Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59095

Is q > t ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Nov 2014, 05:41
Question Stats:
73% (01:06) correct 27% (01:17) wrong based on 188 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
Tough and Tricky questions: Inequalities. Is q > t ? (1) qp^2 < tp^2 (2) qp^3 > tp^3 Kudos for a correct solution.
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
_________________



Manager
Joined: 05 Jun 2014
Posts: 60

Re: Is q > t ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Nov 2014, 07:10
IMO A.
ST 1 p^2 (qt) < 0, p^2 must be +ve so qt<0, so q<t....Sufficent
ST 2 p^3(qt) < 0, but if p^3 is negative qt is +ve, and vice versa. Insufficient.



Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Mar 2014
Posts: 426

Re: Is q > t ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Nov 2014, 05:00
As per Statement 1. qp^2 < tp^2 Get terms on one side qp^2  tp^2 < 0 p^2 ( qt) < 0 If multiplication of two terms is zero then both terms should have opposite signs. p^2 will always be +ve . So qt < 0 q<t Sufficient
As per Statement 2 qp^3 > tp^3 P^3 (qt) > 0
If mulitplication of two terms are positive then both terms either will be +ve or ve P^3 can be +ve or ve. So q>t or q<t. Statement 2 is insufficient
Answer: A
Regards, Ammu



Intern
Joined: 28 Sep 2014
Posts: 1

Is q > t ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 08 Apr 2015, 06:31
This has to be 'A' .
Is q> t ?
Statement 1 : (1) qp^2 < tp^2
=> qp^2  tp^2 <0 p^2 ( q t ) < 0
Now , p^2 can never be negative ( GMAT does not deal with complex numbers ) , therefore, to satisfy the above equation ,
(qt) has to be negative , i.e (qt) < 0 ,
Therefore , q<t
a confirmed NO . Therefore sufficient statement .
Statement 2 : qp^3 > tp^3
qp^3 tp^3 > 0 p^3 (q  t ) > 0
Now the above equation will hold when , p^3 and (qt) are of same signs .
So if p is positive , then p^3 is positive , therefore (qt) is positive , therefore q>t . > Yes ( q>t)
But if p is negative , then p^3 is negative , therefore (qt) is negative , therefore q<t . > NO ( q <t )
Conflicting answers ( both yes and no ) , so the statement is not sufficient .
Therefore the answer is "A".
Originally posted by Ruchika2302 on 08 Apr 2015, 04:07.
Last edited by Ruchika2302 on 08 Apr 2015, 06:31, edited 1 time in total.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59095

Re: Is q > t ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Apr 2015, 04:09
navneetb wrote: I think the assumption that p^2 is positive is wrong.. p^2 can also be negative... The question stem doesn't say anything about p. How can you take it for granted that p^2 is positive? Dear Bunuel, Could you please clarify~ On the GMAT the square of a number cannot be negative. It can be 0 or positive.
_________________



Manager
Status: Manager to Damager!
Affiliations: MBA
Joined: 22 May 2014
Posts: 56
Location: United States

Is q > t ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Apr 2015, 18:24
I think the assumption that p^2 is positive is wrong.. p^2 can also be negative... The question stem doesn't say anything about p. How can you take it for granted that p^2 is positive? Dear Bunuel, Could you please clarify~



Intern
Joined: 14 Apr 2012
Posts: 10

Re: Is q > t ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Apr 2015, 19:48
p^2 can also be negative...
navneetb > p can be negative only if, p is a complex number, and even though inquestion it has not been specified whether p is real or imaginary. However, I think in gmat they always mean real number.



Manager
Status: Manager to Damager!
Affiliations: MBA
Joined: 22 May 2014
Posts: 56
Location: United States

Re: Is q > t ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Apr 2015, 03:50
tusharacc wrote: p^2 can also be negative...
navneetb > p can be negative only if, p is a complex number, and even though inquestion it has not been specified whether p is real or imaginary. However, I think in gmat they always mean real number. Thanks for the reply.. I agree that GMAT doesn't deal with imaginary numbers. I presume it is true when it comes to real calculations... Somehow in case inequalities, according to my experience, I believe GMAT does allow squared numbers to be taken as negative. I am not sure 100% though. It will be great if some expert chips in here to confirm....



Manager
Joined: 11 Sep 2013
Posts: 104

Re: Is q > t ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Apr 2015, 18:48
Is q > t ?
(1) qp^2 < tp^2 qp^2 < tp^2 => P is not 0 and q < t => Sufficient (2) qp^3 > tp^3 qp^3 > tp^3 => p is not 0 and we have 2 cases
 Case1: p>0 => q>t  Case2: p<0 => q<t => Insufficient
=> Chose A



Manager
Joined: 11 Oct 2013
Posts: 98
Concentration: Marketing, General Management

Re: Is q > t ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Dec 2015, 03:02
Bunuel wrote: Tough and Tricky questions: Inequalities. Is q > t ? (1) qp^2 < tp^2 (2) qp^3 > tp^3 Kudos for a correct solution.Since this is an inequality, terms common(which could otherwise be cancelled, if nonzero) on both sides of the inequality cannot be 0 and hence can be cancelled. 1) qp^2 < tp^2 will always be q < p, because p^2 can never be negative, and in this case never be 0 as well (reason mentioned above). This answers the question. Sufficient! 2) qp^3 > tp^3. In this case, although p can never be 0, p^3 can definitely be both positive and negative. Thus the sign will flip. Insufficient! Answer A
_________________



Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Posts: 8141
GPA: 3.82

Re: Is q > t ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Dec 2015, 04:14
Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember equal number of variables and independent equations ensures a solution. Is q > t ? (1) qp^2 < tp^2 (2) qp^3 > tp^3 > In inequality, it is important to ignore square. That is, when it comes to multiplication in the other equation with 0, you need to ignore square. Thus, the question above is q > t ?. In (1) qp^2tp^2<0, (qt)p^2<0, as qt<0(p^2 is always positive number, even if you divide the both equations, the direction of the inequality sign is not changed. As q<t, it is (2) qp^3 > tp^3, (qt)p^3>0, (qt)p>0. So, the answer is A. In 1), it becomes no and is sufficient. Therefore, the answer is A. > For cases where we need 3 more equations, such as original conditions with “3 variables”, or “4 variables and 1 equation”, or “5 variables and 2 equations”, we have 1 equation each in both 1) and 2). Therefore, there is 80% chance that E is the answer (especially about 90% of 2 by 2 questions where there are more than 3 variables), while C has 15% chance. These two are the majority. In case of common mistake type 3,4, the answer may be from A, B or D but there is only 5% chance. Since E is most likely to be the answer using 1) and 2) separately according to DS definition (It saves us time). Obviously there may be cases where the answer is A, B, C or D.
_________________
MathRevolution: Finish GMAT Quant Section with 10 minutes to spareThe oneandonly World’s First Variable Approach for DS and IVY Approach for PS with ease, speed and accuracy. "Only $79 for 1 month Online Course""Free Resources30 day online access & Diagnostic Test""Unlimited Access to over 120 free video lessons  try it yourself"



NonHuman User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 13603

Re: Is q > t ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Apr 2019, 22:35
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot! Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up  doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos). Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________










