It is currently 20 Nov 2017, 01:23

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In the xy-plane, region R consists of all the points (x, y)

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Retired Moderator
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1628

Kudos [?]: 1120 [11], given: 109

Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
In the xy-plane, region R consists of all the points (x, y) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Oct 2010, 20:27
11
KUDOS
126
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

40% (01:49) correct 60% (01:45) wrong based on 2135 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In the xy-plane, region R consists of all the points (x,y) such that $$2x + 3y\leq{6}$$. Is the point (r,s) in region R?

(1) $$3r + 2s = 6$$
(2) $$r\leq{3}$$ and $$s\leq{2}$$
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Last edited by Bunuel on 25 Dec 2012, 04:01, edited 2 times in total.
Renamed the topic and edited the question.

Kudos [?]: 1120 [11], given: 109

Retired Moderator
Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Posts: 793

Kudos [?]: 1209 [41], given: 25

Location: London

### Show Tags

04 Oct 2010, 23:24
41
KUDOS
34
This post was
BOOKMARKED
metallicafan wrote:
In the xy-plane, region R consists of all the points (x, y) such that $$2x + 3y =< 6$$ . Is the point (r,s) in region R?

(1) $$3r + 2s = 6$$
(2) $$r=< 3$$ and $$s=< 2$$

Ok, the easiest way to solve this is to visualize the graph with the lines plotted on it.
2x+3y<=6, is the region below the line with X-intercept 3 and Y-intercept 2. We know it is that region, because (0,0) lies below the line and it satisfies the inequality. And all points on one side of the line satisfy the same sign of inequality. (BLUE LINE)

(1) : The line 3r+2s=6 (PURPLE LINE) represents the second line shown in the figure. It can be above or below the other line. So insufficient.
(2) : r<=3 & s<=2. Again easy to see from the graph even with that constraint, the point (r,s) may lie above or below the line in question

(1+2) : the two conditions together, only take a section of the 3r+2s=6 line as a solution, but again even with r<=3, s<=2, its not sufficient to keep solutions below the 2x + 3y =< 6 line

In questions like these, once you are comfortable with graphs, you can solve in less than 30 seconds fairly easily.
Let me know if the method isn't clear
_________________

Last edited by Bunuel on 05 Aug 2012, 07:29, edited 1 time in total.
Edited the diagram.

Kudos [?]: 1209 [41], given: 25

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 42264

Kudos [?]: 132745 [32], given: 12371

### Show Tags

05 Oct 2010, 03:37
32
KUDOS
Expert's post
56
This post was
BOOKMARKED
metallicafan wrote:
In the xy-plane, region R consists of all the points (x, y) such that $$2x + 3y =< 6$$ . Is the point (r,s) in region R?

(1) $$3r + 2s = 6$$
(2) $$r=< 3$$ and $$s=< 2$$

Though the solution provided by shrouded1 above is perfectly OK, it's doubtful that can be done in 2-3 minutes.

So I'd say the best way for this question would be to try boundary values.

Q: is $$2r+3s\leq{6}$$?

(1) $$3r + 2s = 6$$ --> very easy to see that this statement is not sufficient:
If $$r=2$$ and $$s=0$$ then $$2r+3s=4<{6}$$, so the answer is YES;
If $$r=0$$ and $$s=3$$ then $$2r+3s=9>6$$, so the answer is NO.
Not sufficient.

(2) $$r\leq{3}$$ and $$s\leq{2}$$ --> also very easy to see that this statement is not sufficient:
If $$r=0$$ and $$s=0$$ then $$2r+3s=0<{6}$$, so the answer is YES;
If $$r=3$$ and $$s=2$$ then $$2r+3s=12>6$$, so the answer is NO.
Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) We already have an example for YES answer in (1) which valid for combined statements:
If $$r=2<3$$ and $$s=0<2$$ then $$2r+3s=4<{6}$$, so the answer is YES;
To get NO answer try max possible value of $$s$$, which is $$s=2$$, then from (1) $$r=\frac{2}{3}<3$$ --> $$2r+3s=\frac{4}{3}+6>6$$, so the answer is NO.
Not sufficient.

