It is currently 18 Oct 2017, 04:31

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In the course of her researches, a historian recently found

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 30 Oct 2004
Posts: 284

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 0

In the course of her researches, a historian recently found [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Oct 2005, 17:02
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In the course of her researches, a historian recently found two documents mentioning the same person, Erich Schnitzer. One, dated May 3, 1739, is a record of Schnitzer's arrest for peddling without a license. The second, undated, is a statement by Schnitzer asserting that he has been peddling off and on for 20 years.
The facts above best suppport which of the following conclusions?
A) Schnitzer started peddling around 1719
B) Schnitzer was arrested repeatedly for peddling
C) The undated document was written before 1765
D) The arrest record was written after the undated document
E) The arrest record provides better evidence that Schnitzer peddled than does the undated document
_________________

-Vikram

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 21 Aug 2005
Posts: 786

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 Oct 2005, 17:25

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 30 Oct 2004
Posts: 284

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 Oct 2005, 17:50
gsr wrote:

Thx.
_________________

-Vikram

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5036

Kudos [?]: 437 [0], given: 0

Location: Singapore

### Show Tags

19 Oct 2005, 18:34
E is the best choice.

A) We can't tell if Schnitzer's statement was made prior to the arrest of after
B) We catn't tell if that's the case
C) Not supported by passage
D) Can't tell

Kudos [?]: 437 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 30 Oct 2004
Posts: 284

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 Oct 2005, 20:13
ywilfred wrote:
E is the best choice.

A) We can't tell if Schnitzer's statement was made prior to the arrest of after
B) We catn't tell if that's the case
C) Not supported by passage
D) Can't tell

OA is C. This was from one of the paper tests.
_________________

-Vikram

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 794

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 0

Location: Singapore

### Show Tags

19 Oct 2005, 21:50
Indeed C it is.
E does not quite tell us which one is better!
But c says before 1965 - so 20 years either way from 1939, has to before 1965. SO C is the best.
_________________

Cheers, Rahul.

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 0

Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5206

Kudos [?]: 434 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

20 Oct 2005, 08:17
Just do the math and C becomes a simple answer.

Kudos [?]: 434 [0], given: 0

20 Oct 2005, 08:17
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# In the course of her researches, a historian recently found

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.