GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 24 Sep 2018, 10:35

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Is |4m - 3n| > |3m - n| + |m - 2n| ?

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 28 Apr 2014
Posts: 232
Re: Is |4m - 3n| > |3m - n| + |m - 2n| ?  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Jul 2014, 11:59
vietmoi999 wrote:
this is not og questions and should not be studied

If Bunuel is presenting a question , I would definitely study it

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Intern
Joined: 19 Nov 2016
Posts: 3
Re: Is |4m - 3n| > |3m - n| + |m - 2n| ?  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Nov 2016, 15:39
Statement 2 says 2n<m which translates to m-2n>0. I thought, by filling in numbers, this would mean that 3m-n certainly is bigger than 0. However, in the explanation above m=-4 and n=-3 are given as an example to fill in. But if m =-4 and n=-3 then 2n is not smaller than m. This would mean that these numbers could not be used with this premise right? m has to be bigger than 2n so m has to be >0. I'd say statement 2 is sufficient to answer the question. Could someone help me please?
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 49430
Re: Is |4m - 3n| > |3m - n| + |m - 2n| ?  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Nov 2016, 00:47
esmeeaugustijn wrote:
Statement 2 says 2n<m which translates to m-2n>0. I thought, by filling in numbers, this would mean that 3m-n certainly is bigger than 0. However, in the explanation above m=-4 and n=-3 are given as an example to fill in. But if m =-4 and n=-3 then 2n is not smaller than m. This would mean that these numbers could not be used with this premise right? m has to be bigger than 2n so m has to be >0. I'd say statement 2 is sufficient to answer the question. Could someone help me please?

If m =-4 and n=-3, then $$(2n = -6) < (m = -4)$$
_________________
Senior SC Moderator
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Posts: 1322
Location: Malaysia
Re: Is |4m - 3n| > |3m - n| + |m - 2n| ?  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Mar 2017, 20:41
Bunuel wrote:
SOLUTION

Is $$|3m - n| + |m - 2n| > |4m - 3n|$$?

One of the properties of absolute values says that $$|x|+|y|\geq|x+y|$$. Note that "=" sign holds for $$xy\geq{0}$$ (or simply when $$x$$ and $$y$$ have the same sign). So, the strict inequality (>) holds when $$xy<0$$. ()

Notice that if we denote $$x=3m - n$$ and $$y=m - 2n$$, then $$x+y=4m-3n$$. So, the question becomes: is $$|x|+|y|>|x+y|$$? Thus, the qeustion basically asks whether $$x$$ and $$y$$, or which is the same $$3m - n$$ and $$m - 2n$$, have the opposite signs.

(1) $$m > 0$$. Clearly insufficient as no info about $$n$$. Not sufficient.

(2) $$2n < m$$. This implies that $$m-2n>0$$. If $$m=3$$ and $$n=1$$, then $$3m - n>0$$ (so in this case $$3m - n$$ and $$m - 2n$$ will have the same sign) but if $$m=-4$$ and $$n=-3$$, then $$3m - n<0$$ (so in this case $$3m - n$$ and $$m - 2n$$ will have different signs sign). Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) We have that $$m > 0$$, or which is the same $$5m>0$$ and $$m>2n$$. Add them: $$6m>2n$$. Reduce by 2 and re-arrange: $$3m-n>0$$. Thus, both $$m-2n$$ and $$3m-n$$ are positive, so we have a NO answer to the question. Sufficient.

Kudos points given to correct solutions above.

Try NEW Absolute Value PS question.

Could someone please help to explain $$x=3m - n$$ and $$y=m - 2n$$, then $$x+y=4m-3n$$. So, the question becomes: is $$|x|+|y|>|x+y|$$? Thus, the qeustion basically asks whether $$x$$ and $$y$$, or which is the same $$3m - n$$ and $$m - 2n$$, have the opposite signs?

I thought it needs to be the same sign.
_________________

"Be challenged at EVERY MOMENT."

“Strength doesn’t come from what you can do. It comes from overcoming the things you once thought you couldn’t.”

"Each stage of the journey is crucial to attaining new heights of knowledge."

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 49430
Re: Is |4m - 3n| > |3m - n| + |m - 2n| ?  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Mar 2017, 00:21
ziyuen wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
SOLUTION

Is $$|3m - n| + |m - 2n| > |4m - 3n|$$?

