Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 28 May 2017, 03:38

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# In the years since the city of London imposed strict

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 22 May 2005
Posts: 139
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 0

In the years since the city of London imposed strict [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2005, 10:36
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

In the years since the city of London imposed strict air-pollution regulations on local industry, the number of bird species seen in and around London has increased dramatically. Similar air-pollution rules should be imposed in other major cities.

Each of the following is an assumption made in the argument above EXCEPT:

(A) In most major cities, air-pollution problems are caused almost entirely by local industry.

(B) Air-pollution regulations on industry have a significant impact on the quality of the air.

(C) The air-pollution problems of other major cities are basically similar to those once suffered by London.

(D) An increase in the number of bird species in and around a city is desirable.

(E) The increased sightings of bird species in and around London reflect an actual increase in the number of species in the area.
Director
Joined: 11 Mar 2005
Posts: 718
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 66 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2005, 14:26
Look B to me

But can someone explain what is E saying...
Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Apr 2005
Posts: 349
Location: USA
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 113 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2005, 08:04
The answer is very clearly E

Ritesh,

E states that "The increased sightings of bird species in and around London reflect an actual increase in the number of species in the area."

In simple terms lets assume that there were 5 species of birds before the pollution regulations came into effect. If E is true it states, that the number of species have increase.. for example from 5 to 10.

The argument only states, that the number of sightings have increased. It does not state anything about the number of species, and thus, E cannot be assumed.

Though B is not stated anywhere, it is implied that air pollution regulations could have significantly impacted the quality of air - WHICH COULD have caused the increase in bird sightings.

Enuf of my rambling
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Apr 2005
Posts: 373
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2005, 09:26
that the number of sightings have increased. It does not state anything about the number of species, and thus, E cannot be assumed.

The stem clearly say the No. of species seen has increasd.

Picked D.

If it weren't D, then there is no reason to suggest pollution controls to other cities.

HMTG.
Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Apr 2005
Posts: 349
Location: USA
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 113 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2005, 12:27
HowManyToGo wrote:
that the number of sightings have increased. It does not state anything about the number of species, and thus, E cannot be assumed.

The stem clearly say the No. of species seen has increasd.

Picked D.

If it weren't D, then there is no reason to suggest pollution controls to other cities.

HMTG.

I stand corrected. Thank you Howmanytogo. I don't know how I missed that. The answer should be D.
15 Jul 2005, 12:27
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2001 proved to be the automaker's first losing year since 3 18 Aug 2008, 17:42
1 At the beginning of the year, the city allocated $150 4 29 Jul 2008, 07:29 At the beginning of the year, the city allocated$150 1 07 Jul 2008, 11:37
At the beginning of the year, the city allocated \$150 8 05 Jan 2008, 06:57
6 More and more in recent years, cities are stressing the arts 3 30 Jan 2008, 06:43
Display posts from previous: Sort by