GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 21 Jul 2018, 06:49

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 26 Mar 2008
Posts: 94
Schools: Tuck, Duke
In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 23 Mar 2018, 19:15
3
17
00:00

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

55% (01:07) correct 45% (01:17) wrong based on 1521 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Edit: This discussion has retired. Find the new thread HERE

In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in Verland used wooden sleds with runners and steering bars. Ten years ago, smooth plastic sleds became popular; they go faster than wooden sleds but are harder to steer and slow. The concern that plastic sleds are more dangerous is clearly borne out by the fact that the number of children injured while sledding was much higher last winter than it was ten years ago.

Which of the following, if true in Verland, most seriously undermines the force of the evidence cited?

(A) A few children still use traditional wooden sleds.

(B) Very few children wear any kind of protective gear, such as helmets, while sledding.

(C) Plastic sleds can be used in a much wider variety of snow conditions than wooden sleds can.

(D) Most sledding injuries occur when a sled collides with a tree, a rock, or another sled.

(E) Because the traditional wooden sled can carry more than one rider, an accident involving a wooden sled can result in several children being injured.

Originally posted by arorag on 21 Sep 2008, 14:26.
Last edited by GMATNinjaTwo on 23 Mar 2018, 19:15, edited 2 times in total.
Edited the question.
Director
Joined: 04 Jun 2016
Posts: 606
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V43
Re: In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 13 Jun 2016, 11:08
8
3

EXPLAINATION:-
In weaken questions one must try to attack the conclusion of the argument. Because there is a logical error in the conclusion and by revealing the error, you can show that the conclusion is weak. A weak conclusion makes the entire argument invalid (if the argument is deductive) or uncogent (if the argument is inductive). Also remember in Weaken question, we can use New Information.

Lets try to do this here
The argument tells us that Plastic sleds have these qualities:- faster, bad handling (hard to steer), weak brakes (harder to slow).
"Plastic sleds became popular; they go faster than wooden sleds but are harder to steer and slow" ===> mentioned in passage
Now if something skids fast, cannot be stopped and cannot be handled, it will crash more frequently and more injuries will occur.

The argument also tells us that Plastic Sleds have been used for 10 years but the rate of accident was higher only last year.
Ten years ago, smooth plastic sleds became popular ===> mentioned in passage
The number of children injured while sledding was much higher last winter than it was ten years ago. ===> mentioned in passage
Suddenly during last year the accident number has gone up? Why ? LET US INVESTIGATE.

A. A few children still use traditional wooden sleds.
This should actually cause less accident, since wooden sleds are safer. DISCARD OPTION A

B. Very few children wear any kind of protective gear, such as helmets, while sledding.
Well, children must not be wearing protection for 10 years. Why accidents have gone up last year only. doesn't answer this question. DISCARD OPTION B

C. Plastic sleds can be used in a much wider variety of snow conditions than wooden sleds can.
At first glance looks out of scope or irrelevant...BUT KEEP IT FOR LATER ANALYSIS

D. Most sledding injuries occur when a sled collides with a tree, a rock, or another sled.
So suddenly last year many trees, many rocks and many sleds appear? No indication about that DISCARD OPTION D

E. Because the traditional wooden sled can carry more than one rider, an accident involving a wooden sled can result in several children being injured.
This is reverse answer. More Wooden Sled = More injuries. So accidents should have been more 10 years ago when wooden sleds were used, not now. DISCARD OPTION E

What remains with us now is only option C which looked out of scope, or irrelevant
Now no matter, whether we like it or not it has to be the answer.

Lets Analyse it again
C. Plastic sleds can be used in a much wider variety of snow conditions than wooden sleds can.

Wooden sled can only be used in good weather when snow is soft and fresh, when there is no storm, when there is no fog, when visibility is good etc etc. Also given they are safer.

Plastic sled can be used in much wider condition such as when there is snow storm, still snowing, when the snow is hard and can cause injury on impact etc etc.

