Sep 23 08:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Join a free 1hour webinar and learn how to create the ultimate study plan, and be accepted to the upcoming Round 2 deadlines. Save your spot today! Monday, September 23rd at 8 AM PST Sep 22 08:00 PM PDT  09:00 PM PDT Exclusive offer! Get 400+ Practice Questions, 25 Video lessons and 6+ Webinars for FREE Sep 26 07:00 AM PDT  08:00 AM PDT a chat session focused on MBA recruitment of international students at US schools. Sep 28 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Attend this webinar to learn two proprietary ways to PreThink assumptions and ace GMAT CR in 10 days. Sep 29 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Attend this Free Algebra Webinar and learn how to master Inequalities and Absolute Value problems on GMAT.
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 10 Jul 2013
Posts: 294

Is the triangle depicted above isosceles?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 22 Aug 2013, 01:58
Question Stats:
72% (01:43) correct 28% (01:41) wrong based on 236 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
Attachment:
isosceles.png [ 5.04 KiB  Viewed 3827 times ]
Is the triangle depicted above isosceles? (Figure not necessarily drawn to scale.) (1) 180° − (a + c) = 60° (2) a = 2b − c
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
_________________
Originally posted by Asifpirlo on 21 Aug 2013, 17:53.
Last edited by Bunuel on 22 Aug 2013, 01:58, edited 1 time in total.
Edited the question.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58103

Re: Is the triangle depicted above isosceles?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Aug 2013, 02:25
Is the triangle depicted above isosceles? (Figure not necessarily drawn to scale.)According to the OG an isosceles triangle has at least two sides of the same length. a + b + c =180° (1) 180° − (a + c) = 60° > a + c =120° > b = 60°. Now, if a = b = c = 60°, then the triangle is isosceles (equilateral) but if a = 100°, b = 60° and c = 20°, then the triangle is NOT isosceles. Not sufficient. (2) a = 2b − c > a + c =2b > 2b + b = 180° > b = 60°. The same as above. Not sufficient. (1)+(2) Both statements provide with the same infor. Not sufficient. Answer: E. Notice that if we define an isosceles triangle as a triangle with exactly two equal sides ( not the case for the GMAT) then the answer will be D.
_________________



Intern
Joined: 21 Aug 2013
Posts: 6

Re: Is the triangle depicted above isosceles?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Aug 2013, 20:04
Asifpirlo wrote: Is the triangle depicted above isosceles? (Figure not necessarily drawn to scale.)
(1)180° − (a + c) = 60° (2)a = 2b − c Both the conditions are not sufficient to answer the question. 1st will give a+c =120 2nd will give a+c =2b hence b=60 which does not tell whether triangle is isosceles or not.



Intern
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 47

Re: Is the triangle depicted above isosceles?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Aug 2013, 06:08
Bunuel wrote: Is the triangle depicted above isosceles? (Figure not necessarily drawn to scale.)According to the OG an isosceles triangle has at least two sides of the same length. a + b + c =180° (1) 180° − (a + c) = 60° > a + c =120° > b = 60°. Now, if a = b = c = 60°, then the triangle is isosceles (equilateral) but if a = 100°, b = 60° and c = 20°, then the triangle is NOT isosceles. Not sufficient. (2) a = 2b − c > a + c =2b > 2b + b = 180° > b = 60°. The same as above. Not sufficient. (1)+(2) Both statements provide with the same infor. Not sufficient. Answer: E. Notice that if we define an isosceles triangle as a triangle with exactly two equal sides ( not the case for the GMAT) then the answer will be D. Why would the answer be D in that case Bunuel? None of the statements would be able to tell us the exact values for C or A. we would just know their sum to be 180....please point out the problem in my assumptions....



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58103

Re: Is the triangle depicted above isosceles?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Aug 2013, 06:13
avaneeshvyas wrote: Bunuel wrote: Is the triangle depicted above isosceles? (Figure not necessarily drawn to scale.)According to the OG an isosceles triangle has at least two sides of the same length. a + b + c =180° (1) 180° − (a + c) = 60° > a + c =120° > b = 60°. Now, if a = b = c = 60°, then the triangle is isosceles (equilateral) but if a = 100°, b = 60° and c = 20°, then the triangle is NOT isosceles. Not sufficient. (2) a = 2b − c > a + c =2b > 2b + b = 180° > b = 60°. The same as above. Not sufficient. (1)+(2) Both statements provide with the same infor. Not sufficient. Answer: E. Notice that if we define an isosceles triangle as a triangle with exactly two equal sides ( not the case for the GMAT) then the answer will be D. Why would the answer be D in that case Bunuel? None of the statements would be able to tell us the exact values for C or A. we would just know their sum to be 180....please point out the problem in my assumptions.... Ask yourself: do we need the angles to answer YES or NO to the question.
_________________



