It is currently 21 Oct 2017, 04:05

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Industrial accidents are more common when some of the people

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 02 Aug 2014
Posts: 14

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 2

Re: Industrial accidents are more common when some of the people [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Aug 2014, 04:12
I will go with C.

Option 'D' uses ''They may have", implies, any existing problem can be worsen. But what if the person don have drinking habit !!!

Its same like DS problem. True in some cases and false in other.

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 2

Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Posts: 531

Kudos [?]: 621 [0], given: 606

Concentration: Technology, Other
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Industrial accidents are more common when some of the people [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jun 2015, 00:49
C Vs D:

P1: Industrial accidents are more common when some of the people in safety-sensitive jobs have drinking problems than when none do.
P2: Since, even after treatment, people who have had drinking problems are somewhat more likely than other people to have drinking problems in the future,
Conclusion: any employer trying to reduce the risk of accidents should bar anyone who has ever been treating for a drinking problem from holding a safety=sensitive job.
Conclusion is based upon the assumption that employer has a way to identify the drinking problem in people. What if its not true or employer fails in doing so. Obviously conclusion would come in doubt.


Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument above?

Workers who would permanently lose their jos if they sought treatment for a drinking problem try instead to conceal their problem and continue working for as long as possible.
>> This what v r looking for.
People who hld safety-sentive jobs are subject to stresses that can exacerbate any personal problems they may have, including drinking problems.
>> More in line with P1. Doesnt help much.
_________________

--------------------------------------------------------
Regards :)

Kudos [?]: 621 [0], given: 606

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 03 Jul 2015
Posts: 71

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 41

Concentration: Marketing, Finance
Re: Industrial accidents are more common when some of the people [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jun 2016, 09:11
Still confused among B C and D
I am not saying C cannot be the answer but on what basis can we eliminate answer choices B and D?

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 41

1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
User avatar
G
Joined: 26 Oct 2016
Posts: 694

Kudos [?]: 180 [1], given: 855

Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
Schools: HBS '19
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V44
GPA: 4
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Industrial accidents are more common when some of the people [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 May 2017, 06:33
1
This post received
KUDOS
P1: Industrial accidents are more common when some of the people in safety-sensitive jobs have drinking problems than when none do.
P2: Since, even after treatment, people who have had drinking problems are somewhat more likely than other people to have drinking problems in the future,
Conclusion: any employer trying to reduce the risk of accidents should bar anyone who has ever been treating for a drinking problem from holding a safety=sensitive job.

The argument goes as follows:
- accidents are more frequent when people in the safety business have drinking problems
- people who've had drinking problems stand a greater chance of have drinking problems in the future
- in order to reduce the risk of accidents, employers must not hire anyone who has been treated for drinking issues

B is definitely out because it does not touch on the issue of "people with drinking problems". The argument specifically discusses reducing risk of accidents as a result of having fewer employees with a history of alcohol abuse. In this respect, B is somewhat like A: it's an issue that's parallel to the argument itself.

OK so C presents an issue with such an unforgiving policy, i.e. not hiring anyone who's had treatment: this creates an incentive for people with issues to lie. If such a policy were not in place, then people might seek treatment and therefore fewer people with drinking problems will be on the job. However, if you make it clear that anyone who's been treated before is not welcome, such a drastic measure might discourage some from seeking help, which means that they'll do anything in their power to avoid being detected. In other words, such a policy (of not hiring someone who's received help in the past) might backfire because people now have an added incentive to lie about their condition. So C is a good option (not a perfect one).

Now D is one of my favorite options because it presents a different cause for something. It's the jobs themselves that are making people more likely to have drinking problems. So the idea you could derive from this option is that no matter what you do, you won't be able to eliminate the risk of accidents completely, since the job in itself is stressful and causes people to drink. However, you'd be missing a very subtle note here: the phrase that makes this option less convincing is "exacerbate problems that they may have". If you don't have drinking problems to begin with, then you won't necessarily develop them later. If you already do, then it get even worse and the potential for issues later on greatly increases. D actually supports the passage.




The correct answer is definitely choice C, as many have pointed out.

Choice C tells us that current workers may actually have a (current) drinking problem. So, by replacing them with those who have been treated for their drinking problem, we may actually decrease the risk of accidents, thereby weakening the argument.

That some companies' policy is to put drinkers in residential treatment is clealy irrelelvant. Thus, choice A is incorrect.

Because the argument was about reducing the risk of accident through a certain policy, that some accidents are attributable to an alternative explanation is irrelevant. Thus, choice B is incorrect.

We don't care that safety-sensiive job holders are more likely to become drinkers. We care about whether the policy against hiring them will lead to a reduction in the risk of accident. Thus, choice D is incorrect.

Choice E is wrong for the same reason that choice B is wrong: that some accidents are attributable to an alternative explanation is irrelevant.
_________________

Thanks & Regards,
Anaira Mitch

Kudos [?]: 180 [1], given: 855

Director
Director
User avatar
G
Joined: 26 Oct 2016
Posts: 694

Kudos [?]: 180 [0], given: 855

Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
Schools: HBS '19
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V44
GPA: 4
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Industrial accidents are more common when some of the people [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 May 2017, 12:12
lavya07 wrote:
Why is B wrong?