So may be last year something happened that has not happened in a long time after the introduction of plastic sleds. Finally after 10 years, last year snow conditions were bad. Now if people used wooden sleds , they could not sled because their wooden sleds don't have the capability. So NO sleds = NO accidents.
But Plastic sleds can still sleds in such extreme conditions. So people being stupid, ignored the bad condition and went out and coupled with the fact that plastic sleds are injury prone, People got injured and injured again and injured again. Stupid People

AND WHY DOES THIS HAPPENED:- THE BLAME LIES ON PLASTIC SLEDS BECAUSE THEY CAN WORK IN A VARIETY OF WEATHER CONDITIONS (INCLUDING BAD CONDITIONS)

Thats what exactly option C says

In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in Verland used wooden sleds with runners and steering bars. Ten years ago, smooth plastic sleds became popular; they go faster than wooden sleds but are harder to steer and slow. The concern that plastic sleds are more dangerous is clearly borne out by the fact that the number of children injured while sledding was much higher last winter than it was ten years ago.

Which of the following, if true in Verland, most seriously undermines the force of the evidence cited?
A. A few children still use traditional wooden sleds.
B. Very few children wear any kind of protective gear, such as helmets, while sledding.
C. Plastic sleds can be used in a much wider variety of snow conditions than wooden sleds can.
D. Most sledding injuries occur when a sled collides with a tree, a rock, or another sled.
E. Because the traditional wooden sled can carry more than one rider, an accident involving a wooden sled can result in several children being injured.
_________________

Posting an answer without an explanation is "GOD COMPLEX". The world doesn't need any more gods. Please explain you answers properly.
FINAL GOODBYE :- 17th SEPTEMBER 2016. .. 16 March 2017 - I am back but for all purposes please consider me semi-retired.

Originally posted by LogicGuru1 on 11 Jun 2016, 00:13.
Last edited by LogicGuru1 on 13 Jun 2016, 11:08, edited 1 time in total.
##### General Discussion
Joined: 28 May 2012
Posts: 127
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.33
WE: Information Technology (Retail)
Re: In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Oct 2012, 09:18
arorag wrote:
In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in Verland used wooden sleds with runners and steering bars. Ten years ago, smooth plastic sleds became popular; they go faster than wooden sleds but are harder to steer and slow. The concern that plastic sleds are more dangerous is clearly borne out by the fact that the number of children injured while sledding was much higher last winter than it was ten years ago.

Which of the following, if true in Verland, most seriously undermines the force of the evidence cited?
A. A few children still use traditional wooden sleds.
B. Very few children wear any kind of protective gear, such as helmets, while sledding.
C. Plastic sleds can be used in a much wider variety of snow conditions than wooden sleds can.
D. Most sledding injuries occur when a sled collides with a tree, a rock, or another sled.
E. Because the traditional wooden sled can carry more than one rider, an accident involving a wooden sled can result in several children being injured.

OA B????

Are you sure the OA is ? I highly doubt the OA.

IMO the answer should be .

Anyone else any thoughts on this one ?

Thanks,
Ankit
_________________

You want something, go get it . Period !

Intern
Joined: 07 Sep 2012
Posts: 9
Re: In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Oct 2012, 14:03
1
arorag wrote:
In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in Verland used wooden sleds with runners and steering bars. Ten years ago, smooth plastic sleds became popular; they go faster than wooden sleds but are harder to steer and slow. The concern that plastic sleds are more dangerous is clearly borne out by the fact that the number of children injured while sledding was much higher last winter than it was ten years ago.

Which of the following, if true in Verland, most seriously undermines the force of the evidence cited?
A. A few children still use traditional wooden sleds.
B. Very few children wear any kind of protective gear, such as helmets, while sledding.
C. Plastic sleds can be used in a much wider variety of snow conditions than wooden sleds can.
D. Most sledding injuries occur when a sled collides with a tree, a rock, or another sled.
E. Because the traditional wooden sled can carry more than one rider, an accident involving a wooden sled can result in several children being injured.

