It is currently 20 Oct 2017, 13:34

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In the United States in 1986, the average rate of violent

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 07 Jun 2006
Posts: 109

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 0

In the United States in 1986, the average rate of violent [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2006, 21:31
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In the United States in 1986, the average rate of violent crime in states with strict gun-control laws was 645 crimes per 100,000 personsâ€”about 50 percent higher than the average rate in the eleven states where strict gun-control laws have never been passed. Thus one way to reduce violent crime is to repeal strict gun control laws.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above?
(A) The annual rate of violent crime in states with strict gun-control laws has decreased since the passage of those laws.
(B) In states with strict gun-control laws, few individuals are prosecuted for violating such laws.
(C) In states without strict gun-control laws, many individuals have had no formal training in the use of firearms.
(D) The annual rate of nonviolent crime is lower in states with strict gun-control laws than in states without such laws.
(E) Less than half of the individuals who reside in states without strict gun-control laws own a gun.

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 702

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2006, 21:46
Looks like E

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1012

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2006, 22:56
The best answer could have been "strict gun-control laws were implemented in states which had high violent crime rate"

A seems to be answer now. The argument says that the violent crime rate has come down since the laws were implemented. If the laws are repealed, then this might increase the crime rate in the states with strict gun-control laws.

E can't be the answer, because there is no information on what proportion of individuals own guns in states with strict gun-control laws.
_________________

The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1439

Kudos [?]: 218 [0], given: 13

Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2006, 23:39
A it eeeezz

Kudos [?]: 218 [0], given: 13

Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Aug 2005
Posts: 409

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Nov 2006, 00:23
Only A fits the bill

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 03 Nov 2006
Posts: 161

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Nov 2006, 00:29
Why not B?

If few people are persecuted for crimes, then more of them will commit the crimes.

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5034

Kudos [?]: 438 [0], given: 0

Location: Singapore

### Show Tags

09 Nov 2006, 00:34
A is best. It tells us the law actually works. The comparison could simply be poor since the other eleven states could have a massive population sample.

Kudos [?]: 438 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 432

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Nov 2006, 04:07
Clear A

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 148

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Nov 2006, 04:21
A it is.
_________________

Neelabh Mahesh

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 25 Sep 2006
Posts: 150

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Nov 2006, 05:02
one more A

B says 'few', but this is not convincing. A few could be 100 over 10000 cases

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

09 Nov 2006, 05:02
Display posts from previous: Sort by