Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Kick off your 2019 GMAT prep with a free 7-day boot camp that includes free online lessons, webinars, and a full GMAT course access. Limited for the first 99 registrants! Feb. 21st until the 27th.

E. The key to this problem is recognizing that b could equal 0. Statement 1 should clearly not be sufficient, as there are infinitely many negative multiples of 13 (including -13, -26, -130, etc., all providing the answer "yes") but also infinitely many positive values (13, 26, 130, etc., each providing the answer "no"). And statement 2 should also pretty clearly not be sufficient, as any negative number would satisfy the statement, but so would an integer like 1 or 2.

Taken together, you might think that the statements are sufficient, as statement 1 rules out b = 1 and b = 2. But what about 0? 0 is a multiple of 13 and when cubed it's less than 13, but it's also not negative. All other solutions are negative multiples of 13 (-13, -26, -130, etc.) all providing the answer "yes" but 0 provides the answer "no", meaning that the statements together are not sufficient.
_________________

(1) -> 13*i=b. but is b<0? sometimes yes, sometimes no. (2) b could be 1 or -100, b<0? sometimes yes, sometimes no. (1/2) -> (13*i)^3<13 ->for negative multiples of 13 this is ok. but wait, whats about 0. if se set b=0 then we got 0<13 and 13*i=0, but b is still not <0. sometimes yes, sometimes no.

(1) not sufficient, b could be 26 or -26 so could be greater or less than 0 (2) b could be 1,2 or any negative number so also not sufficient

Taking both statements together will also not work, b=0 makes both statements true, and b=-26 also makes both statements true, so taking both statements together does not show that b<0

(1) Integer b is a multiple of 13 (2) b^3 < 13 Statement 1. If b=13 then answer is No but if b=-13 then answer is Yes. Not sufficient Statement 2. B could be equal to 2 or -2. Hence not sufficient. Both statements together. If b=(-13) then answer is Yes. But if b=0 then Answer is No. Hence answer E
_________________

from 1: b can be 13, 26, 39 ....or -13, -26, -39 and 0 so NSF from 2: considering only this statement b lies in the interval (-infinity,3) considering b as an integer --> NSF

1+ 2 values that b can take are ......-39,-26,-13 and 0. so b can be negative or 0 NSF

E. The key to this problem is recognizing that b could equal 0. Statement 1 should clearly not be sufficient, as there are infinitely many negative multiples of 13 (including -13, -26, -130, etc., all providing the answer "yes") but also infinitely many positive values (13, 26, 130, etc., each providing the answer "no"). And statement 2 should also pretty clearly not be sufficient, as any negative number would satisfy the statement, but so would an integer like 1 or 2.

Taken together, you might think that the statements are sufficient, as statement 1 rules out b = 1 and b = 2. But what about 0? 0 is a multiple of 13 and when cubed it's less than 13, but it's also not negative. All other solutions are negative multiples of 13 (-13, -26, -130, etc.) all providing the answer "yes" but 0 provides the answer "no", meaning that the statements together are not sufficient.

If the problem was worded differently (in this case: is b>0?) would the answer have been C? Using both 1 and 2 stems, we know that b is either 0 or negative. If b is 0, then the answer to the question is 'no'. If b is negative, the answer to the question still in 'no'. Please help.

E. The key to this problem is recognizing that b could equal 0. Statement 1 should clearly not be sufficient, as there are infinitely many negative multiples of 13 (including -13, -26, -130, etc., all providing the answer "yes") but also infinitely many positive values (13, 26, 130, etc., each providing the answer "no"). And statement 2 should also pretty clearly not be sufficient, as any negative number would satisfy the statement, but so would an integer like 1 or 2.

Taken together, you might think that the statements are sufficient, as statement 1 rules out b = 1 and b = 2. But what about 0? 0 is a multiple of 13 and when cubed it's less than 13, but it's also not negative. All other solutions are negative multiples of 13 (-13, -26, -130, etc.) all providing the answer "yes" but 0 provides the answer "no", meaning that the statements together are not sufficient.

If the problem was worded differently (in this case: is b>0?) would the answer have been C? Using both 1 and 2 stems, we know that b is either 0 or negative. If b is 0, then the answer to the question is 'no'. If b is negative, the answer to the question still in 'no'. Please help.

Best, Tae

Yes you are correct. If the question was "is b>0" then taking both statements together would mean that statement 1 rules out 1 and 2 and we have only 0 and negative multiples of 13. In both cases answer would be "no"
_________________

Statement 1: Integer b is a multiple of 13 There are several values of b that satisfy statement 1. Here are two: Case a: b = -13, in which case x IS less than 0 Case b: b = 0, in which case x is NOT less than 0 Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: b³ < 13 There are several values of b that satisfy statement 2. Here are two: Case a: b = -13, in which case x IS less than 0 Case b: b = 0, in which case x is NOT less than 0 Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statements 1 and 2 combined IMPORTANT: Notice that I was able to use the same counter-examples to show that each statement ALONE is not sufficient. So, the same counter-examples will satisfy the two statements COMBINED. In other words, Case a: b = -13, in which case x IS less than 0 Case b: b = 0, in which case x is NOT less than 0 Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, the combined statements are NOT SUFFICIENT

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________