Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 24 May 2017, 18:44

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In the course of her researches, a historian recently

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2003
Posts: 261
Location: sydney
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

In the course of her researches, a historian recently  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Apr 2004, 22:30
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In the course of her researches, a historian recently
found two documents mentioning the same person,
Erich Schnitzler. One, dated May 3, 1739, is a
record of SchnitzlerтАЩs arrest for peddling without a
license. The second, undated, is a statement by
Schnitzler asserting that he has been peddling off
and on for 20 years.

The facts above best support which of the following
conclusions?
(A) Schnitzler started peddling around 1719.
(B) Schnitzler was arrested repeatedly for peddling.
(C) The undated document was written before 1765.
(D) The arrest record was written after the undated
document.
(E) The arrest record provides better evidence that
Schnitzler peddled than does the undated
document.
_________________

When u r about to make ends meet, someone moves the ends.

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4289
Followers: 43

Kudos [?]: 469 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

20 Apr 2004, 05:03
Tough one. I go with C
A) If the undated document were dated 1750, then we cannot say that Schnitzler started peddling in 1719
B) He could have been arrested only once, in 1739
C) The most conservative answer. If the documents were simply written before 1765, it would account for the fact that Schnitzler was peddling on and off for the past 20 years. Say it was dated 1730, then Schnitzler was at least peddling on in 1739. Say it was dated 1750, then again we can say that Schnitzler was at least peddling on in 1739.
D) As said in C, the document could have been written in 1750. We cannot say that it was written after the undated document for sure
E) Nothing ascertains the veracity of each document. The undated document could have been an official court order or something the like
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Senior Manager
Joined: 23 Sep 2003
Posts: 293
Location: US
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

20 Apr 2004, 07:38
Agree with Paul that C is the best answer.

(A) Schnitzler started peddling around 1719.
We don't know that this is true. He might have peddled for the first time in 1739 and also arreasted in the same year.

(B) Schnitzler was arrested repeatedly for peddling.
May or may not be true.

(C) The undated document was written before 1765.
If it is true that he peddled off and on for 20 years and that he was arrested sometime in 1739, then we know that the document was probably written before 1765.

(D) The arrest record was written after the undated document.
We don't know this either. He may have made the statement a day before he was arrested.

(E) The arrest record provides better evidence that Schnitzler peddled than does the undated document.
Not necessarily. Might have been a false arrest.
SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1790
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

20 Apr 2004, 09:50
C should be it.

It is possible that he was arrested and let go in 1739 and from then he might have peddled for 20 years till 1759 or he got arrested after 20 years from 1719 and never peddeled after 1739. In any case the events fall below 1765.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4289
Followers: 43

Kudos [?]: 469 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

20 Apr 2004, 11:05
I think the arbitrary date of 1765 was to confuse people. It could have been 1760 just as well as 1850
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Feb 2004
Posts: 413
Location: Lungi
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

20 Apr 2004, 21:09
yeah toughie, but managed to select C with the same reasoning Paul used.
Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2003
Posts: 261
Location: sydney
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

20 Apr 2004, 23:00
yes C is the answer. good work guys.
_________________

When u r about to make ends meet, someone moves the ends.

20 Apr 2004, 23:00
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
In the course of her researches, a historian recently found 4 04 Apr 2010, 11:18
Recent research in neuropsychology suggests that laughter is 11 25 Oct 2009, 09:27
A recent research study of undergraduate students analyzed 14 05 Feb 2009, 02:55
A recent research study of undergraduate students analyzed 3 21 May 2008, 08:12
Dietary researcher: A recent study reports that laboratory 11 07 Jan 2008, 10:35
Display posts from previous: Sort by