GMAT Changed on April 16th - Read about the latest changes here

It is currently 24 Apr 2018, 01:46

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Industrial accidents are more common when some of the people

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

VP
VP
User avatar
D
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1000
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Re: Industrial accidents are more common when some of the people [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Oct 2017, 11:30
alimad wrote:
Industrial accidents are more common when some of the people in safety-sensitive jobs have drinking problems than when none do. Since, even after treatment, people who have had drinking problems are somewhat more likely than other people to have drinking problems in the future, any employer trying to reduce the risk of accidents should bar anyone hwo has ever been treating for a drinking problem from holding a safety=sensitive job.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument above?

A.Some companies place employees who are being treated for drinking problems in residential programs and allow them several weeks of paid sick leave

B.Many accidents in the workplace are the result of errors by employees who do not hold safety-sensitive jobs.

C.Workers who would permanently lose their jos if they sought treatment for a drinking problem try instead to conceal their problem and continue working for as long as possible.

D.People who hld safety-sentive jobs are subject to stresses that can exacerbate any personal problems they may have, including drinking problems.

E.Some industrial accidents are caused by equipment failure rather than by employer error.

Please provide some details with your choice.


C
_________________

Kudos if my post helps!

Long And A Fruitful Journey - V21 to V41; If I can, So Can You!!


My study resources:
1. Useful Formulae, Concepts and Tricks-Quant
2. e-GMAT's ALL SC Compilation
3. LSAT RC compilation
4. Actual LSAT CR collection by Broal
5. QOTD RC (Carcass)
6. Challange OG RC
7. GMAT Prep Challenge RC

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
G
Status: Countdown Begins...
Joined: 03 Jul 2016
Posts: 304
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
Schools: IIMB
GMAT 1: 580 Q48 V22
GPA: 3.7
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: Industrial accidents are more common when some of the people [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Oct 2017, 21:33
Verbal Moderators please clear the typos in the problem.

Thanks!
_________________

Need Kudos to unlock GMAT Club tests

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 11 Jun 2017
Posts: 80
Industrial accidents are more common when some of the people [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 09 Nov 2017, 08:29
alimad wrote:
Industrial accidents are more common when some of the people in safety-sensitive jobs have drinking problems than when none do. Since, even after treatment, people who have had drinking problems are somewhat more likely than other people to have drinking problems in the future, any employer trying to reduce the risk of accidents should bar anyone who has ever been treating for a drinking problem from holding a safety=sensitive job. .


Between C and D, it should be C. The argument states that since number of accidents in safety sensitive jobs are common in people having drinking problems, the employer should bar anyone who has drinking problems from holding such a job.

alimad wrote:
C.Workers who would permanently lose their jos if they sought treatment for a drinking problem try instead to conceal their problem and continue working for as long as possible .

If the workers begin to hide their drinking problems, the employers will not be able to identify these people and will not be able to bar them. This weakens. Although, I feel the argument says that employers "should" bar, this option focuses on the "could / could not" bar. It says that since they will conceal their problem, the employers just won't be able to identify them and bar. On the other hand, the argument focuses more on the fact that since they have drinking problems, they should be barred and something that says they should not be barred, could have been better.

alimad wrote:
D.People who hold safety-sentive jobs are subject to stresses that can exacerbate any personal problems they may have, including drinking problems.

This states that people holding a safety sensitive job can automatically worsen any personal problem, so even though it may have worsened other personal problems, the highest rate of accidents are still because of drinking problems, so this is not a weakener.

GMATNinja Hi
Can you please go through the argument and my reasoning and provide your comments. I definitely feel C is a better answer but it weakens the conclusion by stating that the employers won't be able to bar only. The argument says that that the employers SHOULD bar, so if an option, would have specifically been targeted at showing why they SHOULD NOT bar, wouldn't it have been better ?

Thanks in advance! :-)

Originally posted by Poorvasha on 07 Nov 2017, 09:20.
Last edited by Poorvasha on 09 Nov 2017, 08:29, edited 2 times in total.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 12 Aug 2017
Posts: 2
Re: Industrial accidents are more common when some of the people [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Nov 2017, 10:02
As it is said in the argument that employer trying to reduce the risk of accidents should bar anyone who was/is being treated for the problem and would not be given the jobs. So the answer choice that would weaken the argument is that if the employer does not know about the problem of an employee then he cannot remove that employee. This brings us to option C that fits aptly.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 29 Nov 2015
Posts: 1
Re: Industrial accidents are more common when some of the people [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Nov 2017, 10:20
I don't think it's C.