OA B????

A. A few children still use traditional wooden sleds. This doesnt compare the plastic with wooden sleds
B. Very few children wear any kind of protective gear, such as helmets, while sledding. Irrelevant. This statement doesnt contradict/weaken why plastic sleds are dangerous
C. Plastic sleds can be used in a much wider variety of snow conditions than wooden sleds can. This explains correctly that plastic sleds are not only used in certain snow conds, but used in much wider variety. Thus, this statement weakens the conclusion when comparing wooden and plastic sleds
D. Most sledding injuries occur when a sled collides with a tree, a rock, or another sled. Irrelevant
E. Because the traditional wooden sled can carry more than one rider, an accident involving a wooden sled can result in several children being injured. Irrelevant

OA is C IMO.
Manager
Joined: 27 Jul 2012
Posts: 89
Location: India
GMAT Date: 10-25-2012
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Re: In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Oct 2012, 07:23
4
1
The argument concludes that The concern that plastic sleds are more dangerous is clearly borne out by the fact that the number of children injured while sledding was much higher last winter than it was ten years ago.

If we read the question stem closely, it asks which option undermines the force of evidence, that is which option attacks the reason provided in the argument for increase in injuries while using plastic sled. option C clearly provides an alternative reason.

OA to this question is C only I have checked in other threads as well.
_________________

if my post helped you, let me know by pressing Kudos...

Intern
Joined: 31 Oct 2011
Posts: 42
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
GPA: 3.4
WE: Accounting (Commercial Banking)
Re: In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Oct 2012, 21:16
1
It's a question in Official Guide and the answer is C
Director
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Posts: 554
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
Re: In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 06 Nov 2012, 06:35
2
6
In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter in Kentucky used wooden sleds with runners and
steering bars. Fifteen years ago, smooth plastic sleds became popular; they go faster than wooden sleds but are
harder to steer. The fear that plastic sleds are more dangerous is clearly borne out by the fact that the number
of children injured while sledding was much higher last winter than it was fifteen years ago.

Which of the following, if true in Kentucky, most seriously undermines the force of the evidence cited?

A. A few children still use traditional wooden sleds.
B. Most sledding injuries occur when a sled collides with a tree, a rock, or another sled.
C. Very few children wear any kind of protective gear, such as helmets, while sledding.
D. Because plastic sleds are less expensive than wooden sleds, many more children own a sled now than did fifteen years ago.
E. An accident involving a wooden sled can result in several children being injured because the traditional wooden
sleds can carry more than one rider.
_________________

KUDOS me if you feel my contribution has helped you.

Originally posted by gmatbull on 02 Nov 2012, 08:16.
Last edited by gmatbull on 06 Nov 2012, 06:35, edited 1 time in total.
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Posts: 336
Location: European union
Re: In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Nov 2012, 09:38
1
D is the correct answer. As sleds are more affordable today, more children have them, and thus the accidents are more. This undermines the theory that accidents are more because plastic sleds are more dangerous.

E is tempting. It states that a wooden sled accident might involve several injuries. However, we are interested in the number of injuries, not the number of accidents. The problem specifies at that today the number of injuries is higher than the number of injuries 15 years ago, so the number of accidents and the fact that one accident means several injuries are simply irrelevant.
VP
Status: Final Lap Up!!!
Affiliations: NYK Line
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 1022
Location: India
GMAT 1: 410 Q35 V11
GMAT 2: 530 Q44 V20
GMAT 3: 630 Q45 V31
GPA: 3.84
WE: Engineering (Transportation)
Re: In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Nov 2012, 10:33
We have to weaken the evidence
What is the evidence?
Large Number of accidents involving the plastic sleds...

