Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 01:35 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 01:35

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 24 Feb 2013
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: 6 [6]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92911
Own Kudos [?]: 618876 [5]
Given Kudos: 81595
Send PM
General Discussion
Retired Moderator
Joined: 22 Aug 2013
Posts: 1186
Own Kudos [?]: 2499 [0]
Given Kudos: 459
Location: India
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 29 Jul 2021
Posts: 21
Own Kudos [?]: 9 [0]
Given Kudos: 37
Location: India
Send PM
Re: Is n < 0 ? (1) m < n (2) -n < m [#permalink]
Can someone please clear the statement 2 with taking the numerical values of n and m .
-n<m . Why it is not sufficient?

Posted from my mobile device
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92911
Own Kudos [?]: 618876 [0]
Given Kudos: 81595
Send PM
Re: Is n < 0 ? (1) m < n (2) -n < m [#permalink]
Expert Reply
ArunGour wrote:
Can someone please clear the statement 2 with taking the numerical values of n and m .
-n<m . Why it is not sufficient?

Posted from my mobile device


We know nothing about m, so -n < m gives us absolutely NO info about n. We just know that -n is less than some unknown number. How can we say anything about n from that?
Intern
Intern
Joined: 13 Feb 2019
Posts: 4
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 7
Send PM
Re: Is n < 0 ? (1) m < n (2) -n < m [#permalink]
If we take n=0, then also both the condition are satisfied.
Can someone please explain, why it is not E.

Posted from my mobile device
Manager
Manager
Joined: 13 Mar 2017
Posts: 161
Own Kudos [?]: 216 [0]
Given Kudos: 96
Location: India
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: Is n < 0 ? (1) m < n (2) -n < m [#permalink]
GauravAlugh wrote:
If we take n=0, then also both the condition are satisfied.
Can someone please explain, why it is not E.

Posted from my mobile device


(1) m < n --> Implies m is to left of n on the number line. But we don't know whether n is +ve or -ve.
(2) -n < m --> Implies m + n > 0. But n can be -ve, +ve or zero.

Taking both statements together, implies m is to left of n on number line and their sum is +ve.
If n = 0, then as per statement 1, m has to be -ve and then the sum (m+n) cannot be > zero (i.e., Statement 2 fails).
Also, if n is -ve, then m is -ve and the sum (m+n) will be -ve (i.e., Statement 2 fails).

Hence, to make both statements true we need to have n +ve, giving a definitive answer 'NO' to the question 'Is n<0?'.
Hence, both statements together are sufficient.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 20 Mar 2019
Posts: 147
Own Kudos [?]: 14 [0]
Given Kudos: 282
Location: India
Send PM
Re: Is n < 0 ? (1) m < n (2) -n < m [#permalink]
My 2 cents on this:

is n<0?

S1: m<n

m-n<0 which doesn't tell us anything. m=? n=?

S2: -n<m

Same issue. Don't know either n or m and hence cannot answer. Insufficient.

S1 and S2 together.

Remember, inequalities of same direction (sign) can be added.

n>m from S1 and we rewrite -n<m and n>-m from S2

Adding both statements:

n>m
n>-m
---------

2n > 0
n>0 ----> Definitive Answer.

C
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Is n < 0 ? (1) m < n (2) -n < m [#permalink]
Moderator:
Math Expert
92904 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne