It is currently 17 Dec 2017, 02:16

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Is k + k - 2 > 0 (1) k < 1 (2) k > -1

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Oct 2005
Posts: 297

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 0

Is k + k - 2 > 0 (1) k < 1 (2) k > -1 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Nov 2005, 20:24
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum.

Is kÂ² + k - 2 > 0
(1) k < 1
(2) k > -1

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Jul 2005
Posts: 402

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Nov 2005, 20:33
(1) Insufficient.

If k =0 then k^2 + K -2 < 0
If k = -10 then k^2 + K -2 > 0

(2) Insufficient.

Same reasoning above

(1/2) The boundary is now -1 < k < 1

Which implies that k^2 + K -2 will always be less than 0.

Therefore the answer to the question is NO.

I pick C.

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 21 Aug 2005
Posts: 785

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Nov 2005, 20:35
sudhagar wrote:
Is kÂ² + k - 2 > 0
(1) k < 1
(2) k > -1

C
Is (k-1)(k+2)>0
A) Insuff.
k=-2 -> Expression is False
k=-3 -> Expression is True
B Insuff.
k=1 -> Expression is False
k=2 -> Expression is True

Together, -1<k<1
This keeps (k-1) always -ve and (k+2) always +ve. Hence Sufficient.

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1705

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Nov 2005, 21:54
gsr wrote:
sudhagar wrote:
Is kÂ² + k - 2 > 0
(1) k < 1
(2) k > -1

C. Is (k-1)(k+2)>0
A) Insuff.
k=-2 -> Expression is False
k=-3 -> Expression is True
B Insuff.
k=1 -> Expression is False
k=2 -> Expression is True

Together, -1<k<1. This keeps (k-1) always -ve and (k+2) always +ve. Hence Sufficient.

Is kÂ² + k - 2 > 0?
or, is (k-1)(k+2)>0?
or, is k>1, and/or k>-2?

from i, k is smaller than 1 but greater than -2. so not suff.
from ii, k is greater than -1 but could be greater than -2. so not suff.

from i and ii, 1>k>-1.

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 27 Jun 2005
Posts: 501

Kudos [?]: 182 [0], given: 0

Location: MS

### Show Tags

09 Nov 2005, 22:27
C.

A and B are both insufficient ...
and equation is always < 0 when -1 <k<1 ....hence C

Kudos [?]: 182 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Apr 2005
Posts: 414

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Location: India, Chennai

### Show Tags

09 Nov 2005, 22:39
C
Stmt1: Let K = 0 then -2 > 0 false.
Let K = -5 then 18> 0 true. So stmt 1 is insufficient.

Stmt2: Let k = 0 then -2>0 false
Let k = 5 then 28 > 0 true. So stmt 2 is insufficient.

Combing both -1<K<1. Let K = 0 -2 > 0 false. Let k = .5 then -1.25 > 0 false. Let k = -.5 then -2.25 > 0 false. Hence the combined statments are sufficient.

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Oct 2005
Posts: 297

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Nov 2005, 23:50
Thats correct guys, OA is C

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 0

10 Nov 2005, 23:50
Display posts from previous: Sort by