GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 20 Oct 2019, 22:06

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Is r>s?

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58442

Show Tags

21 Mar 2017, 04:54
1
6
00:00

Difficulty:

75% (hard)

Question Stats:

45% (01:18) correct 55% (01:14) wrong based on 125 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Is r>s?

(1) r represents the probability that it will rain on Tuesday.
(2) r > 2s

_________________
Manager
Joined: 02 Aug 2015
Posts: 153

Show Tags

21 Mar 2017, 08:54
1
Bunuel wrote:
Is r>s?

(1) r represents the probability that it will rain on Tuesday.
(2) r > 2s

(1) r represents the probability that it will rain on Tuesday - No information about s. Hence not sufficient.

(2) r > 2s
r=4, s=1 - Yes
r=-1, s=-1 - No

(1) + (2) - r has to be positive as it's a probability. Hence sufficient.

Hence C.

Cheers!
VP
Joined: 05 Mar 2015
Posts: 1000

Show Tags

21 Mar 2017, 08:54
Bunuel wrote:
Is r>s?

(1) r represents the probability that it will rain on Tuesday.
(2) r > 2s

probabilty cant be negative
Senior SC Moderator
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Posts: 1348
Location: Malaysia

Show Tags

21 Mar 2017, 18:17
1
1
Bunuel wrote:
Is $$r > s$$ ?

(1) r represents the probability that it will rain on Tuesday.
(2) $$r > 2s$$

OFFICIAL SOLUTION

Is $$r > s$$ ? Without looking at the additional information, it's impossible to say, and there's no work that can be done upfront.

On to statement (1)! Rain on Tuesday? Huh? Well if that isn't just the dumbest, randomest, most utterly useless piece of non-information ever...

Statement (1) alone is insufficient.

Statement (2) says that r>2s and at first blush it may seem obvious that if r is more than twice s, then surely r is greater than s itself.
But at this point we should begin to feel like giant suckers. If everything in both statements is that obvious, then what's the point of this problem? What could we be missing? How about negatives. If s<0, then 2s is actually less than s itself, and knowing that r>2s would not establish whether r>s. For instance, if s=−3, then 2s=−6, and if r=−4, then r would be greater than 2s but would not be greater than s.

So actually, it's not obvious that Statement (2) is sufficient; in fact, it's not even true! Statement (2) alone is insufficient.

At this point it might be tempting to go straight to E without even bothering to put the statements together, since statement (1) seemed so incredibly pointless. But that first statement does tell us one critical thing: r cannot be negative; the probability of any event is always a number between 0 and 1.

Now, if s is positive, then 2s>s, and r>2s therefore implies that r>s. If s is 0, then 2s=s, and again r>2s implies that r>s. Finally, if s is negative, then r>s simply based on the fact that r is nonnegative, and any nonnegative number is greater than every negative number. Thus, the two statements together do answer the question by establishing that r>s in every case. C is correct.
_________________
"Be challenged at EVERY MOMENT."

“Strength doesn’t come from what you can do. It comes from overcoming the things you once thought you couldn’t.”

"Each stage of the journey is crucial to attaining new heights of knowledge."

Director
Status: Come! Fall in Love with Learning!
Joined: 05 Jan 2017
Posts: 531
Location: India

Show Tags

22 Mar 2017, 06:26
1
Bunuel wrote:
Is r>s?

(1) r represents the probability that it will rain on Tuesday.
(2) r > 2s

ST 1: No data about probability is given. all we know that r is positive
ST 2: for r = positive, if r>2s that means r>s but negative value, not necessarily. for r = -3 and s = -2 r<s but r>2s. INSUFFICIENT

ST 2 & St 2: for positive r if r>2s, that menas r>s. ANSWER

Option C
_________________
GMAT Mentors
Target Test Prep Representative
Status: Founder & CEO
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Posts: 8117
Location: United States (CA)

Show Tags

23 Mar 2017, 17:03
1
Bunuel wrote:
Is r>s?

(1) r represents the probability that it will rain on Tuesday.
(2) r > 2s

We need to determine whether r > s.

Statement One Alone:

r represents the probability that it will rain on Tuesday.

Using the information in statement one, we know that r is a number between 0 and 1 inclusive. However, without knowing anything about s, statement one is not sufficient to answer the question.

Statement Two Alone:

r > 2s

Statement two alone is not sufficient to answer the question. For instance, if s = 1 and r = 3, then r is greater than s; however, if s = -2 and r = -2, then r IS NOT greater than s.

Statements One and Two Together:

Using statements one and two, we see that r is a number between 0 and 1 inclusive and that r > 2s. We know that r is nonnegative; however, s could be negative, 0, or positive.

If s is negative, then r is greater than s.

If s is 0, then 2s = s. So r > 2s means r > s.

Finally, if s is positive, then 2s > s, So r > 2s also means r > s.

Thus, r will always be greater than s.

_________________

Scott Woodbury-Stewart

Founder and CEO

Scott@TargetTestPrep.com
122 Reviews

5-star rated online GMAT quant
self study course

See why Target Test Prep is the top rated GMAT quant course on GMAT Club. Read Our Reviews

If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "Kudos" button.

Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 13321

Show Tags

18 Mar 2019, 02:04
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
Re: Is r>s?   [#permalink] 18 Mar 2019, 02:04
Display posts from previous: Sort by