It is currently 18 Nov 2017, 22:10

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In the United States, vacationers account for more than half

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Jul 2009
Posts: 322

Kudos [?]: 157 [0], given: 0

Re: In the United States, vacationers account [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jan 2010, 20:05
I've doubt in OA of this one. My pick is D

Kudos [?]: 157 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Jul 2009
Posts: 322

Kudos [?]: 157 [0], given: 0

Re: In the United States, vacationers account [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jan 2010, 20:21
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
got it at last why D is wrong. Nice one thats why need to put this analysis for all:
(A) In cities that have both a zoo and a pure aquarium, local residents are twice as likely to visit the aquarium as they are to visit the zoo.
We are talking about visitors or vacationers but still if it is true it weaks the argument

(B) Virtually all large metropolitan areas have zoos, whereas only a few large metropolitan areas have pure aquariums.
A plausible reason why vacationers would be more interested in visiting a pure aquarium than a zoo

(C) Over the last ten years, newly constructed pure aquariums have outnumbered newly established zoos by a factor of two to one.
Proportion of aquariums to zoos is not an issue

(D) People who visit a zoo in a given year are two times more likely to visit a pure aquarium that year than are people who do not visit a zoo.
Probability of visit is not an issue

(E) The zoo aquariums of zoos that are in the same city as a pure aquarium tend to be smaller than the aquariums of zoos that have no pure aquarium nearby.
Size of zoo is not an issue

Kudos [?]: 157 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 162

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 5

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: CR-Zoo Aquariums--Tricky for me [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Mar 2010, 20:06
I missed this one but ans B seems obvious..

if more zoos are present at more places then the proportion of local people visiting the zoo is higher than vacationers.

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 5

Intern
Intern
avatar
Status: fighting hard..
Joined: 12 Jul 2010
Posts: 27

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 24

Schools: ISB, Hass, Ross, NYU Stern
Re: CR-Zoo Aquariums--Tricky for me [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Nov 2010, 13:14
silasaaa2 wrote:
I missed this one but ans B seems obvious..

if more zoos are present at more places then the proportion of local people visiting the zoo is higher than vacationers.


POE works best in this problem.
Even though I didn't understand the full implication of choice B in the first go, I was able to figure out that other options just don't apply to the context.

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 24

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Status: Can't give up
Joined: 20 Dec 2009
Posts: 305

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 35

Re: CR-Zoo Aquariums--Tricky for me [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Nov 2010, 14:23
pple mention POE...how does this work? Method of Elimination...
w/o a particular rule how can one eliminate?

The best way I could attack this problem was trying to be in the area of the premise/facts.
A simple answer such as "B" attacks it.

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 35

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 09 Jun 2009
Posts: 213

Kudos [?]: 329 [0], given: 6

Re: CR-Zoo Aquariums--Tricky for me [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Nov 2010, 14:55
nice one textnet.....I chose C :( Using POE i was left with B & C

Kudos [?]: 329 [0], given: 6

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Status: Do and Die!!
Joined: 15 Sep 2010
Posts: 312

Kudos [?]: 599 [0], given: 193

Re: CR-Zoo Aquariums--Tricky for me [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Nov 2010, 11:52
good one
_________________

I'm the Dumbest of All !!

Kudos [?]: 599 [0], given: 193

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Sep 2010
Posts: 210

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 33

Concentration: General Management, Finance
GPA: 3.59
WE: Corporate Finance (Entertainment and Sports)
Re: CR-Zoo Aquariums--Tricky for me [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Nov 2010, 15:45
Not a bad question. Bah, got this one wrong.

nitya34 wrote:
In the United States, vacationers account for more than half of all visitors to what are technically called “pure aquariums” but for fewer than one quarter of all visitors to zoos, which usually include a “zoo aquarium” of relatively modest scope.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to account for the difference described above between visitors to zoos and visitors to pure aquariums?

