Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 24 May 2017, 05:05

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In the vast majority of cases, when people are stopped by

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

SVP
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1536
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 44

Kudos [?]: 1195 [0], given: 2

Re: This CR really drives me Crazy!!! metal detectors [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 Jul 2010, 14:37
JoshKnewton wrote:
Thanks for the discussion everyone.

Your confusion is understandable since the question was actually copied incorrectly!

In our materials, answer choice A reads "(A) Airport metal detectors, when set to LOWER levels of sensitivity..."

And then the answer is clearly A (though C does remain a strong second-best option). Here's the whole explanation.

--
We are given a situation in which airport metal detectors are said to be too sensitive, forcing innocent passengers carrying coins to be stopped. The argument states that innocent passengers would be stopped less often (because the small bits of harmless metal they are carrying would not set off detectors) with no loss of security (because weapons are not always metal, and if they are, use a larger amount of metal than a coin) if the detectors were programmed to be less sensitive. The correct answer will be additional evidence that supports the first claim without undermining the second.

Choice A: This choice is correct. This choice bolsters the claim that passengers, presumably innocent, with small bits of metal that are not weapons (watches, belts or jean rivets) will not be stopped unnecessarily. Although this choice adds nothing to the claim that security will retain its ability to screen for weapons, it does not undermine it either.

Choice B: The cost of the proposed plan is not at issue. The desired effect of the plan is to retain security and reduce innocent passenger stops, and this choice does not effect either of those issues.

Choice C: This is a very tempting answer choice, because it is a positive aspect of low-sensitivity metal detectors, but this choice does not, in fact, directly address the claim that fewer innocent people will be stopped by the low-sensitivity detectors. This choice only applies to people already carrying weapons, who are not, by definition, innocent.

Choice D: This choice undermines the claim. If passengers who are stopped for having small amounts of metal are carrying weapons, then reducing security's ability to stop them would hamper the ability to screen for weapons.

Choice E: This choice also undermines the proposal. If only small pieces of metal are used in weapons, then a metal detector must be able to detect small pieces of metal to detect weapons.

But the conclusion has 2 points:
- Reduce the frequency with which innocent passengers are stopped.
- Not to hamper security’s ability to screen for weapons.

A addresses the first point, but not the second one; and C vice versa.

So, how you can say that A is better than C?
Thanks.
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Senior Manager
Joined: 23 May 2010
Posts: 430
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 117 [0], given: 112

Re: This CR really drives me Crazy!!! metal detectors [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 Jul 2010, 22:20
c....but now A ....not after correction but after reading the explantion
Manager
Joined: 02 Apr 2010
Posts: 96
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 1

Re: This CR really drives me Crazy!!! metal detectors [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 Jul 2010, 23:04
no wonder it doesn't make sense.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10371
Followers: 997

Kudos [?]: 224 [0], given: 0

Re: In the vast majority of cases, when people are stopped by [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 Jun 2015, 14:55
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: In the vast majority of cases, when people are stopped by   [#permalink] 05 Jun 2015, 14:55

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 24 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 In recent decades, the vast majority of construction 14 20 May 2015, 05:19
19 Surveys reveal that the vast majority of hotel guests in the 10 19 Apr 2017, 11:26
14 Springfi eld Fire Commissioner: The vast majority of false 9 05 Dec 2015, 11:20
11 Springfield Fire Commissioner: the vast majority of false 7 19 Apr 2017, 23:30
1 Springfield Fire Commissioner: the vast majority of false 9 21 Apr 2014, 04:14
Display posts from previous: Sort by