Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 27 May 2017, 00:50

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# INEQUATIONS(Inequalities) Part 1

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

MBA Section Director
Status: Back to work...
Affiliations: GMAT Club
Joined: 22 Feb 2012
Posts: 4320
Location: India
City: Pune
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.4
WE: Business Development (Manufacturing)
Followers: 440

Kudos [?]: 3181 [24] , given: 2302

INEQUATIONS(Inequalities) Part 1 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Jun 2013, 13:24
24
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
35
This post was
BOOKMARKED
INEQUATIONS (INEQUALITIES): Prologue

During GMAT exam, where time is precious, complicated inequalities often create a difficult situation. Purpose of this article is to narrate the paradigms of inequalities and to state the methods to solve the inequalities.

This Article is actually a digital version of my handwritten notes collected from various sources. Most of the input is from Indian School Text Books on Maths(CBSE Board) and remaining is from GMAT Math Strategy Guides of Elite Test Prep Companies and Guides for Indian CAT.

INEQUATIONS : Definition and Characterictics

The term Equation is defined as a statement involving variable(s) and the sign of equality(=)
Similarly, we can define the term Inequation as a statement involving variable(s) and the sign of inequality viz, >, ≥, <, or ≤
An Inequation may contain one or more variables. Also, it may be linear or quadratic or cubic etc.

Some Examples of Inequations

5x – 3 > 0

$$x^2$$ - 5x + 4 ≤ 0

$$ax^2$$ + $$by^2$$ < 1

$$x^3$$ + $$6x^2$$ + 11x + 6 ≤ 0

Linear Inequations with one variable

Let a be a non-zero real number and x be a variable.

Then Inequations of the form ax + b < 0, ax + b ≤ 0, ax + b > 0, ax + b ≥ 0 are known as linear Inequations in one variable

Examples : 9x – 15 > 0, 2x – 3 ≤ 0

Linear Inequations with two variables

Let a, b be non-zero real numbers and x, y be a variables.

Then Inequations of the form ax + by < c, ax + by ≤ c, ax + by > c, ax + by ≥ c are known as linear Inequations in two variables x and y

Examples : 2x + 3y ≤ 6, 2x + y ≥ 6

Quadratic Inequation

Let a be a non-zero real number.

Then Inequations of the form $$ax^2$$ + bx + c < 0, $$ax^2$$ + bx + c ≤ 0, $$ax^2$$ + bx + c > 0, $$ax^2$$ + bx + c ≥ 0 are known as Quadratic Inequations with one variable.

Examples : $$x^2$$ + x - 6 < 0, $$2x^2$$ + 3x + 1 > 0

The equation $$ax^2$$ + $$by^2$$ < 1 is a sample quadric Inequation with two variables.

Solution of an Inequation

Definition :- A Solution of an Inequation is the value(s) or the range of values of the variable(s) that makes the inequation a true statement

Consider the Inequation $$\frac{(3-2x)}{5}$$ < $$\frac{x}{3}$$ – 4

For x = 9, we have, LHS = $$\frac{(3-2*9)}{5}$$ = -3 and, RHS = $$\frac{9}{3}$$ - 4 = -1. Clearly -3 < -1 that means LHS < RHS, which is true. So x = 9 is a solution of the given inequation

For x = 6, LHS = $$\frac{(-9)}{5}$$ and, RHS = -2 ---------> LHS > RHS ---------> So x = 6 is not a solution of the given Inequation.

We can verify that any real number greater than 7 is a solution of the given Inequation.

Let us now consider the Inequation $$x^2$$ + 1 < 0

We know that $$x^2$$ ≥ 0 for all real values of x

$$x^2$$ +1 ≥ 1 for all real values of x--------------(Added 1 to both sides of ineqation)

So, there is no real value of x which makes the Inequation $$x^2$$ + 1 < 0 a true statement. Hence, it has no solution.

Solving an Inequation

It is the process of obtaining all possible solutions of an Inequation. Substitution by numbers is a lengthy process, and it is an impossible process for complicated quadratic equations. Best way to solve Inequations is shown in the following section.

Solution Set

The set of all possible solutions of an Inequation is known as its solution set.