Hope it's clear.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 132745 [32], given: 12371

Retired Moderator
Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Posts: 793

Kudos [?]: 1209 [5], given: 25

Location: London

### Show Tags

07 Oct 2010, 02:53
5
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Graphs are good for the soul !
When I was taught all this, we were always told to use graphs where possible (algebra is drab :p) ... Once you are used to it, questions like these should take < 30secs !!
_________________

Kudos [?]: 1209 [5], given: 25

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 42264

Kudos [?]: 132745 [4], given: 12371

### Show Tags

07 Oct 2010, 02:34
4
KUDOS
Expert's post
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
metallicafan wrote:
Thanks Bunuel for the explanation! It's very clear. However, I have some questions about your criteria to choose the values:

Bunuel wrote:

(2) $$r\leq{3}$$ and $$s\leq{2}$$ --> also very easy to see that this statement is not sufficient:
If $$r=0$$ and $$s=0$$ then $$2r+3s=0<{6}$$, so the answer is YES;

How did you know that you had to use those values ($$r=0$$ and $$s=0$$)?

Bunuel wrote:

(1)+(2) We already have an example for YES answer in (1) which valid for combined statements:
(...)
To get NO answer try max possible value of $$s$$, which is $$s=2$$, then from (1) $$r=\frac{2}{3}<3$$ --> $$2r+3s=\frac{4}{3}+6>6$$, so the answer is NO.
Not sufficient.

The same. How did you know that you had to use the max possible value. How did you know that this value will give you a NO answer.

I think that's the key of the problem.

Thanks!

On DS questions when plugging numbers, goal is to prove that the statement is not sufficient. So we should try to get a YES answer with one chosen number(s) and a NO with another.

For (2) given that $$r\leq{3}$$ and $$s\leq{2}$$ and we should see whether $$2r+3s<{6}$$ is true.

Now, as lower limits of $$r$$ ans $$s$$ are not given then it's really easy to get an YES answer if we choose small enough values for them, to simplify calculation let's try $$r=0$$ and $$s=0$$ --> $$2r+3s=0<{6}$$, so the answer is YES;

For NO answer let's try max possible value of $$r$$ ans $$s$$: $$r=3$$ and $$s=2$$ then $$2r+3s=12>6$$, so the answer is NO.

For (1)+(2) Yes answer is from (1).
To get NO answer we should maximize $$2r+3s$$ to see whetrher this expression can be more than $$6$$: try max possible value of $$r$$, which is $$r=3$$, then from (1) $$s=-\frac{3}{2}<2$$ --> $$2r+3s=6-\frac{9}{2}\leq{6}$$, still YES answer, we need NO;

So now try max possible value of $$s$$, which is $$s=2$$, then from (1) $$r=\frac{2}{3}<3$$ --> $$2r+3s=\frac{4}{3}+6>6$$, so the answer is NO. Done.

Hope it's clear,
_________________

Kudos [?]: 132745 [4], given: 12371

Retired Moderator
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1628

Kudos [?]: 1120 [2], given: 109

Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs

### Show Tags

07 Oct 2010, 00:15
2
KUDOS
Thanks Bunuel for the explanation! It's very clear. However, I have some questions about your criteria to choose the values:

Bunuel wrote:

(2) $$r\leq{3}$$ and $$s\leq{2}$$ --> also very easy to see that this statement is not sufficient:
If $$r=0$$ and $$s=0$$ then $$2r+3s=0<{6}$$, so the answer is YES;

How did you know that you had to use those values ($$r=0$$ and $$s=0$$)?

Bunuel wrote:
(1)+(2) We already have an example for YES answer in (1) which valid for combined statements:
(...)
To get NO answer try max possible value of $$s$$, which is $$s=2$$, then from (1) $$r=\frac{2}{3}<3$$ --> $$2r+3s=\frac{4}{3}+6>6$$, so the answer is NO.
Not sufficient.

The same. How did you know that you had to use the max possible value. How did you know that this value will give you a NO answer.

I think that's the key of the problem.

Thanks!
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1120 [2], given: 109

Director
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 610

Kudos [?]: 1072 [2], given: 43

WE: Science (Education)
Re: In the xy-plane, region R consists of all the points (x, y) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Aug 2012, 05:13
2
KUDOS
harshavmrg wrote:
metallicafan wrote:
In the xy-plane, region R consists of all the points (x, y) such that $$2x + 3y =< 6$$ . Is the point (r,s) in region R?

(1) $$3r + 2s = 6$$
(2) $$r=< 3$$ and $$s=< 2$$

I followed a very manual process of mapping the data and then finding out the answer E( which is said the OA)

Yes! Using a graphical/visual approach is much faster. Try to understand shrouded1's approach presented above.
Just the link to the graph is not working/missing.