E doesnt play any role in weaken

Only contender here is C and D

D wins over C since it weakens the problem specifically by suggesting that there are large number of accidents but comparatively the population of plastic sled user is even larger

Consider 100,000 People using plastic sled out of which 100 are involved in ana accident.
Is the number large.
Director
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Posts: 554
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
Re: In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Nov 2012, 06:41
2
The argument is attributing increase in number of accidents to steel.

Consider:
15yrs ago: 10 steel users with 2 accidents per user - 20 accidents
Now: 100 steel users with 2 accidents per user - 200 accidents

Although 200 accidents now from steel, we still cannot conclude steel are more dangerous
than wood.
_________________

KUDOS me if you feel my contribution has helped you.

Intern
Joined: 29 Jul 2012
Posts: 28
Re: In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2012, 06:09
Just using "The Most Comprehensive Guide of Everything Official - CR" which has the correct answer as "C. Plastic sleds can be used in a much wider variety of snow conditions than wooden sleds can", which isn't an answer choice above.

Actually, looking more closely it's not the same exact question as in the Most Comprehensive study guide as the one above compares accidents of 15 years ago as opposed to 10 years ago and takes place in Kentucky. Probably, explains why the answer choices don't match and why "C" is the correct choice in the Most Comprehensive study guide.
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Dec 2011
Posts: 271
Re: In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 26 May 2017, 10:10
In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in Verland used wooden sleds with runners and steering bars. Ten years ago, smooth plastic sleds became popular; they go faster than wooden sleds but are harder to steer and slow. The concern that plastic sleds are more dangerous is clearly borne out by the fact that the number of children injured while sledding was much higher last winter than it was 10 years ago.

Which of the following, if true in Verland, most seriously undermines the force of the evidence cited?

(A) A few children still use traditional wooden sleds.

(B) Very few children wear any kind of protective gear, such as helmets, while sledding.

(C) Plastic sleds can be used in a much wider variety of snow conditions than wooden sleds can.

(D) Most sledding injuries occur when a sled collides with a tree, a rock, or another sled.

(E) Because the traditional wooden sleds can carry more than one rider, an accident involving a wooden sled can result in several children being injured.

Originally posted by Jp27 on 11 Nov 2012, 04:44.
Last edited by abhimahna on 26 May 2017, 10:10, edited 1 time in total.
Intern
Status: Life begins at the End of your Comfort Zone
Joined: 31 Jul 2011
Posts: 45
Location: Tajikistan
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GPA: 3.86
Re: In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Nov 2012, 11:58
I would say, (E) since this answer choice counters the the idea of the statement and particularly the last sentence. Other answer choices cite some irrelevant points not considered in the statement.

Feel free to correct me, if I went awry
_________________

Retired Moderator
Status: Getting strong now, I'm so strong now!!!
Affiliations: National Institute of Technology, Durgapur
Joined: 04 Jun 2013
Posts: 507
Location: India
GPA: 3.32
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Sep 2013, 11:24
1
What if we say that since Plastic sleds are hard to steer more collisions with immovable objects/otehr sleds are occuring? As said in B?

D is the better choice albeit
_________________

Regards,

S

Consider +1 KUDOS if you find this post useful

Manager
Joined: 16 Mar 2013
Posts: 56
Re: In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2014, 01:58
Freaks this was seriously an amazing weaken question!!!

I think the key here is the question i.e. 'Which of the following, if true in Verland, most seriously undermines the force of the evidence cited?'

The normal question is that 'Which of the following, if true in Verland, most seriously undermines the conclusion' but here we need to undermine the evidence and hence, weakening the conclusion.

I was stuck between options C & E.

C wins from the perspective of the question cited.

Certainly OA is C.

B is out of scope.
_________________

'The best way to thank or appreciate efforts on this forum is to give Kudos.'

Manager
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 86
Schools: Haas '16, AGSM '16
Re: In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Mar 2015, 18:51
1
4
Explanation for choice C

Conclusion: the number of children injured while sledding was much higher than it was ten years ago => plastic sleds more dangerous.

