It is currently 19 Nov 2017, 07:57

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In the last two years alone, nearly a dozen of Central

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Jun 2010
Posts: 357

Kudos [?]: 461 [7], given: 50

Schools: IE'14, ISB'14, Kellogg'15
WE 1: 7 Yrs in Automobile (Commercial Vehicle industry)
In the last two years alone, nearly a dozen of Central [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Aug 2012, 19:56
7
KUDOS
18
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

54% (01:22) correct 46% (01:25) wrong based on 877 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In the last two years alone, nearly a dozen of Central University's most prominent professors have been lured away by the higher salaries offered by competing academic institutions. In order to protect the school's ranking, Central University's president has proposed increasing tuition by 10% and using the extra money to offer more attractive compensation packages to the most talented and well-known members of its faculty.

Which of the following provides the most persuasive argument against the university president's proposed course of action?

A) It is inevitable that at least some members of the faculty will ultimately take jobs at other universities, regardless of how much Central University offers to pay them.
B) Other universities are also looking for ways to provide higher salaries to prominent members of the faculty.
C) Central University slipped in the last year's ranking of regional schools.
D) The single most important factor in ranking a university is its of racial and socioeconomic diversity.
E) The president of Central University has only been in office for 18 months and has never managed such a large enterprise.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Regards
SD
-----------------------------
Press Kudos if you like my post.
Debrief 610-540-580-710(Long Journey): http://gmatclub.com/forum/from-600-540-580-710-finally-achieved-in-4th-attempt-142456.html

Kudos [?]: 461 [7], given: 50

Director
Status: Final Countdown
Joined: 17 Mar 2010
Posts: 534

Kudos [?]: 360 [2], given: 75

Location: India
GPA: 3.82
WE: Account Management (Retail Banking)
Re: In the last two years alone, nearly a dozen of Central Unive [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Aug 2012, 21:03
2
KUDOS
SOURH7WK wrote:
In the last two years alone, nearly a dozen of Central University's most prominent professors have been lured away by the higher salaries offered by competing academic institutions. In order to protect the school's ranking, Central University's president has proposed increasing tuition by 10% and using the extra money to offer more attractive compensation packages to the most talented and well-known members of its faculty.

Which of the following provides the most persuasive argument against the university president's proposed course of action?

A) It is inevitable that at least some members of the faculty will ultimately take jobs at other universities, regardless of how much Central University offers to pay them.
B) Other universities are also looking for ways to provide higher salaries to prominent members of the faculty.
C) Central University slipped in the last year's ranking of regional schools.
D) The single most important factor in ranking a university is its of racial and socioeconomic diversity.
E) The president of Central University has only been in office for 18 months and has never managed such a large enterprise.

A real-GMAT feel question.
(D) weakens the President's decision because the raking is not at all based on anything else but the racial and socioeconomic diversity which has nothing to do with the hike of student's fee and eventually the professor's salary.
_________________

" Make more efforts "
Press Kudos if you liked my post

Kudos [?]: 360 [2], given: 75

Director
Status: Final Countdown
Joined: 17 Mar 2010
Posts: 534

Kudos [?]: 360 [0], given: 75

Location: India
GPA: 3.82
WE: Account Management (Retail Banking)
Re: In the last two years alone, nearly a dozen of Central Unive [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Aug 2012, 21:03
SOURH7WK wrote:
In the last two years alone, nearly a dozen of Central University's most prominent professors have been lured away by the higher salaries offered by competing academic institutions. In order to protect the school's ranking, Central University's president has proposed increasing tuition by 10% and using the extra money to offer more attractive compensation packages to the most talented and well-known members of its faculty.

Which of the following provides the most persuasive argument against the university president's proposed course of action?

A) It is inevitable that at least some members of the faculty will ultimately take jobs at other universities, regardless of how much Central University offers to pay them.
B) Other universities are also looking for ways to provide higher salaries to prominent members of the faculty.
C) Central University slipped in the last year's ranking of regional schools.
D) The single most important factor in ranking a university is its of racial and socioeconomic diversity.
E) The president of Central University has only been in office for 18 months and has never managed such a large enterprise.

A real-GMAT feel question.
(D) weakens the President's decision because the raking is not at all based on anything else but the racial and socioeconomic diversity which has nothing to do with the hike of student's fee and eventually the professor's salary.

_________________

" Make more efforts "
Press Kudos if you liked my post

Kudos [?]: 360 [0], given: 75

Manager
Joined: 10 Jan 2010
Posts: 77

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 11

Schools: IIM
Re: In the last two years alone, nearly a dozen of Central Unive [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2012, 02:05
Good Question. I missed it. I opted B.

I agree that D is indeed a good weakening option but I could not understand why B is not right.

