GMAT Question of the Day: Daily via email | Daily via Instagram New to GMAT Club? Watch this Video

 It is currently 18 Jan 2020, 21:44

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Is r between s and t? (1) |r -s| < |r - t| (2) |r -s| > |s - t|

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 27 Apr 2012
Posts: 57
Location: United States
GMAT Date: 06-11-2013
GPA: 3.5
WE: Marketing (Consumer Products)
Is r between s and t? (1) |r -s| < |r - t| (2) |r -s| > |s - t|  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 04 Apr 2019, 22:47
1
7
00:00

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

46% (01:55) correct 54% (02:25) wrong based on 177 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Is r between s and t?

(1) |r -s| < |r - t|
(2) |r -s| > |s - t|

Originally posted by shivanigs on 11 Aug 2012, 22:48.
Last edited by Bunuel on 04 Apr 2019, 22:47, edited 4 times in total.
Edited the question.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 60480
Re: Is r between s and t? (1) |r -s| < |r - t| (2) |r -s| > |s - t|  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Aug 2012, 01:21
5
1
Is r between s and t?

We are asked whether we have either of the following cases:
----s--r----t----
----t--r----s----

(1) |r -s| < |r - t|. This statement implies that the distance between r and s is less than the distance between r and t.

Not sufficient.

(2) |r -s | > |s - t|. This statement implies that the distance between r and s is greater than the distance between s and t. Now, if r were between s and t, then the distance between r and s would be less than the distance between s and t (ST would be the largest segment), thus r is not between s and t. Sufficient.

_________________
##### General Discussion
Intern
Joined: 24 Jan 2014
Posts: 7
Re: Is r between s and t? (1) |r -s| < |r - t| (2) |r -s| > |s - t|  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Mar 2014, 00:04
1
1 ) In the number line,is R between S and T ?
a.) |r-s|<|r-t|
b.)|r-s|>|s-t|
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 60480
Re: Is r between s and t? (1) |r -s| < |r - t| (2) |r -s| > |s - t|  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Mar 2014, 00:09
1
Ravithj wrote:
1 ) In the number line,is R between S and T ?
a.) |r-s|<|r-t|
b.)|r-s|>|s-t|

Merging similar topics. Please refer to the discussion above.

_________________
Director
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 583
WE: Science (Education)
Re: Is r between s and t? (1) |r -s| < |r - t| (2) |r -s| > |s - t|  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Aug 2012, 01:44
Bunuel wrote:
Is r between s and t?

We are asked whether we have either of the following cases:
----s--r----t----
----t--r----s----

(1) |r -s| < |r - t|. This statement implies that the distance between r and s is less than the distance between r and t.

Not sufficient.

(2) |r -s | > |s - t|. This statement implies that the distance between r and s is greater than the distance between s and t. Now, if r were between s and t, then the distance between r and s would be less than the distance between s and t (ST would be the largest segment), thus r is not between s and t. Sufficient.

Visualizing the situation for Statement (2):
We are given that the distance between $$s$$ and $$r$$ is greater than the distance between $$s$$ and $$t.$$

$$r_1---t_1--s--t_2---r_2$$

Now we can see that $$r$$ is definitely not between $$s$$ and $$t$$.
Sufficient.

_________________
PhD in Applied Mathematics
Love GMAT Quant questions and running.
Manager
Joined: 05 Jul 2012
Posts: 57
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT Date: 09-30-2012
GPA: 3.08
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Re: Is r between s and t? (1) |r -s| < |r - t| (2) |r -s| > |s - t|  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Aug 2012, 04:04
shivanigs wrote:
Is r between s and t?

(1) |r -s| < |r - t|
(2) |r -s| > |s - t|

The solution already mentioned is a very novel one, it uses the basic definition of Modulus
|a| = distance of point a from Origin that is (0) or (0,0) or (0,0,0) where a can be anything rational, irrational, real or even imaginary.
and some times we spend lots of time in solving the questions algebraically, simplifying the expressions when they can be very easily done if we spend a lil more time understanding the question.
IN Most of the problems in algebra we can narrow down to the range of answer if we define the range and domain of all the functions involved in that expression.

In this example if you are not able to remember what the modulus of a number means you can always use the basic rule that
|a| < |b| implies ....... -|b| < a<|b|

apply it to both the options.
Director
Joined: 27 May 2012
Posts: 945
Re: Is r between s and t? (1) |r -s| < |r - t| (2) |r -s| > |s - t|  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Sep 2013, 01:47
Bunuel wrote:
Is r between s and t?

We are asked whether we have either of the following cases:
----s--r----t----
----t--r----s----

(1) |r -s| < |r - t|. This statement implies that the distance between r and s is less than the distance between r and t.

Not sufficient.

