Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 12:55 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 12:55

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Intern
Intern
Joined: 04 Oct 2018
Posts: 3
Own Kudos [?]: 52 [19]
Given Kudos: 35
Location: United States
Schools: Wharton '21
GPA: 3.91
Send PM
RC & DI Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Status:Math and DI Expert
Posts: 11178
Own Kudos [?]: 31929 [3]
Given Kudos: 290
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 01 Jan 2018
Posts: 65
Own Kudos [?]: 54 [0]
Given Kudos: 26
Send PM
RC & DI Moderator
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Status:Math and DI Expert
Posts: 11178
Own Kudos [?]: 31929 [0]
Given Kudos: 290
Send PM
Re: Is v − w < 0? (1) v − 2w < 0 (2) 5w − v < 0 [#permalink]
Expert Reply
dvishal387 wrote:
chetan2u wrote:
Is v−w<0?
Or is \(v<w?\)

Combined
2w<v<5w
So 5w>2w...3w>0....w>0 and so v>2w means v>w
Sufficient

C


Hi Chetan2u,

I could not get the last part. If we combine 1 and 2 should not the equation be 5w<v<2w
=> w<0 . Although the answer would still be C.


Thanks Vishal .. it was a typo corrected it.
RSM Erasmus Moderator
Joined: 26 Mar 2013
Posts: 2461
Own Kudos [?]: 1360 [0]
Given Kudos: 641
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
Schools: Erasmus (II)
Send PM
Re: Is v − w < 0? (1) v − 2w < 0 (2) 5w − v < 0 [#permalink]
chetan2u wrote:
Is v−w<0?
Or is \(v<w?\)

(1) v−2w<0
v<2w...
if v is 4 and W is 3....v>W
If v is 4 and W is 7.....v<w
Insufficient

(2) 5w−v<0
5w<v
If both v and w are positive, w<v
If both are negative, say v=-2 and w=-1, w>v
Insufficient

Combined
2w>v>5w
So 5w<2w...3w<0....w<0 and so v<5w means v<w
Sufficient

C


I think you reversed the sign. According to statement 2: v>5w.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Posts: 6820
Own Kudos [?]: 29930 [4]
Given Kudos: 799
Location: Canada
Send PM
Re: Is v − w < 0? (1) v − 2w < 0 (2) 5w − v < 0 [#permalink]
3
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
Top Contributor
wunstepcloser wrote:
Is v − w < 0?

(1) v − 2w < 0
(2) 5w − v < 0


Target question: Is v − w < 0?
This is a good candidate for rephrasing the target question.
Take: v − w < 0
Add w to both sides to get: v < w
REPHRASED target question: Is v < w?

Statement 1: v − 2w < 0
Let's TEST some values.
There are several values of v and w that satisfy statement 1. Here are two:
Case a: v = 0 and w = 1. In this case, the answer to the REPHRASED target question is YES, it is true that v < w
Case b: v = 3 and w = 2. In this case, the answer to the REPHRASED target question is NO, it is NOT true that v < w
Since we cannot answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT


Statement 2: 5w − v < 0
Let's TEST some values.
There are several values of v and w that satisfy statement 2. Here are two:
Case a: v = -2 and w = -1. In this case, the answer to the REPHRASED target question is YES, it is true that v < w
Case b: v = 1 and w = 0. In this case, the answer to the REPHRASED target question is NO, it is NOT true that v < w
Since we cannot answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statements 1 and 2 combined
Statement 1 tells us that v − 2w < 0
Statement 2 tells us that 5w − v < 0
If we ADD the two inequalities, we get: 3w < 0, which means w is NEGATIVE

Also, if we can take v − 2w < 0 and add 2w to both sides, we get v < 2w
And, if we can take 5w − v < 0 and add v to both sides, we get 5w < v
So, we can combine the inequalities to get: 5w < v < 2w
Since, we already know that w is NEGATIVE, we know that 2w < w
So, we can add this to our existing inequality to get: 5w < v < 2w < w
At this point, we can see that within our inequality, it is certain that v < w
In other words, the answer to the REPHRASED target question is YES, it is true that v < w
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, the combined statements are SUFFICIENT

Answer: C

RELATED VIDEOS FROM OUR COURSE


User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 32678
Own Kudos [?]: 822 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Is v w < 0? (1) v 2w < 0 (2) 5w v < 0 [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Is v w < 0? (1) v 2w < 0 (2) 5w v < 0 [#permalink]
Moderator:
Math Expert
92914 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne