Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

/p/(/p/-1)<0 we cannot divide the inequality with /p/ since we don't know if /p/=0. from statement 1 ,we have that -1<=p<=1 insuff from statement 2, p<>+-1. insuff

combined p lies in(-1 U +1). p=0.5 ,we have YES,p=0 we have NO. insuff IMO E

Hey, Good Q ..... I'm bit confused ... Correct me if I'm wrong ....

The Question asks....

Is |p|^2<|p| ? , one must always keep in mind that Is |p| is always positive, no matter the sign of P ..Okay & second thing that p^2 will always remain +ve. Now, |p|^2<|p| will only be possible if |p| must be a proper fraction okay. So, we have to find if |p| is a proper fraction or not. okay.

now statement 1 says .......... p^2 =<1 ...... this means that P can be equal to +1, -1 or p can be equal to any proper fraction as P^2 must always be less than 1 only if P is a proper fraction. so from this we have three values of P... 1, -1 & any proper fraction... however this is insufficient because of multiple possibilities.

Now statement 2 says ....... p^2-1 is not equal to Zero. that means that p is not equal to +,-1 , therefore it is clearly insufficient. .....

Now, 1+2 ........ as statement 1 says that p can be 1 or -1 or any proper fraction & statement 2 says that P is not equal to +,-1 , therefore we can conclude that p = Proper fraction & if P is a Proper fraction whether +ve Proper fraction or -ve Proper fraction, ..... |p|^2<|p| will always remain true. Hence , C.

Please correct me if I'm wrong. Pls......
_________________

If you don’t make mistakes, you’re not working hard. And Now that’s a Huge mistake.

lets see if I can remove your doubts. The graph will help a lot, scroll down it's \(|p|^2-|p|<0\) we have to look where it is negative!

\(|p|^2<|p|\), remember that both |p| and |p|^2 don't have to be positive, they can also equal 0.

"So, we have to find if |p| is a proper fraction or not. okay." Not correct, we must find out if p is in the interval \(-1<p<1\) AND \(\neq{0}\).

"this means that P can be equal to +1, -1 or p can be equal to any proper fraction" AND 0 I would add, p ranges in the interval \(-1\leq{p}\leq{1}\) "however this is insufficient because of multiple possibilities." Correct

"Now statement 2 is clearly insufficient" Correct

Question: is p \(-1<p<1\) AND \(\neq{0}\)? Statement 1: \(-1\leq{p}\leq{1}\) Statement 2 \(p\neq{-,+1}\)

1+2 \(-1<p<1\) But no one says anything about \(p=0\)

The point is all here: p could still equal 0, and both statement don't give us info about this possibility.

Attachments

mia.png [ 8.74 KiB | Viewed 2705 times ]

_________________

It is beyond a doubt that all our knowledge that begins with experience.

lets see if I can remove your doubts. The graph will help a lot, scroll down it's \(|p|^2-|p|<0\) we have to look where it is negative!

\(|p|^2<|p|\), remember that both |p| and |p|^2 don't have to be positive, they can also equal 0.

"So, we have to find if |p| is a proper fraction or not. okay." Not correct, we must find out if p is in the interval \(-1<p<1\) AND \(\neq{0}\).

"this means that P can be equal to +1, -1 or p can be equal to any proper fraction" AND 0 I would add, p ranges in the interval \(-1\leq{p}\leq{1}\) "however this is insufficient because of multiple possibilities." Correct

"Now statement 2 is clearly insufficient" Correct

Question: is p \(-1<p<1\) AND \(\neq{0}\)? Statement 1: \(-1\leq{p}\leq{1}\) Statement 2 \(p\neq{-,+1}\)

1+2 \(-1<p<1\) But no one says anything about \(p=0\)

The point is all here: p could still equal 0, and both statement don't give us info about this possibility.

-----------------------------------

Yeah You're certainly right. I missed out 0 as one of the possibility. .......I really appreciate your quick help.Thanks !! Brother !!
_________________

If you don’t make mistakes, you’re not working hard. And Now that’s a Huge mistake.

1.) insufficient as p could be 1 or -1 meaning p|^2 could equal |p| or p|^2 could be less than |p| Insufficient.

2.) p^2-1≠0 insufficient. p could = 1/2 which when squared = 1/4 which doesn't = 0 and p^2 would be less than P. On the other hand P could = 10 and 10^2-1 > 10.

1+2) we know that -1<p<1 and that p^2-1≠0 so the range of values to test is between -1 and 1. Fine. For ALL values of p except -1, 0 and 1 is |p|^2<|p|. However, while -1^2 - 1 and 1^2 - 1 = 0 (which rules out p being -1 or 1) p could be 0 In which case p^2 = p or it could be a fraction in which p^2 is less than p!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

There’s something in Pacific North West that you cannot find anywhere else. The atmosphere and scenic nature are next to none, with mountains on one side and ocean on...

This month I got selected by Stanford GSB to be included in “Best & Brightest, Class of 2017” by Poets & Quants. Besides feeling honored for being part of...

Joe Navarro is an ex FBI agent who was a founding member of the FBI’s Behavioural Analysis Program. He was a body language expert who he used his ability to successfully...