Once you have a good command of the basic necessary tools, it's a piece of cake.
If you need more help, get in touch with me.
_________________

PhD in Applied Mathematics
Love GMAT Quant questions and running.

Kudos [?]: 1072 [2], given: 43

Intern
Joined: 05 May 2013
Posts: 27

Kudos [?]: 23 [2], given: 5

GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V39
GRE 1: 1480 Q800 V680
Re: In the xy-plane, region R consists of all the points (x, y) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Jul 2013, 22:50
2
KUDOS
(1) Not sufficient. since we do not know the value of 2r+3s.

(2) If r and s are 0 and 0, it satisfies the inequality. however, if r=3 and s =2, it doesn't. So, insufficient.

We need to know the values of 2r+3s. We are given the value of 3r+2s.
2r+3s=3r+2s-r+s = 6 +(s-r). If s< r inequality is satisfied. Taking (1) +(2) together still doesn't give us the information of whether s <r.

Kudos [?]: 23 [2], given: 5

SVP
Joined: 08 Jul 2010
Posts: 1847

Kudos [?]: 2343 [2], given: 51

Location: India
GMAT: INSIGHT
WE: Education (Education)
Re: In the xy-plane, region R consists of all the points (x, y) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Jun 2015, 03:26
2
KUDOS
Expert's post
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
gaurav0480 wrote:
metallicafan wrote:
In the xy-plane, region R consists of all the points (x,y) such that $$2x + 3y\leq{6}$$. Is the point (r,5) in region R?

(1) $$3r + 2s = 6$$
(2) $$r\leq{3}$$ and $$s\leq{2}$$

I took nearly 10 min to solve. Probably on the test i would have guessed and moved on. Please correct the highlighted error. IMO graphical approach will lead to a quicker solution.

This Questions isn't worth 10 Mins

and You are right about Graphical method to be superior in this question but please ensure that while plotting graphically the approximate correct locations are marked on the graph paper

Step 1: Plot the equation of line 2x+3y = 6 by graphing points (0,2) and (3,0) [The easiest points to be taken by substituting x and y zero and making two cases]

Step 2: Since the given relation is inequation with the sign < hence understand that the questions is asking whether point (r,s) lie below the line or not

Step 3: Draw the line given in Statement 1 by taking points (0,3) and (2,0) and conclude that this statement is NOT sufficient because some points on this line lie in the region R e.g.(2,0) and some are outside like point (0,3)

Step 4: Draw the two lines given in Statement 2 which are Vertical and Horizontal respectively and and conclude that this statement is NOT sufficient because some points on these two line lie in the region R and some are outside the region R

Step 5: Combine the two statements and see the graphs drawn together. You will realize that some of the enclosed region represented by graphs of Statement 1 and 2 together is outside the region R and most of the region is inside region R hence conclude INSUFFICIENT

[Reveal] Spoiler:
C

_________________

Prosper!!!
GMATinsight
Bhoopendra Singh and Dr.Sushma Jha
e-mail: info@GMATinsight.com I Call us : +91-9999687183 / 9891333772
Online One-on-One Skype based classes and Classroom Coaching in South and West Delhi
http://www.GMATinsight.com/testimonials.html

22 ONLINE FREE (FULL LENGTH) GMAT CAT (PRACTICE TESTS) LINK COLLECTION

Kudos [?]: 2343 [2], given: 51

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 42264

Kudos [?]: 132745 [1], given: 12371

### Show Tags

25 Feb 2011, 12:59
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
gmat1220 wrote:
Bunuel
Pardon me. Let me rephrase. Hypothetically if point (r,s) lie in the region R. The equation becomes 2r + 3s <=6. Hence at s=0 r<=3 and at r=0 s<=2. So my question is can i paraphrase ?

the question 2r+3s<=6?
to whether r<=3 and s<=2?

Am I assuming too much
Bunuel wrote:
Not sure that I understood your question. Anyway: region R is not some closed figure it's the the REGION below the line y=2-2/3*x.

Certainly you CANNOT rephrase "is $$2r+3s\leq{6}$$?" to "is $$r\leq{3}$$ and $$s\leq{2}$$?". There is an example in my solution showing that.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 132745 [1], given: 12371

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 42264

Kudos [?]: 132745 [1], given: 12371

### Show Tags

04 Aug 2012, 02:52
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
shreya717 wrote:

This is how I solved the question and im arriving at the wrong answer. Please could someone correct me.