(A) In cities that have both a zoo and a pure aquarium, local residents are twice as likely to visit the aquarium as they are to visit the zoo.
(B) Virtually all large metropolitan areas have zoos, whereas only a few large metropolitan areas have pure aquariums.
(C) Over the last ten years, newly constructed pure aquariums have outnumbered newly established zoos by a factor of two to one.
(D) People who visit a zoo in a given year are two times more likely to visit a pure aquarium that year than are people who do not visit a zoo.
(E) The zoo aquariums of zoos that are in the same city as a pure aquarium tend to be smaller than the aquariums of zoos that have no pure aquarium nearby.

[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
B


==
Explain yr Ans pls.

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 33

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 01 Dec 2010
Posts: 7

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 6

Re: CR-Zoo Aquariums--Tricky for me [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Dec 2010, 08:12
nitya34 wrote:
In the United States, vacationers account for more than half of all visitors to what are technically called “pure aquariums” but for fewer than one quarter of all visitors to zoos, which usually include a “zoo aquarium” of relatively modest scope.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to account for the difference described above between visitors to zoos and visitors to pure aquariums?

(A) In cities that have both a zoo and a pure aquarium, local residents are twice as likely to visit the aquarium as they are to visit the zoo.
(B) Virtually all large metropolitan areas have zoos, whereas only a few large metropolitan areas have pure aquariums.
(C) Over the last ten years, newly constructed pure aquariums have outnumbered newly established zoos by a factor of two to one.
(D) People who visit a zoo in a given year are two times more likely to visit a pure aquarium that year than are people who do not visit a zoo.
(E) The zoo aquariums of zoos that are in the same city as a pure aquarium tend to be smaller than the aquariums of zoos that have no pure aquarium nearby.

[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
B


==
Explain yr Ans pls.


Hey, what's the source?

Not a single answer choice fits perfectly imo. I guess B is the closest, but it still assumes too much. Again, this is my opinion.

Thanks

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 6

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Feb 2011
Posts: 70

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Re: CR-Zoo Aquariums--Tricky for me [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Mar 2011, 07:25
agreed ...its B

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: I will not stop until i realise my goal which is my dream too
Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Posts: 222

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 16

Schools: Johnson '15
Re: In the United States, vacationers account for more than half [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Apr 2012, 22:45
nitya34 wrote:
In the United States, vacationers account for more than half of all visitors to what are technically called “pure aquariums” but for fewer than one quarter of all visitors to zoos, which usually include a “zoo aquarium” of relatively modest scope.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to account for the difference described above between visitors to zoos and visitors to pure aquariums?

(A) In cities that have both a zoo and a pure aquarium, local residents are twice as likely to visit the aquarium as they are to visit the zoo.
(B) Virtually all large metropolitan areas have zoos, whereas only a few large metropolitan areas have pure aquariums.
(C) Over the last ten years, newly constructed pure aquariums have outnumbered newly established zoos by a factor of two to one.
(D) People who visit a zoo in a given year are two times more likely to visit a pure aquarium that year than are people who do not visit a zoo.
(E) The zoo aquariums of zoos that are in the same city as a pure aquarium tend to be smaller than the aquariums of zoos that have no pure aquarium nearby.

==
Explain your Ans pls.



i had got confused with B and D and then went with B...now i feel that B is the right answer
_________________

Regards,
Harsha

Note: Give me kudos if my approach is right , else help me understand where i am missing.. I want to bell the GMAT Cat ;)

Satyameva Jayate - Truth alone triumphs

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 16

VP
VP
User avatar
Status: Been a long time guys...
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1378

Kudos [?]: 1703 [0], given: 62

Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.75
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: In the USA, Vacationers account for more than half of all [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jan 2013, 03:39
jgomey wrote:
In the USA, Vacationers account for more than half of all visitors to what are technically called "pure aquariums" but for fewer than one quarter of all visitors to zoos, which simply include a "zoo aquarium" of modest scope.

Which of the following, if true, helps to account for the difference described above between visitors to zoos and visitors to pure aquariums?

