GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 19 Jun 2018, 11:17

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In the wake of World War I, the terms of the Versailles treaty restric

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

4 KUDOS received
Retired Moderator
avatar
Joined: 29 Apr 2015
Posts: 868
Location: Switzerland
Concentration: Economics, Finance
Schools: LBS MIF '19
WE: Asset Management (Investment Banking)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
In the wake of World War I, the terms of the Versailles treaty restric [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jun 2015, 08:39
4
21
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

33% (01:21) correct 67% (01:40) wrong based on 791 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

In the wake of World War I, the terms of the Versailles treaty restricted the size of the German army to no more than 100,000 troops, in essence demanding that its numbers be seven times smaller than in 1904.

A. Versailles treaty restricted the size of the German army to no more than 100,000 troops, in essence demanding that its numbers be seven times smaller than in 1904
B. treaty of Versailles demanded in essence that the German army will be seven times smaller than in 1904 and restricted its number to no more than 100,000 troops
C. Versailles treaty demanded that the numbers of the German army's troops be seven times less than in 1904; doing so, in essence, would restrict its size to no more than 100,000 troops
D. treaty of Versailles restricted the German army's size and, in essence, demanded that its numbers be seven times smaller than in 1904 - no more than 100,000 troops
E. Versailles treaty restricted the size of the German army and demanded that, numbering no more than 100,000 troops, they be seven times smaller than in 1904

_________________

Saving was yesterday, heat up the gmatclub.forum's sentiment by spending KUDOS!

PS Please send me PM if I do not respond to your question within 24 hours.

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 24 Oct 2014
Posts: 40
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GMAT 2: 760 Q48 V47
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: In the wake of World War I, the terms of the Versailles treaty restric [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Jul 2015, 15:14
reto wrote:
In the wake of World War I, the terms of the Versailles treaty restricted the size of the German army to no more than 100,000 troops, in essence demanding that its numbers be seven times smaller than in 1904.

A. Versailles treaty restricted the size of the German army to no more than 100,000 troops, in essence demanding that its numbers be seven times smaller than in 1904
B. treaty of Versailles demanded in essence that the German army will be seven times smaller than in 1904 and restricted its number to no more than 100,000 troops
C. Versailles treaty demanded that the numbers of the German army's troops be seven times less than in 1904; doing so, in essence, would restrict its size to no more than 100,000 troops
D. treaty of Versailles restricted the German army's size and, in essence, demanded that its numbers be seven times smaller than in 1904 - no more than 100,000 troops
E. Versailles treaty restricted the size of the German army and demanded that, numbering no more than 100,000 troops, they be seven times smaller than in 1904


Could you please post the OE. I am confused between A and D.
1 KUDOS received
Retired Moderator
avatar
Joined: 29 Apr 2015
Posts: 868
Location: Switzerland
Concentration: Economics, Finance
Schools: LBS MIF '19
WE: Asset Management (Investment Banking)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: In the wake of World War I, the terms of the Versailles treaty restric [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Jul 2015, 22:27
1
2
nphatak wrote:
reto wrote:
In the wake of World War I, the terms of the Versailles treaty restricted the size of the German army to no more than 100,000 troops, in essence demanding that its numbers be seven times smaller than in 1904.

A. Versailles treaty restricted the size of the German army to no more than 100,000 troops, in essence demanding that its numbers be seven times smaller than in 1904
B. treaty of Versailles demanded in essence that the German army will be seven times smaller than in 1904 and restricted its number to no more than 100,000 troops
C. Versailles treaty demanded that the numbers of the German army's troops be seven times less than in 1904; doing so, in essence, would restrict its size to no more than 100,000 troops
D. treaty of Versailles restricted the German army's size and, in essence, demanded that its numbers be seven times smaller than in 1904 - no more than 100,000 troops
E. Versailles treaty restricted the size of the German army and demanded that, numbering no more than 100,000 troops, they be seven times smaller than in 1904


Could you please post the OE. I am confused between A and D.


Here you are:

A. Wrong modifier. "In essence" should appear next to what it modifies (the terms of the versailles treaty.
B. Subjunctive Rule!
C. Numbers should idiomatically be described by "smaller"
D. Corrects the ambiguity in the original Sentence by changing the modifier demanding into a conjugated verb demanded, making it clear that it refers to the terms of the treaty of Versailles.
E. "While this answer choice corrects the original ambiguity, it is illogical. The plural pronoun they can only refer to plural noun. However, because numbering no more than 100,000 troops is between commas, the only plural noun in the main clause is terms. It is illogical to say that the terms demanded that the terms be smaller. "
_________________

Saving was yesterday, heat up the gmatclub.forum's sentiment by spending KUDOS!

PS Please send me PM if I do not respond to your question within 24 hours.