Assumption: the number of children who involve in accidences is representative for each sleds. In other words, the number of time that children use plastic sleds is comparable to that of children using wooden sleds

Weaken: the assumption. hence choice C is correct
Current Student
Joined: 18 Oct 2014
Posts: 880
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GPA: 3.98
Re: In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Jan 2016, 07:31
2
I chose 'C' over 'D'.

The reason for this was that 'owning' a sled does not mean that children are actually 'sledding'. It is possible that they are just owning it but not using it.

However, option 'C' says that safety precautions are not used and that might have resulted in more injuries.

Any thoughts, folks??
_________________

I welcome critical analysis of my post!! That will help me reach 700+

Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 30 Apr 2012
Posts: 794
Re: In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jan 2016, 08:26
1
1
Choice D is the correct answer because you want to find some information that weakens the argument. It's a classic GMAT-like argument that attempts to compare raw numbers when rates really should be compared. This issue is highlighted by choice D which states that the number of sleds (and by extension sledders) has grown significantly with the introduction of the cheaper plastic sled. This increase in sleds could lead to a higher NUMBER of accidents with a lower RATE of accidents overall, thus weakening the conclusion.

You have a valid point about the sleds not necessarily equating directly with sledders, but remember that with CR you are choosing the best answer available. Choice C doesn't provide any differentiation between now and 15 years ago. If it had (by mentioning that protective gear was used heavily 15 years ago but not anymore) then C would be a strong answer choice.

KW
_________________

Kyle Widdison | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | Utah

Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile

Current Student
Joined: 18 Oct 2014
Posts: 880
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GPA: 3.98
Re: In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Jan 2016, 12:49
KyleWiddison wrote:
Choice D is the correct answer because you want to find some information that weakens the argument. It's a classic GMAT-like argument that attempts to compare raw numbers when rates really should be compared. This issue is highlighted by choice D which states that the number of sleds (and by extension sledders) has grown significantly with the introduction of the cheaper plastic sled. This increase in sleds could lead to a higher NUMBER of accidents with a lower RATE of accidents overall, thus weakening the conclusion.

You have a valid point about the sleds not necessarily equating directly with sledders, but remember that with CR you are choosing the best answer available. Choice C doesn't provide any differentiation between now and 15 years ago. If it had (by mentioning that protective gear was used heavily 15 years ago but not anymore) then C would be a strong answer choice.

KW

Thanks for the explanation. Hope I would not face such choices on the real day
_________________

I welcome critical analysis of my post!! That will help me reach 700+

Manager
Joined: 29 Nov 2011
Posts: 109
Re: In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Mar 2016, 00:50
KyleWiddison wrote:
Choice D is the correct answer because you want to find some information that weakens the argument. It's a classic GMAT-like argument that attempts to compare raw numbers when rates really should be compared. This issue is highlighted by choice D which states that the number of sleds (and by extension sledders) has grown significantly with the introduction of the cheaper plastic sled. This increase in sleds could lead to a higher NUMBER of accidents with a lower RATE of accidents overall, thus weakening the conclusion.

You have a valid point about the sleds not necessarily equating directly with sledders, but remember that with CR you are choosing the best answer available. Choice C doesn't provide any differentiation between now and 15 years ago. If it had (by mentioning that protective gear was used heavily 15 years ago but not anymore) then C would be a strong answer choice.

KW

KyleWiddison I know E cannnot be the answer because it gives no information about Plastics sleds, but what if E had (by mentioning that today Plastics sleds carry 4 riders and traditional wooden carry 2 riders), would this be the possible contender.
My reasoning to this is "number of injuries more not because number of acc but because carry more slders". PLease share your thoughts on this.
Re: In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in &nbs [#permalink] 20 Mar 2016, 00:50

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 39 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Events & Promotions

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.