GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 19 Jan 2019, 15:22

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

## Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in January
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
303112345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
Open Detailed Calendar
• ### FREE Quant Workshop by e-GMAT!

January 20, 2019

January 20, 2019

07:00 AM PST

07:00 AM PST

Get personalized insights on how to achieve your Target Quant Score.
• ### Free GMAT Strategy Webinar

January 19, 2019

January 19, 2019

07:00 AM PST

09:00 AM PST

Aiming to score 760+? Attend this FREE session to learn how to Define your GMAT Strategy, Create your Study Plan and Master the Core Skills to excel on the GMAT.

# Is x/3 + 3/x > 2 (1) x < 3 (2) x > 1

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 03 Jun 2010
Posts: 128
Location: Dubai, UAE
Schools: IE Business School, Manchester Business School, HEC Paris, Rotterdam School of Management, Babson College
Re: Is x/3 + 3/x > 2 (1) x < 3 (2) x > 1  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Jun 2011, 05:33
I'm actually a little lost as to why it's C and not B. Clearly statement 1 is insufficient because since this is a yes no question. We are getting different answers with different values so insufficient. However, with regards to statement 2 all values greater than 1 which is what statement 2 is saying are greater than 2. So statement 2 sufficient. Unless im not reading something correctly.

Posted from GMAT ToolKit
Director
Status: No dream is too large, no dreamer is too small
Joined: 14 Jul 2010
Posts: 516
Re: Is x/3 + 3/x > 2 (1) x < 3 (2) x > 1  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Jun 2011, 05:44
scbguy wrote:
I'm actually a little lost as to why it's C and not B. Clearly statement 1 is insufficient because since this is a yes no question. We are getting different answers with different values so insufficient. However, with regards to statement 2 all values greater than 1 which is what statement 2 is saying are greater than 2. So statement 2 sufficient. Unless im not reading something correctly.

Posted from GMAT ToolKit

TRY X = 2 AND 3 AND YOU WILL GET RESULT OF YOUR QUESTION.
_________________

Collections:-
PSof OG solved by GC members: http://gmatclub.com/forum/collection-ps-with-solution-from-gmatclub-110005.html
DS of OG solved by GC members: http://gmatclub.com/forum/collection-ds-with-solution-from-gmatclub-110004.html
100 GMAT PREP Quantitative collection http://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-prep-problem-collections-114358.html
Collections of work/rate problems with solutions http://gmatclub.com/forum/collections-of-work-rate-problem-with-solutions-118919.html
Mixture problems in a file with best solutions: http://gmatclub.com/forum/mixture-problems-with-best-and-easy-solutions-all-together-124644.html

Manager
Joined: 04 Apr 2010
Posts: 135
Re: Is x/3 + 3/x > 2 (1) x < 3 (2) x > 1  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Jun 2011, 08:18
(x^2 + 9) / 3x > 2
1) Try -1 for No and 1 for Yes.
2) Try 2 for Yes and 3 for No.
Combining 1) and 2) values between 1< x < 3 give only Yes answer.
C is the answer. No need to simplify. Baten80 is right.
_________________

Consider me giving KUDOS, if you find my post helpful.
If at first you don't succeed, you're running about average. ~Anonymous

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 8795
Location: Pune, India
Re: Is x/3 + 3/x > 2 (1) x < 3 (2) x > 1  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Jun 2011, 11:38
1
Baten80 wrote:
is (x/3+3/x) > 2?
(1) x < 3
(2) x > 1

This ds has been discussed thoroughly at http://gmatclub.com/forum/tricky-inequality-problem-97331.html. It inequality simplified there as [(x - 3)^2]/3 > 0.
if i do not simplify then i can i solved it as:
(1) if x = 2 then the (x/3+3/x) > 2 but if x = negative the (x/3+3/x) > 2 is not true. so Insufficient.
(2) if x = 2 then (x/3+3/x) > 2 but if x = 1 then (x/3+3/x) > 2 is true. so insufficient.

for C x =2 and (x/3+3/x) > 2.

so why i will simplify as i am getting direct answer?

