It is currently 20 Nov 2017, 08:48

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Current Student
Joined: 18 Oct 2014
Posts: 903

Kudos [?]: 434 [0], given: 69

Location: United States
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GPA: 3.98
Re: In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Jan 2016, 12:49
KyleWiddison wrote:
Choice D is the correct answer because you want to find some information that weakens the argument. It's a classic GMAT-like argument that attempts to compare raw numbers when rates really should be compared. This issue is highlighted by choice D which states that the number of sleds (and by extension sledders) has grown significantly with the introduction of the cheaper plastic sled. This increase in sleds could lead to a higher NUMBER of accidents with a lower RATE of accidents overall, thus weakening the conclusion.

You have a valid point about the sleds not necessarily equating directly with sledders, but remember that with CR you are choosing the best answer available. Choice C doesn't provide any differentiation between now and 15 years ago. If it had (by mentioning that protective gear was used heavily 15 years ago but not anymore) then C would be a strong answer choice.

KW

Thanks for the explanation. Hope I would not face such choices on the real day
_________________

I welcome critical analysis of my post!! That will help me reach 700+

Kudos [?]: 434 [0], given: 69

Manager
Joined: 29 Nov 2011
Posts: 114

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 367

Re: In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Mar 2016, 00:50
KyleWiddison wrote:
Choice D is the correct answer because you want to find some information that weakens the argument. It's a classic GMAT-like argument that attempts to compare raw numbers when rates really should be compared. This issue is highlighted by choice D which states that the number of sleds (and by extension sledders) has grown significantly with the introduction of the cheaper plastic sled. This increase in sleds could lead to a higher NUMBER of accidents with a lower RATE of accidents overall, thus weakening the conclusion.

You have a valid point about the sleds not necessarily equating directly with sledders, but remember that with CR you are choosing the best answer available. Choice C doesn't provide any differentiation between now and 15 years ago. If it had (by mentioning that protective gear was used heavily 15 years ago but not anymore) then C would be a strong answer choice.

KW

KyleWiddison I know E cannnot be the answer because it gives no information about Plastics sleds, but what if E had (by mentioning that today Plastics sleds carry 4 riders and traditional wooden carry 2 riders), would this be the possible contender.
My reasoning to this is "number of injuries more not because number of acc but because carry more slders". PLease share your thoughts on this.

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 367

Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 30 Apr 2012
Posts: 798

Kudos [?]: 846 [1], given: 5

Re: In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Mar 2016, 07:37
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
The real issue with E isn't so much that is doesn't compare wooden vs. plastic sleds but rather the issue is the unnecessary information on injuries per crash. Look at the wording of the argument. We are comparing the gross number of injuries attributed to plastic or wooden sleds, not injuries per sled. Whether a sled carries 1 or 100 riders is irrelevant because the data sums all the injuries related to sledding. If the argument had discussed injuries per crash and E discussed the comparison between wood and plastic then E would be in contention.

KW
_________________

Kyle Widdison | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | Utah

Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile

Kudos [?]: 846 [1], given: 5

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10127

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Re: In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Jun 2016, 20:23
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 04 Jun 2016
Posts: 647

Kudos [?]: 377 [6], given: 36

GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V43
In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Jun 2016, 00:13
6
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED

EXPLAINATION:-
In weaken questions one must try to attack the conclusion of the argument. Because there is a logical error in the conclusion and by revealing the error, you can show that the conclusion is weak. A weak conclusion makes the entire argument invalid (if the argument is deductive) or uncogent (if the argument is inductive). Also remember in Weaken question, we can use New Information.

Lets try to do this here
The argument tells us that Plastic sleds have these qualities:- faster, bad handling (hard to steer), weak brakes (harder to slow).
"Plastic sleds became popular; they go faster than wooden sleds but are harder to steer and slow" ===> mentioned in passage
Now if something skids fast, cannot be stopped and cannot be handled, it will crash more frequently and more injuries will occur.

The argument also tells us that Plastic Sleds have been used for 10 years but the rate of accident was higher only last year.
Ten years ago, smooth plastic sleds became popular ===> mentioned in passage
The number of children injured while sledding was much higher last winter than it was ten years ago. ===> mentioned in passage
Suddenly during last year the accident number has gone up? Why ? LET US INVESTIGATE.

