It is currently 19 Nov 2017, 23:33

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In the suburbs surrounding Middletown, there is an average

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Feb 2004
Posts: 413

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

Location: Lungi
In the suburbs surrounding Middletown, there is an average [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Apr 2004, 07:04
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (00:17) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 14 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In the suburbs surrounding Middletown, there is an
average of 2.4 automobiles per family, and thus very
few suburban residents use public buses. The subur-
ban communities, therefore, would derive little bene-
fit from continuing to subsidize the portion of
Middletown's public bus system that serves the
suburbs.

Which of the following, if true, casts the most
serious doubt on the conclusion drawn above?
(A) The real-estate tax rate in Middletown is higher
than it is in the suburbs.
(B) Last year voters in the suburban communities
defeated by a narrow margin a bill designed
to increase subsidies for public bus routes.
(C) Many suburban shops can attract enough
employees to remain in business only because
subsidized public transportation from
Middletown is available.
(D) Public buses operated with less than a 35
percent occupancy rate produce more pollu-
tion per passenger mile than would the oper-
ation of private automobiles for each passenger.
(E) Most voters in Middletown's suburban commu-
nities are unwilling to continue subsidies for
public buses next year if ridership on those
buses drops below current levels.

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 152

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Location: India

### Show Tags

07 Apr 2004, 09:29
My choice B.

My reasoning:

The argument says that 'The subur-
ban communities, therefore, would derive little bene-
fit from continuing to subsidize
the portion of
Middletown's public bus system that serves the
suburbs.'
In order words, it means that the subsidies do not help the people.

And B states that last year voters in the suburban communities
defeated by a narrow margin a bill designed
to increase subsidies for public bus routes.

So if subsidies do not help them, then why should they defeat the bill to increase the subsidies? This means that there is something in the subsidies that benefits them.

Hence I chose B.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I feel that my answer could be wrong. But still I preferred to express my line of reasoning. Would be glad if someone could correct me.
_________________

A 750 aspirant.

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1788

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

Location: NewJersey USA

### Show Tags

07 Apr 2004, 09:35
C it is.
B uses the word narrow margin meaning fifty% of voters still want subsidies,

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 15 Mar 2004
Posts: 155

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Location: New York

### Show Tags

07 Apr 2004, 11:21
aspire wrote:
My choice B.

My reasoning:

The argument says that 'The subur-
ban communities, therefore, would derive little bene-
fit from continuing to subsidize
the portion of
Middletown's public bus system that serves the
suburbs.'
In order words, it means that the subsidies do not help the people.

And B states that last year voters in the suburban communities
defeated by a narrow margin a bill designed
to increase subsidies for public bus routes.

So if subsidies do not help them, then why should they defeat the bill to increase the subsidies? This means that there is something in the subsidies that benefits them.

Hence I chose B.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I feel that my answer could be wrong. But still I preferred to express my line of reasoning. Would be glad if someone could correct me.

Aspire,

I think B means that >50%, say 51% defeated a bill to increase subsidies. Meaning they dont want the increase. They are unhappy as it is, than they definitely dont want the increase. Hope that makes sense. Besides, C casts a real doubt to the conclusion.
_________________

---------------------------------------------------
The more I learn, the more I realize I know nothing!
----------------------------------------------------

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 152

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Location: India

### Show Tags

07 Apr 2004, 11:44
Thanks. I overlooked the phrase 'narrow margin', and that makes the choice weak.

lvb9th wrote:
aspire wrote:
My choice B.

My reasoning:

The argument says that 'The subur-
ban communities, therefore, would derive little bene-
fit from continuing to subsidize
the portion of
Middletown's public bus system that serves the
suburbs.'
In order words, it means that the subsidies do not help the people.

And B states that last year voters in the suburban communities
defeated by a narrow margin a bill designed
to increase subsidies for public bus routes.

So if subsidies do not help them, then why should they defeat the bill to increase the subsidies? This means that there is something in the subsidies that benefits them.

Hence I chose B.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I feel that my answer could be wrong. But still I preferred to express my line of reasoning. Would be glad if someone could correct me.

Aspire,

I think B means that >50%, say 51% defeated a bill to increase subsidies. Meaning they dont want the increase. They are unhappy as it is, than they definitely dont want the increase. Hope that makes sense. Besides, C casts a real doubt to the conclusion.

_________________

A 750 aspirant.

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4284

Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Apr 2004, 12:14
Nice discussion guys. C indeed
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Feb 2004
Posts: 413

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

Location: Lungi

### Show Tags

10 Apr 2004, 20:03
OA is C.

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 18 Oct 2009
Posts: 51

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 7

Schools: Queen's E-MBA
Re: CR9:Middletown's public bus system [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Feb 2010, 00:23
Question is: What casts serious doubt on conclusion?

Conclusion is: The suburban communities, therefore, would derive little benefit from continuing to subsidize ..........

So the answer that asserts that communiteis are benefited from the subsidy will weaken the conclusion, which C!
_________________

Please give KUDOS if you like the post

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 7

Re: CR9:Middletown's public bus system   [#permalink] 27 Feb 2010, 00:23
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# In the suburbs surrounding Middletown, there is an average

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.