It is currently 22 Nov 2017, 19:33

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Irradiation of food by gamma rays would keep it from spoiling

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

BSchool Forum Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: Transforming Educational System
Joined: 21 Sep 2016
Posts: 353

Kudos [?]: 134 [0], given: 54

Location: India
Concentration: Nonprofit, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 650 Q50 V27
GRE 1: 319 Q170 V149
WE: Education (Non-Profit and Government)
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Irradiation of food by gamma rays would keep it from spoiling [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Oct 2017, 22:31
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

22% (01:51) correct 78% (01:25) wrong based on 87 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Proponent: Irradiation of food by gamma rays would keep it from spoiling before it reaches the consumer in food stores. The process leaves no radiation behind, and vitamin losses are comparable to those that occur in cooking, so there is no reason to reject irradiation on the grounds of nutrition or safety. Indeed, it kills harmful Salmonella bacteria, which in contaminated poultry have caused serious illness to consumers.

Opponent: The irradiation process has no effect on the bacteria that cause botulism, a very serious form of food poisoning, while those that cause bad odors that would warn consumers of botulism are killed. Moreover, Salmonella and the bacteria that cause botulism can easily be killed in poultry by using a safe chemical dip.

The opponent’s argument proceeds by
(A) isolating an ambiguity in a crucial term in the proponent’s argument
(B) showing that claims made in the proponent’s argument result in a self-contradiction
(C) establishing that undesirable consequences result from the adoption of either one of two proposed remedies
(D) shifting perspective from safety with respect to consumers to safety with respect to producers
(E) pointing out an alternative way of obtaining an advantage claimed by the proponent without risking a particular disadvantage

Source: LSAT Critical Reasoning
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Canadian Bschools: Detailed comparison
Resume Guides

If you found my post helpful, kindly press "+1 Kudos" to appreciate :) ..TIA

Kudos [?]: 134 [0], given: 54

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 08 Apr 2017
Posts: 29

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Irradiation of food by gamma rays would keep it from spoiling [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Oct 2017, 18:30
Quote:
Proponent: Irradiation of food by gamma rays would keep it from spoiling before it reaches the consumer in food stores. The process leaves no radiation behind, and vitamin losses are comparable to those that occur in cooking, so there is no reason to reject irradiation on the grounds of nutrition or safety. Indeed, it kills harmful Salmonella bacteria, which in contaminated poultry have caused serious illness to consumers.

Opponent: The irradiation process has no effect on the bacteria that cause botulism, a very serious form of food poisoning, while those that cause bad odors that would warn consumers of botulism are killed. Moreover, Salmonella and the bacteria that cause botulism can easily be killed in poultry by using a safe chemical dip.


Proponent states irradiation of food by gamma rays would keep it from spoiling (prevents from bad odor). The added advantage, gamma rays kill Salmonella bacteria. Opponent states, gamma rays does not effect botulism, a very serious form of food poisoning. In fact, gamma rays kills bad odor which is a way of identifying botulism.

Therefore, the opponent’s argument proceeds by showing that claims made in the proponent’s argument result in a self-contradiction

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 07 Jul 2015
Posts: 45

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 20

Location: India
Concentration: Operations, General Management
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V35
GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40
GPA: 3.7
WE: Operations (Manufacturing)
Reviews Badge
Re: Irradiation of food by gamma rays would keep it from spoiling [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Oct 2017, 15:32
explanations please

I am stuck on E and just cannot understand why is B a better option than E

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 20

BSchool Forum Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: Transforming Educational System
Joined: 21 Sep 2016
Posts: 353

Kudos [?]: 134 [0], given: 54

Location: India
Concentration: Nonprofit, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 650 Q50 V27
GRE 1: 319 Q170 V149
WE: Education (Non-Profit and Government)
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Irradiation of food by gamma rays would keep it from spoiling [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Oct 2017, 19:32
(A) is irrelevant. We're not talking about what might happen if you store poorly.
(C) doesn't matter--the argument already considers them separate issues ("nutrition or safety")
(D) So?
(E) Again... so? We're just worried about whether there's a safety or nutrition issue, here.

Here was my line of thinking when I came to (B). I too was turned off by the "raw food" bit.
We know vitamin losses occur in cooking - shown when the author says "vitamin losses [that occur in irradiation] are comparable to those that occur in cooking").
We also know that irradiation causes some vitamin losses too as the statement shows above.
So if irradiation causes vitamin losses and cooking causes vitamin losses, then cooking irradiated food would be less nutritionally beneficial than cooking non-irradiated food. Therefore, the part about having "no reason to reject irradiation on the grounds of nutrition" is bogus!
Now we get to the part about "if eaten raw, it would not have the vitamin advantage of raw food."
Now we have the same thing: we are comparing irradiated food and non-irradiated food. From this statement, we see clearly that irradiated food "would not have the vitamin advantage" of regular raw food. In other words raw, non-irradiated, food has more vitamins.
So irradiated food that is COOKED has less vitamins and irradiated food that is RAW has less vitamins. Ultimately, irradiated food has less vitamins than raw food. If the opponent states, "well, irradiated food still needs cooking," he would DESTROY the proponent's argument that "there is no reason to reject irradiation on the grounds of nutrition."
_________________

Canadian Bschools: Detailed comparison
Resume Guides

If you found my post helpful, kindly press "+1 Kudos" to appreciate :) ..TIA

Kudos [?]: 134 [0], given: 54

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 08 Apr 2017
Posts: 29

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Re: Irradiation of food by gamma rays would keep it from spoiling [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Oct 2017, 08:26
puneetj88 wrote:
explanations please

I am stuck on E and just cannot understand why is B a better option than E


(E) pointing out an alternative way of obtaining an advantage claimed by the proponent without risking a particular disadvantage

Here the opponent's argument is not proceeded by pointing out an alternate way. It is proceeded by pointing out the problem with irradiation "The irradiation process has no effect on the bacteria that cause botulism" that the proponent misses which results in self contradiction.

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 08 Apr 2017
Posts: 29

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Re: Irradiation of food by gamma rays would keep it from spoiling [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Oct 2017, 08:27
puneetj88 wrote:
explanations please

I am stuck on E and just cannot understand why is B a better option than E


(E) pointing out an alternative way of obtaining an advantage claimed by the proponent without risking a particular disadvantage

Here the opponent's argument is not proceeded by pointing out an alternate way. It is proceeded by pointing out the problem with irradiation "The irradiation process has no effect on the bacteria that cause botulism" that the proponent misses which results in self contradiction.

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Re: Irradiation of food by gamma rays would keep it from spoiling   [#permalink] 30 Oct 2017, 08:27
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Irradiation of food by gamma rays would keep it from spoiling

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.