Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Christina scored 760 by having clear (ability) milestones and a trackable plan to achieve the same. Attend this webinar to learn how to build trackable milestones that leverage your strengths to help you get to your target GMAT score.
Statement 1: ca > cb The temptation here is to divide both sides by c to get a > b, but this approach has a major flaw, since we don't know whether c is POSITIVE or NEGATIVE If c is NEGATIVE, then we must REVERSE the direction of the inequality after dividing by c (see the video below for more on this)
Alternatively, we can demonstrate this by examining some values of a, b and c that satisfy statement 1: Case a: a = 1, b = 0 and c = 1. In this case, ca > cb becomes (1)(1) > (1)(0), which is true. Here, the answer to the target question is YES, it is the case that a > b Case b: a = 0, b = 1 and c = -1. In this case, ca > cb becomes (-1)(0) > (-1)(1), which is true. Here, the answer to the target question is NO, it is NOT the case that a > b Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT
Statement 2: 3a > 3b Since 3 is POSITIVE, we can safely divide both sides of the inequality by 3 to get: a > b So, the answer to the target question is YES, it is the case that a > b Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is SUFFICIENT
close
69% (00:41) correct 