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Oct 2013
Posts: 238
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT Date: 03-02-2015
GPA: 3.88
In the wake of World War I, the terms of the Versailles treaty restric [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Jul 2015, 01:02
1
Here we go -

The fight is between option A and Option D, rest of the options are easy to eliminate

Actually the statement is talking about a past event.

Option A - 1.) demanding that its............ is a present participle.
2.) restricted is a past tense verb(PTV) and PTV and present participle can't be paralleled. Hence parallelism error
3.) Treaty of Versailles is anytime preferred and more concise that Versailles Treaty. Consider the analogy - Boston Soldiers and Soldiers of Boston.



Option B - Tense error

Option C - unnecessary wordy ----- pronoun error (its)

Option D - Correct

option E - Awkward construction - pronoun error(they)
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 06 Feb 2016
Posts: 30
Reviews Badge
Re: In the wake of World War I, the terms of the Versailles treaty restric [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jul 2016, 00:02
After 1 year :-D !!

Hi Reto@,

Thanks for the explanation . Can you please explain subjective rule in option 2 .

Abhijit
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2016
Posts: 48
Location: China
Concentration: Finance, Nonprofit
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V33
GMAT 2: 690 Q51 V31
GMAT 3: 710 Q50 V36
GPA: 3.4
Re: In the wake of World War I, the terms of the Versailles treaty restric [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jul 2016, 00:12
D: treaty of Versailles restricted the German army's size and, in essence, demanded that its numbers be seven times smaller than in 1904 - no more than 100,000 troops

IMO the last part does not unequivocally modify its numbers in the wake of WWI; it can also modify the numbers in 1904. Thus D is ambiguity.

tks,
_________________

It's better to burn out than to fade away.

Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2016
Posts: 48
Location: China
Concentration: Finance, Nonprofit
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V33
GMAT 2: 690 Q51 V31
GMAT 3: 710 Q50 V36
GPA: 3.4
Re: In the wake of World War I, the terms of the Versailles treaty restric [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jul 2016, 00:12
D: treaty of Versailles restricted the German army's size and, in essence, demanded that its numbers be seven times smaller than in 1904 - no more than 100,000 troops

IMO the last part does not unequivocally modify its numbers in the wake of WWI; it can also modify the numbers in 1904. Thus D is ambiguity.

tks,
_________________

It's better to burn out than to fade away.

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 05 Sep 2016
Posts: 16
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: In the wake of World War I, the terms of the Versailles treaty restric [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Mar 2017, 06:59
reto wrote:
In the wake of World War I, the terms of the Versailles treaty restricted the size of the German army to no more than 100,000 troops, in essence demanding that its numbers be seven times smaller than in 1904.

A. Versailles treaty restricted the size of the German army to no more than 100,000 troops, in essence demanding that its numbers be seven times smaller than in 1904
B. treaty of Versailles demanded in essence that the German army will be seven times smaller than in 1904 and restricted its number to no more than 100,000 troops
C. Versailles treaty demanded that the numbers of the German army's troops be seven times less than in 1904; doing so, in essence, would restrict its size to no more than 100,000 troops
D. treaty of Versailles restricted the German army's size and, in essence, demanded that its numbers be seven times smaller than in 1904 - no more than 100,000 troops
E. Versailles treaty restricted the size of the German army and demanded that, numbering no more than 100,000 troops, they be seven times smaller than in 1904



I know b is wrong due to tense error but isn't option B a subjunctive structure and then to use be form after that sounds right. I was confused between B and D.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 20 Sep 2016
Posts: 118
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V35
GPA: 3.99
Re: In the wake of World War I, the terms of the Versailles treaty restric [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Mar 2017, 08:24
jamescath wrote:

I know b is wrong due to tense error but isn't option B a subjunctive structure and then to use be form after that sounds right. I was confused between B and D.


I think that it would change the meaning slightly. Subjunctive is also used to express wishes, hypotheticals and commands (hence demands might seem appropriate). But demanded is here more used descriptively, to better explain consequences of the main thing the treaty did: restrict the army size. Therefore D is more precise.

By the way, the usage of hyphen confused me in D :oops:
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 05 Sep 2016
Posts: 16
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: In the wake of World War I, the terms of the Versailles treaty restric [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Mar 2017, 10:13
kivalo wrote:
jamescath wrote:

I know b is wrong due to tense error but isn't option B a subjunctive structure and then to use be form after that sounds right. I was confused between B and D.


I think that it would change the meaning slightly. Subjunctive is also used to express wishes, hypotheticals and commands (hence demands might seem appropriate). But demanded is here more used descriptively, to better explain consequences of the main thing the treaty did: restrict the army size. Therefore D is more precise.