A. In cities that have both a zoo and a pure aquarium, local residents are twice as likely to visit the aquarium as they are to visit the zoo

B. Virtually all large metropolitan areas have zoos, whereas only a few metropolitan areas have pure aquariums.

C. Over the last 10 years newly constructed pure aquariums have outnumbered newly established zoos by a factor of 2 to 1

D. People who visit zoos in a given year are two times more likely to visit a pure aquarium that year than are people who do not visit the zoo.

E. The Zoo aquariums of Zoos that are in the same city as a pure aquarium tend to be smaller than the aquariums of zoos that have no pure aquarium nearby.


[Reveal] Spoiler:
Lets chat first


Hii.
I feel its B.
My reasoning is that since there is a shortage of pure aquariums, therefore this shortage becomes a reason why there is difference.
Let me know if more clarification is required.
Regards.
_________________

Prepositional Phrases Clarified|Elimination of BEING| Absolute Phrases Clarified
Rules For Posting
www.Univ-Scholarships.com

Kudos [?]: 1703 [0], given: 62

Board of Directors
User avatar
G
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3372

Kudos [?]: 9279 [0], given: 1168

Re: In the USA, Vacationers account for more than half of all [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jan 2013, 04:49

Kudos [?]: 9279 [0], given: 1168

VP
VP
User avatar
Status: Been a long time guys...
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1378

Kudos [?]: 1703 [0], given: 62

Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.75
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: In the USA, Vacationers account for more than half of all [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jan 2013, 07:40
I feel number can play a crucial role and the reason why C is being kicked is that it talks about NEW CONSTRUCTED ZOOS. lets see what others think.
_________________

Prepositional Phrases Clarified|Elimination of BEING| Absolute Phrases Clarified
Rules For Posting
www.Univ-Scholarships.com

Kudos [?]: 1703 [0], given: 62

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Jan 2013
Posts: 79

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 1

Re: In the USA, Vacationers account for more than half of all [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jan 2013, 15:03
Am really having trouble in understanding this today:-(

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 1

Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: GMAT Streetfighter!!
Joined: 22 Nov 2012
Posts: 61

Kudos [?]: 100 [0], given: 21

Location: United States
Concentration: Healthcare, Finance
GPA: 3.87
Re: In the USA, Vacationers account for more than half of all [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jan 2013, 16:59
Triforce wrote:
Quote:
In the USA, Vacationers account for more than half of all visitors to what are technically called "pure aquariums" but for fewer than one quarter of all visitors to zoos, which simply include a "zoo aquarium" of modest scope.


Which of the following, if true, helps to account for the difference described above between visitors to zoos and visitors to pure aquariums?


A. In cities that have both a zoo and a pure aquarium, local residents are twice as likely to visit the aquarium as they are to visit the zoo
Wrong Wrong direction if local residents (LRs) would be twice as likely to visit A then there would be less of them in Z. The passage supports that there are rather fewer LRs in A.

B. Virtually all large metropolitan areas have zoos, whereas only a few metropolitan areas have pure aquariums.
Correct One could conclude that people from other regions will go on vacation to visit A but not Z since they could do it at home. This would explain why the propotion of visitors to LRs is higher in A.


C. Over the last 10 years newly constructed pure aquariums have outnumbered newly established zoos by a factor of 2 to 1
Wrong Out of scope. We do not care about the number of Z or A.

D. People who visit zoos in a given year are two times more likely to visit a pure aquarium that year than are people who do not visit the zoo.
Wrong This says nothing about the relationship of the number of visitors to LRs in A or Z.


E. The Zoo aquariums of Zoos that are in the same city as a pure aquarium tend to be smaller than the aquariums of zoos that have no pure aquarium nearby.

Wrong Size says nothing about the relationship between the number of visitors to LRs.




Excellent Analysis!

I fell for C. My reasoning was as follows:

Since more aquariums are built, more aquariums exist compared to Zoos. This explains why more people are visiting aquariums. MY REASONING was clearly flawed, because I did not consider the possibility that more Zoos exist overall, despite the new construction.

