abrakadabra21 wrote:

I dont understand this kind of graph pl help somebody

Hi

abrakadabra21,

As per original image L and S are in positive correlation.

The relation of L and S are inversed in sense , L and S are in Negative correlation.

The position of circle remains same but the size differs. PFB the image how it looks when reversed.

Answers explained belowAttachment:

IR.jpg [ 51.75 KiB | Viewed 928 times ]
So the answers as per image :

If the relationship between L and S were inversed, then the greatest effect on the graph would be to the

Size of the circles.

( as position remain the same) If the relationship between L and S were inversed, then the largest circle would be

A .

If the relationship between L and S were inversed, then were would be a

Negative correlation between F and L.

If the relationship between L and S were inversed, then were would be a

Negative correlation between S and L.

If the relationship between L and S were inversed, then were would be a

Positive correlation between F and S.

( Still positive as L doesnt matter now) Hope this helps

kudos if it does

_________________

Cheers,

Shri

-------------------------------

GMAT is not an Exam... it is a war .. Let's Conquer !!!