By the way, the usage of hyphen confused me in D :oops:


Yea I guess you're right thanks :)
3 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 12 Mar 2017
Posts: 49
Re: In the wake of World War I, the terms of the Versailles treaty restric [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Mar 2017, 06:50
3
In the wake of World War I, the terms of the Versailles treaty restricted the size of the German army to no more than 100,000 troops, in essence demanding that its numbers be seven times smaller than in 1904.

Elimination round 1

A. Versailles treaty restricted the size of the German army to no more than 100,000 troops, in essence demanding that its numbers be seven times smaller than in 1904
B. treaty of Versailles demanded in essence that the German army will be seven times smaller than in 1904 and restricted its number to no more than 100,000 troops
C. Versailles treaty demanded that the numbers of the German army's troops be seven times less than in 1904; doing so, in essence, would restrict its size to no more than 100,000 troops
D. treaty of Versailles restricted the German army's size and, in essence, demanded that its numbers be seven times smaller than in 1904 - no more than 100,000 troops
E. Versailles treaty restricted the size of the German army and demanded that, numbering no more than 100,000 troops, they be seven times smaller than in 1904

Versatile's treaty is a possessive modifier. "Terms" is modifying Versailles which is wrong. It should modify treaty. So it should be treaty of Versailles. "Terms" of the "Treaty" of the Versailles. Modifier touch rule.

Elimination round 2

B. treaty of Versailles demanded in essence that the German army will be seven times smaller than in 1904 and restricted its number to no more than 100,000 troops

D. treaty of Versailles restricted the German army's size and, in essence, demanded that its numbers be seven times smaller than in 1904 - no more than 100,000 troops

Meaning: How can a treaty demand? It is a signed contract meaning the decision has been already taken. So it restricts now.

Hence D
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 19 Jan 2018
Posts: 1
In the wake of World War I, the terms of the Versailles treaty restric [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 25 Jan 2018, 09:12
Just want to understand what makes the right answer right and the wrong answers wrong.

Originally posted by CharliePGE on 19 Jan 2018, 17:41.
Last edited by CharliePGE on 25 Jan 2018, 09:12, edited 1 time in total.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 03 Dec 2016
Posts: 33
Re: In the wake of World War I, the terms of the Versailles treaty restric [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Jan 2018, 11:52
Hi,

Had a doubt in option D.

D. treaty of Versailles restricted the German army's size and, in essence, demanded that its numbers be seven times smaller than in 1904 - no more than 100,000 troops

As German army serves as a possessive noun for size, I felt there is no antecedent for "its" and hence thought this option to be wrong. What is the mistake I'm committing here?
Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 23 May 2017
Posts: 226
Concentration: Finance, Accounting
WE: Programming (Energy and Utilities)
CAT Tests
Re: In the wake of World War I, the terms of the Versailles treaty restric [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Jan 2018, 14:17
In the wake of WWI, the terms of the X
restricted the size of the german army to Y, in essence demanding that its numbers be seven times smaller than in 1904.

Isn't the Verb+ing - "demanding" an adverbial modifier modifying the restriction of the size of german army. Why is A incorrect.

In D : Restricted and demanded becomes parallel ( giving the idea that these are two separate events - not linked to each other - which is not the case here)

The restriction was qualified as demand :
_________________

If you like the post, please award me Kudos!! It motivates me

Expert Post
Verbal Expert
User avatar
G
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3200
Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: In the wake of World War I, the terms of the Versailles treaty restric [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jan 2018, 05:49
Novice90 wrote:
Hi,

Had a doubt in option D.

D. treaty of Versailles restricted the German army's size and, in essence, demanded that its numbers be seven times smaller than in 1904 - no more than 100,000 troops

As German army serves as a possessive noun for size, I felt there is no antecedent for "its" and hence thought this option to be wrong. What is the mistake I'm committing here?


A possessive pronoun can refer to a possessive noun (or a personal noun). The problem is with a personal pronoun referring to a possessive noun.
Expert Post
Verbal Expert
User avatar
G
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3200
Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: In the wake of World War I, the terms of the Versailles treaty restric [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jan 2018, 06:10
Leo8 wrote:
In the wake of WWI, the terms of the X
restricted the size of the german army to Y, in essence demanding that its numbers be seven times smaller than in 1904.

Isn't the Verb+ing - "demanding" an adverbial modifier modifying the restriction of the size of german army. Why is A incorrect.

In D : Restricted and demanded becomes parallel ( giving the idea that these are two separate events - not linked to each other - which is not the case here)

The restriction was qualified as demand :


Yes, the participle is a better choice in this case - there is no solid reason to select D over A.
Re: In the wake of World War I, the terms of the Versailles treaty restric   [#permalink] 23 Jan 2018, 06:10
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In the wake of World War I, the terms of the Versailles treaty restric

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.