Because the President of the Central University is proposing for the fee hike because the excess money collected will be given to good faculties and hence the faculties will remain with the university. And B says that other universities may also increase compensation and then the faculties will not remain with central university.

so, the plan of president will fail.

Then, how is B wrong?

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 11

Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Jun 2010
Posts: 357

Kudos [?]: 461 [0], given: 50

Schools: IE'14, ISB'14, Kellogg'15
WE 1: 7 Yrs in Automobile (Commercial Vehicle industry)
Re: In the last two years alone, nearly a dozen of Central Unive [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2012, 03:23
ranjeet75 wrote:
Good Question. I missed it. I opted B.

I agree that D is indeed a good weakening option but I could not understand why B is not right.

Because the President of the Central University is proposing for the fee hike because the excess money collected will be given to good faculties and hence the faculties will remain with the university. And B says that other universities may also increase compensation and then the faculties will not remain with central university.

so, the plan of president will fail.

Then, how is B wrong?

B is a strengthener. If other Universities are providing hike, central university need to do so to retain them.
_________________

Regards
SD
-----------------------------
Press Kudos if you like my post.
Debrief 610-540-580-710(Long Journey): http://gmatclub.com/forum/from-600-540-580-710-finally-achieved-in-4th-attempt-142456.html

Kudos [?]: 461 [0], given: 50

Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4311

Kudos [?]: 8168 [0], given: 364

Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: In the last two years alone, nearly a dozen of Central Unive [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2012, 03:28
A) It is inevitable that at least some members of the faculty will ultimately take jobs at other universities, regardless of how much Central University offers to pay them. .. May not weaken the president’s wish, because even if some go, the rest are there
B) other universities are also looking for ways to provide higher salaries to prominent members of the faculty. This will impede the President’s scheme, since the disparity is still maintained. I feel this must be the answer
C) Central University slipped in the last year's ranking of regional schools. --- Ranking is irrelevant to the remuneration issue.
D) The single most important factor in ranking a university is it’s of racial and socioeconomic diversity. …… ranking is irrelevant to the remuneration issue

E) The president of Central University has only been in office for 18 months and has never managed such a large enterprise.--- Experience of the President is outside the ambit of our issue.
_________________

Can you solve at least some SC questions without delving into the initial statement?

Narendran 98845 44509

Kudos [?]: 8168 [0], given: 364

BSchool Forum Moderator
Joined: 23 Jul 2010
Posts: 556

Kudos [?]: 988 [1], given: 321

GPA: 3.4
WE: General Management (Non-Profit and Government)
Re: In the last two years alone, nearly a dozen of Central [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Oct 2013, 02:54
1
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Bumping for review and further discussion*.

Theory on Weaken the Argument Questions
Manhattan Gmat
Stacy Manhattan Gmat
Stacy Manhattan Gmat
Mangoosh GMAT
Knewton
e-gmat

Thursdays with Ron video sessions (Weaken and Strengthen questions)

Souvik's Article
Veritas prep

_________________

General Mistakes to Avoid on the GMAT
TOP 10 articles on Time Management on the GMAT
Thanks = Kudos. Kudos are appreciated

Rules for posting on the verbal forum

Kudos [?]: 988 [1], given: 321

Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2013
Posts: 59

Kudos [?]: 26 [2], given: 7

Re: In the last two years alone, nearly a dozen of Central [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Nov 2013, 03:18
2
KUDOS
My take-
The conclusion says that - the decision to increase the fees for students will generate more money by which the good instructors can be retrained. This is essential to maintain the school ranking. Now if the rankings are independent of instructors but depend on other factors (as described in option D), the Preseident's proposal will make no significant difference in the school rankings. Hence, Ans D.

B says other schools are trying to increase the salaries and so should the Central university. But it does not relate how such move will improve or help maintain school rankings.

Kudos [?]: 26 [2], given: 7

Current Student
Joined: 09 Jul 2013
Posts: 25

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 15

Location: United States (WA)
Schools: Foster '18 (M)
GMAT 1: 710 Q44 V44
GPA: 3.65
WE: Military Officer (Military & Defense)
Re: In the last two years alone, nearly a dozen of Central [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Nov 2013, 08:59
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
D.

Question type: weaken conclusion.
Conclusion is: protect ranking by increasing tuition to pay for incentives to keep the best teachers around.

A) not relevant. has nothing to do with protecting rankings by tuition hikes/faculty retention.
B) not relevant to the conclusion.
C) not relevant to the conclusion.
D) Bingo. If rankings are based on things besides quality of faculty, then the whole conclusion is worthless.
E) not relevant to the conclusion.