B is out because it does not touch on the issue of "people with drinking problems". The argument specifically discusses reducing the risk of accidents as a result of having fewer employees with a history of alcohol abuse. In this respect, B is somewhat like A: it's an issue that's parallel to the argument itself.
_________________

Thanks & Regards,
Anaira Mitch

Kudos [?]: 180 [0], given: 855

Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 05 Oct 2016
Posts: 170

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 11

Location: China
Concentration: Healthcare, Entrepreneurship
WE: Sales (Health Care)
Re: Industrial accidents are more common when some of the people [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Aug 2017, 22:01
durgesh79 wrote:
Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument above?

Some companies place employees who are being treated for drinking problems in residential programs and allow them several weeks of paid sick leave
No connection with the question stem - Drop it

Many accidents in the workplace are the result of errors by employees who do not hold safety-sensitive jobs.
"many" does not give enough information. and i think it goes against the premise of the question - drop it

Workers who would permanently lose their jos if they sought treatment for a drinking problem try instead to conceal their problem and continue working for as long as possible.
If there is no record of any treatment of drinking problem, the employer wont bar workers from working in safety-sensetive jobs and still have the risk of accidents - keep it

People who hld safety-sentive jobs are subject to stresses that can exacerbate any personal problems they may have, including drinking problems.
This is a tricky / trap options. It says that stress can increase the risk of drinking problem (which employee already had). please see the word "exacerbate". it doesnt say that due to stress employee will start drinking. So in my opinion this option actually supports the conclusion. It gives another reason to emplyer not to put peeple with prior drinking problems on this job. Drop it

Some industrial accidents are caused by equipment failure rather than by emplyer error.
"some" doesnt give enough information - Drop it

u have made a clearance btw B C&D, very helpful~
_________________

LSAT CR is driving me mad

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 11

Math Forum Moderator
User avatar
D
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 1530

Kudos [?]: 952 [0], given: 72

Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Industrial accidents are more common when some of the people [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Aug 2017, 13:05
Industrial accidents are more common when some of the people in safety-sensitive jobs have drinking problems than when none do. Since, even after treatment, people who have had drinking problems are somewhat more likely than other people to have drinking problems in the future, any employer trying to reduce the risk of accidents should bar anyone who has ever been treating for a drinking problem from holding a safety-sensitive job.

Type - weaken
Boil it down - Any employer trying to reduce the risk of accidents should bar anyone who has ever been treating for a drinking problem from holding a safety-sensitive job since people who have had drinking problems are somewhat more likely than other people to have drinking problems in the future

A.Some companies place employees who are being treated for drinking problems in residential programs and allow them several weeks of paid sick leave - Irrelevant

B.Many accidents in the workplace are the result of errors by employees who do not hold safety-sensitive jobs. - Incorrect - we are only concerned with safety- sensitive jobs

C.Workers who would permanently lose their jobs if they sought treatment for a drinking problem try instead to conceal their problem and continue working for as long as possible. - Correct

D.People who hold safety-sensitive jobs are subject to stresses that can exacerbate any personal problems they may have, including drinking problems. - Incorrect - this is just a nature of the job and does not undermine the plan

E.Some industrial accidents are caused by equipment failure rather than by employer error. - Out of scope - we are not concerned about accidents caused by equipment failure

Answer C
_________________

When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful

Kudos [?]: 952 [0], given: 72

Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 04 Feb 2014
Posts: 203

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 157

Concentration: Finance, International Business
GPA: 3
WE: Project Management (Manufacturing)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Industrial accidents are more common when some of the people [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Sep 2017, 21:40
D is close but I would go for C....However still not clear why D is wrong...
_________________

Kudos if you like my post

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 157

Manager
Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 14 Mar 2011
Posts: 142

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 310

Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Industrial accidents are more common when some of the people [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Sep 2017, 04:06
anurag16 wrote:
D is close but I would go for C....However still not clear why D is wrong...


The whole scope of the passage deals with the result of the drinking problem [ and "ways" how those disastrous/unwanted result can be eliminated/reduced], so what caused the "drinking problems" at first place is irrelevant to the argument because the central assumption is that drinking problems do exist, and that's what matters. Therefore, reject D.

Cheers !!
_________________

If you find my posts/replies helpful, please take a moment to click on the "kudos" icon.

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 310

Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 21 Sep 2015
Posts: 25

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 9

CAT Tests
Re: Industrial accidents are more common when some of the people [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Oct 2017, 06:59
Can we fix some of the ridiculous typos on this?

accidents should bar anyone hwo has ever been treating for a drinking problem from holding a safety=sensitive job

should be

accidents should bar anyone WHO has ever been TREATED for a drinking problem from holding a safety-sensitive job
_________________

Insanity at its finest.

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 9

Re: Industrial accidents are more common when some of the people   [#permalink] 18 Oct 2017, 06:59

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 30 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Industrial accidents are more common when some of the people

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.