It is currently 23 Oct 2017, 19:49

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In the late 1980 s, the population of sea otters in the

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 22 Aug 2008
Posts: 181

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 11

Re: In the late 1980 s, the population of sea otters in the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Sep 2010, 21:51
Premise : The number of sea otters has declined.
Premise: The sea lions and seals are affected by pollution related disease

Conclusion: Otters are also affected by the disease and that's the reason of decline in numbers

A states that as there is scarcity of sea lions and seals, the whales are preying the otters.

which weakens the reasoning.

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 11

Intern
Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Posts: 43

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 2

Schools: Haas, HBS, UNC, Duke, Kellogg, etc
WE 1: Investment Banking Domain, Functionally-Technology
Re: In the late 1980 s, the population of sea otters in the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Sep 2010, 22:04
this was an easy A...

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 2

Manager
Joined: 04 Sep 2010
Posts: 51

Kudos [?]: 2 [1], given: 1

Re: In the late 1980 s, the population of sea otters in the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Oct 2010, 23:50
1
KUDOS
A seems the best..

Kudos [?]: 2 [1], given: 1

Retired Moderator
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1633

Kudos [?]: 1107 [0], given: 109

Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Re: In the late 1980 s, the population of sea otters in the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Oct 2010, 14:25
+1 A
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1107 [0], given: 109

Senior Manager
Status: Can't give up
Joined: 20 Dec 2009
Posts: 305

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 35

Re: In the late 1980 s, the population of sea otters in the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Nov 2010, 14:31
A is the only one which closely weakens the QS.

In C...it can be talking about another region around Pacific coast.

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 35

Intern
Joined: 03 Sep 2010
Posts: 5

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: In the late 1980 s, the population of sea otters in the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Nov 2010, 12:29
Hi i disagree with option (a). It states that whales would usually eat the seals, but when this source gets scarce they move to other sources - we can not assume that they'll eat otters.

The otters' population might actually be affected by pollution like the seals and this argument does not weaken that. "Other sources" may or may not be otters.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 02 Nov 2009
Posts: 140

Kudos [?]: 204 [0], given: 97

Re: In the late 1980 s, the population of sea otters in the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Aug 2012, 21:24
Can anyone tell me vvhat is the conclusion of this argument

vvhat are vve trying to vveaken here could not follovv please

Thanks

Kudos [?]: 204 [0], given: 97

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10107

Kudos [?]: 264 [0], given: 0

Re: In the late 1980 s, the population of sea otters in the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 May 2014, 20:30
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 264 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 05 Jun 2012
Posts: 107

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 66

Schools: IIMA
Re: In the late 1980 s, the population of sea otters in the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jul 2014, 02:18
it is good question indeed, struck between a and C , took a time and then realize

Killer whales in the North Pacific usually prey on seals and sea lions but will,
when this food source is scarce, seek out other prey.--->had killer whales eaten them they would have got infected by disease and would have died , there number does not decrease So A
_________________

If you are not over prepared then you are under prepared !!!

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 66

Manager
Joined: 10 Mar 2014
Posts: 238

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 13

Re: In the late 1980 s, the population of sea otters in the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Oct 2015, 06:47
noboru wrote:
In the late 1980’s, the population of sea otters in the North Pacific Ocean began to decline. Of the two plausible explanations for the decline—increased predation by killer whales or disease—disease is the more likely. After all, a concurrent sharp decline in the populations of seals and sea lions was almost certainly caused by a pollution related disease, which could have spread to sea otters, whereas the population of killer whales did not change noticeably

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the reasoning?

A. Killer whales in the North Pacific usually prey on seals and sea lions but will, when this food source is scarce, seek out other prey.
B. There is no indication that substantial numbers of sea otters migrated to other locations from the North Pacific in the 1980’s.
C. Along the Pacific coast of North America in the 1980’s, sea otters were absent from many locations where they had been relatively common in former times.
D. Following the decline in the population of the sea otters, there was an increase in the population of sea urchins, which are sea otters’ main food source.
E. The North Pacific populations of seals and sea lions cover a wider geographic area than does the population of sea otters

hi EMPOWERgmatMax

could you please provide your comments on this. I was between option A and C. I want to know how A is preferable over C?

Regards

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 13

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7677

Kudos [?]: 17408 [0], given: 232

Location: Pune, India
Re: In the late 1980 s, the population of sea otters in the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Apr 2017, 00:24
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
noboru wrote:
In the late 1980’s, the population of sea otters in the North Pacific Ocean began to decline. Of the two plausible explanations for the decline—increased predation by killer whales or disease—disease is the more likely. After all, a concurrent sharp decline in the populations of seals and sea lions was almost certainly caused by a pollution related disease, which could have spread to sea otters, whereas the population of killer whales did not change noticeably

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the reasoning?

