Last visit was: 23 Apr 2024, 20:45 It is currently 23 Apr 2024, 20:45

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 24 May 2014
Posts: 13
Own Kudos [?]: 655 [112]
Given Kudos: 6
Location: Brazil
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92883
Own Kudos [?]: 618618 [28]
Given Kudos: 81563
Send PM
General Discussion
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 31 Jul 2014
Posts: 107
Own Kudos [?]: 123 [0]
Given Kudos: 373
GMAT 1: 630 Q48 V29
Send PM
SVP
SVP
Joined: 20 Mar 2014
Posts: 2362
Own Kudos [?]: 3626 [4]
Given Kudos: 816
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.7
WE:Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)
Send PM
Re: Is |x| < 1 ? (1) x/|x| < x (2) x/|x| < 1 [#permalink]
3
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
anupamadw wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
Is |x| < 1 ?

Is |x| < 1 --> is -1 < x < 1.

(1) x/|x| < x.

Two cases:
A. \(x<0\) --> \(\frac{x}{-x}<x\) --> \(-1<x\). Since we consider the case when \(x<0\), then we'd have \(-1<x<0\). Answer YES.

B. \(x>0\) --> \(\frac{x}{x}<x\) --> \(1<x\). Answer NO.

Not sufficient.

(2) x/|x| < 1. This simply means that x is a negative number: if x is positive then x/|x| = 1, if x is negative x/|x| = -1 < 1. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Since from (2) we have that x is negative, then we have case A from (1), which gives an YES answer to the question. Sufficient.


Answer: C.

Please tag the questions properly (this is NOT an algebra question) and copy the questions EXACTLY as they appear in the source.





Hi Bunuel
I fail to understand above solution.
We have to find whether -1< x<1
From 1 ) we know that x/|x| < x holds true for -1<x<0 and x>1 so we know that x is not in range 0<x<1
is this not sufficient to answer NO ....?
Again from 2) We know -infinity < x<0 then answer is NO
Sorry, could you please tell me what am I missing...how are you getting YES and NO for each?


Let me try to explain.

From 1,

x/|x| < x ---> 2 cases:

--- when x \(\geq\)0 --> |x| = x ---> x/x < x --> x > 1 . Thus a "no" for is |x| < 1

--- when x < 0 --> |x| = -x ---> x/-x < x --> x > -1 . For x = 0.5, then a "yes" for |x|<1 but if x = 5, then a "no" for is |x|<1. Thus NOT sufficient.

From 2,

x/|x| < 1 , again 2 cases,

--- when x \(\geq\)0 --> |x| = x ---> x/x < 1 --> 1<1 . Thus x \(\geq\)0 is not a possible scenario.

--- when x <0 --> |x| = -x ---> x/-x < 1 --> 1>-1 . This is true for ALL x and thus x <0 satisfies this. For x = -0.5, you get a "yes" for is |x|<1 but for x = -4, you get a "no" for is |x| <1 . Thus NOT sufficient.

Alternately, if you want you can also test cases to come up with ranges for x. But this might be a bit more time consuming.

For your analysis of statement 1, the text in red is not correct. Refer to the explanation mentioned above.

For statement 2, you are correct that x<0 but you need to check whether -1<x<0 is satisfied or not. You get 2 different answers when you take x = -0.5 or x = -4.

Hope this helps.
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 01 Jul 2015
Posts: 9
Own Kudos [?]: 8 [1]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Is |x| < 1 ? (1) x/|x| < x (2) x/|x| < 1 [#permalink]
1
Kudos
I have tried to use the line method to solve this problem.
1. x/!x!<xSince !x! is always positive, I can multiply it each side and get x<x.!x! and after substracting x-x.!x!<0
Now taking x as common factor, x(1-!x!)<0
x will have three factors:0,1,-1
Now refer to the attached figure to get the region where the given condition will be true.
Since the inequality is of "less than 0" type, we shold consider "negative portion"
we will get two possibilities which are -1<x<0 and x>1. Hence not suffecient.

2. x/!x!<1. Repeating the same logic above we get x-!x!<0. This will be true only if x<0. Still not suffeceint.

Combining both statements, we can eliminate the portion x>1, which we got in statement 1.
Leaving us only with -1<x<0, which tells us that !x! will always be a fraction less than 1. Hence suffeceint.
Attachments

1.JPG
1.JPG [ 3.48 KiB | Viewed 15303 times ]

Manager
Manager
Joined: 10 Apr 2018
Posts: 187
Own Kudos [?]: 446 [0]
Given Kudos: 115
Location: United States (NC)
Send PM
Re: Is |x| < 1 ? (1) x/|x| < x (2) x/|x| < 1 [#permalink]
Hi,

There is similar question out there
https://gmatclub.com/forum/if-x-is-not- ... 86140.html

Now here Bunuel has explained two approaches for solving the question
https://gmatclub.com/forum/if-x-is-not- ... 86140.html

Hope this helps

Probus
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 03 Jun 2019
Posts: 5342
Own Kudos [?]: 3964 [0]
Given Kudos: 160
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
WE:Engineering (Transportation)
Send PM
Re: Is |x| < 1 ? (1) x/|x| < x (2) x/|x| < 1 [#permalink]
Reni wrote:
Is |x| < 1 ?

(1) x/|x| < x

(2) x/|x| < 1


Is |x| < 1 ?