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 15

Manager
Joined: 09 Apr 2013
Posts: 148

Kudos [?]: 122 [3], given: 24

Location: India
WE: Supply Chain Management (Consulting)
Re: In the last two years alone, nearly a dozen of Central [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Nov 2013, 12:12
3
KUDOS

CU's Plan: increasing tuition by 10% and using the extra money to offer more attractive compensation packages to the most talented and well-known members of its faculty

Conclusion: CU's plan would protect the school's ranking

Weaken: Show reasons to prove that the proposed plan would have no effect on the school's ranking or that some other factors that are not addressed in the stimulus are needed to protect the ranking. Choice D exactly does that.

In the last two years alone, nearly a dozen of Central University's most prominent professors have been lured away by the higher salaries offered by competing academic institutions. In order to protect the school's ranking, Central University's president has proposed increasing tuition by 10% and using the extra money to offer more attractive compensation packages to the most talented and well-known members of its faculty.

Which of the following provides the most persuasive argument against the university president's proposed course of action?

A) It is inevitable that at least some members of the faculty will ultimately take jobs at other universities, regardless of how much Central University offers to pay them.Some or few of the members taking jobs at other universities may not have much effect.
B) Other universities are also looking for ways to provide higher salaries to prominent members of the faculty.What if other universities execute the same plan? CU's plan could still be successful.
C) Central University slipped in the last year's ranking of regional schools.Last year's ranking would have nothing to do with success of the plan this year.
D) The single most important factor in ranking a university is its of racial and socioeconomic diversity.
E) The president of Central University has only been in office for 18 months and has never managed such a large enterprise.President's experience and skills are irrelevant to success of the plan.
_________________

+1 KUDOS is the best way to say thanks

"Pay attention to every detail"

Kudos [?]: 122 [3], given: 24

Intern
Joined: 14 May 2011
Posts: 10

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 2

Location: US
Re: In the last two years alone, nearly a dozen of Central [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Dec 2013, 18:48
More than one choice seem to be weakeners. I think it needs more explanation. I like A as well. Anyone else?

Conclusion - President's plan is aimed at PROTECTING rankings. The Plan is to RETAIN professors by increasing tution. (It is given that professors were lured away earlier by higher salaries)

A) It is inevitable that at least some members of the faculty will ultimately take jobs at other universities, regardless of how much Central University offers to pay them. If this was true it means that it is a weakener , albeit a mild one. New info provided states that no matter what you plan, retention can not be guaranteed and out of the "SOME professors" who will ultimately go to other universities, there can be the prominent ones that President was trying to retain. So this is a weakener in itself as it puts a dent in President's plan. What am I missing ?

B) Other universities are also looking for ways to provide higher salaries to prominent members of the faculty. This is not a weakener for me. Unless the other universities try to bait the professors from CU, it is not a weakener. They can provide higher salaries to their eminent professors and it does not undermine Presidents plan at all as long as the choice is not talking about luring CU faculty

D) The single most important factor in ranking a university is its of racial and socioeconomic diversity. I missed it. But this choice is attacking the conclusion with STRONG words and thus could be the most persuasive of all.
_________________

-------------------------------------------------
Press +Kudos if you like what you see

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 2

Director
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Posts: 512

Kudos [?]: 595 [1], given: 6

Location: India
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
Re: In the last two years alone, nearly a dozen of Central [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Dec 2013, 06:34
1
KUDOS
All right,
Let's first understand what the author's conclusion here is
It's that - faculty must be retained to preserve ranking. This is his plan.
He plans to do this, of course, by raising tuition fees.
The only evidence/ justification he provides for this proposal is that "nearly a dozen of Central University's most prominent professors have been lured away by the higher salaries offered by competing academic institutions."

Compare the premise with the conclusion - this will betray the assumptions made by the author.

Some of the points that pop out are
1. Author assumes that the money raised will be enough to dissuade prof from quitting
2. Raising Tuition by itself won't jeopardize ranking
and finally
3. that these "prominent" professors actually matter when it comes to university ranking!

As mentioned the question tag expects you to weaken the argument. Attack the assumptions to achieve this.

Only D addresses this. Option A,B and C have no relevance to the conclusion (that dissuading profs from quitting will ensure higher ranking) E is an obvious rubbish answer.

Cheers,
Ajeeth Peo
Verbal Trainer
Crack Verbal
_________________

Enroll for our GMAT Trial Course here -
http://gmatonline.crackverbal.com/

Learn all PS and DS strategies here-
http://gmatonline.crackverbal.com/p/mastering-quant-on-gmat

Kudos [?]: 595 [1], given: 6

Intern
Joined: 08 Apr 2012
Posts: 11

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 6

GMAT 1: 650 Q51 V29
Re: In the last two years alone, nearly a dozen of Central [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Dec 2013, 02:49
I think B is more weaken the conclusion than D.
The purpose of the plan is protect the school's ranking. In D, the single most important factor in ranking a university is its of racial and socioeconomic diversity but it isn't only factor deciding the ranking. If that factor is unchanged, the ranking could be protected when increase salaries for professor.
In B, because other universities are also looking for ways to provide higher salaries to prominent members of the faculty, the plan doesn't guarantee the ranking to be protected.