I would work with the inequality as is. It is symmetrical in the given form. Symmetry makes me comfortable because it makes it easy to see patterns.
This question is a play on a standard concept that if x is a positive integer, minimum value of x + 1/x is 2. (which is actually derived from another concept: If the product of two positive integers is a constant (x*1/x = 1), their sum is least when they are equal (so x + 1/x is least when x = 1/x i.e. x = 1)
Similarly,
x/2 + 2/x has a minimum value of 2 when x = 2.
x/3 + 3/x has a minimum value of 2 when x = 3.
and so on...

In this question they don't say that x is a positive integer.
So when x is negative, (x/3 + 3/x) is negative.
When 0<x<=1, infinity > (x/3 + 3/x) >= 10/3
When 1<x<3, 10/3 > (x/3 + 3/x) > 2
When x >= 3, (x/3 + 3/x) >= 2

Notice that (x/3 + 3/x) does not take values between 0 and 2.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor

VP
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1015
Re: Is x/3 + 3/x > 2 (1) x < 3 (2) x > 1  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jun 2011, 03:20
a+b

1<x<3 gives values where LHS > RHS always.

hence C.
Intern
Joined: 05 Jul 2012
Posts: 3
Re: Is x/3 + 3/x > 2 (1) x < 3 (2) x > 1  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Aug 2012, 21:06

For any positive number 'a', (a+ 1/a )>=2
So , from the given options, all we need to do is ensure that x/3 is a positive quantity.

Hence B.

Please correct me if i am wrong.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 52294
Re: Is x/3 + 3/x > 2 (1) x < 3 (2) x > 1  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Aug 2012, 22:16

For any positive number 'a', (a+ 1/a )>=2
So , from the given options, all we need to do is ensure that x/3 is a positive quantity.

Hence B.

Please correct me if i am wrong.

OA for this question is given in the first post under the spoiler and it's C, not A.

To see that the second statement is not sufficient, consider x=3 for a NO answer (if x=3 then 3/3+3/3=2) and x=10 for an YES answer. Please refer to the solutions on the first page.

Hope it helps.
_________________
Director
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 600
WE: Science (Education)
Re: Is x/3 + 3/x > 2 (1) x < 3 (2) x > 1  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Aug 2012, 01:47
shrouded1 wrote:
hirendhanak wrote:
thanks for your explanation... can you explain the below mentioned rule with an example and its reasoning.

Never multiply or reduce inequality by an unknown (a variable) unless you are sure of its sign since you do not know whether you must flip the sign of the inequalit

Consider the inequality $$\frac{x^2-12}{x}>-1$$

Lets say I multiply both sides by 7x without considering the signs of the variable, what happens ?

$$x^2-12>-x$$
$$x^2+x-12>0$$
$$(x+4)(x-3)>0$$

Which is true whenever x>3 (both terms positive) or when x<-4 (both terms negative)

But since we haven't kept the Sign of x in mind when we multiplied in step 1, the solution is wrong.

For eg. Take x=-1 which according to us is not a solution. It is easy to see ((-1)^2-12)/(-1)=11>-1. So it should be a solution
Similarly take x=-6 which according to us is a solution, but ((-6)^2-12)/-6=-4<-1. So it should not be a solution

Very well illustrated why we shouldn't multiply an inequality with an expression of unknown sign.
Just a few more things:

The given inequality $$\frac{x^2-12}{x}>-1$$ is equivalent to $$\frac{x^2+x-12}{x}>0$$. The sign of the ratio of two numbers is the same as the sign of their product. So, the previous inequality is equivalent to $$x(x^2+x-12)>0$$, which in fact can be obtained from the original inequality by multiplying by $$x^2$$, which we know for sure that it is positive, because x being in the denominator, $$x\neq0.$$