One of the properties of absolute values says that $$|x|+|y|\geq|x+y|$$. Note that "=" sign holds for $$xy\geq{0}$$ (or simply when $$x$$ and $$y$$ have the same sign). So, the strict inequality (>) holds when $$xy<0$$. ()

Notice that if we denote $$x=3m - n$$ and $$y=m - 2n$$, then $$x+y=4m-3n$$. So, the question becomes: is $$|x|+|y|>|x+y|$$? Thus, the qeustion basically asks whether $$x$$ and $$y$$, or which is the same $$3m - n$$ and $$m - 2n$$, have the opposite signs.

(1) $$m > 0$$. Clearly insufficient as no info about $$n$$. Not sufficient.

(2) $$2n < m$$. This implies that $$m-2n>0$$. If $$m=3$$ and $$n=1$$, then $$3m - n>0$$ (so in this case $$3m - n$$ and $$m - 2n$$ will have the same sign) but if $$m=-4$$ and $$n=-3$$, then $$3m - n<0$$ (so in this case $$3m - n$$ and $$m - 2n$$ will have different signs sign). Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) We have that $$m > 0$$, or which is the same $$5m>0$$ and $$m>2n$$. Add them: $$6m>2n$$. Reduce by 2 and re-arrange: $$3m-n>0$$. Thus, both $$m-2n$$ and $$3m-n$$ are positive, so we have a NO answer to the question. Sufficient.

Kudos points given to correct solutions above.

Try NEW Absolute Value PS question.

Could someone please help to explain $$x=3m - n$$ and $$y=m - 2n$$, then $$x+y=4m-3n$$. So, the question becomes: is $$|x|+|y|>|x+y|$$? Thus, the qeustion basically asks whether $$x$$ and $$y$$, or which is the same $$3m - n$$ and $$m - 2n$$, have the opposite signs?

I thought it needs to be the same sign.

Plug the numbers and check. Try x=1 and y=2 AND x=1 and y=-2.
_________________
SVP
Joined: 26 Mar 2013
Posts: 1811
Re: Is |4m - 3n| > |3m - n| + |m - 2n| ?  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Mar 2018, 05:04
Bunuel wrote:
SOLUTION

Is $$|3m - n| + |m - 2n| > |4m - 3n|$$?

Notice that if we denote $$x=3m - n$$ and $$y=m - 2n$$, then $$x+y=4m-3n$$. So, the question becomes: is $$|x|+|y|>|x+y|$$? Thus, the qeustion basically asks whether $$x$$ and $$y$$, or which is the same $$3m - n$$ and $$m - 2n$$, have the opposite signs.

(1) $$m > 0$$. Clearly insufficient as no info about $$n$$. Not sufficient.

(2) $$2n < m$$. This implies that $$m-2n>0$$. If $$m=3$$ and $$n=1$$, then $$3m - n>0$$ (so in this case $$3m - n$$ and $$m - 2n$$ will have the same sign) but if $$m=-4$$ and $$n=-3$$, then $$3m - n<0$$ (so in this case $$3m - n$$ and $$m - 2n$$ will have different signs sign). Not sufficient.

Dear Bunuel

Can you prove that statement 2 is insufficient through algebraic approach? I failed to do so

Thanks
Board of Directors
Status: Stepping into my 10 years long dream
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 3672
Is |4m - 3n| > |3m - n| + |m - 2n| ?  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Mar 2018, 05:16
Mo2men wrote:
Dear Bunuel

Can you prove that statement 2 is insufficient through algebraic approach? I failed to do so

Thanks

Hey Mo2men ,

Here I go:

We are given 2n < m

This means m - 2n > 0 and

RHS could be 4m - 3n or 3n - 4m

Now, I will take the 2nd and 3rd modulus positive while I am not sure of the 1st modulus, so I will evaluate both + and - scenarios for it.

We know that our RHS = 4m - 3n because 4m > 3n.

When 3m - n > 0

We have LHS = 3m - n + m - 2n = 4m - 3n , which is also equal to RHS if it is 4m - 3n. But not otherwise.

When 3m - n < 0

We have LHS = - 3m + n + m - 2n = -2m - n , which is not equal to RHS.

Hence, 2nd statement is giving us both scenarios. Hence, insufficient.