B is the correct choice. As indicated earlier, less aquariums exist compared to the number of Zoos, so people must travel in order to visit a "Pure Aquarium."

Last edited by jgomey on 23 Jan 2013, 18:52, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 100 [0], given: 21

Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: GMAT Streetfighter!!
Joined: 22 Nov 2012
Posts: 61

Kudos [?]: 100 [0], given: 21

Location: United States
Concentration: Healthcare, Finance
GPA: 3.87
Re: In the USA, Vacationers account for more than half of all [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jan 2013, 18:49
Marcab wrote:
I feel number can play a crucial role and the reason why C is being kicked is that it talks about NEW CONSTRUCTED ZOOS. lets see what others think.



It's a trap-both nasty and deadly, and, perhaps, even downright dirty.

Kudos [?]: 100 [0], given: 21

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 12 Jan 2013
Posts: 57

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 13

Location: United States (NY)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V47
GPA: 3.89
Re: In the USA, Vacationers account for more than half of all [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jan 2013, 20:15
I also chose B, but for a different reason.

My thinking was that most pure aquariums are located in popular tourist destinations outside of metropolitan areas, so most of the visitors are on vacation. However, most of the zoos are in big cities and are thus mostly visited by local residents.

The creators of the question probably meant the other explanation, though, namely that if people can go to a zoo at home, they choose a pure aquarium while on vacation.
_________________

Sergey Orshanskiy, Ph.D.
I tutor in NYC: http://www.wyzant.com/Tutors/NY/New-York/7948121/#ref=1RKFOZ

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 13

Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: GMAT Streetfighter!!
Joined: 22 Nov 2012
Posts: 61

Kudos [?]: 100 [0], given: 21

Location: United States
Concentration: Healthcare, Finance
GPA: 3.87
Re: In the USA, Vacationers account for more than half of all [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jan 2013, 22:59
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
jgomey wrote:

I fell for C. My reasoning was as follows:

Since more aquariums are built, more aquariums exist compared to Zoos. This explains why more people are visiting aquariums. MY REASONING was clearly flawed, because I did not consider the possibility that more Zoos exist overall, despite the new construction.

B is the correct choice. As indicated earlier, less aquariums exist compared to the number of Zoos, so people must travel in order to visit a "Pure Aquarium."


Actually, notice another thing. You don't have to explain why more people are visiting pure aquariums (actually that may not be true. Overall, the number of people visiting pure aquariums might be lesser). You have to explain why visitors to pure aquariums are 50% vacationers (and other 50% are perhaps local people) while visitors to zoos are only 25% vacationers while other 75% are local people. The number of people visiting the pure aquarium and the number visiting the zoo are not an issue at all. The issue is the different demography: vacationers vs locals.
The reasons can be two:
- Vacationers find pure aquariums attractive for some reason (as C explains - its because there are fewer pure aquariums)
- Local people prefer zoo over pure aquarium (probably because their kids want to visit zoos and often)


That makes sense. Thank you for the explanation

Kudos [?]: 100 [0], given: 21

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Dec 2012
Posts: 226

Kudos [?]: 99 [0], given: 181

Concentration: Leadership, Marketing
GMAT 1: 540 Q36 V28
GMAT 2: 550 Q39 V27
GMAT 3: 620 Q42 V33
GPA: 2.82
WE: Human Resources (Health Care)
Re: In the United States, vacationers account for more than half [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Mar 2013, 04:58
Hmmmmmmmmmm ... I still believe that B is out of scope . Can any body clarify more why B in particular ? Thanks in advance
_________________

My RC Recipe
http://gmatclub.com/forum/the-rc-recipe-149577.html

My Problem Takeaway Template
http://gmatclub.com/forum/the-simplest-problem-takeaway-template-150646.html

Kudos [?]: 99 [0], given: 181

Re: In the United States, vacationers account for more than half   [#permalink] 13 Mar 2013, 04:58

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3    Next  [ 59 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

In the United States, vacationers account for more than half

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.