For Example
The solution set of the Inequation $$x^2$$ + 1 ≥ 0 is the set of all real numbers
The solution set of the Inequation $$x^2$$ + 1 < 0 is empty/null set

Solving Linear Inequation with one variable

As mentioned earlier that solving an Inequation is the process of obtaining all possible solutions of the variable.
In the process of solving an Inequation, we use mathematical simplifications which are governed by the following rules

Rule 1 :- Same Number may be added to (or subtracted from) both sides of an Inequation without changing the sign of inequality. Example: x > 5 ---------> x + 2 > 5 + 2

Rule 2 :- Both sides of an Inequation can be multiplied (or divided) by the same positive real number without changing the sign of inequality. However, the sign of inequality is reversed when both sides of an Inequation are multiplied or divided by a negative number. Examples: x > 5 ----> 3x > 15; x > 1 ----> -x < -1

Rule 3 :- Any term of an Inequation may be taken to the other side with its sign changed without affecting the sign of inequality. Example: $$\frac{x}{3}$$ - 2 < $$\frac{x}{6}$$ -----> $$\frac{x}{3}$$ - $$\frac{x}{6}$$ < 2

Rule 4 :-
In inequalities never multiply for a term unless you know it does not equal 0 AND you know its sign.

Type I :- Algorithm to solve the Inequations of the form ax + b < 0, ax + b ≤ 0, ax + b > 0, ax + b ≥ 0

Step I :- Obtain the linear Inequation.
Step II :- Collect all terms involving the variable on one side of the Inequation and the constant terms on other side
Step III :- Simplify both sides of inequality in their simplest forms to reduce the Inequation in the form ax < b, or ax ≤ b, or ax > b, or ax ≥ b
Step IV :- Solve the Inequation obtained in step III by dividing both sides of the Inequation by the coefficient of the variable (of x)
Step V :- Write the solution set obtained in step IV in the form of an interval on the real line.

Example 1 :- Solve the Inequation 2x – 4 ≤ 0

Step 1) 2x – 4 ≤ 0
Step 2) (2x – 4) + 4 ≤ 0 + 4 --------------------------[ Adding 4 on both sides ]
Step 3) 2x ≤ 4
Step 4) $$\frac{2x}{2}$$ ≤ $$\frac{4}{2}$$
Step 5) x ≤ 2

Any real number less than or equal to 2 is a solution of the given Inequation.

Hence the solution set of the given Inequation is (-∞, 2]

NOTE :- The Interval [x, y] stands for the values between x and y, both inclusive, where as The interval (x, y) stands for the values between x and y, both exclusive

Example 2 :- -3x + 12 < 0

Step 1) -3x + 12 < 0

Step 2) -3x < -12 --------------------------[ Transposing 12 on right side ]

Step 3) $$\frac{-3x}{-3}$$ > $$\frac{-12}{-3}$$ --------------------------[ Dividing both sides by -3, and hence the sign of inequality changes ]

Step 4) x > 4

Any real number greater than 4 is a solution of the given Inequation.

Hence the solution set of the given Inequation is (4,∞)

Example 3 :- $$\frac{1}{(x-2)}$$ < 0

$$\frac{1}{(x-2)}$$ < 0 ---------> x-2 < 0 -----------------[ If $$\frac{a}{b}$$ < 0 and a > 0 then b < 0]

x < 2 ----------> Solution set is ( -∞, 2)

Type II :- Algorithm to solve the Inequations of the form $$\frac{(ax+b)}{(cx+d)}$$ < k, $$\frac{(ax+b)}{(cx+d)}$$ ≤ k, $$\frac{(ax+b)}{(cx+d)}$$ > k, $$\frac{(ax+b)}{(cx+d)}$$ ≥ k

Step I :- Obtain the Inequation.

Step II :- Transpose all terms on LHS

Step III :- Simplify LHS of the equation obtained in step II to obtain an Inequation of the form $$\frac{(px+q)}{(rx+s)}$$ < 0, $$\frac{(px+q)}{(rx+s)}$$ ≤ 0, $$\frac{(px+q)}{(rx+s)}$$ > 0, $$\frac{(px+q)}{(rx+s)}$$ ≥ 0

Step IV :- Make Coefficient of x positive in numerator and denominator if they are not.

Step V :- Equate Numerator and denominator separately to zero and obtain the values of x. These values of x are generally called critical points.

Step VI :-
Plot the critical points obtained in step V on real line. These points will divide the real line In three regions.

Step VII :-
In the rightmost region the expression on LHS of the Inequation obtained in step IV will be Positive and in other regions it will be alternatively negative and positive. So, mark positive Sign in the right most region and then mark alternatively negative and positive signs in Other regions.

Step VIII :-
Select Appropriate region on the basis of the sign of the information obtained in step IV. For +ve inequality signs (>, ≥), the range will be the region with +ve signs, i.e., the rightmost segment and leftmost segment. For -ve inequality signs (<, ≤), the range will be the region with -ve signs, i.e., the range between critical points. Write these regions in the form of intervals to obtain the desired solution sets of the given Inequation.