Does that make sense?
_________________

My GMAT Story: From V21 to V40
My MBA Journey: My 10 years long MBA Dream
My Secret Hacks: Best way to use GMATClub | Importance of an Error Log!
Verbal Resources: All SC Resources at one place | All CR Resources at one place

GMAT Club Inbuilt Error Log Functionality - View More.
New Visa Forum - Ask all your Visa Related Questions - here.

Find a bug in the new email templates and get rewarded with 2 weeks of GMATClub Tests for free

SVP
Joined: 26 Mar 2013
Posts: 1811
Re: Is |4m - 3n| > |3m - n| + |m - 2n| ?  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Mar 2018, 05:25
abhimahna wrote:
Mo2men wrote:
Dear Bunuel

Can you prove that statement 2 is insufficient through algebraic approach? I failed to do so

Thanks

Hey Mo2men ,

Here I go:

We are given 2n < m

This means m - 2n > 0 and

if m - 2n > 0 => m > 2n or 2m > 4n or 4m > 8n. => 4m > 3n as well

Now, I will take the 2nd and 3rd modulus positive while I am not sure of the 1st modulus, so I will evaluate both + and - scenarios for it.

We know that our RHS = 4m - 3n because 4m > 3n.

When 3m - n > 0

We have LHS = 3m - n + m - 2n = 4m - 3n , which is also equal to RHS

When 3m - n < 0

We have LHS = - 3m + n + m - 2n = -2m - n , which is not equal to RHS.

Hence, 2nd statement is giving us both scenarios. Hence, insufficient.

Does that make sense?

Hi abhimahna

The highlighted dedcution is not always true

Take Bunuel example above

m = -4 & n =-3

Statement 2 says : m > 2n ......... -4 > -6...true

In your conclusion that 4m > 3n, you can consider same same example above

-16 > -9..........which is not true.
Board of Directors
Status: Stepping into my 10 years long dream
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 3672
Re: Is |4m - 3n| > |3m - n| + |m - 2n| ?  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Mar 2018, 05:41
Mo2men wrote:
Hi abhimahna

The highlighted dedcution is not always true

Take Bunuel example above

m = -4 & n =-3

Statement 2 says : m > 2n ......... -4 > -6...true

In your conclusion that 4m > 3n, you can consider same same example above

-16 > -9..........which is not true.

Hey Mo2men ,

I agree to your point. I missed the nature of variables point.

Anyways, to conclude we can still have two different RHS values and some of the scenarios would work while others won't. Hence, B is insufficient.
_________________

My GMAT Story: From V21 to V40
My MBA Journey: My 10 years long MBA Dream
My Secret Hacks: Best way to use GMATClub | Importance of an Error Log!
Verbal Resources: All SC Resources at one place | All CR Resources at one place

GMAT Club Inbuilt Error Log Functionality - View More.
New Visa Forum - Ask all your Visa Related Questions - here.

Find a bug in the new email templates and get rewarded with 2 weeks of GMATClub Tests for free

SVP
Joined: 26 Mar 2013
Posts: 1811
Re: Is |4m - 3n| > |3m - n| + |m - 2n| ?  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Mar 2018, 16:30
abhimahna wrote:

Hey Mo2men ,

I agree to your point. I missed the nature of variables point.

Hi abhimahna

It seems you forgot math and focus on other school issues now

I was challenged by statement 2 and reached algebraic proof and I hope Bunuel could feedback. The xlation might be long for details.

Question: |3m−n|+|m−2n|>|4m−3n|

Quote Bunuel solution:

One of the properties of absolute values says that |x|+|y|≥|x+y|. Note that "=" sign holds for xy≥0 (or simply when x and y have the same sign). So, the strict inequality (>) holds when xy<0.

Notice that if we denote x=3m−n and y=m−2n, then x+y=4m−3n. So, the question becomes: is |x|+|y|>|x+y|? Thus, the question basically asks whether x and y, or which is the same 3m−n and m−2n, have the opposite signs.

