It is currently 18 Nov 2017, 22:25

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Is 1/p > r/(r^2 + 2)?

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 25 Oct 2008
Posts: 594

Kudos [?]: 1182 [2], given: 100

Location: Kolkata,India
Is 1/p > r/(r^2 + 2)? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Nov 2009, 16:06
2
KUDOS
19
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

60% (01:16) correct 40% (01:13) wrong based on 502 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Is 1/p > r/(r^2 + 2) ?

(1) p = r
(2) r > 0

[Reveal] Spoiler:
1/p > r /r^2 +2
r^2 +2 > pr ??

From stmt 1 we know:
r^2 +2 > r^2 ..so why s the answer not A
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

http://gmatclub.com/forum/countdown-beginshas-ended-85483-40.html#p649902

Last edited by Bunuel on 04 May 2013, 04:11, edited 2 times in total.
Edited the question and added the OA

Kudos [?]: 1182 [2], given: 100

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 42249

Kudos [?]: 132631 [18], given: 12326

### Show Tags

01 Nov 2009, 16:33
18
KUDOS
Expert's post
10
This post was
BOOKMARKED
This question was posted in another thread just an hour ago, here is my reply to that post.

Is $$\frac{1}{p}>\frac{r}{r^2 + 2}$$?

(1) $$p=r$$ --> $$\frac{1}{r}>\frac{r}{r^2+2}?$$ --> as $$r^2+2$$ is always positive, multiplying inequality by this expression we'll get: $$\frac{r^2+2}{r}>r?$$ --> $$r+\frac{2}{r}>r?$$ --> $$\frac{2}{r}>0?$$. This inequality is true when $$r>0$$ and not true when $$r<0$$. Not sufficient.

(2) $$r>0$$. Not sufficient by itself.

(1)+(2) $$r>0$$, $$\frac{2}{r}>0$$. Sufficient.

tejal777 again when you simplifying $$\frac{1}{p} >\frac{r}{r^2 +2}$$ to $$r^2 +2 > pr$$, you are making a mistake. You can multiply inequality by r^2 +2 as this expression is always positive, BUT you can not multiply inequality by p, as we don't know the sigh of p.

Hope it's clear.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 132631 [18], given: 12326

Director
Joined: 25 Oct 2008
Posts: 594

Kudos [?]: 1182 [0], given: 100

Location: Kolkata,India

### Show Tags

01 Nov 2009, 19:11
Great wayof approaching!Super clear..thanks!
_________________

http://gmatclub.com/forum/countdown-beginshas-ended-85483-40.html#p649902

Kudos [?]: 1182 [0], given: 100

Intern
Joined: 19 Nov 2004
Posts: 12

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 9

### Show Tags

04 Nov 2009, 01:17
Thanks Bunuel , your approach to the problem was very good. !

thanks

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 9

Current Student
Status: Three Down.
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 1914

Kudos [?]: 2225 [0], given: 210

Concentration: General Management, Nonprofit

### Show Tags

26 Oct 2010, 17:59
The question can be rephrased as:

$$p < \frac{r^2+2}{r}$$, by taking the reciprocals on each side (The inequality sign switches here, note that!)

Statement 1: p = r

This means the RHS becomes: $$\frac{p^2 + 2}{p} = p + \frac{2}{p}$$. Note that $$p + \frac{2}{p}$$ will be greater than p (you're adding the term 2/p to it) as long as p > 0. If p < 0, then ultimately, you're subtracting a number from p, and hence it'll be lesser. Since there are two cases here, this is insufficient by itself.

So we are down to B, C and E.

Statement 2: r > 0

Does this say anything at all about the relationship between p and r? No. Insufficient.

So, if you combine the statements, then p = r and r > 0, which means we've answered the only condition we had while solving the first statement and hence the statements together are sufficient.

Hope this helps.

Kudos [?]: 2225 [0], given: 210

Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4488

Kudos [?]: 8737 [2], given: 105

### Show Tags

08 Jan 2012, 15:55
2
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
I'm happy to help with this one.

Is (1/x) > y/(y^2+3)

(1) y > 0
(2) x = y

Statement #1: y > 0

That tells us no information about x, so it's not sufficient by itself.

Statement #2: x = y

Let's say x = y = 1. Then the left is 1, the right side is 1/(1^2 + 3) = 1/4, and the left side is bigger.

BUT, if x = y = -1, then the left side is -1, and the right side is -1/4, and --- here's one of the really tricky things about negatives and inequalities --- the "less negative" number -1/4 is greater than -1, so the right side is bigger. It may be less confusing to think about that in terms of whole numbers ---- for example, 10 > 5, but -5 > -10: it's better to have $10 in your pocket rather than$5 in your pocket, but it's better to be $5 in debt than$10 in debt. Does that make sense?

