It is currently 21 Oct 2017, 18:37

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Informed people generally assimilate information from

Author Message
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5034

Kudos [?]: 438 [0], given: 0

Location: Singapore
Informed people generally assimilate information from [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Oct 2005, 13:17
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Informed people generally assimilate information from several divergent sources before coming to an opinion. However, most popular news organizations view foreign affairs solely through the eyes of our State Department. In reporting the political crisis in foreign country B, news organizations must endeavor to find alternative sources of information.

Which of the following inferences can be drawn from the argument above?
(A) To the degree that a news source gives an account of another country that mirrors that of our State Department, that reporting is suspect.
(B) To protect their integrity, news media should avoid the influence of State Department releases in their coverage of foreign affairs.
(C) Reporting that is not influenced by the State Department is usually more accurate than are other accounts.
(D) The alternative sources of information mentioned in the passage would probably not share the same views as the State Department.
(E) A report cannot be seen as influenced by the State Department if it accurately depicts the events in a foreign country.

Kudos [?]: 438 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 11 May 2004
Posts: 453

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 0

Location: New York

### Show Tags

15 Oct 2005, 14:56
Going with B.

The other choices all appear to be extreme.

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 21 Aug 2005
Posts: 786

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Oct 2005, 14:59
D.

The point is that varied sources provide a variety of information. Otherwise, there will be no need to go and look at the other sources.

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 14 Sep 2005
Posts: 984

Kudos [?]: 215 [0], given: 0

Location: South Korea

### Show Tags

17 Oct 2005, 02:06
I vote for (A).

(A) The article says "people who are informed receive information from various sources" Therefore, if a report views a foreign affiar solely thru the eyes of the state department(=which paraphrases "a report which has only a single source"), the report is suspect(=which paraphrases "not informed")

(B) Not relevant. Integrity is not mentioned nor implied in the article.

(C) Not relevant. It is not a matter of how accurate it is.

(D) Well, if the question was "what is the assumption?", I'd pick (D). However, what we are supposed to do is "what can be inferred", and so we have to stick to what we can notice from the article, not to a hidden assumption.

(E) Not relevant.

Kudos [?]: 215 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 04 Feb 2005
Posts: 37

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

17 Oct 2005, 03:24
gamjatang wrote:
I vote for (A).

(A) The article says "people who are informed receive information from various sources" Therefore, if a report views a foreign affiar solely thru the eyes of the state department(=which paraphrases "a report which has only a single source"), the report is suspect(=which paraphrases "not informed")

(B) Not relevant. Integrity is not mentioned nor implied in the article.

(C) Not relevant. It is not a matter of how accurate it is.

(D) Well, if the question was "what is the assumption?", I'd pick (D). However, what we are supposed to do is "what can be inferred", and so we have to stick to what we can notice from the article, not to a hidden assumption.

(E) Not relevant.

I think D is the right answer. I don't think there is much difference between "Assumption" and "Inference". Inference means the hidden assumption or meaning. That is how it is different from "Conclusion"

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 21 Sep 2005
Posts: 231

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

17 Oct 2005, 08:13
go D go....

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5206

Kudos [?]: 434 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

17 Oct 2005, 08:41
My money is on D.

A makes the bold claim that the state department is suspect, rather than biased or incomplete.

Kudos [?]: 434 [0], given: 0

Current Student
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 3350

Kudos [?]: 319 [0], given: 2

Location: New York City
Schools: Wharton'11 HBS'12

### Show Tags

17 Oct 2005, 08:55
yup D for me too

Kudos [?]: 319 [0], given: 2

SVP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798

Kudos [?]: 170 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

17 Oct 2005, 09:12
D.

Kudos [?]: 170 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 18 Aug 2005
Posts: 42

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

17 Oct 2005, 09:18
D for me too. OA/OE please

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 198

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Location: New York

### Show Tags

17 Oct 2005, 10:47
I choose A because the information from the State Department Department seems suspicious, not accurate. That is why alternative sources are needed.

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 251

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

17 Oct 2005, 20:03
One more for D !

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 08 Aug 2005
Posts: 102

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

18 Oct 2005, 01:37
i would go for D

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

18 Oct 2005, 01:37
Display posts from previous: Sort by