A. A few children still use traditional wooden sleds.
This should actually cause less accident, since wooden sleds are safer. DISCARD OPTION A

B. Very few children wear any kind of protective gear, such as helmets, while sledding.
Well, children must not be wearing protection for 10 years. Why accidents have gone up last year only. doesn't answer this question. DISCARD OPTION B

C. Plastic sleds can be used in a much wider variety of snow conditions than wooden sleds can.
At first glance looks out of scope or irrelevant...BUT KEEP IT FOR LATER ANALYSIS

D. Most sledding injuries occur when a sled collides with a tree, a rock, or another sled.
So suddenly last year many trees, many rocks and many sleds appear? No indication about that DISCARD OPTION D

E. Because the traditional wooden sled can carry more than one rider, an accident involving a wooden sled can result in several children being injured.
This is reverse answer. More Wooden Sled = More injuries. So accidents should have been more 10 years ago when wooden sleds were used, not now. DISCARD OPTION E

What remains with us now is only option C which looked out of scope, or irrelevant
Now no matter, whether we like it or not it has to be the answer.

Lets Analyse it again
C. Plastic sleds can be used in a much wider variety of snow conditions than wooden sleds can.

Wooden sled can only be used in good weather when snow is soft and fresh, when there is no storm, when there is no fog, when visibility is good etc etc. Also given they are safer.

Plastic sled can be used in much wider condition such as when there is snow storm, still snowing, when the snow is hard and can cause injury on impact etc etc.

So may be last year something happened that has not happened in a long time after the introduction of plastic sleds. Finally after 10 years, last year snow conditions were bad. Now if people used wooden sleds , they could not sled because their wooden sleds don't have the capability. So NO sleds = NO accidents.
But Plastic sleds can still sleds in such extreme conditions. So people being stupid, ignored the bad condition and went out and coupled with the fact that plastic sleds are injury prone, People got injured and injured again and injured again. Stupid People

AND WHY DOES THIS HAPPENED:- THE BLAME LIES ON PLASTIC SLEDS BECAUSE THEY CAN WORK IN A VARIETY OF WEATHER CONDITIONS (INCLUDING BAD CONDITIONS)

Thats what exactly option C says

In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in Verland used wooden sleds with runners and steering bars. Ten years ago, smooth plastic sleds became popular; they go faster than wooden sleds but are harder to steer and slow. The concern that plastic sleds are more dangerous is clearly borne out by the fact that the number of children injured while sledding was much higher last winter than it was ten years ago.

Which of the following, if true in Verland, most seriously undermines the force of the evidence cited?
A. A few children still use traditional wooden sleds.
B. Very few children wear any kind of protective gear, such as helmets, while sledding.
C. Plastic sleds can be used in a much wider variety of snow conditions than wooden sleds can.
D. Most sledding injuries occur when a sled collides with a tree, a rock, or another sled.
E. Because the traditional wooden sled can carry more than one rider, an accident involving a wooden sled can result in several children being injured.
_________________

Posting an answer without an explanation is "GOD COMPLEX". The world doesn't need any more gods. Please explain you answers properly.
FINAL GOODBYE :- 17th SEPTEMBER 2016. .. 16 March 2017 - I am back but for all purposes please consider me semi-retired.

Last edited by LogicGuru1 on 13 Jun 2016, 11:08, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 377 [6], given: 36

VP
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 1394

Kudos [?]: 168 [0], given: 916

Re: In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jun 2016, 02:36
The argument concludes that The concern that plastic sleds are more dangerous is clearly borne out by the fact that the number of children injured while sledding was much higher last winter than it was ten years ago.

If we read the question stem closely, it asks which option undermines the force of evidence, that is which option attacks the reason provided in the argument for increase in injuries while using plastic sled. option C clearly provides an alternative reason.

OA to this question is C only I have checked in other threads as well.

yes, "while sleding" are KEY WORDS for which to choose C.

great explanation
_________________

visit my facebook to help me.
on facebook, my name is: thang thang thang

Kudos [?]: 168 [0], given: 916

Manager
Joined: 22 Jun 2016
Posts: 60

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 4

Re: In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Sep 2016, 14:18
C calls for the question that does really plastic sledges are more harmful.

Wooden sledges are used by less people than plastic ones due to its usage and hence accidents are more but not due to the quality or design of plastic sledge.