Statement 2:

$$2n < m$$

Case 1:

m > 0 & n>= 0

m > 2n & 2n >n....hence m>n and consequently 4m > 3n & 3m > n

First term: 3m−n = +++

second term: m−2n = +++

x & y have same sign.............Answer to question is NO

Case 2:

m > 0 & n < 0

Same as above excalty

x & y have same sign.............Answer to question is NO

The trick starts here when 'm' is negative and 'n' is negative because m could be larger or less than n. (let m=-4 & n =-2) or ( m=-2 & n =-3). Both examples hold statement 2 true. let's see the algebraic approach

By plugging numbers, I proved that '3m-n' is negative and hence x & y have different sign and answer is Yes.

But I could not reach it algebraically. I hope to get some help.

Thanks
Board of Directors
Status: Stepping into my 10 years long dream
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 3672
Is |4m - 3n| > |3m - n| + |m - 2n| ?  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Mar 2018, 00:43
Mo2men wrote:
Hi abhimahna

It seems you forgot math and focus on other school issues now

I was challenged by statement 2 and reached algebraic proof and I hope Bunuel could feedback. The xlation might be long for details.

Question: |3m−n|+|m−2n|>|4m−3n|

Quote Bunuel solution:

One of the properties of absolute values says that |x|+|y|≥|x+y|. Note that "=" sign holds for xy≥0 (or simply when x and y have the same sign). So, the strict inequality (>) holds when xy<0.

Notice that if we denote x=3m−n and y=m−2n, then x+y=4m−3n. So, the question becomes: is |x|+|y|>|x+y|? Thus, the question basically asks whether x and y, or which is the same 3m−n and m−2n, have the opposite signs.

Statement 2:

$$2n < m$$

Case 1:

m > 0 & n>= 0

m > 2n & 2n >n....hence m>n and consequently 4m > 3n & 3m > n

First term: 3m−n = +++

second term: m−2n = +++

x & y have same sign.............Answer to question is NO

Case 2:

m > 0 & n < 0

Same as above excalty

x & y have same sign.............Answer to question is NO

The trick starts here when 'm' is negative and 'n' is negative because m could be larger or less than n. (let m=-4 & n =-2) or ( m=-2 & n =-3). Both examples hold statement 2 true. let's see the algebraic approach

By plugging numbers, I proved that '3m-n' is negative and hence x & y have different sign and answer is Yes.

But I could not reach it algebraically. I hope to get some help.

Thanks

Hey Mo2men ,

Lol, I have to politely deny your statement "It seems you forgot math and focus on other school issues now". I am pretty much sure that if I give the exam at this moment also, I will end up getting Q50.

Anyways, you need to understand the fact that there are n number of ways to solve any question. The way I approached above can also be used to break the 2nd statement and call it insufficient. And the way I solved is also an algebraic way to solve any modulus questions.

You need to understand that if we have any complex modulus, we can always end up making multiple possibilities and see which case will actually work. That's what I did. Hence. I got 2nd statement insufficient.

I hope that makes sense.
_________________

My GMAT Story: From V21 to V40
My MBA Journey: My 10 years long MBA Dream
My Secret Hacks: Best way to use GMATClub | Importance of an Error Log!
Verbal Resources: All SC Resources at one place | All CR Resources at one place

GMAT Club Inbuilt Error Log Functionality - View More.
New Visa Forum - Ask all your Visa Related Questions - here.

Find a bug in the new email templates and get rewarded with 2 weeks of GMATClub Tests for free

SVP
Joined: 26 Mar 2013
Posts: 1811
Is |4m - 3n| > |3m - n| + |m - 2n| ?  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Mar 2018, 04:06
abhimahna wrote:

Hey Mo2men ,

Lol, I have to politely deny your statement "It seems you forgot math and focus on other school issues now". I am pretty much sure that if I give the exam at this moment also, I will end up getting Q50.

Anyways, you need to understand the fact that there are n number of ways to solve any question. The way I approached above can also be used to break the 2nd statement and call it insufficient. And the way I solved is also an algebraic way to solve any modulus questions.

You need to understand that if we have any complex modulus, we can always end up making multiple possibilities and see which case will actually work. That's what I did. Hence. I got 2nd statement insufficient.

I hope that makes sense.

I'm pretty sure you get Q50 my friend

I wish you to continue success in your mba journey.
Is |4m - 3n| > |3m - n| + |m - 2n| ? &nbs [#permalink] 12 Mar 2018, 04:06

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 32 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Is |4m - 3n| > |3m - n| + |m - 2n| ?

## Events & Promotions

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.