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 6

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Nov 2012
Posts: 333

Kudos [?]: 429 [0], given: 4

Schools: LBS '14 (A)
GMAT 1: 770 Q48 V48
Re: In the last two years alone, nearly a dozen of Central [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Dec 2013, 15:56
Hi AnChu,

The correct answer is definitely D.

Think about the effect that raising tuition will have. It will likely dissuade those from a disadvantaged background attending, this will affect the 'diversity' score - which is the most important thing.

James
_________________

Former GMAT Pill student, now on staff. Used GMATPILL OG 12 and nothing else: 770 (48,48) & 6.0

... and more

Kudos [?]: 429 [0], given: 4

Senior Manager
Joined: 04 May 2013
Posts: 353

Kudos [?]: 151 [0], given: 70

Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Human Resources
Schools: XLRI GM"18
GPA: 4
WE: Human Resources (Human Resources)
Re: In the last two years alone, nearly a dozen of Central [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Dec 2013, 11:43
I do not agree with DAAGH......

1. In the last two years a dozen of Central University's prominent professors have been lured away by the higher salaries offered by competing academic institutions.

2. In order to protect the school's ranking, Central University's president has proposed increasing tuition by 10% and using the extra money to offer more attractive compensation packages to the most talented and well-known members of its faculty.

THE POINT IS THAT Central University's president ERRONEOUSLY ASSESSED that the schools ranking is to do with prominent professors..... so he started working on lines of holding them back with higher remunerations....
SUPPOSE HE SUCCEEDED IN HOLDING THEM BACK AND THEN FOUND THAT THE UNIVERSITY RANKING IS STILL LOW......AND THEN REALIZED HIS MISTAKE THAT RANKING HAD ACTUALLY NOTHING TO DO WITH PROMINENT PROFESSORS BUT racial and socioeconomic diversity. HAS'NT HIS PLAN FAILED MISERABLY.....

IF as B says "Other universities are also looking for ways to provide higher salaries to prominent members of the faculty''......how does it make a difference when retaining of prominent professors is a non - issue....
Which of the following provides the most persuasive argument against the university president's proposed course of action?

CORRECT ANSWER.................D) The single most important factor in ranking a university is its of racial and socioeconomic diversity.

Kudos [?]: 151 [0], given: 70

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10132

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Re: In the last two years alone, nearly a dozen of Central [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jun 2015, 19:31
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 29 Mar 2013
Posts: 2

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 6

Re: In the last two years alone, nearly a dozen of Central [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Aug 2015, 06:24
ranjeet75 wrote:
Good Question. I missed it. I opted B.

I agree that D is indeed a good weakening option but I could not understand why B is not right.

Because the President of the Central University is proposing for the fee hike because the excess money collected will be given to good faculties and hence the faculties will remain with the university. And B says that other universities may also increase compensation and then the faculties will not remain with central university.

so, the plan of president will fail.

Then, how is B wrong?

Even I opted B as I missed to notice that President's objective is to retain school's rating.
I think, University President's objective is retain school's ranking. If ranking doesn't depend upon salaries/professors it doesn't matter. D is the best counter for Proposed solution.
Hope this helps.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 6

Manager
Joined: 19 Nov 2014
Posts: 81

Kudos [?]: -13 [0], given: 57

Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
Schools: ISB '18
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: In the last two years alone, nearly a dozen of Central [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Aug 2015, 20:45
Was confused bw A and D but finally choose D in the last moments as the word " single " was there . and means ranking has nothing to do with faculty
Wondering if the answer would have changed if option D said - the most imp factor for ranking ................. instead of single most imp factor

Hope logic is correct.
_________________

KUDOS pls if you like My Post

Kudos [?]: -13 [0], given: 57

Current Student
Joined: 09 Jun 2015
Posts: 227

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 32

Re: In the last two years alone, nearly a dozen of Central [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Aug 2015, 04:01
I chose C based on the logic that C indicates the professors are leaving for a reason other than money, therefore a plan to get them to stay by paying them more money won't work.

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 32

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10132

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Re: In the last two years alone, nearly a dozen of Central [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Sep 2017, 22:36
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Re: In the last two years alone, nearly a dozen of Central   [#permalink] 23 Sep 2017, 22:36

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 21 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

# In the last two years alone, nearly a dozen of Central

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.