When given $$A/B>0,$$ it means:
1) A and B have the same sign (either both positive or both negative)
2) Neither A nor B can be 0, A is in the numerator and the fraction is greater than 0, B is in the denominator.
It is obvious that multiplying by B the given inequality leads to $$A>0$$, incorrect.
$$A/B>0$$ is equivalent to $$AB>0,\, B\neq0.$$

When given $$A/B\geq0,$$ it means:
1) A and B have the same sign (either both positive or both negative). A can be 0.
2) B cannot be 0, being in the denominator.
It is obvious that multiplying by B the given inequality leads to $$A\geq0$$, incorrect.
$$A/B\geq0$$ is equivalent to $$AB\geq0,\, B\neq0.$$

So, when we have to compare a fraction to 0, we can just compare the product of all the factors involved to 0. We should check carefully for values of the unknown if equality to 0 is allowed and we should not forget the values for which the denominator becomes 0.
_________________

PhD in Applied Mathematics
Love GMAT Quant questions and running.

Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Aug 2012
Posts: 426
Concentration: Marketing, Finance
GPA: 3.23
Re: Is x/3 + 3/x > 2 (1) x < 3 (2) x > 1  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jan 2013, 02:48
$$\frac{x}{3}+3/x > 2$$
$$\frac{{9+x^2}}{3x}>2$$
$$\frac{{9+x^2}}{3x}-2>0$$
$$\frac{x^2-6x+9}{3x}>0$$
$$\frac{(x-3)^2}{3x}>0$$

x is not equal 3 since it will make the value 0
x is not negative since it will make the value negative

(1) $$x < 3$$
x may be negative or positive. THUS INSUFFICIENT!

(2) $$x > 1$$[/quote]
x may be equal to 3 or not. THUS INSUFFICIENT.

Together (1) and (2): x is positive and not equal to 3

_________________

Impossible is nothing to God.

Intern
Joined: 07 Jun 2014
Posts: 7
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V40
Re: Is x/3 + 3/x > 2 (1) x < 3 (2) x > 1  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Jul 2014, 21:22
In general, if a number happens to be positive, the sum of the number and its reciprocal is always >=2.
Here, statement 1 is not sufficient as it includes the negative portion of the number line.
Statement 2 appears to be sufficient, but it fails alone since it includes x=3 in its set of solutions. At x=3, LHS becomes EQUAL to 2, which is not what the question is looking for. A holistic answer is obtained by clubbing both the statements!
Intern
Joined: 28 Nov 2012
Posts: 28
Schools: NUS '20
Re: Is x/3 + 3/x > 2 (1) x < 3 (2) x > 1  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Dec 2015, 08:05
A simpler approach to the problem can be to use AM>=GM method (Arithmetic mean and Geometric mean)

For 2 positive numbers, the AM is always greater than either equal to the GM --> This method usually should strike when you see inequalities involving inverse fractions as is in our problem. Now simply looking at the equation and applying AM>=GM approach here:

(x/3 + 3/x)/2 >= sqrt(x/3 * 3/x) or x/3 + 3/x > 2. Now we just need to fix the numbers in a way that the basic math is not broken. With

A. x<3, x could be 0 (not defined situation in our equation) or x is -ve --> For sure this is not sufficient
B. x>1 (gives us some hope to apply AM>=GM formula) BUT x=3 will still create the issue as LHS =2 which is not required. Hence, not sufficient

USING A and B => 1<x<3, for which the AM>GM eqn will always hold.

