It is currently 13 Dec 2017, 09:06

# Decision(s) Day!:

CHAT Rooms | Ross R1 | Kellogg R1 | Darden R1 | Tepper R1

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In the United States, of the people who moved from one state

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
Manager
Joined: 08 Apr 2004
Posts: 131

Kudos [?]: 981 [0], given: 0

Location: Corea
In the United States, of the people who moved from one state [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Aug 2004, 02:43
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In the United States, of the people who moved from one state to another when they retired, the percentage who retired to Florida has decreased by three percentage points over the past ten years. Since many local businesses in Florida cater to retirees, this decline is likely to have a noticeably negative economic effect on these businesses.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. Florida attracts more people who move from one state to another when they retire than does any other state.
B. The number of people who move out of Florida to accept employment in other states has increased over the past ten years.
C. There are far more local businesses in Florida that cater to tourists than there are local businesses that cater to retirees.
D. The total number of people who retired and moved to another state for their retirement has increased significantly over the past ten years.
E. The number of people who left Florida when they retired to live in another state was greater last year than it was ten years ago

Kudos [?]: 981 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 16 Aug 2004
Posts: 320

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 0

Location: India

### Show Tags

26 Aug 2004, 02:57
B, C and E are ruled out. My choice is option D.

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 217

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Aug 2004, 04:21
D for sure

Authors of questions are running out of fantasy, they use the same technique: percentage VS absolute value

If the total number of people who retired and moved has increased then the percentage decrease does not indicate the decrease in the number of customers for Florida businesses who cater for retirees

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798

Kudos [?]: 174 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

26 Aug 2004, 13:37
Yes I think you are right OleC. Atleast we should not miss quesitons of this type.

Kudos [?]: 174 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 05 May 2004
Posts: 574

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 0

Location: San Jose, CA

### Show Tags

26 Aug 2004, 14:19
D
Agree with other explanations

The key catch is "the percentage who retired to Florida has decreased by three percentage points "

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 05 Aug 2004
Posts: 13

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Location: Manhattan

### Show Tags

28 Aug 2004, 05:41
D -- more people but lesser percentage may still imply more people coming in

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Affiliations: CFA Level 2
Joined: 05 May 2004
Posts: 263

Kudos [?]: 164 [0], given: 0

Location: Hanoi

### Show Tags

28 Aug 2004, 19:49
Agree with D. Sorry for late coming
_________________

"Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you'r gonna get"

Kudos [?]: 164 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 02 Apr 2004
Posts: 222

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

Location: Utrecht

### Show Tags

31 Aug 2004, 06:42
Maybe I am complet off track but I think A could be possible.

If I look at D it is mentioning that "the total number of people who retired and moved to another state for their retirement has increased significantly over the past ten years". But what has this to do to weaken the argument that it will not influence the economic effect on local businesses in Florida?

From D we could say that there has been an increase in people who retired and moved to another state. But it does not mention that they move to Florida. It could be any other state as well.

From A we could say that Florida still is number one in receiving retirees although there is an decline. Therefore still most of the retirees of the US will enter Florida and therefore still most business to cater retirees is in Florida.

I know I am the only one who will choose A as an answer but what do you guys think of my approach. Maybe I am really off track with this question.

Correct me please if I am wrong.

Regards,

Alex

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 21 Aug 2004
Posts: 134

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 Sep 2004, 10:56
Alex, you are wrong. A is just a statement from the argument and it must be ruled out immediately. It is just restating the argument.

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5032

Kudos [?]: 457 [0], given: 0

Location: Singapore

### Show Tags

02 Sep 2004, 16:42
A. Florida attracts more people who move from one state to another
when they retire than does any other state.
- Even if Florida has more retirees than any other state, this does not put down the fact that it is still too low to maintain the local business scene.

B. The number of people who move out of Florida to accept employment
in other states has increased over the past ten years.
- Not importatn. We're interested in retirees, not working community folks

C. There are far more local businesses in Florida that cater to
tourists than there are local businesses that cater to retirees.
- Good choice here. This goes to counter the claim many local businesses are going to suffer.

D. The total number of people who retired and moved to another state
for their retirement has increased significantly over the past ten
years.
- Nothing about Florida !

E. The number of people who left Florida when they retired to live in
another state was greater last year than it was ten years ago
- We don't care about those leaving, but the impact of the number currently staying in Florida thus sustaining the local businesses

Kudos [?]: 457 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5032

Kudos [?]: 457 [0], given: 0

Location: Singapore

### Show Tags

02 Sep 2004, 16:46
D. The total number of people who retired and moved to another state
for their retirement has increased significantly over the past ten
years.
I want to say something about D. Even if total number of people may be greater than 3% points, this doesn't mean more are going Florida. Instead, the greater numbers might be going to Washington, New York, anywhere except Florida. This choice is making too much of an assumption.

Kudos [?]: 457 [0], given: 0

02 Sep 2004, 16:46
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# In the United States, of the people who moved from one state

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.