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 4

Intern
Joined: 07 May 2016
Posts: 20

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 77

Re: In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Sep 2016, 14:34
I think B is the answer. since children wear less/no safety gear, so that is wy they are getting injured, not because of plastic sledges. I might be wrong in the reasoning
_________________

-S1D1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 77

Intern
Joined: 02 Sep 2016
Posts: 23

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 1

Re: In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Sep 2016, 23:07
Jp27 wrote:
(C) Plastic sleds can be used in a much wider variety of snow conditions than wooden sleds can.

If plastic sleds can be used in a wider variety of conditions than wooden sleds can, then plastic sleds can be used more frequently. It is possible that more frequent use, rather than the sleds themselves, has led to more accidents.
The absence of protective gear would affect accidents with both kinds of sleds. Therefore, B is not the appropriate answer.

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 1

Verbal Expert
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3198

Kudos [?]: 3508 [0], given: 22

Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Re: In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Jan 2017, 20:00
The OA is correct and explanations provided in the thread appear sufficient. If there are any specific questions, please click again on the "Request Expert Reply" button and post your queries – closing this request.

Kudos [?]: 3508 [0], given: 22

Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Sep 2015
Posts: 479

Kudos [?]: 80 [0], given: 18

Location: India
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Jan 2017, 17:19
C. Plastic sleds can be used in a much wider variety of snow conditions than wooden sleds can.
The above option provides the reason how the plastic sledges are different to those made of wood gives an alternate reason for the findings

Kudos [?]: 80 [0], given: 18

Intern
Joined: 18 Oct 2016
Posts: 8

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 19

In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Feb 2017, 08:56
Its a tough call between C & E.

I guess the catch lies in the line"most children who went sledding in the winter snow in Verland used wooden sleds with runners and steering bars", meaning despite majority using wooden sleds the increase in number of accidents was attributed to plastic sleds. Despite being the minority if plastic sleds contribute more to the number of accident victims then to weaken the argument we need something positive to undermine the "dangerous" argument.

That's what I think.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 19

Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Jan 2017
Posts: 435

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 15

Location: India
Re: In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Mar 2017, 03:52
(A) A few children still use traditional wooden sleds. ( Wrong Answer : The argument is about an increase the sled related injuries.)

(B) Very few children wear any kind of protective gear, such as helmets, while sledding. ( Wrong : this is not affecting the argument in any manner.)

(C) Plastic sleds can be used in a much wider variety of snow conditions than wooden sleds can. (Right Answer : Given the fact that plastic sleds can be used in a much wider variety of snow conditions the chances of injury gets increased alongwith the variety.)

(D) Most sledding injuries occur when a sled collides with a tree, a rock, or another sled. ( wrong Answer : This is not affecting the argument since this may happen to both plastic as well as wooden sled riders)

(E) Because the traditional wooden sleds can carry more than one rider, an accident involving a wooden sled can result in several children being injured.( wrong Answer : the argument’s focus is plastic sleds)

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 15

Intern
Joined: 13 Feb 2015
Posts: 14

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 1

GMAT 1: 670 Q51 V30
GPA: 3
Re: In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 May 2017, 08:02
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
According to me, Right answer has to be option (b). Because, Plastic sleds are not responsible for injuries. Children are not taking precaution, That's why, Injuries are there.

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 1

Director
Status: I don't stop when I'm Tired,I stop when I'm done
Joined: 11 May 2014
Posts: 564

Kudos [?]: 2917 [0], given: 220

GPA: 2.81
Re: In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 May 2017, 08:42
Top Contributor
thedubey wrote:
According to me, Right answer has to be option (b). Because, Plastic sleds are not responsible for injuries. Children are not taking precaution, That's why, Injuries are there.

Hi,

Here is my understanding :
Children may not careful at using wooden sleds or plastic sleds all over the time,but it does not affect the argument.

Premise: As plastic sleds became popular ,the number of children injured was much higher last winter than it was 10 years ago when wooden sleds were popular

Conclusion: plastic sleds are more dangerous

Answer choice C correctly weakened the conclusion by providing additional information about plastic sled's wide range of usage.