P.S. - This approach may help us save a lot of time if we are able to think back with the problem statement. Also, sometimes in PS questions, if we are asked for minimum values (given all the variables written in the equation are >0 or positive, this approach can come handy (if the equation simplifies which is generally the case as problems are always solvable )

For e.g. - We can look at a problem like what can be the maximum value of (21-2x)(x-1)(x-5) given that 5<x<10. We can immediately solve it by the method

AM>=GM or GM<=AM
= cuberoot[(21-2x)(x-1)(x-5)]<= (21- 2x + x - 1 + x - 5)/3
= Max{(21-2x)(x-1)(x-5)} = 5^3 = 125

Thanks
Retired Moderator
Joined: 05 Jul 2006
Posts: 1722
Re: Is x/3 + 3/x > 2 (1) x < 3 (2) x > 1  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 26 Oct 2016, 23:36
Is (x - 3)^2/(3x) >0

(1) x < 3
(2) x > 1

Originally posted by yezz on 26 Oct 2016, 23:16.
Last edited by yezz on 26 Oct 2016, 23:36, edited 2 times in total.
Renamed the topic and edited the question.
Manager
Joined: 28 Jun 2016
Posts: 207
Concentration: Operations, Entrepreneurship
Re: Is x/3 + 3/x > 2 (1) x < 3 (2) x > 1  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Oct 2016, 00:53
yezz wrote:
Is (x - 3)^2/(3x) >0

(1) x < 3
(2) x > 1

Statement 1:

If x=2, then (x - 3)^2/(3x) = 1/6.. Yes

If x=-1, then (x - 3)^2/(3x) = -16/3..No

Insufficient

Statement 2:

If x=2, then (x - 3)^2/(3x) = 1/6.. Yes

If x=3then (x - 3)^2/(3x) = 0.. No

Insufficient

Statement 1&2:

If 1<x<3, then the expression will always be positive.

C

Sent from my iPhone using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 52294
Re: Is x/3 + 3/x > 2 (1) x < 3 (2) x > 1  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Oct 2016, 02:54
Is $$\frac{x}{3} + \frac{3}{x} > 2$$?

Question: is $$\frac{x}{3}+\frac{3}{x}>2$$? Let's check when this statement holds true.

$$\frac{x}{3}+\frac{3}{x}>2$$ --> $$\frac{(x^2-6x+9)}{3x}>0$$ --> $$\frac{(x-3)^2}{3x}>0$$.

Nominator (x-3)^2 is NEVER negative, so expression is negative only when denominator 3x is negative, or simply when x is negative. Hence when x>0 our expression (x-3)^2/3x>0 is always positive EXCEPT when x=3, because at that case nominator (x-3)^2 becomes 0, thus expression becomes 0 and we need expression to be more then 0.

So we get that $$\frac{(x-3)^2}{3x}>0$$ holds true when x>0 and x#3.

Let's move to the statements:

(1) x<3, tells us that x#3, but it's not enough, we need x to be positive besides that. Not sufficient.

(2) x>1, tell us that x positive, but it's not enough we need x not to be equal to 3. Not sufficient.

(1) + (2) 1<x<3 in this range x is positive and not equal to 3. Sufficient.

_________________
Intern
Joined: 18 Aug 2017
Posts: 4
Re: Is x/3 + 3/x > 2 (1) x < 3 (2) x > 1  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Sep 2018, 09:40
AM>=GM (provided elements are all positive) LHS= (x/3)+(3/x)
in question LHS/2>=((x/3)*(3/x))^(1/2) , therefore LHS>=2 : equality holds when (x/3)=(3/x) ,which implies at x=3 LHS of question =2

stat 1:x<3 , if 0<x<3, from the above analysis inequality in the question holds i.e. LHS>2 , however if x<0 LHS is negative therefore LHS<2 (INSUFFICIENT)
state 2:x>1, if x=3 LHS=2 , for other values greater than 1 LHS>2 ( INSUFFICENT)

stat1 +stat2 : 1<x<3 , x is positive and not equal to 3 , from the initial analysis LHS will always be greater than 3

therefore c
Re: Is x/3 + 3/x > 2 (1) x < 3 (2) x > 1 &nbs [#permalink] 18 Sep 2018, 09:40

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 35 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by