(2) |r -s | > |s - t|. This statement implies that the distance between r and s is greater than the distance between s and t. Now, if r were between s and t, then the distance between r and s would be less than the distance between s and t (ST would be the largest segment), thus r is not between s and t. Sufficient.

small query
I am used to the general perception that if there is Mod on both sides of the equation then we have 2 cases

1) Both the sides of the equation have the same sign or 2) Both the sides have opposite signs

using the same logic here for statement 2 --> |r -s | > |s - t|.
I thought we could write this as r-s >s-t -->r+t>2s case 1

or

r-s>-s+t --> case 2 ( both the sides opposite signs ) which gives r>t
so if r>t then statement 2 is also satisfied , but here we have nothing about s
so I thought if r>t then statement 2 is also insufficient , as there is nothing about s. what is the flaw here?

why cannot we have r-s>-s+t and hence r>t for statement 2 ?
Thank you
_________________
- Stne
Director
Joined: 27 May 2012
Posts: 945
Re: Is r between s and t? (1) |r -s| < |r - t| (2) |r -s| > |s - t|  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Sep 2013, 02:29
can any body help with this query of mine, thank you
_________________
- Stne
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 60480
Re: Is r between s and t? (1) |r -s| < |r - t| (2) |r -s| > |s - t|  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Sep 2013, 02:47
stne wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
Is r between s and t?

We are asked whether we have either of the following cases:
----s--r----t----
----t--r----s----

(1) |r -s| < |r - t|. This statement implies that the distance between r and s is less than the distance between r and t.

Not sufficient.

(2) |r -s | > |s - t|. This statement implies that the distance between r and s is greater than the distance between s and t. Now, if r were between s and t, then the distance between r and s would be less than the distance between s and t (ST would be the largest segment), thus r is not between s and t. Sufficient.

small query
I am used to the general perception that if there is Mod on both sides of the equation then we have 2 cases

1) Both the sides of the equation have the same sign or 2) Both the sides have opposite signs

using the same logic here for statement 2 --> |r -s | > |s - t|.
I thought we could write this as r-s >s-t -->r+t>2s case 1

or

r-s>-s+t --> case 2 ( both the sides opposite signs ) which gives r>t
so if r>t then statement 2 is also satisfied , but here we have nothing about s
so I thought if r>t then statement 2 is also insufficient , as there is nothing about s. what is the flaw here?

why cannot we have r-s>-s+t and hence r>t for statement 2 ?
Thank you

Not a good way to solve this problem.

What is the question you are trying to answer there?
When you say that r-s and s-t have the same/opposite signs, what cases you'd have?
_________________
Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2016
Posts: 356
Location: Singapore
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Re: Is r between s and t? (1) |r -s| < |r - t| (2) |r -s| > |s - t|  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Aug 2017, 12:26
shivanigs wrote:
Is r between s and t?

(1) |r -s| < |r - t|
(2) |r -s| > |s - t|

Great Question on the core definition of absolute values.
s---r---t or t----r----s ?

1) |r-s| < |r-t|
Distance b/w r & s is less than the distance b/w r & t.
r--s-------t -> No
s-r------t -> Yes
Insufficient.

2) |r-s| > |s-t|
Distance between r & s is greater than the distance b/w s & t
=> r cannot be between s & t.
Sufficient.

_________________
Put in the work, and that dream score is yours!
Intern
Joined: 30 Jun 2017
Posts: 17
Re: Is r between s and t? (1) |r -s| < |r - t| (2) |r -s| > |s - t|  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Aug 2017, 08:31
Bunuel wrote:
Is r between s and t?

We are asked whether we have either of the following cases:
----s--r----t----
----t--r----s----

(1) |r -s| < |r - t|. This statement implies that the distance between r and s is less than the distance between r and t.

Not sufficient.

(2) |r -s | > |s - t|. This statement implies that the distance between r and s is greater than the distance between s and t. Now, if r were between s and t, then the distance between r and s would be less than the distance between s and t (ST would be the largest segment), thus r is not between s and t. Sufficient.

There can be no easier explanation than this. Thanks!
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 60480
Re: Is r between s and t? (1) |r -s| < |r - t| (2) |r -s| > |s - t|  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Apr 2019, 22:50
shivanigs wrote:
Is r between s and t?

(1) |r -s| < |r - t|
(2) |r -s| > |s - t|

Similar questions:
https://gmatclub.com/forum/is-s-between ... 92599.html
https://gmatclub.com/forum/is-s-between ... 92600.html
_________________
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 18 Aug 2017
Posts: 5693
Location: India
Concentration: Sustainability, Marketing
GPA: 4
WE: Marketing (Energy and Utilities)
Re: Is r between s and t? (1) |r -s| < |r - t| (2) |r -s| > |s - t|  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Apr 2019, 04:06
shivanigs wrote:
Is r between s and t?

(1) |r -s| < |r - t|
(2) |r -s| > |s - t|

#1
we get |r -s| < |r - t|
t>s
s+t>2r
relation btwn r & t not know

so r....s......t or s...t....r

insufficient
#2
|r -s| > |s - t|
2s>t+r
r>t
so we can say that
t....r....s ; sufficient
IMO B
Re: Is r between s and t? (1) |r -s| < |r - t| (2) |r -s| > |s - t|   [#permalink] 06 Apr 2019, 04:06
Display posts from previous: Sort by