GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 16 Jan 2019, 00:10

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

## Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in January
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
303112345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
Open Detailed Calendar
• ### The winning strategy for a high GRE score

January 17, 2019

January 17, 2019

08:00 AM PST

09:00 AM PST

Learn the winning strategy for a high GRE score — what do people who reach a high score do differently? We're going to share insights, tips and strategies from data we've collected from over 50,000 students who used examPAL.
• ### Free GMAT Strategy Webinar

January 19, 2019

January 19, 2019

07:00 AM PST

09:00 AM PST

Aiming to score 760+? Attend this FREE session to learn how to Define your GMAT Strategy, Create your Study Plan and Master the Core Skills to excel on the GMAT.

# Intellectual authority is defined as the authority of argume

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Current Student
Joined: 13 Jan 2009
Posts: 315
Location: India
Intellectual authority is defined as the authority of argume  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 27 Jul 2013, 19:18
2
1
Question 1
00:00

based on 45 sessions

71% (03:26) correct 29% (03:40) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 2
00:00

based on 43 sessions

60% (01:26) correct 40% (01:14) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 3
00:00

based on 44 sessions

70% (01:22) correct 30% (00:58) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 4
00:00

based on 43 sessions

8% (01:26) correct 92% (01:18) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 5
00:00

based on 41 sessions

63% (01:27) correct 38% (01:05) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 6
00:00

based on 38 sessions

50% (00:54) correct 50% (01:57) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Intellectual authority is defined as the authority of arguments that prevail by virtue of good reasoning and do not depend on coercion or convention. A contrasting notion, institutional authority, refers to the power of social institutions to enforce acceptance of arguments that may or may not possess intellectual authority. The authority wielded by legal systems is especially interesting because such systems are institutions that nonetheless aspire to a purely intellectual authority. One judge goes so far as to claim that courts are merely passive vehicles for applying the intellectual authority of the law and possess no coercive powers of their own.

In contrast, some critics maintain that whatever authority judicial pronouncements have is exclusively institutional. Some of these critics go further, claiming that intellectual authority does not really exist—i.e., it reduces to institutional authority. But it can be countered that these claims break down when a sufficiently broad historical perspective is taken: Not all arguments accepted by institutions withstand the test of time, and some well-reasoned arguments never receive institutional imprimatur. The reasonable argument that goes unrecognized in its own time because it challenges institutional beliefs is common in intellectual history; intellectual authority and institutional consensus are not the same thing.

But the critics might respond, intellectual authority is only recognized as such because of institutional consensus. For example, if a musicologist were to claim that an alleged musical genius who, after several decades, had not gained respect and recognition for his or her compositions is probably not a genius, the critics might say that basing a judgment on a unit of time—“several decades”—is an institutional rather than an intellectual construct. What, the critics might ask, makes a particular number of decades reasonable evidence by which to judge genius? The answer, of course, is nothing, except for the fact that such institutional procedures have proved useful to musicologists in making such distinctions in the past.

The analogous legal concept is the doctrine of precedent, i.e., a judge’s merely deciding a case a certain way becoming a basis for deciding later cases the same way—a pure example of institutional authority. But eh critics miss the crucial distinction that when a judicial decision is badly reasoned, or simply no longer applies in the face of evolving social standards or practices, the notion of intellectual authority is introduced: judges reconsider, revise, or in some cases throw out in the reconsideration of decisions, leading one to draw the conclusion that legal systems contain a significant degree of intellectual authority even if the thrust of their power is predominantly institutional.
9. Which one of the following most accurately states the main idea of the passage?
(A) Although some argue that the authority of legal systems is purely intellectual, these systems possess a degree of institutional authority due to their ability to enforce acceptance of badly reasoned or socially inappropriate judicial decisions.
(B) Although some argue that the authority of legal systems is purely institutional, theses systems are more correctly seen as vehicles for applying the intellectual authority of the law while possessing no coercive power of their own.
(C) Although some argue that the authority of legal systems is purely intellectual, these systems in fact wield institutional authority by virtue of the fact that intellectual authority reduces to institutional authority.
(D) Although some argue that the authority of legal systems is purely institutional, these systems possesses a degree of intellectual authority due to their ability to reconsider badly reasoned or socially inappropriate judicial decisions.
(E) Although some argue that the authority of legal systems is purely intellectual, these systems in fact wield exclusively institutional authority in that they possess the power to enforce acceptance of badly reasoned or socially inappropriate judicial decisions.

10. That some arguments “never receive institutional imprimatur” (line 22-23) most likely means that these arguments
(A) fail to gain institutional consensus
(B) fail to challenge institutional beliefs
(C) fail to conform to the example of precedent
(D) fail to convince by virtue of good reasoning
(E) fail to gain acceptance except by coercion

11. Which one of the following, if true, most challenges the author’s contention that legal systems contain a significant degree of intellectual authority?
(A) Judges often act under time constraints and occasionally render a badly reasoned or socially inappropriate decision.
(B) In some legal systems, the percentage of judicial decisions that contain faulty reasoning is far higher than it is in other legal systems.
(C) Many socially inappropriate legal decisions are thrown out by judges only after citizens begin to voice opposition to them.
(D) In some legal systems, the percentage of judicial decisions that are reconsidered and revised is far higher than it is in other legal systems.
(E) Judges are rarely willing to rectify the examples of faulty reasoning they discover when reviewing previous legal decisions.

