It is currently 16 Dec 2017, 05:21

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In the past, teachers, bank tellers, and secretaries were

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Dec 2007
Posts: 448

Kudos [?]: 314 [0], given: 6

In the past, teachers, bank tellers, and secretaries were [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Sep 2008, 00:21
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (00:12) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 24 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In the past, teachers, bank tellers, and secretaries were predominantly men; these occupations slipped in pay and status when they became largely occupied by women. Therefore, if women become the majority in currently male-dominated professions like accounting, law, and medicine, the income and prestige of these professions will also drop.

Q. The argument above is based on

A. another argument that contains circular reasoning

B. an attempt to refute a generalization by means of an exceptional case

C. an analogy between the past and the future

D. an appeal to popular beliefs and values

E. an attack on the character of the opposition

Kudos [?]: 314 [0], given: 6

Senior Manager
Joined: 16 Jul 2008
Posts: 288

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 4

### Show Tags

05 Sep 2008, 00:27
C.

"In the past, X happened and led to Y. Now, if X happens again (in other professions), Y will happen again."
_________________

http://applicant.wordpress.com/

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 4

SVP
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1530

Kudos [?]: 282 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

05 Sep 2008, 01:12
C for me as well....although I am not sure whether status maps to prestige.

Kudos [?]: 282 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1402

Kudos [?]: 454 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

05 Sep 2008, 09:29
Nihit wrote:
In the past, teachers, bank tellers, and secretaries were predominantly men; these occupations slipped in pay and status when they became largely occupied by women. Therefore, if women become the majority in currently male-dominated professions like accounting, law, and medicine, the income and prestige of these professions will also drop.

Q. The argument above is based on

A. another argument that contains circular reasoning No Circular reasoning

B. an attempt to refute a generalization by means of an exceptional case No refutation

C. an analogy between the past and the future exactly

D. an appeal to popular beliefs and values Nope

E. an attack on the character of the opposition too strong and unwarranted

Kudos [?]: 454 [0], given: 1

Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Dec 2007
Posts: 448

Kudos [?]: 314 [0], given: 6

### Show Tags

05 Sep 2008, 10:30
OA is indeed C , thanks guys !

Kudos [?]: 314 [0], given: 6

Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Apr 2008
Posts: 428

Kudos [?]: 170 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

05 Sep 2008, 22:42
Nihit wrote:
In the past, teachers, bank tellers, and secretaries were predominantly men; these occupations slipped in pay and status when they became largely occupied by women. Therefore, if women become the majority in currently male-dominated professions like accounting, law, and medicine, the income and prestige of these professions will also drop.

Q. The argument above is based on

A. another argument that contains circular reasoning

B. an attempt to refute a generalization by means of an exceptional case

C. an analogy between the past and the future

D. an appeal to popular beliefs and values

E. an attack on the character of the opposition

IMO C)

Kudos [?]: 170 [0], given: 1

VP
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1373

Kudos [?]: 434 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

05 Sep 2008, 22:42
Nihit wrote:
In the past, teachers, bank tellers, and secretaries were predominantly men; these occupations slipped in pay and status when they became largely occupied by women. Therefore, if women become the majority in currently male-dominated professions like accounting, law, and medicine, the income and prestige of these professions will also drop.

Q. The argument above is based on

A. another argument that contains circular reasoning -> second part is based on first part no circular reasoning

B. an attempt to refute a generalization by means of an exceptional case -> no particular evidence given

C. an analogy between the past and the future -> rightly said with past experience we are prdicting future

D. an appeal to popular beliefs and values -> OOS

E. an attack on the character of the opposition -> such attack

_________________

cheers
Its Now Or Never

Kudos [?]: 434 [0], given: 0

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10204

Kudos [?]: 277 [0], given: 0

Re: In the past, teachers, bank tellers, and secretaries were [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Jan 2016, 21:30
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 277 [0], given: 0

Re: In the past, teachers, bank tellers, and secretaries were   [#permalink] 12 Jan 2016, 21:30
Display posts from previous: Sort by