(1) x/|x| < x
\(\frac{x}{|x|}- x <0\)
\(\frac{x - x|x|}{|x|} < 0\)
Since |x| > 0
x - x|x| < 0
x (1- |x|) < 0
x (|x| -1) > 0
If x>0; |x| > 1; x>1
If x<0; |x| < 1; -1<x<0
Either x>1 or -1<x<0
NOT SUFFICIENT


(2) x/|x| < 1
x/|x| - 1 < 0
x - |x| < 0
If x>0; x-x<0;
If x<0; x + x < 0; x<0
|x| may or may not be <1
NOT SUFFICIENT

(1) + (2)
(1) x/|x| < x
If x>0; |x| > 1; x>1
If x<0; |x| < 1; -1<x<0
(2) x/|x| < 1
x<0
-1<x<0
|x|<1
SUFFICIENT

IMO C
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 23 Nov 2016
Posts: 312
Own Kudos [?]: 695 [0]
Given Kudos: 156
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
Send PM
Re: Is |x| < 1 ? (1) x/|x| < x (2) x/|x| < 1 [#permalink]
do not multiply or cancel anything until and unless we know the exact sign of the x (or any other unknown stated in the question )
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Dec 2015
Posts: 468
Own Kudos [?]: 543 [0]
Given Kudos: 84
Send PM
Re: Is |x| < 1 ? (1) x/|x| < x (2) x/|x| < 1 [#permalink]
Is |x| < 1 ?
(1) x/|x| < x
(2) x/|x| < 1

Solution:
(1) x/|x| < x --> insuff
=> x < x|x|
=> x|x|-x > 0
=> x(|x|-1) > 0
` ++>0 => x >0 & |x|>1 --> no
or -->0 => x<0 &|x|<1 --> yes

(2) x/|x| < 1 --> insuff
=> x<|x|
so, x is always -ve
=> x can be -1<x<0 --> yes
or x=<-1 --> no
combing (1) & (2)=>
x< 0 from (2), so |x| <1 from (1) --> suff
Answer: C
Manager
Manager
Joined: 26 Dec 2019
Posts: 57
Own Kudos [?]: 27 [0]
Given Kudos: 112
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
GMAT 1: 600 Q49 V22
GMAT 2: 670 Q49 V31
GPA: 4
WE:Research (Manufacturing)
Send PM
Re: Is |x| < 1 ? (1) x/|x| < x (2) x/|x| < 1 [#permalink]
Reni wrote:
Is |x| < 1 ?

(1) x/|x| < x

(2) x/|x| < 1


The statement asks whether the value of x is between -1 and 1.

A:
x can fall into four domain,
x<-1
-1<x<0
0<x<1
1<x

for first and third the statement holds true, and not for second and fourth.

B:
It simply states that x<1.

Both the statement is insufficient. But by clubbing them still, we cannot say
because x<-1 satisfies and -1<x<0 too.

A bit confused why C is correct answer!
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Posts: 3512
Own Kudos [?]: 6856 [0]
Given Kudos: 500
Re: Is |x| < 1 ? (1) x/|x| < x (2) x/|x| < 1 [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Romil042 wrote:
Reni wrote:
Is |x| < 1 ?

(1) x/|x| < x

(2) x/|x| < 1

Hello, Romil042. I just happened upon this question today and scrolled down to find your query. I think I can help clarify your confusion. I will respond inline below.

Romil042 wrote:
The statement asks whether the value of x is between -1 and 1.

So far, so good.

Romil042 wrote:
A:
x can fall into four domain,
x<-1
-1<x<0
0<x<1
1<x

for first and third the statement holds true, and not for second and fourth.

This statement at the end is inaccurate. Did you test values or make assumptions?

1) x < -1; test x = -2

\(\frac{x}{|x|} < x\)

\(\frac{(-2)}{|(-2)|} < (-2)\)

\(\frac{-2}{2} < -2\)

\(-1 < -2\) X

Since -1 is NOT less than -2, we know that x CANNOT be less than -1.

2) -1 < x < 0; test x = -0.5

\(\frac{x}{|x|} < x\)

\(\frac{(-0.5)}{|(-0.5)|} < (-0.5)\)

\(\frac{-0.5}{0.5} < -0.5\)

\(-1 < -0.5\)

We have found that x CAN be between -1 and 0.

3) 0 < x < 1; test x = 0.5

\(\frac{x}{|x|} < x\)

\(\frac{(0.5)}{|(0.5)|} < (0.5)\)

\(\frac{0.5}{0.5} < 0.5\)

\(1 < 0.5\) X

Since 1 is NOT less than 0.5, x CANNOT be between 0 and 1.

4) 1 < x; test x = 2

\(\frac{x}{|x|} < x\)

\(\frac{(2)}{|(2)|} < (2)\)

\(\frac{2}{2} < 2\)

\(1 < 2\)

We have found that x CAN be greater than 1. In short, we have two valid types of inputs based on Statement (1): x is either between -1 and 0 or it is greater than 1. Of course, we CANNOT answer the original question conclusively with this information.

a) If -1 < x < 0, |x| < 1

b) If x > 1, |x| > 1

Thus, Statement (1) on its own is NOT sufficient.

Romil042 wrote:
B:
It simply states that x<1.

Both the statement is insufficient. But by clubbing them still, we cannot say
because x<-1 satisfies and -1<x<0 too.

A bit confused why C is correct answer!

Of course, I hope you can see now that by combining the two statements, we can eliminate b) above, so it must be true that |x| < 1, and the answer is (C).

Good luck with your studies.

- Andrew
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 32633
Own Kudos [?]: 821 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Is |x| < 1 ? (1) x/|x| < x (2) x/|x| < 1 [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Is |x| < 1 ? (1) x/|x| < x (2) x/|x| < 1 [#permalink]
Moderator:
Math Expert
92883 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne