Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 29 May 2017, 11:20

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In the past decade, a decreasing percentage of money spent

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 01 Oct 2003
Posts: 20
Location: Not far
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Jan 2004, 13:18
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

33% (00:00) correct 67% (02:40) wrong based on 2 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In the past decade, a decreasing percentage of money spent on treating disease X went to pay for standard methods of treatment, which are known to be effective though they are expensive and painful. An increasing percentage is being spent on non-standard treatments, which cause little discomfort. Unfortunately, the nonstandard treatments have proved to be ineffective. Obviousy, less money is being spent now on effective treatment than treating disease X than was spent ten years ago.

Which of the following, if assumed, allows the conclusion above to be properly drawn

1. Varieties of disease X requiring expensive special treatment have become less common during the past decade

2. Nonstandard methods of treating disease X are most expensively now than they were a decade ago.

3. Of total medical expenditures, the percentage that is due treatment of disease X increased during the past decade

4.Most of the money spent on treating disease X during the last decade went to pay for nonstandard treatment

5. The total amount of money spent on treating disease X declined during the past decade
_________________

Aiming for 700.

If you have any questions
New!
Director
Joined: 28 Oct 2003
Posts: 501
Location: 55405
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Jan 2004, 13:24
I think 5 is the answer, and I would categorize the question as middle of the road (If I'm wrong, then I call it "difficult").

However, this smells like an LSAT question rather than a GMAT question! I'd be happy to give you some more difficulty opinions if you asked some GMAT CR questions.

Do you have the OG?
Director
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 960
Location: Florida
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 145 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Jan 2004, 13:29
5 ??

my case: I take it for granted that a conclusion based question is never easy. need to consider couple of scenarios.

If, I am right, then this one is of medium difficulty... if, I am wrong, then I am a flyer
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4288
Followers: 43

Kudos [?]: 469 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Jan 2004, 13:57
Hmmm, somehow I came up with 2 as answer and I find this question difficult to very difficult. I will try to come up with my explanation in a moment
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4288
Followers: 43

Kudos [?]: 469 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Jan 2004, 14:57
Wow, took me a while to figure out that only 5 would work. I'm on a streak of bad answers today.
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1790
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Jan 2004, 15:29
I was debating between 2 and 5.

Case for choice 2:
If a treatment is ineffective then more money is being spent may be because of lengthy duration of treatement or may be patients are treated more often. Also it has become very expensive.

Case for Choice 5:
if % money spent on standard treatment is decreasing and % money spent on non standard treatment is increasing then one possible scenario would be reduction in the spending. If absolute money spent on NS treatment remained same and money spent on S treament went down then that means total money spent went down. Relatively % for NS treatment increased.

Again choice 5 also depends on certain assumption. One can also argue that reduction in S treatment may be compensated by increase in NS treatment. Even then the conclusion holds good. Choice 5 would have been perfect if it said money spent on treating disease X remained unchanged over past decade. Then it will be 5.
Intern
Joined: 05 Dec 2003
Posts: 47
Location: LA
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Jan 2004, 22:55
I initally thought 4, but after reading the posts I think that 5 is it. This is a hard question.
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 May 2003
Posts: 329
Location: Uruguay
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 153 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 Jan 2004, 10:54
I think answer is 4. And IMO this is a difficult question.

If 5 were true then the conclusion would be true, but 5 is not needed in order for the conclusion to be properly drawn.

If by any chance the answer is 4 I'll gladly explain more.

Martin
Intern
Joined: 01 Oct 2003
Posts: 20
Location: Not far
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 Jan 2004, 12:44
I am happy to see that none of you said that the question was easy otherwise......................
Th ecorrect answer is 5 and stoolfi as you guessed it's an LSAT question
_________________

Aiming for 700.

GMAT Instructor
Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Posts: 770
Location: New York NY 10024
Schools: Haas, MFE; Anderson, MBA; USC, MSEE
Followers: 26

Kudos [?]: 212 [0], given: 0

Re: CR-I need an honest opinion [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Feb 2004, 04:04
higmat wrote:
I need an honest opinion. Please after answering this question, categorize it as very easy, easy, medium, hard, and very hard. CR is my weakest point and I would like to know how I stand compared to others.Thanks in advance

In the past decade, a decreasing percentage of money spent on treating disease X went to pay for standard methods of treatment, which are known to be effective though they are expensive and painful. An increasing percentage is being spent on non-standard treatments, which cause little discomfort. Unfortunately, the nonstandard treatments have proved to be ineffective. Obviousy, less money is being spent now on effective treatment than treating disease X than was spent ten years ago.

Which of the following, if assumed, allows the conclusion above to be properly drawn

1. Varieties of disease X requiring expensive special treatment have become less common during the past decade

2. Nonstandard methods of treating disease X are most expensively now than they were a decade ago.

3. Of total medical expenditures, the percentage that is due treatment of disease X increased during the past decade

4.Most of the money spent on treating disease X during the last decade went to pay for nonstandard treatment

5. The total amount of money spent on treating disease X declined during the past decade

IMO, this is an easy question. Why? Because this type of question pattern is typical:

Premise: There is a decrease in the percentage of something.
Conclusion: These is a decrease in the absolute amount of something.

The only way the conclusion can be justified is if you know that the "something" did not grow faster than the decrease in the percentage.

Whenever one sees percentage decrease implying absolute decrease, the first thing one should check is the change in size of the whole.

Since E says that the whole pie got smaller, only then we can conclude for SURE that a smaller percentage of the pie equates to a smaller piece.
_________________

Best,

AkamaiBrah
Former Senior Instructor, Manhattan GMAT and VeritasPrep
Vice President, Midtown NYC Investment Bank, Structured Finance IT
MFE, Haas School of Business, UC Berkeley, Class of 2005
MBA, Anderson School of Management, UCLA, Class of 1993

Intern
Joined: 05 Aug 2014
Posts: 10
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: In the past decade, a decreasing percentage of money spent [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Apr 2016, 05:59
I also think that the right answer should be 5.
Re: In the past decade, a decreasing percentage of money spent   [#permalink] 14 Apr 2016, 05:59
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 In the last decade there has been a signiﬁcant decrease in coffee 2 06 Dec 2015, 22:34
4 In the past decade, two Motorlux models 10 13 Mar 2017, 07:05
7 European nations are starting to decrease the percentage of 14 29 Jan 2017, 04:35
19 In the last decade there has been a significant decrease in 10 10 Jul 2016, 12:13
1 In the past decade, a decreasing % of money spent on 10 21 Dec 2014, 01:36
Display posts from previous: Sort by