Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 03:41 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 03:41

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Affiliations: PMI, ASQ
Posts: 99
Own Kudos [?]: 2275 [20]
Given Kudos: 21
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
Send PM
Director
Director
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Status:Retaking after 7 years
Posts: 864
Own Kudos [?]: 4468 [2]
Given Kudos: 221
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
GPA: 3.75
Send PM
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 09 Oct 2012
Posts: 26
Own Kudos [?]: 13 [0]
Given Kudos: 14
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 17 Aug 2015
Posts: 77
Own Kudos [?]: 64 [0]
Given Kudos: 196
Send PM
Re: In yesterday’s council election a majority of voters supported conserv [#permalink]
IanSolo wrote:
Quote:
(D) The majority of customers who regularly eat at this restaurant always order both fish and stuffed mushrooms. Thus, fish and stuffed mushrooms must be the restaurant’s most frequently ordered dishes.



I have a question about this answer unrelated with the question,
is the reasoning in this answer flaw?
In my opinion is correct but I'm not sure.
What do you think?


In my opinion this is flawed as well. The reason is that we cannot generalize based on the sales from customers who eat most regularly. What if other customers who don't eat regularly order chicken wings most of the times. That may have another contender
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 22 Dec 2015
Posts: 83
Own Kudos [?]: 53 [1]
Given Kudos: 40
Concentration: General Management
GMAT 1: 760 Q48 V47
GPA: 3.89
WE:Accounting (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
Re: In yesterday’s council election a majority of voters supported conserv [#permalink]
1
Kudos
ajdse22 wrote:
IanSolo wrote:
In my opinion this is flawed as well. The reason is that we cannot generalize based on the sales from customers who eat most regularly. What if other customers who don't eat regularly order chicken wings most of the times. That may have another contender


We have to look at which answer is flawed in a similar manner to the original argument, not just which one is flawed. The original statement said that most people support A and most people support B. Therefore, A must = B. The only option that sets up an argument in a similar manner is B.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Mar 2017
Posts: 369
Own Kudos [?]: 823 [3]
Given Kudos: 646
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Organizational Behavior
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: In yesterday’s council election a majority of voters supported conserv [#permalink]
2
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Legendaddy wrote:
In yesterday’s council election a majority of voters supported conservative candidates, and a majority of voters supported candidates who voted in favor of the antipollution act. Therefore, it must be that a majority of voters in yesterday’s council election supported conservative candidates who voted in favor of the antipollution act.
Which one of the following is an argument that contains flawed reasoning most similar to the flawed reasoning in the argument above?


(B) According to Sara, most children like pies. According to Robert, most children like blueberries. So if Sara and Robert are both right, it must be that most children like pies that contain blueberries.


X(majority)--> Y( voted conservatives) & X(majority)--> Z(antipollution laws)
so Z is a subset of Y



parallel structure:option B
X(majority of children) --> Y(like pies) & X(majority of children)--> Z(blueberries)
so Z is a subset of Y
i.e blueberries are contained in pies.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 15 Nov 2017
Posts: 44
Own Kudos [?]: 13 [0]
Given Kudos: 182
Send PM
Re: In yesterday’s council election a majority of voters supported conserv [#permalink]
Hello,

Can someone provide insight about why B is correct and not E?

Thank you!
Manager
Manager
Joined: 21 Jul 2018
Posts: 153
Own Kudos [?]: 434 [0]
Given Kudos: 80
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Social Entrepreneurship
Send PM
Re: In yesterday’s council election a majority of voters supported conserv [#permalink]
KHow wrote:
Hello,

Can someone provide insight about why B is correct and not E?

Thank you!


KHow

Quote:
In yesterday’s council election a majority of voters supported conservative candidates, and a majority of voters supported candidates who voted in favor of the antipollution act. Therefore, it must be that a majority of voters in yesterday’s council election supported conservative candidates who voted in favor of the antipollution act.

Which one of the following is an argument that contains flawed reasoning most similar to the flawed reasoning in the argument above?


Premise: …a majority (over 50%) of voters supported conservative candidates…
Premise: ….a majority (over 50%) of voters supported candidates who voted in favor of the antipollution act.
Conclusion: …a majority (over 50%) of voters supported conservative candidates who voted in favor of the antipollution act.


Notice the “majority…majority…majority” construction. And that premise 1 supports X, premise 2 supports Y, and concludes that therefore as a whole the majority supports both X and Y.

Quote:
(A) Bill claims that soil can be damaged if it is tilled when it is too wet, and Sue claims that seeds planted in wet soil can rot. Therefore, if both claims are true, gardeners who till and plant their gardens when the soil is wet damage both their soil and their seeds.

Doesn’t follow construction.

Quote:
(B) According to Sara, most children like pies. According to Robert, most children like blueberries. So if Sara and Robert are both right, it must be that most children like pies that contain blueberries.

“Most…most…most”. Similar reasoning. Hold!

Quote:
(C) Mark will go on a picnic today only if it does not rain. Susan will go on a picnic today only if Mark goes too. Since it is not going to rain today, both Mark and Susan will go on a picnic.

Not the same reasoning as the stimulus.

Quote:
(D) The majority of customers who regularly eat at this restaurant always order both fish and stuffed mushrooms. Thus, fish and stuffed mushrooms must be the restaurant’s most frequently ordered dishes.

This answer choice starts off fine, but fails to offer the second premise. So it fails.

Quote:
(E) Most people living at Gina’s house cook well. Since most people at Gina’s house enjoy eating well-cooked meals, most meals served at Gina’s house are cooked well.

This is tempting with the “most…most…most” but if we look carefully the reasoning is different. It starts of saying that “most people at Gina’s house do X” then “most people at Gina’s house enjoy Y”. It concludes that “most meals served are cooked well” when we are looking for a conclusion that describes “cooking well” and “eating well-cooked meals”….not about meals served.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: In yesterday’s council election a majority of voters supported conserv [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6920 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne