It is currently 17 Dec 2017, 00:27

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Is 10 percent of k less than 20 percent of n ? 1) k is less

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 May 2006
Posts: 369

Kudos [?]: 155 [0], given: 0

Location: Rancho Palos Verdes
Is 10 percent of k less than 20 percent of n ? 1) k is less [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Jul 2006, 14:33
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum.

Is 10 percent of k less than 20 percent of n ?
1) k is less than n.
2) 1 percent of k is less than 5 percent of n
_________________

The only thing that matters is what you believe.

Kudos [?]: 155 [0], given: 0

GMAT Instructor
Joined: 04 Jul 2006
Posts: 1259

Kudos [?]: 345 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

20 Jul 2006, 15:35
A nice way to do this question is to draw a quick graph, and you see that together they are sufficient, but separately neither is.

Kudos [?]: 345 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 04 Jul 2006
Posts: 57

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

20 Jul 2006, 19:25
Nice tricky question!

If you want a numerical solution: (I don't know how to draw the graph).

C it is.

A is not sufficient.
example, k=40, n=50 0,1k=4 <0,2n=10.
But: k=-50, n=-40 => 0,1k = -5 > 0,2n=-8.

B is not sufficient, too.

Both statements together are sufficient.
3 cases:
a) n, k > 0 (obvious)
b) k<0, n> 0 (obvious)
c) n, k < 0

k<n (by (1))
=> -k>-n (multiplying with -1)
Using (2)
0,01k < 0,05 n or equivalent k < 5n
Hence: -k > -5n (multiplying with -1)
-k > -2n must also be true because -5n > -2n (because -n > 0)

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 22 May 2006
Posts: 369

Kudos [?]: 155 [0], given: 0

Location: Rancho Palos Verdes

### Show Tags

20 Jul 2006, 22:00
OA is C.

IME

Is 0.1k < 0.2n?

stmt1. k<n
only when k<n<0 => 0.1k > 0.2n : insuff.

stmt2. 0.01k < 0.05n
since k<n or k>n : insuff.

thust stmt1+stmt2
tells that 0 < k < n.

thus, sufficient. C.
_________________

The only thing that matters is what you believe.

Kudos [?]: 155 [0], given: 0

GMAT Instructor
Joined: 04 Jul 2006
Posts: 1259

Kudos [?]: 345 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

20 Jul 2006, 23:02
0.10k<0.20n reduces n > k/2, if we plot k and n on the x and y axes, we get the region above the line though the origin with slope 1/2. It's really quite fast, and this technique can come in handy!

Kudos [?]: 345 [0], given: 0

20 Jul 2006, 23:02
Display posts from previous: Sort by