Intern
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 47

Re: Is the triangle depicted above isosceles?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Aug 2013, 11:21
Bunuel wrote: avaneeshvyas wrote: Bunuel wrote: Is the triangle depicted above isosceles? (Figure not necessarily drawn to scale.)According to the OG an isosceles triangle has at least two sides of the same length. a + b + c =180° (1) 180° − (a + c) = 60° > a + c =120° > b = 60°. Now, if a = b = c = 60°, then the triangle is isosceles (equilateral) but if a = 100°, b = 60° and c = 20°, then the triangle is NOT isosceles. Not sufficient. (2) a = 2b − c > a + c =2b > 2b + b = 180° > b = 60°. The same as above. Not sufficient. (1)+(2) Both statements provide with the same infor. Not sufficient. Answer: E. Notice that if we define an isosceles triangle as a triangle with exactly two equal sides ( not the case for the GMAT) then the answer will be D. Why would the answer be D in that case Bunuel? None of the statements would be able to tell us the exact values for C or A. we would just know their sum to be 180....please point out the problem in my assumptions.... Ask yourself: do we need the angles to answer YES or NO to the question. I am sorry but I seem to miss something here.....to identify a triangle as an isosceles one, we either need to prove two sides equal or the opposite angles equal.....if yes then we do need the measure of individual angles



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58103

Re: Is the triangle depicted above isosceles?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Aug 2013, 11:25
Bunuel wrote: avaneeshvyas wrote: Bunuel wrote: Is the triangle depicted above isosceles? (Figure not necessarily drawn to scale.)According to the OG an isosceles triangle has at least two sides of the same length. a + b + c =180° (1) 180° − (a + c) = 60° > a + c =120° > b = 60°. Now, if a = b = c = 60°, then the triangle is isosceles (equilateral) but if a = 100°, b = 60° and c = 20°, then the triangle is NOT isosceles. Not sufficient. (2) a = 2b − c > a + c =2b > 2b + b = 180° > b = 60°. The same as above. Not sufficient. (1)+(2) Both statements provide with the same infor. Not sufficient. Answer: E. Notice that if we define an isosceles triangle as a triangle with exactly two equal sides ( not the case for the GMAT) then the answer will be D. Why would the answer be D in that case Bunuel? None of the statements would be able to tell us the exact values for C or A. we would just know their sum to be 180....please point out the problem in my assumptions.... Ask yourself: do we need the angles to answer YES or NO to the question. I am sorry but I seem to miss something here.....to identify a triangle as an isosceles one, we either need to prove two sides equal or the opposite angles equal.....if yes then we do need the measure of individual angles If we define an isosceles triangle as a triangle with exactly two equal sides ( not the case for the GMAT) then the answer will be D, because from a + c =120° (b = 60°) we cannot have only two angles equal to each other, so the answer is NO the triangle is NOT isosceles.
_________________



Current Student
Joined: 23 May 2013
Posts: 184
Location: United States
Concentration: Technology, Healthcare
GPA: 3.5

Re: Is the triangle depicted above isosceles?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 May 2014, 12:30
Bunuel wrote: If we define an isosceles triangle as a triangle with exactly two equal sides (not the case for the GMAT) then the answer will be D, because from a + c =120° (b = 60°) we cannot have only two angles equal to each other, so the answer is NO the triangle is NOT isosceles.
Right: The possibilities are either that 1) all the angles are 60 degrees, in which case the triangle is equilateral (which, according to the GMAT is also isosceles), or 2) all the angles are different, which is definitely not isosceles. With the GMAT definition, the OA should be E, but if we use the definition that isosceles triangles have EXACTLY TWO congruent sides, then either answer is sufficient to say NO.



Manager
Status: Applied
Joined: 02 May 2014
Posts: 125
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, General Management
Schools: Tulane '18 (A), Tippie '18 (D), Moore '18, Katz '18 (D), UCSD '18, Madison '18, Olin '18 (S), Simon '18, Desautels '18 (I), Sauder '18 (S), Terry '18 (WL), GWU '18, Neeley '18 (WL), Weatherhead '18 (S), Fox(Temple)'18, Eller FT'18 (A), Schulich Sept"18 (S)
GPA: 3.35
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)

Re: Is the triangle depicted above isosceles?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Mar 2015, 21:09
Both the statements point towards saying that a+ 120 and b=60 hence no knowledge about whether a and b are isosceles.




Re: Is the triangle depicted above isosceles?
[#permalink]
19 Mar 2015, 21:09