Example 1 :- $$\frac{(x-2)}{(x+5)}$$ > 2

Step I :- $$\frac{(x-2)}{(x+5)}$$ > 2

Step II :- $$\frac{(x-2)}{(x+5)}$$ - 2 > 0

Step III :- $$\frac{(-x-12)}{(x+5)}$$ > 0

Step IV :- $$\frac{(x+12)}{(x+5)}$$ < 0 ---------------[Multiplying by -1 to make coefficient of x positive in the expression in numerator]

Step V :- x+12 < 0 -----> x < -12 and x+5 < 0 --------> x < -5

Therefore x = -12, -5 are the critical points.

Step VI and Step VII :-

Step VIII:- The Real line is divided in to three regions and the signs of LHS of Inequation (step IV) marked. Since the Inequation in (step IV) possesses less than sign which means that LHS of the Inequation is negative. So, the solution set of the given Inequation is the union of the regions containing negative sign.

Hence the solution set of given Inequation is -12 < x < -5

Example 2 :- $$\frac{(x-3)}{(x-5)}$$ > 0

$$\frac{(x-3)}{(x-5)}$$ > 0

x-3 > 0 ------> x > 3 --------------------[ Equating x-3 to zero]

x-5 > 0 ------> x > 5 --------------------[ Equating x-5 to zero]

Upon equating x-3 and x-5 separately to zero, we obtain x = 3, 5 as critical points.

Plot these points on Real Line

The Real line is divided into three regions. Since the Inequation possesses greater than sign which means that LHS of the Inequation is positive. So, the solution set of the given Inequation is the union of the regions Containing positive sign.

Hence x > 5 or x < 3 -----------> (-∞, 3) U (5, ∞)

Example 3 :- $$\frac{(2x+4)}{(x-1)}$$ ≥ 5

$$\frac{(2x+4)}{(x-1)}$$ ≥ 5

$$\frac{(2x+4)}{(x-1)}$$ - 5 ≥ 0

$$\frac{((2x+4)-5(x-1))}{(x-1)}$$ ≥ 0

$$\frac{(-3x+9)}{(x-1)}$$ ≥ 0

$$\frac{(3x-9)}{(x-1)}$$ ≤ 0 ----------------[ Multiplying both sides by -1]

$$\frac{(3(x-3))}{(x-1)}$$ ≤ 0

$$\frac{(x-3)}{(x-1)}$$ ≤ 0 -----------------[ dividing both sides on Inequation by 3]

x = 3, 1

Sign of original Inequation obtained in Step 4 is negative so the solution set will be union of the regions containing negative sign.

Therefore Solution Set is 1 < x ≤ 3

NOTE :-
When x=1, the Inequation becomes $$\frac{6}{0}$$ ≥ 5 and we know that division by zero is not defined, hence we need to exclude x=1 from solution set.

Example 4 :- $$\frac{(x+3)}{(x-2)}$$ ≤ 2

$$\frac{(x+3)}{(x-2)}$$ ≤ 2

$$\frac{(x+3)}{(x-2)}$$ - 2 ≤ 0

$$\frac{(x+3-2x+4)}{(x-2)}$$ ≤ 0

$$\frac{(-x+7)}{(x-2)}$$ ≤ 0

$$\frac{(x-7)}{(x-2)}$$ ≥ 0 -------------------[Multiplying both sides by -1]

x-7 ≥ 0 ---------> x ≥ 7

x-2 ≥ 0 ---------> x ≥ 2

x = 7 and 2 are the critical points.

The Real line is divided into three regions. Since the Inequation (obtained in step 4) possesses greater than sign which means that LHS of the Inequation is positive. So, the solution set of the given Inequation is the union of the regions containing positive sign.

Hence x ≥ 7 or x ≤ 2 -----------> (-∞, 2] U [7, ∞)

In order this Article not be dense with too much information, we have decided to split the same in two parts. This is the first Part of Article. Second Part contains two remaining concepts which are 1) Modules - Absolute Value 2) Quadratic Inequalities.
Here is the link to Second Part of the Article inequations-inequalities-part-154738.html#p1238488.

Courtesy for the Information

Prof. Dr. R. D. Sharma
B.Sc. (Hons) (Gold Medalist), M.Sc. (Gold Medalist), Ph.D. in Mathematics
Author of CBSE Math Books

Mr. Arun Sharma
Aluminus – IIM Bangalore

Special Thanks to

BUNUEL, doe007, Zarrolou

Regards,

Narenn

---------- End of First Part ------------
Attachments

INEQUATIONS Part 1.pdf [160.45 KiB]
Downloaded 721 times

 To download please login or register as a user

_________________

Last edited by Bunuel on 02 Jul 2013, 12:20, edited 3 times in total.
Downloadable copy in PDF format Attached
Manager
Joined: 20 Dec 2011
Posts: 86
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 86 [0], given: 31

Re: INEQUATIONS(Inequalities) Part 1 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Jul 2013, 08:42
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Narenn wrote:
Rule 4 :- In inequalities never multiply for a term unless you know it does not equal 0 AND you know its sign.

