Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 22 May 2017, 10:09

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Is |x| < 1 ? ----------------------- (1) |x + 1| = 2|x 1|

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Jun 2006
Posts: 286
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 124 [0], given: 0

Is |x| < 1 ? ----------------------- (1) |x + 1| = 2|x 1| [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Jun 2007, 08:16
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum.

Is |x| < 1 ?

-----------------------
(1) |x + 1| = 2|x – 1|

------------------------

(2) |x – 3| > 0
Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Jun 2007
Posts: 379
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

28 Jun 2007, 10:46
B for me

Stmt1 says x=1/3 or 3 So insufficient
Stmt 2 gives |x| > 3. So B
Director
Joined: 26 Feb 2006
Posts: 901
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 123 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

28 Jun 2007, 12:09
ArvGMAT wrote:
Is |x| <1> 0

C for me.

a: if (x + 1) is +ve:
x + 1 = 2x – 2
x = 3

if (x + 1) is -ve:
- x - 1 = 2x – 2
x = 1/3. nsf.

b: x is not equal to 3. nsf.

a & b: x is not equal to 3 means it is equal to 1/3. sufficient.

I have little doubt that i missed something in a.
Intern
Joined: 04 Aug 2006
Posts: 7
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

28 Jun 2007, 19:28
Himalayan:
if (x+1) is -ve wouldnt (x-1) also be -ve,so
wouldn't it be -(x+1)=-2(x-1) ?=>x=3
Director
Joined: 26 Feb 2006
Posts: 901
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 123 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

28 Jun 2007, 20:29
ynot wrote:
Himalayan:
if (x+1) is -ve wouldnt (x-1) also be -ve,so
wouldn't it be -(x+1)=-2(x-1) ?=>x=3

yah i know i am missing something there. therefore i mentioned my skepticism in my earlier post too.

its too much confusion when you do inequalities and modulas. i will rectify later in a fresh mood. i am too much exhusted now.
Manager
Joined: 23 May 2007
Posts: 107
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

28 Jun 2007, 22:30
A for me .1 gives x =3 in both cases (+ and -)
VP
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 1123
Location: India
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 1

Show Tags

28 Jun 2007, 23:27
Go with B.

Statement B tells that 3>x>2. So we know clearly that whether |x| < 1, in this case, NO.
_________________

Trying hard to conquer Quant.

Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Jun 2007
Posts: 345
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

28 Jun 2007, 23:57
ArvGMAT wrote:
Is |x| < 1 ?

-----------------------
(1) |x + 1| = 2|x – 1|

------------------------

(2) |x – 3| > 0

I say C.

stmt 2: x <> 3. INSUFFICIENT

stmt 1:
case 1: x < -1
-(x+1) = -2*(x-1) => x=3

case 2: x > 1
(x+1) = 2*(x-1) => x=3

case 3: -1 < x < 1
(x+1) = -2*(x-1) => x=1/3

So, INSUFFICIENT.

From 1 and 2, x=1/3. So, SUFFICIENT.
SVP
Joined: 01 May 2006
Posts: 1796
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 154 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

29 Jun 2007, 00:41
(C) for me too

|x| < 1 ?
<=> -1 < x < 1 ?

From 1
|x + 1| = 2|x – 1|

o If x > 1, then:
|x + 1| = 2|x – 1|
<=> x+1 = 2*(x-1) as x+1 > 0 and x-1 > 0
<=> x = 3 >>> Ok, as x > 1

o If -1 < x =< 1, then:
|x + 1| = 2|x – 1|
<=> x+1 = 2*[-(x-1)] as x+1 > 0 and x-1 =< 0
<=> x = 1/3 >>> Ok, as -1 < x =< 1

o If x =< -1, then:
|x + 1| = 2|x – 1|
<=> -[x+1] = 2*[-(x-1)] as x+1 =< 0 and x-1 < 0
<=> x = 3 >>> Out as x =< -1

So, the solutions are 3 and 1/3

INSUFF.

From 2
|x – 3| > 0
<=> x-3 != 0
<=> x != 3

INSUFF.

Both 1 & 2
We have:
o x=3 or x=1/3
or
o x != 3

Thus x = 1/3

SUFF.
SVP
Joined: 01 May 2006
Posts: 1796
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 154 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

29 Jun 2007, 00:43
ynot wrote:
Himalayan:
if (x+1) is -ve wouldnt (x-1) also be -ve,so
wouldn't it be -(x+1)=-2(x-1) ?=>x=3

Yes... But we must remove this solution x=3 because if both x+1 < 0 and x-1 <0, we know that x must be < -1.... so x cannot be 3 if x < -1
Director
Joined: 09 Aug 2006
Posts: 757
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 210 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

29 Jun 2007, 03:09
dreamgmat1 wrote:
A for me .1 gives x =3 in both cases (+ and -)

A for me as well.

Stat 1 gives x=3 both when x<0>0

Stat 2 gives x>3 when x>0 and x<3 when x<0

Let me know if you want to see the solution.
SVP
Joined: 01 May 2006
Posts: 1796
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 154 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

29 Jun 2007, 03:24
GK_Gmat wrote:
dreamgmat1 wrote:
A for me .1 gives x =3 in both cases (+ and -)

A for me as well.

Stat 1 gives x=3 both when x<0>0

Stat 2 gives x>3 when x>0 and x<3 when x<0

Let me know if you want to see the solution.

In stat 1, try to plug in x = 1/3

o |1/3 + 1| = 4/3
o 2|x – 1| = 2*|1/3-1|= 2*|-2/3| = 2 * 2/3 = 4/3

So, we have x=3 and x=1/3 as solutions... making it insufficient to answer the question -1 < x < 1.
Director
Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Posts: 775
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 148 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

30 Jun 2007, 04:03
Fig wrote:
(C) for me too

|x| < 1 ?
<=> -1 < x <1> 1, then:[/b]
|x + 1| = 2|x – 1|
<x> 0 and x-1 > 0
<x>>> Ok, as x > 1

o If -1 < x =< 1, then:
|x + 1| = 2|x – 1|
<x> 0 and x-1 =< 0
<x>>> Ok, as -1 < x =< 1

o If x =< -1, then:
|x + 1| = 2|x – 1|
<=> -[x+1] = 2*[-(x-1)] as x+1 =< 0 and x-1 < 0
<x>>> Out as x =<1> 0
<=> x-3 != 0
<=> x != 3

INSUFF.

Both 1 & 2
We have:
o x=3 or x=1/3
or
o x != 3

Thus x = 1/3

SUFF.

Perfect. I solved the same way too.
30 Jun 2007, 04:03
Display posts from previous: Sort by