The argument is companies should bar people from holding safety-sensitive job, not other jobs. This means they do not permanently lose their job. C brings in "permanently losing their job". Also, this true in real life, but in GMAT, questions always try to exploit your experience in real life to make you choose the wrong option. I can counter-argue by saying: these people don't lose their job, they can do non-safety-sensitive jobs... such as janitorial jobs.

In B, if accidents come from employees who don't hold safety-sensitive jobs, then the argument's assumption is wrong, and the conclusion is also wrong (it should be: barring employees from holding ALL jobs), so it weakens the argument.
Expert Post
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
P
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 8031
Location: Pune, India
Re: Industrial accidents are more common when some of the people [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Nov 2017, 01:13
alimad wrote:
Industrial accidents are more common when some of the people in safety-sensitive jobs have drinking problems than when none do. Since, even after treatment, people who have had drinking problems are somewhat more likely than other people to have drinking problems in the future, any employer trying to reduce the risk of accidents should bar anyone hwo has ever been treating for a drinking problem from holding a safety=sensitive job.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument above?

A.Some companies place employees who are being treated for drinking problems in residential programs and allow them several weeks of paid sick leave

B.Many accidents in the workplace are the result of errors by employees who do not hold safety-sensitive jobs.

C.Workers who would permanently lose their jos if they sought treatment for a drinking problem try instead to conceal their problem and continue working for as long as possible.

D.People who hld safety-sentive jobs are subject to stresses that can exacerbate any personal problems they may have, including drinking problems.

E.Some industrial accidents are caused by equipment failure rather than by employer error.

Please provide some details with your choice.



Premises:
Industrial accidents are more common when some people in safety-sensitive jobs have drinking problems than when none do.
Even after treatment, people with a history are more likely to have drinking problems again

Conclusion: To reduce the risk of accidents bar anyone who has ever been treated for a drinking problem from holding a safety-sensitive job.

We need to weaken it.

Options (B), (C) and (D) seem to be causing trouble.

B.Many accidents in the workplace are the result of errors by employees who do not hold safety-sensitive jobs.

"Many accidents" are caused by employees who do not hold safety sensitive jobs. But we are given that Industrial accidents are MORE common when some people in safety-sensitive jobs have drinking problems than when none do. So the accidents become MORE common in our context. It doesn't matter how many take place in other circumstances.

C.Workers who would permanently lose their jos if they sought treatment for a drinking problem try instead to conceal their problem and continue working for as long as possible.
Our conclusion says that we should bar anyone "who has ever been treated". It doesn't say bar anyone who has a drinking problem (which might be far more difficult to identify anyway). If there is a policy in which workers who take treatment are barred from their jobs, workers with drinking problem may decide to not seek treatment at all. In that case, the risk of accidents will not reduce. Hence this is the answer.

D.People who hld safety-sentive jobs are subject to stresses that can exacerbate any personal problems they may have, including drinking problems.

Safety sensitive jobs could worsen the drinking problem. So that is more of a reason to not hire people with drinking problem (mind you, not those who have sought treatment) on such jobs. It doesn't weaken our conclusion.

Answer (C)
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 09 Nov 2017
Posts: 5
Re: Industrial accidents are more common when some of the people [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Nov 2017, 02:14
gmatnub wrote:
C

if people get fired by admitting that they have a problem and come to treatment, then they will not come to treatment or admit that they have a problem. Therefore you will have a bunch of people working with problems, and they create safety hazards.



create safety hazards?
Verbal Forum Moderator
avatar
B
Joined: 13 Feb 2015
Posts: 801
Premium Member
Re: Industrial accidents are more common when some of the people [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Dec 2017, 18:33
Merged topics. Please, search before posting questions!
_________________

Please Read: Verbal Posting Rules

Re: Industrial accidents are more common when some of the people   [#permalink] 10 Dec 2017, 18:33

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   [ 48 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Industrial accidents are more common when some of the people

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.