This is really important and it is a common mistake of test takers, especially in data sufficiency. Here is a really simple problem to demonstrate this:

Is x > 3?
1) xy > 3y
2) y > 1

If a test-taker divides each side of the inequality in statement 1 by y, then the result is x > 3. This appears to be sufficient to answer the question, but it is not because of your rule 4. y may not be a positive number, in which case we would have to switch the sign if we divide both sides by y. Instead, one should perform a bifurcated analysis in working statement 1, as below.

Statement 1:
Case 1: y > 0
This results in x > 3 because we can divide both sides by a non-zero y and we don't have to change the sign because y is positive

Case 2: y < 0
This results in x < 3 because we can divide both sides by a non-zero y and we have to change the sign because y is negative

Since x > 3 and x < 3 are each possible, this is enough to prove the insufficiency of statement 1, so we don't have to try the case of y = 0. In fact, y = 0 is not possible because then we would have 0 > 0

Statement 2 forces y to be a positive number. This is not enough by itself because we don't know x.

When we combine both statements, we are only left with case 1 (y > 0). This results in x > 3. Therefore, the answer is C.

Another way to avoid this trap is to choose numbers, put them into the equation, and then observe the outcome. When working with inequalities, be especially prone to try 0, 1, 2, -1, -2, 1/2, -1/2 as these will cover most outcomes. Choosing y = 1 and y = -1 disproves statement 1 by itself.
Current Student
Status: Everyone is a leader. Just stop listening to others.
Joined: 22 Mar 2013
Posts: 960
Location: India
GPA: 3.51
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 171

Kudos [?]: 1612 [1] , given: 229

Re: INEQUATIONS(Inequalities) Part 1 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Aug 2013, 15:49
1
This post received
KUDOS
"Hence x ≥ 7 or x ≤ 2 -----------> (-∞, 2] U [7, ∞)"

x ≤ 2 should be x < 2, not equal to 2 else denom will become 0.
_________________

Piyush K
-----------------------
Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is to try just one more time. ― Thomas A. Edison
Don't forget to press--> Kudos
My Articles: 1. WOULD: when to use? | 2. All GMATPrep RCs (New)
Tip: Before exam a week earlier don't forget to exhaust all gmatprep problems specially for "sentence correction".

Manager
Joined: 11 Feb 2014
Posts: 62
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 25

Re: INEQUATIONS(Inequalities) Part 1 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Jul 2014, 13:17
Narenn wrote:

Example 3 :- $$\frac{(2x+4)}{(x-1)}$$ ≥ 5

$$\frac{(2x+4)}{(x-1)}$$ ≥ 5

$$\frac{(2x+4)}{(x-1)}$$ - 5 ≥ 0

$$\frac{((2x+4)-5(x-1))}{(x-1)}$$ ≥ 0

$$\frac{(-3x+9)}{(x-1)}$$ ≥ 0

$$\frac{(3x-9)}{(x-1)}$$ ≤ 0 ----------------[ Multiplying both sides by -1]

$$\frac{(3(x-3))}{(x-1)}$$ ≤ 0

$$\frac{(x-3)}{(x-1)}$$ ≤ 0 -----------------[ dividing both sides on Inequation by 3]

x = 3, 1

Sign of original Inequation obtained in Step 4 is negative so the solution set will be union of the regions containing negative sign.

Therefore Solution Set is 1 < x ≤ 3

NOTE :-
When x=1, the Inequation becomes $$\frac{6}{0}$$ ≥ 5 and we know that division by zero is not defined, hence we need to exclude x=1 from solution set.

Great work!

Shouldn't the highlighted portion be 1 ≤ x ≤ 3
Current Student
Status: Everyone is a leader. Just stop listening to others.
Joined: 22 Mar 2013
Posts: 960
Location: India
GPA: 3.51
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 171

Kudos [?]: 1612 [0], given: 229

Re: INEQUATIONS(Inequalities) Part 1 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Jul 2014, 00:40
Game wrote:
Example 3 :- $$\frac{(2x+4)}{(x-1)}$$ ≥ 5

$$\frac{(2x+4)}{(x-1)}$$ ≥ 5

Great work!