You are perfectly right --- y^2 is positive whether y is positive or negative, and therefore the denominator (y^2 + 3) is the same whether y is positive or negative, but what's different are whether the fractions themselves are negative, and that's what can reverse the order of the inequality.

Without knowing whether x & y are positive and negative, we cannot determine the direction of the inequality. Statement #2 by itself is not sufficient

Combined: y > 0 AND x = y

Now, we are guaranteed that the fractions are both positive, so multiplying by x or y will not reverse the order of the inequality. Because x = y, we have (1/y) > y/(y^2+3). Cross-multiplying, we get y^2 + 3 > y^2, which is always true. Together, the statements are sufficient. Answer choice = C.

Does that make sense? Please let me know if you have any further questions.

Mike
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)

Kudos [?]: 8737 [2], given: 105

Manager
Joined: 29 Jul 2011
Posts: 104

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 6

Location: United States

### Show Tags

08 Jan 2012, 17:16
Good one.

1. y>0. No info on x, insuff.
2. x=y. Substituting 1/y > y^2/(y^2 + 3). However, you can only multiply both sides and not change the inequality if x=y=positive. If negative, inequality changes. Insuff.

Together, it is given that y is positive. So, x=y=positive. So, multiplying both sides with no change in inequality is possible. This implies 1 > y^2/(y^2+3).
LHS is obviously < 1, so this inequality is true. Suff. C
_________________

I am the master of my fate. I am the captain of my soul.
Please consider giving +1 Kudos if deserved!

DS - If negative answer only, still sufficient. No need to find exact solution.
PS - Always look at the answers first
CR - Read the question stem first, hunt for conclusion
SC - Meaning first, Grammar second
RC - Mentally connect paragraphs as you proceed. Short = 2min, Long = 3-4 min

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 6

Manager
Joined: 06 Jun 2011
Posts: 141

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 15

### Show Tags

20 Jan 2012, 06:42
C. BTW Excellent explanation and approach to problem bunuel

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 15

Intern
Joined: 20 Apr 2013
Posts: 24

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 99

Concentration: Finance, Finance
GMAT Date: 06-03-2013
GPA: 3.3
WE: Accounting (Accounting)
Is 1/p > r/(r^2 + 2) ? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 May 2013, 09:41
robertrdzak wrote:
Is 1/p > r/(r^2+2) ?

(1) p = r
(2) r > 0

[Reveal] Spoiler:
C. I dont see why you need (2) to solve the problem. Using (1) alone, you know that r^2+2 must be positive so the inequality sign does not change when we simplify to (r^2+2)/r > r.

If r>0, than r^2+2 > r^2 which can be simplified further to 2>0, this is TRUE.

If r<0 than r^2+2 < r^2 which can be simplified further to 2 < 0 which impossible so r must be greater than 0

What am i doing wrong?

if P=0 then R=0. Zero divided by anything is not defined so we cannot solve the equation when p=0.

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 99

Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Posts: 329

Kudos [?]: 229 [0], given: 12

Re: Is 1/p > r/(r^2+2) ? (1) p = r (2) r > 0 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 May 2013, 17:17
Kind of incomplete question. It should be given that p cannot be equal to zero.
The answer is C. If you know that you can cross multiple with a number only if you know the sign of that number than you can get to the answer C.

Kudos [?]: 229 [0], given: 12

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 42249

Kudos [?]: 132631 [0], given: 12326

Re: Is 1/p > r/(r^2+2) ? (1) p = r (2) r > 0 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 May 2013, 04:16
Bluelagoon wrote:
Kind of incomplete question. It should be given that p cannot be equal to zero.
The answer is C. If you know that you can cross multiple with a number only if you know the sign of that number than you can get to the answer C.

We are given that p = r and r > 0, thus p does not equal 0.

Check here: is-1-p-r-r-86165.html#p645975
_________________

Kudos [?]: 132631 [0], given: 12326

Retired Moderator
Joined: 05 Jul 2006
Posts: 1749

Kudos [?]: 442 [0], given: 49

Re: Is 1/p > r/(r^2 + 2)? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 May 2013, 10:40
Is 1/p > r/(r^2 + 2) ?

(1) p = r
(2) r > 0

r^2 +2 is +ve thus the question becomes

is (r^2 + 2) / p > r?

from one
question becomes is (r^2 + 2) / r > r ..... is r + 2/r > r or ..... is 2/r > 0 .....insuff

from 2

obviously insuff as there is no info about p

both

suff...C

Kudos [?]: 442 [0], given: 49

Retired Moderator
Joined: 05 Jul 2006
Posts: 1749

Kudos [?]: 442 [0], given: 49

Re: Is 1/p > r/(r^2 + 2)? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 May 2013, 10:11
Is 1/p > r/(r^2 + 2) ?