A. Killer whales in the North Pacific usually prey on seals and sea lions but will, when this food source is scarce, seek out other prey.
B. There is no indication that substantial numbers of sea otters migrated to other locations from the North Pacific in the 1980’s.
C. Along the Pacific coast of North America in the 1980’s, sea otters were absent from many locations where they had been relatively common in former times.
D. Following the decline in the population of the sea otters, there was an increase in the population of sea urchins, which are sea otters’ main food source.
E. The North Pacific populations of seals and sea lions cover a wider geographic area than does the population of sea otters

Premises:
Population of sea otters is declining.
Two possible reasons: killer whales and disease.
Disease is more likely because disease is killing seals and sea lions and because killer whale population has remained steady.

The reasoning uses two prong logic to show why disease is more probable than killer whales:
Disease is already killing other animals so it could have spread to sea otters too.
The population of killer whales has remained steady.

We can weaken the conclusion by weakening either.

(A) Killer whales in the North Pacific usually prey on seals and sea lions but will, when this food source is scarce, seek out other prey.

This shows that even though the population of killer whales hasn't increased, they could be the reason for decreased sea otter population. Their usual prey - seals and sea lions - have dwindled because of disease. So they could be seeking out sea otters. Hence it weakens the argument by showing that even if the killer whale population has not increased, more of them could be relying on sea otters as food source.

(B) There is no indication that the sea otter population at any North Pacific location declined in the 1980s because of substantial numbers of sea otters migrating to other locations.

Note that the scope of our argument is limited - out of two plausible explanations, one is more likely than the other. We don't have to worry about any other explanation. It is either disease or killer whales. We need to compare the likelihood of these two only. Hence any option talking about any other reasoning is out of scope of the argument.

(C) Along the Pacific coast of North America in the 1980s, sea otters were absent from many locations where they had been relatively common in former times.

This doesn't strengthen/weaken either of the two explanations. It just says that sea otter population has declined in a way that they are absent from some location. What caused it, disease or killer whales, we don't know.

(D) Following the decline in the population of the sea otters, there was an increase in the population of sea urchins, which are sea otters' main food source.

Again, this has nothing to do with WHY sea otter population declined - the concern of our argument. What happened after sea otter population declined is out of scope.

(E) The North Pacific populations of seals and sea lions cover a wider geographic area than does the population of sea otters.

The geographical area covered by seals and sea lions doesn't affect our argument. We want to compare the two explanations - disease or killer whales. It doesn't affect either.
Note that a change in geographical area covered by prey of killer whales could have had some impact.

_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for \$199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Kudos [?]: 17408 [0], given: 232

BSchool Forum Moderator
Joined: 17 Jun 2016
Posts: 400

Kudos [?]: 188 [0], given: 198

Location: India
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
GPA: 3.65
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Re: In the late 1980 s, the population of sea otters in the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2017, 06:53
In the late 1980s, the population of sea otters in the North Pacific began to decline. There are two plausible explanations for the decline: predation, possibly by killer whales, or disease. Of these two, disease is the more likely, since a concurrent sharp decline in populations of seals and sea lions is believed to have been caused by disease, and diseases that infect these creatures are likely to be able to infect sea otters also.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the reasoning?

(A) Killer whales in the North Pacific usually prey on seals and sea lions but will, when this food source is scarce, seek out other prey.

(B) There is no indication that the sea otter population at any North Pacific location declined in the 1980s because of substantial numbers of sea otters migrating to other locations.
This option is actually trying to eliminate a possible weakener. So not correct.

(C) Along the Pacific coast of North America in the 1980s, sea otters were absent from many locations where they had been relatively common in former times.
This option is irrelevant as we are concerned with whatever available population of sea otter in the late 1980s.

(D) Following the decline in the population of the sea otters, there was an increase in the population of sea urchins, which are sea otters' main food source.
Of course, this is ought to happen. But we not concerned about the aftermath of the decline in population of sea otters.

(E) The North Pacific populations of seals and sea lions cover a wider geographic area than does the population of sea otters.
Again, irrelevant. We are worried about the population of the otters in the north pacific sea and not the coverage they had.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 188 [0], given: 198

Re: In the late 1980 s, the population of sea otters in the   [#permalink] 14 Jul 2017, 06:53

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 32 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by