Given:- equation of the line is 2x+3y<6
Thus, y<2/3x+2
the y and x intercepts of the given line are y<2 and x <3 respectively.

Statement 2 gives us that r (x) < 2 and s (y) <3. Therefore i concluded statment 2 is suff to answer the question. Am i going wrong in the calculation?

Thanks.

First of all $$2x+3y\leq{6}$$ can be rewritten as $$y\leq{2-\frac{2}{3}*x}$$, not as $$y\leq{2+\frac{2}{3}*x}$$. Next, it's not equation of a line, it gives the region which is below line $$y={2-\frac{2}{3}*x}$$, so all your farther conclusions are wrong.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 132745 [1], given: 12371

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 42264

Kudos [?]: 132745 [1], given: 12371

In the xy-plane, region R consists of all the points (x, y) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Sep 2012, 06:27
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
smartass666 wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
egiles wrote:
In the xy-plane, region R consists of all the points (x,y), such that 2x +3y <= 6. Is the point (r,s) in region R?

1) 3r +2s = 6
2) r<= 3 and s<= 2

Merging similar topics.

Can you provide the solution for this question?

Graphic Approach: in-the-xy-plane-region-r-consists-of-all-the-points-x-y-102233.html#p794049
Number Plugging: in-the-xy-plane-region-r-consists-of-all-the-points-x-y-102233.html#p794138 and in-the-xy-plane-region-r-consists-of-all-the-points-x-y-102233.html#p795613

Hope it helps.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 132745 [1], given: 12371

Intern
Joined: 08 Sep 2012
Posts: 14

Kudos [?]: 8 [1], given: 10

GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V45
WE: General Management (Non-Profit and Government)
Re: In the xy-plane, region R consists of all the points (x, y) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Dec 2012, 03:47
1
KUDOS
metallicafan wrote:
In the xy-plane, region R consists of all the points (x,y) such that $$2x + 3y\leq{6}$$. Is the point (r,5) in region R?

(1) $$3r + 2s = 6$$
(2) $$r\leq{3}$$ and $$s\leq{2}$$

I took nearly 10 min to solve. Probably on the test i would have guessed and moved on. Please correct the highlighted error. IMO graphical approach will lead to a quicker solution.

Kudos [?]: 8 [1], given: 10

SVP
Joined: 08 Jul 2010
Posts: 1847

Kudos [?]: 2343 [1], given: 51

Location: India
GMAT: INSIGHT
WE: Education (Education)
Re: In the xy-plane, region R consists of all the points (x, y) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Jun 2015, 06:27
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Swaroopdev wrote:
Hi Bunuel,

Any link to similar problems like this ?

Thanks.

search.php?search_tags=all&selected_search_tags%5B%5D=41&selected_search_tags%5B%5D=180

search.php?search_tags=all&selected_search_tags%5B%5D=41&selected_search_tags%5B%5D=222

search.php?search_tags=all&selected_search_tags%5B%5D=62&selected_search_tags%5B%5D=187

search.php?search_tags=all&selected_search_tags%5B%5D=62&selected_search_tags%5B%5D=216
_________________

Prosper!!!
GMATinsight
Bhoopendra Singh and Dr.Sushma Jha
e-mail: info@GMATinsight.com I Call us : +91-9999687183 / 9891333772
Online One-on-One Skype based classes and Classroom Coaching in South and West Delhi
http://www.GMATinsight.com/testimonials.html

22 ONLINE FREE (FULL LENGTH) GMAT CAT (PRACTICE TESTS) LINK COLLECTION

Kudos [?]: 2343 [1], given: 51

Manager
Joined: 31 Oct 2011
Posts: 52

Kudos [?]: 32 [1], given: 25

Location: India
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V32
GPA: 3.56
WE: Programming (Computer Software)
Re: In the xy-plane, region R consists of all the points (x, y) [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Sep 2016, 10:53
1
KUDOS
I tried the graph method and was right in plotting it out.

Could someone help me understand why
"(2) : r<=3 & s<=2. Again easy to see from the graph even with that constraint, the point (r,s) may lie above or below the line in question"

From the graph, we see that any point with r<=3 and s<=2 will definitely lie under the blue line. Where am I going wrong here?

