Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 25 May 2017, 23:24

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In the effort to fire a Civil Service employee, his or her

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Aug 2005
Posts: 409
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 60 [0], given: 0

In the effort to fire a Civil Service employee, his or her [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Oct 2005, 21:51
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

In the effort to fire a Civil Service employee, his or her manager may have to spend up to $100,000 of tax money. Since Civil Service employees know how hard it is to fire them, they tend to loaf. This explains in large part why the government is so inefficient. It can be properly inferred on the basis of the statements above that the author believes which of the following? I. Too much job security can have a negative influence on workers. II. More government workers should be fired. III. Most government workers are Civil Service employees. (A) I only (B) I and III only (C) II only (D) I, II, and III (E) III only Director Joined: 21 Aug 2005 Posts: 790 Followers: 2 Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 0 ### Show Tags 11 Oct 2005, 22:24 Answer is B "Since they know it is hard to fore them, they tend to loaf" " in large part why the government is so inefficient." VP Joined: 13 Jun 2004 Posts: 1115 Location: London, UK Schools: Tuck'08 Followers: 7 Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 0 ### Show Tags 11 Oct 2005, 23:24 B for me too SVP Joined: 28 May 2005 Posts: 1713 Location: Dhaka Followers: 8 Kudos [?]: 374 [0], given: 0 ### Show Tags 11 Oct 2005, 23:27 I will go with A. _________________ hey ya...... Manager Joined: 20 Sep 2005 Posts: 55 Followers: 0 Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0 ### Show Tags 11 Oct 2005, 23:36 I will also go with A. Most civil servants loaf. The goverment could be inefficient because the small number of civil servants don't create enough work or right policies for the huge clerical staff subordinate to them. Manager Joined: 21 Sep 2005 Posts: 232 Followers: 2 Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0 ### Show Tags 12 Oct 2005, 01:15 Man..this is tough...I would have gone with B on the test day...which I think would have been wrong...so I correct my mistake and go for A. Senior Manager Joined: 05 Aug 2005 Posts: 409 Followers: 2 Kudos [?]: 60 [0], given: 0 ### Show Tags 12 Oct 2005, 11:27 Not reaching to any conclusion Intern Joined: 18 Aug 2005 Posts: 42 Followers: 1 Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0 ### Show Tags 12 Oct 2005, 11:42 Between A and B. I think I will go with A Manager Joined: 28 Jun 2005 Posts: 65 Location: New York, NY Followers: 1 Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0 Re: CR: Civil services [#permalink] ### Show Tags 12 Oct 2005, 11:51 gmacvik wrote: Since Civil Service employees know how hard it is to fire them, they tend to loaf. This explains in large part why the government is so inefficient. I. Too much job security can have a negative influence on workers. II. More government workers should be fired. III. Most government workers are Civil Service employees. I choose B VP Joined: 13 Jun 2004 Posts: 1115 Location: London, UK Schools: Tuck'08 Followers: 7 Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 0 ### Show Tags 13 Oct 2005, 20:16 OA ? Manager Joined: 10 Sep 2005 Posts: 162 Followers: 1 Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 0 ### Show Tags 22 Oct 2005, 03:28 A for me....can someone post the OA if they know SVP Joined: 03 Jan 2005 Posts: 2236 Followers: 16 Kudos [?]: 342 [0], given: 0 Re: CR: Civil services [#permalink] ### Show Tags 22 Oct 2005, 09:09 gmacvik wrote: In the effort to fire a Civil Service employee, his or her manager may have to spend up to$100,000 of tax money. Since Civil Service employees know how hard it is to fire them, they tend to loaf. This explains in large part why the government is so inefficient.
It can be properly inferred on the basis of the statements above that the author believes which of the following?
I. Too much job security can have a negative influence on workers.
II. More government workers should be fired.
III. Most government workers are Civil Service employees.
(A) I only
(B) I and III only
(C) II only
(D) I, II, and III
(E) III only

II is obviously not infered. However, do we need III? If he believes that only a small part of government workers are lazy civil service employees, would he still be able to say that this would explain government's inefficiency in large part? It's the "in large part" that makes it hard to decide. I say he has to believe III, although I'm not very sure.

B, hesitately.
_________________

Keep on asking, and it will be given you;
keep on seeking, and you will find;
keep on knocking, and it will be opened to you.

Current Student
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 3363
Location: New York City
Schools: Wharton'11 HBS'12
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 297 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

22 Oct 2005, 10:00
D for me...

yes like me too much job security is a bad thing...
yes if you fire more people, then you will eradicate the culture
yes most govt. employees are civil service employess cause "in large part" means there are a lot of them...

I am hesitiant about II but I will go for it..
Manager
Joined: 04 Oct 2005
Posts: 246
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 78 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

22 Oct 2005, 10:17
I go for A...

most of us agree that II is false and that I is true due to "they know its hard to fire them"

III is tempting because of the words "large part"... but this large part referst to the explanation of why the government is inefficient. It just means, the cause of inefficiency is largely explained by this behaviour. It could be. that only a minor part of the employees act according to the author, but this behaviour is the only cause of government's inefficiency. Than this behaviour EXPLAINS A LARGE part of the issue. Since we have no information, whether other parts of the government may operate inefficient as well, we cannot conclude that this "large part explanation" leads to III.
Director
Joined: 14 Sep 2005
Posts: 988
Location: South Korea
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 173 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Oct 2005, 04:57
Clearly (A).

III is wrong since 'in large part' does not mean 'most Civil Service employees. It does not refer to a numeric. It just means "How well it is explained".
_________________

Auge um Auge, Zahn um Zahn !

Director
Joined: 09 Jul 2005
Posts: 592
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Oct 2005, 11:23
A for me. Nothing is stated about how many civil employees work for the government.
SVP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1805
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 154 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Oct 2005, 19:15
A.

You just cannot infer III.
SVP
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2236
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 342 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Oct 2005, 19:32
gamjatang wrote:
Clearly (A).

III is wrong since 'in large part' does not mean 'most Civil Service employees. It does not refer to a numeric. It just means "How well it is explained".

I know. Though if only a small number of people are inefficient, could it really explain very well the government's efficiency? I would agree that it is not clearly infered, though.
_________________

Keep on asking, and it will be given you;
keep on seeking, and you will find;
keep on knocking, and it will be opened to you.

23 Oct 2005, 19:32
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
In the effort to fire a Civil Service employee, his or her 7 06 Jul 2009, 10:32
In the effort to fire a Civil Service employee, his or her 6 26 Jul 2008, 01:13
In the effort to fire a Civil Service employee, his or her 8 06 May 2008, 22:59
In the effort to fire a Civil Service employee, his or her 2 04 Feb 2008, 13:15
In the effort to fire a Civil Service employee, his or her 2 28 Jan 2008, 10:52
Display posts from previous: Sort by