Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

First let's see for which ranges of k the given inequality holds true: \(k^2 + k - 2 > 0\) --> \((k+2)(k-1)>0\) --> roots are -2 and 1 --> ">" sign indicates that the solution lies to the left of a smaller root and to the right of a larger root (check here for this technique: if-x-is-an-integer-what-is-the-value-of-x-1-x-2-4x-94661.html#p731476). Thus the given inequality holds true for: \(k<-2\) and \(k>1\).

So, the question asks whether \(k<-2\) or \(k>1\).

(1) k < 1. Not sufficient. (2) k < -2. Sufficient.

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

If you spot the Quadratic expression in the prompt, then you can use an Algebra approach to get to the correct answer. This question can also be solved with a combination of TESTing VALUES and Number Properties.

We're asked if K^2 + K - 2 > 0. This is a YES/NO question

Fact 1: K < 1

IF.... K = 0 0^2 + 0 - 2 = -2 and the answer to the question is NO.

IF... K = -3 (-3)^2 -3 - 2 = 4 and the answer to the question is YES. Fact 1 is INSUFFICIENT

Fact 2: K < -2

With this Fact, we have an interesting "limit" issue.

Even though it's not permitted....IF K = -2, then (-2)^2 - 2 + 2 = 0 which is NOT > 0

As K becomes "more negative" (re. -2.1, -3, -100, etc.).... K^2 creates a "bigger positive" than (+K - 2) creates a "negative"

eg. K = -3 (-3)^2 = +9 vs. (-3 - 2)

K = -2.1 (-2.1)^2 = +4.41 vs. (-2.1 - 2) Etc.

Thus, the result of the calculation will ALWAYS be greater than 0 and the answer to the question is ALWAYS YES. Fact 2 is SUFFICIENT.

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

For the equation k^2+k-2 greater than 0, K should either be less than -2 or should be greater than 1 (explaination: k^2+K-2 can be written as (k+1)(k-2) and for this product to be positive either K+1 and K-2 both should be positive or negative)

Coming to options:

1. K<1 is not sufficient because it includes the range k<-2 and some numbers beyond it 2. k<-2 is sufficient (as explained above)

In order for (k + 2)(k - 1) to be greater than zero, either both (k + 2) and (k - 1) must be greater than zero or both (k + 2) and (k - 1) must be less than zero.

If both (k + 2) and (k - 1) are greater than zero, then k must be greater than 1. Similarly, if both (k + 2) and (k - 1) are less than zero, then k must be less than -2. That is:

k > 1 or k < -2

Statement One Alone:

k < 1

The information in statement one is not sufficient to answer the question. For example, if n = -1, then (k + 2)(k - 1) is less than zero; however, if k = -4, then (k + 2)(k - 1) is greater than zero.

Statement Two Alone:

k < -2

Since k is less than -2, regardless of which values we select for k, both (k + 2) and (k - 1) will always be negative. Thus, (k + 2)(k - 1) > 0. We have sufficient information to answer the question.

Answer: B
_________________

Scott Woodbury-Stewart Founder and CEO

GMAT Quant Self-Study Course 500+ lessons 3000+ practice problems 800+ HD solutions

Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember equal number of variables and independent equations ensures a solution.

For inequality questions we're not going to simply substitute all the values, but we'll be comparing the range of the original question and the range of conditions and investigate if the range of the question includes that of conditions. If it does, then the condition is sufficient.

anartey wrote:

Is \(k^2 + k - 2 > 0\)?

(1) \(k < 1\) (2) \(k < -2\)

The first step is simplifying the original question. \(k^2 + k - 2 > 0\) \((k+2)(k-1)>0\) \(k < -2\) or \(k > 1\)

Condition (1) The range of the question, "\(k < -2\) or \(k > 1\)" does not include the range of condition (1), "\(k < 1\)".

Thus this is NOT sufficient.

Condition (2) The range of the question, "\(k < -2\) or \(k > 1\)" includes the range of condition (2), "\(k < -2\)".

Normally for cases where we need 1 more equation, such as original conditions with "1 variable", or "2 variables and 1 equation", or "3 variables and 2 equations", we have 1 equation each in both 1) and 2). Therefore D has a high chance of being the answer, which is why we attempt to solve the question using 1) and 2) separately. Here, there is 59 % chance that D is the answer, while A or B has 38% chance. There is 3% chance that C or E is the answer for the case. Since D is most likely to be the answer according to DS definition, we solve the question assuming D would be our answer hence using 1) and 2) separately. Obviously there may be cases where the answer is A, B, C or E.
_________________

There’s something in Pacific North West that you cannot find anywhere else. The atmosphere and scenic nature are next to none, with mountains on one side and ocean on...

This month I got selected by Stanford GSB to be included in “Best & Brightest, Class of 2017” by Poets & Quants. Besides feeling honored for being part of...

Joe Navarro is an ex FBI agent who was a founding member of the FBI’s Behavioural Analysis Program. He was a body language expert who he used his ability to successfully...