I understand that if we were to substitute r and s as 3 and 2 in the original equation,we would get the solution though. Just wanted to know what am I doing wrong here

Kudos [?]: 32 [1], given: 25

Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 871

Kudos [?]: 401 [0], given: 123

### Show Tags

25 Feb 2011, 11:59
Bunuel,
Thanks for the solution ! Please correct me.

If (r,s) is inside the region R on the XY plane, as per equation 2r + 3s <=6 is true.
That also means that r is bounded (when s=0) i.e. r<=3
s is also bounded (when r=0) is s<=2

Hence r<=3 and s<=2 should be sufficient. Am I missing something? Please clarify.

Kudos [?]: 401 [0], given: 123

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 42264

Kudos [?]: 132745 [0], given: 12371

### Show Tags

25 Feb 2011, 12:14
gmat1220 wrote:
Bunuel,
Thanks for the solution ! Please correct me.

If (r,s) is inside the region R on the XY plane, as per equation 2r + 3s <=6 is true.
That also means that r is bounded (when s=0) i.e. r<=3
s is also bounded (when r=0) is s<=2

Hence r<=3 and s<=2 should be sufficient. Am I missing something? Please clarify.

Not sure that I understood your question. Anyway: region R is not some closed figure it's the the REGION below the line y=2-2/3*x.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 132745 [0], given: 12371

Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 871

Kudos [?]: 401 [0], given: 123

### Show Tags

25 Feb 2011, 12:50
Bunuel
Pardon me. Let me rephrase. Hypothetically if point (r,s) lie in the region R. The equation becomes 2r + 3s <=6. Hence at s=0 r<=3 and at r=0 s<=2. So my question is can i paraphrase ?

the question 2r+3s<=6?
to whether r<=3 and s<=2?

Am I assuming too much
Bunuel wrote:
Not sure that I understood your question. Anyway: region R is not some closed figure it's the the REGION below the line y=2-2/3*x.

Kudos [?]: 401 [0], given: 123

Intern
Joined: 01 Aug 2011
Posts: 23

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 15

### Show Tags

04 Aug 2012, 02:31
Bunuel wrote:
gmat1220 wrote:
Bunuel
Pardon me. Let me rephrase. Hypothetically if point (r,s) lie in the region R. The equation becomes 2r + 3s <=6. Hence at s=0 r<=3 and at r=0 s<=2. So my question is can i paraphrase ?

the question 2r+3s<=6?
to whether r<=3 and s<=2?

Am I assuming too much
Bunuel wrote:
Not sure that I understood your question. Anyway: region R is not some closed figure it's the the REGION below the line y=2-2/3*x.

Certainly you CAN NOT rephrase "is $$2r+3s\leq{6}$$?" to "is $$r\leq{3}$$ and $$s\leq{2}$$?". There is an example in my solution showing that.

This is how I solved the question and im arriving at the wrong answer. Please could someone correct me.

Given:- equation of the line is 2x+3y<6
Thus, y<2/3x+2
the y and x intercepts of the given line are y<2 and x <3 respectively.

Statement 2 gives us that r (x) < 2 and s (y) <3. Therefore i concluded statment 2 is suff to answer the question. Am i going wrong in the calculation?

Thanks.

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 15

Intern
Joined: 01 Aug 2011
Posts: 23

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 15

### Show Tags

04 Aug 2012, 03:30
Bunuel wrote:
shreya717 wrote:

This is how I solved the question and im arriving at the wrong answer. Please could someone correct me.

Given:- equation of the line is 2x+3y<6
Thus, y<2/3x+2
the y and x intercepts of the given line are y<2 and x <3 respectively.

Statement 2 gives us that r (x) < 2 and s (y) <3. Therefore i concluded statment 2 is suff to answer the question. Am i going wrong in the calculation?

Thanks.

First of all $$2x+3y\leq{6}$$ can be rewritten as $$y\leq{2-\frac{2}{3}*x}$$, not as $$y\leq{2+\frac{2}{3}*x}$$. Next, it's not equation of a line, it gives the region which is below line $$y={2-\frac{2}{3}*x}$$, so all your farther conclusions are wrong.

Thanks . $$y\leq{2-\frac{2}{3}*x}$$- this was a typo.

But, Next, it's not equation of a line, it gives the region which is below line $$y={2-\frac{2}{3}*x}$$, so all your farther conclusions are wrong., is where I was going wrong.

Thnaks for the clarification.

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 15

Re: In the xy-plane...   [#permalink] 04 Aug 2012, 03:30

Go to page    1   2   3    Next  [ 46 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by