Shouldn't the highlighted portion be 1 ≤ x ≤ 3

No, because (x-1) in denominator will yield zero at X=1 and answer undefined.
_________________

Piyush K
-----------------------
Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is to try just one more time. ― Thomas A. Edison
Don't forget to press--> Kudos
My Articles: 1. WOULD: when to use? | 2. All GMATPrep RCs (New)
Tip: Before exam a week earlier don't forget to exhaust all gmatprep problems specially for "sentence correction".

Intern
Joined: 22 Jul 2014
Posts: 4
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V35
GPA: 2.8
WE: Other (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 17

Re: INEQUATIONS(Inequalities) Part 1 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2014, 19:36
PiyushK wrote:
Game wrote:
Example 3 :- $$\frac{(2x+4)}{(x-1)}$$ ≥ 5

$$\frac{(2x+4)}{(x-1)}$$ ≥ 5

Great work!

Shouldn't the highlighted portion be 1 ≤ x ≤ 3

No, because (x-1) in denominator will yield zero at X=1 and answer undefined.

Example 4 :- \frac{(x+3)}{(x-2)} ≤ 2

Why based on the same concept, 2 has not been excluded in example 4? In this example also, 2 in the denominator will result the expression to undefined
Manager
Joined: 26 May 2013
Posts: 93
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 29

Re: INEQUATIONS(Inequalities) Part 1 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Jan 2015, 22:44
PiyushK wrote:
Game wrote:
Example 3 :- $$\frac{(2x+4)}{(x-1)}$$ ≥ 5

$$\frac{(2x+4)}{(x-1)}$$ ≥ 5

Great work!

Shouldn't the highlighted portion be 1 ≤ x ≤ 3

No, because (x-1) in denominator will yield zero at X=1 and answer undefined.

How come when you multiply the equation by (x-1), you don't eliminate it from the denominator?
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 15475
Followers: 651

Kudos [?]: 209 [0], given: 0

Re: INEQUATIONS(Inequalities) Part 1 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Feb 2016, 20:45
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
Intern
Joined: 07 Jul 2015
Posts: 31
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 6

Re: INEQUATIONS(Inequalities) Part 1 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 May 2016, 17:38
Narenn
Hi Sir,
In Example 4, the answer reads as: x ≥ 7 or x ≤ 2

Shouldn't the answer be x ≥ 7 or x < 2
The reason being that if x=2, then the denominator becomes 0, and we can't have that.
Manager
Joined: 26 May 2013
Posts: 93
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 29

Re: INEQUATIONS(Inequalities) Part 1 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 May 2016, 20:44
kanav06 wrote:
Narenn
Hi Sir,
In Example 4, the answer reads as: x ≥ 7 or x ≤ 2

Shouldn't the answer be x ≥ 7 or x < 2
The reason being that if x=2, then the denominator becomes 0, and we can't have that.

I believe you're correct here.

As a rule of thumb, shouldn't the test taker always test the inequality solution to ensure 0 doesn't result in the denominator?
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 4515
Followers: 394

Kudos [?]: 4200 [0], given: 109

Re: INEQUATIONS(Inequalities) Part 1 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 May 2016, 20:57
ak1802 wrote:
kanav06 wrote:
Narenn
Hi Sir,
In Example 4, the answer reads as: x ≥ 7 or x ≤ 2

Shouldn't the answer be x ≥ 7 or x < 2
The reason being that if x=2, then the denominator becomes 0, and we can't have that.

I believe you're correct here.

As a rule of thumb, shouldn't the test taker always test the inequality solution to ensure 0 doesn't result in the denominator?

Hi ak1802 and kanav06,

yes both of you are correct, the values of x will not include x=2..

say for an Inequality you are getting the range of x between 0 and 7, 0<x<7, BUT in the denominator of that fraction is x-2 ----------- abc/(x-2) >0.....
the range will become 0<x<7, where $$x\neq{2}$$...
_________________

Absolute modulus :http://gmatclub.com/forum/absolute-modulus-a-better-understanding-210849.html#p1622372
Combination of similar and dissimilar things : http://gmatclub.com/forum/topic215915.html

Re: INEQUATIONS(Inequalities) Part 1   [#permalink] 09 May 2016, 20:57
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Two-Part Analysis 2 07 Nov 2013, 23:56
47 INEQUATIONS(Inequalities) Part 2 7 12 Mar 2016, 19:23
Daily review worksheet - part of daily routine 0 16 Feb 2012, 23:23
2 Fundas of Geometry - Part I 2 10 Feb 2017, 13:12
6 Arithmetic Progression formula (i.e. AP) is not a part of 13 16 May 2014, 06:20
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# INEQUATIONS(Inequalities) Part 1

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.