12. Given the information in the passage, the author is LEAST likely to believe which one of the following?
(A) Institutional authority may depend on coercion; intellectual authority never does.
(B) Intellectual authority may accept well-reasoned arguments; institutional authority never does.
(C) Institutional authority may depend on convention; intellectual authority never does.
(D) Intellectual authority sometimes challenges institutional beliefs; institutional authority never does.
(E) Intellectual authority sometimes conflicts with precedent; institutional authority never does.

13. The author discusses the example from musicology primarily in order to
(A) distinguish the nothing of institutional authority from that of intellectual authority
(B) given an example of an argument possessing intellectual authority that did not prevail in its own time
(C) identify an example in which the ascription of musical genius did not withstand the test of time
(D) illustrate the claim that assessing intellectual authority requires an appeal to institutional authority
(E) demonstrate that the authority wielded by the arbiters of musical genius is entirely institutional

14. Based on the passage, the author would be most likely to hold which one of the following views about the doctrine of precedent?
(A) it is the only tool judges should use if they wish to achieve a purely intellectual authority.
(B) It is a useful tool in theory but in practice it invariably conflicts with the demands of intellectual authority.
(C) It is a useful tool but lacks intellectual authority unless it is combined with the reconsidering of decisions.
(D) It is often an unreliable tool because it prevents judges from reconsidering the intellectual authority of past decisions.
(E) It is an unreliable tool that should be abandoned because it lacks intellectual authority.

Originally posted by rs2010 on 02 Apr 2009, 16:40.
Last edited by fameatop on 27 Jul 2013, 19:18, edited 1 time in total.
Incorrect Format n lack of OA
Current Student
Joined: 13 Jan 2009
Posts: 315
Location: India
Re: Long RC -3 Legal system Thursday  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Apr 2009, 08:47
DAEDEC 19 mins

I will post OAs after 7 PM ET.
VP
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1100
Re: Long RC -3 Legal system Thursday  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Apr 2009, 19:28
Though Im late but here r my answers:

D A E B C C

Hemant what is the source? I found it really tough.
Director
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 766
Re: Long RC -3 Legal system Thursday  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Apr 2009, 13:58
Seems a typical LSAT RC (law related topic).
DAEDDB

Stem 5 1/4 min
Questions 9min

Need to reduce time spent to 4-4.5 min per long passage, and 1 min per question.
Current Student
Joined: 13 Jan 2009
Posts: 315
Location: India
Re: Long RC -3 Legal system Thursday  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Apr 2009, 17:05
ritula wrote:
Though Im late but here r my answers:

D A E B C C

Hemant what is the source? I found it really tough.

LSAT

Since I started doing RCs I always feel like doing this. I have hardly visited Quanta forums in last one week or so.

Waiting for Nitya to join but he seems busy these days.

Good luck Ritula and do sleep well before exam
VP
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1100
Re: Long RC -3 Legal system Thursday  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Apr 2009, 21:05
U r right abt RC. it is indeed addictive.
Thanks a lot for ur wishes. I will surely follow ur advice
hemantsood wrote:
ritula wrote:
Though Im late but here r my answers:

D A E B C C

Hemant what is the source? I found it really tough.

LSAT

Since I started doing RCs I always feel like doing this. I have hardly visited Quanta forums in last one week or so.

Waiting for Nitya to join but he seems busy these days.

Good luck Ritula and do sleep well before exam
Manager
Joined: 04 Sep 2008
Posts: 221
Location: Kolkata
Schools: La Martiniere for Boys
Re: Long RC -3 Legal system Thursday  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Apr 2009, 08:50
DAEBDC

Can someone explain 5. I got confused between d and e
_________________

Thanks
rampuria

Intern
Joined: 21 Aug 2012
Posts: 20
Re: Filling in for Nitya... Intellectual authority is defined  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Jul 2013, 02:50
DAEBDC
Timings:IR-4:41
1) :38 ; 2)1:19 ; 3) 3:04 ; 4)1:09 ; 5) 3:51 ; 6) :48
OA time:15:33 mins
Intern
Joined: 04 May 2013
Posts: 10
Re: Intellectual authority is defined as the authority of argume  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jul 2013, 04:52
A Reasonable hard Rc to read,
Took 10 Mins
all Correct but the 13. It also includes a bit of guess work.
Its actually quite difficult to nail these types especially aftr frying ur brain in Quant.
Nonetheless, very good of the sorts to Practice.
Manager
Joined: 18 Jun 2013
Posts: 71
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V35
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Re: Intellectual authority is defined as the authority of argume  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Apr 2018, 04:00
Found this one to be quite tough. Got only 2 correct. Can someone please share the explanations for the questions here?
Re: Intellectual authority is defined as the authority of argume &nbs [#permalink] 21 Apr 2018, 04:00
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Intellectual authority is defined as the authority of argume

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.