Thanks
_________________

Md. Abdur Rakib

Please Press +1 Kudos,If it helps
Sentence Correction-Collection of Ron Purewal's "elliptical construction/analogies" for SC Challenges

Kudos [?]: 2917 [0], given: 220

Retired Moderator
Joined: 13 Feb 2015
Posts: 806

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 32

Re: In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 May 2017, 13:51
Merged topics. Please, search before posting questions!
_________________

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 32

Intern
Joined: 26 Jun 2017
Posts: 9

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 6

Re: In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2017, 18:16
KyleWiddison wrote:
Choice D is the correct answer because you want to find some information that weakens the argument. It's a classic GMAT-like argument that attempts to compare raw numbers when rates really should be compared. This issue is highlighted by choice D which states that the number of sleds (and by extension sledders) has grown significantly with the introduction of the cheaper plastic sled. This increase in sleds could lead to a higher NUMBER of accidents with a lower RATE of accidents overall, thus weakening the conclusion.

You have a valid point about the sleds not necessarily equating directly with sledders, but remember that with CR you are choosing the best answer available. Choice C doesn't provide any differentiation between now and 15 years ago. If it had (by mentioning that protective gear was used heavily 15 years ago but not anymore) then C would be a strong answer choice.

KW

Sorry I think I haven't got fully your points. My assumption is "if all those accidents were not caused by plastic sledges, it means plastic sledges are less dangerous than wooden sledges". Thus my choice was E instead of C and D, can you help detect my falsified assumption?

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 6

Manager
Joined: 22 Aug 2016
Posts: 91

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 74

Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Finance
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
GMAT 2: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE: Other (Education)
Re: In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2017, 20:15
Hi

A few children still use traditional wooden sleds.

I chose A because if the number of people using plastic is more or wood is less, that explains the discrepancy in the evidence.
Could you help me understand where I am going wrong?

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 74

GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 1160

Kudos [?]: 1874 [0], given: 449

Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: 340 Q170 V170
Re: In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Aug 2017, 15:23
sarathgopinath wrote:
Hi

A few children still use traditional wooden sleds.

I chose A because if the number of people using plastic is more or wood is less, that explains the discrepancy in the evidence.
Could you help me understand where I am going wrong?

Quote:
A. A few children still use traditional wooden sleds.

The evidence cited is "that the number of children injured while sledding was much higher last winter than it was ten years ago [when wooden sleds were popular]." This evidence seems to suggest that plastic sleds are more dangerous. Even if a few children still use traditional wooden sleds, if injuries have increased since plastic sleds became popular, this still suggests that plastic sleds are more dangerous.

The evidence cited does not require that ALL children use plastic sleds, so (A) can be eliminated.
_________________

GMAT Club Verbal Expert | GMAT/GRE tutor at www.gmatninja.com (Now hiring!) | GMAT blog | Food blog | Friendly warning: I'm bad at PMs

GMAT Ninja Wednesdays LIVE on YouTube

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal
Reading Comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Sentence Correction

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations
All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Sentence Correction articles & resources
How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

Reading Comprehension, Critical Reasoning, and other articles & resources
All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for \$29.99... in any section order

"Next-level" GMAT pronouns | Uses of "that" on the GMAT | Parallelism and meaning | Simplifying GMAT verb tenses | Comparisons, part I |
November webinar schedule

Kudos [?]: 1874 [0], given: 449

Director
Joined: 12 Nov 2016
Posts: 794

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 165

Re: In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Nov 2017, 02:55
arorag wrote:
In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in Verland used wooden sleds with runners and steering bars. Ten years ago, smooth plastic sleds became popular; they go faster than wooden sleds but are harder to steer and slow. The concern that plastic sleds are more dangerous is clearly borne out by the fact that the number of children injured while sledding was much higher last winter than it was ten years ago.

Which of the following, if true in Verland, most seriously undermines the force of the evidence cited?
A. A few children still use traditional wooden sleds.
B. Very few children wear any kind of protective gear, such as helmets, while sledding.
C. Plastic sleds can be used in a much wider variety of snow conditions than wooden sleds can.
D. Most sledding injuries occur when a sled collides with a tree, a rock, or another sled.
E. Because the traditional wooden sled can carry more than one rider, an accident involving a wooden sled can result in several children being injured.

OA B????

This question really boils down to E vs C IMO. The issue with E is that it actually kind of strengthens the argument because if a wooden sled accident ends up harming more children then how is it that the plastic sled has led to more overall accidents? This possibly means that there have been more plastic sled accidents. The thing about C means that ok well the sledders could be using it in more dangerous snow conditions such as thin ice hence the increased rate of injury.

C

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 165

Re: In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter   [#permalink] 06 Nov 2017, 02:55

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3    Next  [ 41 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by