2016
Posts: 7

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 47

Re: In the country of Veltria, the past two years' broad [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Jul 2017, 16:00
To me it was too easy so I tripled checked.
First: This is a Resolve the Paradox.

Second: The argument in very simple terms tells you that in the beginning of the economic recession the sales where higher than on the 2nd year of the recessing (by 7%). <-- SIDE A. OF THE PARADOX.
Then it follows to tell you that on the first year of the recession the paid off credit fell but on the second year it went back up. <-- SIDE B. OF THE PARADOX

In this type of problem we need to look for something that explains the 2 side (A and B) of the paradox.

I made a little drawing, because I am extremely visual, and saw that the paradox is mainly on the second year. The sales decreased but the payment of credit increased. Here is my reasoning:

(A) The total amount of credit extended to retailers by clothing wholesalers increased between the first year of the recession and the second year.
R: It talks about increase in extended credit to businesses from one year to another. Good for them! This is irrelevant!

(B) Between the first and second years of the recession, clothing retailers in Veltria saw many of their costs, rent and utilities in particular, increase.
R: It "could" explain why the credit was not paid off. Maybe they focused on priorities and decided to stop paying off the credit so they could pay the lighting and the actual place to sell the cloth... BUT then why did the sales fall? It doesn't explain the paradox.

(C) Of the considerable number of clothing retailers in Veltria who were having financial difficulties before the start of the recession, virtually all were forced to go out of business during its first year.
[b]R:[/b] Well if some stores went out of business that means that sales would fall because those stores wouldn't buy as much, but what about the increase in credit payoff? Actually, it would make sense too. "bad finance" stores are no longer "available" which means that more "good finance" stores remain. The "bad stores" are no longer affecting the percentage of paid off credit.

(D) Clothing retailers in Veltria attempted to stimulate sales in the second year of the recession by discounting merchandise.
R: Again, talks only about PART A. OF THE PARADOX, IF it even does THAT.

(E) Relatively recession-proof segments of the clothing trade, such as work clothes, did not suffer any decrease in sales during the first year of the recession.
R: SOOOOO OUT OF SCOPE. NO offense but who cares about the type of clothes (work)? How would that connect Para A and B of the paradox?

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 47

Re: In the country of Veltria, the past two years' broad   [#permalink] 22 Jul 2017, 16:00

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 38 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Company President: Last year, Broad Street Restaurant ... 5 06 Jun 2015, 12:03
7 In the past, to run for one's country in the Olympics 15 24 Mar 2017, 01:12
101 For each of the past two years, major department stores have 26 16 Sep 2017, 22:36
3 In Country E, car sales have dropped significantly in the past 8 years 1 24 May 2015, 12:53
11 In the past two years, the effects of the worldwide economic 21 12 Aug 2015, 13:25
Display posts from previous: Sort by