(1) p = r
(2) r > 0

1/p - (r/r^2+2) =( r^2+2 - pr)/ p(r^2+2) > 0?

from 1 the numerator becomes 2 and the sign of the denominator depends on r.... insuff

from 2........insuff

both
r = p >0 .... suff ...c

Kudos [?]: 442 [0], given: 49

Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Dec 2012
Posts: 329

Kudos [?]: 188 [0], given: 291

Re: Is 1/p > r/(r^2 + 2)? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 May 2013, 04:06
mr bunuel how does r^2+2/r >r => r^2>0. shouldnt it be r^2+ 2 >r^2 instead

Kudos [?]: 188 [0], given: 291

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 42249

Kudos [?]: 132631 [0], given: 12326

Re: Is 1/p > r/(r^2 + 2)? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 May 2013, 06:08
mohnish104 wrote:
mr bunuel how does r^2+2/r >r => r^2>0. shouldnt it be r^2+ 2 >r^2 instead

$$\frac{1}{r}>\frac{r}{r^2+2}?$$ --> as $$r^2+2$$ is always positive, multiplying inequality by this expression we'll get: $$\frac{r^2+2}{r}>r?$$ --> $$r+\frac{2}{r}>r?$$ --> $$\frac{2}{r}>0?$$.

As for your solution: we cannot cross-multiply $$\frac{1}{r}>\frac{r}{r^2+2}$$ since we don't know whether r is positive or negative.

Hope it's clear.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 132631 [0], given: 12326

Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Dec 2012
Posts: 329

Kudos [?]: 188 [0], given: 291

Re: Is 1/p > r/(r^2 + 2)? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 May 2013, 07:27
hey thanks a lot Mr Bunuel for the explanation.

Kudos [?]: 188 [0], given: 291

Current Student
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 1972

Kudos [?]: 740 [0], given: 355

Concentration: Finance
Re: Is 1/p > r/(r^2 + 2)? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Jan 2014, 06:36
tejal777 wrote:
Is 1/p > r/(r^2 + 2) ?

(1) p = r
(2) r > 0

[Reveal] Spoiler:
1/p > r /r^2 +2
r^2 +2 > pr ??

From stmt 1 we know:
r^2 +2 > r^2 ..so why s the answer not A

Good question +1

r^2 + 2 /p > r?

(r^2 + 2 - pr)/p > 0?

Statement 1

r = p so numerator must be 2, but we don't know whether p is positive or negative

Statement 2

R is positive, but we don't know anything about P

(1) + (2) We know that p = r and r>0, Hence p>0

Sufficient

Hope it helps
Cheers!

J

Kudos [?]: 740 [0], given: 355

Intern
Joined: 04 Mar 2015
Posts: 4

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 60

Is 1/p > r/(r^2 + 2)? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Mar 2015, 03:45
1/p > r/r^2+2
=> r^2 + 2 > pr
=> r^2 - pr > -2
=> r(r - p) > -2
now if p=r than r-p becomes 0
so => 0>-2 true

Why not statement A is suffiecient

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 60

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 42249

Kudos [?]: 132631 [0], given: 12326

Re: Is 1/p > r/(r^2 + 2)? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Mar 2015, 05:15
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
architbansal wrote:
1/p > r/r^2+2
=> r^2 + 2 > pr
=> r^2 - pr > -2
=> r(r - p) > -2
now if p=r than r-p becomes 0
so => 0>-2 true

Why not statement A is suffiecient

We cannot cross-multiply in this case.

We can multiply 1/p > r/(r^2+2) by r^2+2 because r^2+2=non-negative+positive=positive but we cannot multiply 1/p > r/(r^2+2) by p because we don't know its sign:
If p is positive, then we'd get 1 > p*r/(r^2+2): keep the sign when multiplying by positive value;
If p is negative, then we'd get 1 < p*r/(r^2+2): flip the sign of the inequality when multiplying by negative value.

Hope it helps.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 132631 [0], given: 12326

Retired Moderator
Joined: 12 Aug 2015
Posts: 2213

Kudos [?]: 869 [0], given: 602

Re: Is 1/p > r/(r^2 + 2)? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Mar 2016, 06:11
Here we must realize that r^2 +2 is always positive so we take it to the numerator of the left hand side
Now statement 1 is not sufficient as we dont know the signs of p and r
if they are positive the answer is yes else the answer is no => not sufficient
statement 2 although gives a sign of r but we dont know what p or r actually are => not sufficient
combining them => P>0 AND THE ANSWER IS YES => C is sufficient
_________________

Give me a hell yeah ...!!!!!

Kudos [?]: 869 [0], given: 602

Re: Is 1/p > r/(r^2 + 2)?   [#permalink] 13 Mar 2016, 06:11

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 22 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by