Is |xy| > x^2*y^2 ? (1) 0 < x^2 < 1/4 (2) 0 < y^2 < 1/9

Two variables are confusing you.

Note that the question is just this:

Is \(|xy|> x^{2}y^{2}\)
Is \(|xy|> |xy|^2\)
Is \(z > z^2\) where \(z = |xy|\)

When is z greater than z^2? When z lies between -1 and 1 or we can say between 0 and 1 when z is positive.

1.\(0<x^{2}<1/4\)
This tells you that 0 < |x| < 1/2. Doesn't tell you anything about y so you don't know anything about z.

2. \(0<y^{2}<1/9\)
This tells you that 0 < |y| < 1/3. Doesn't tell you anything about x so you don't know anything about z.

Both together, you know that |x|*|y| is less than 1 i.e. z is less than 1. Hence z WILL BE greater than z^2.

Answer (C)
_________________

IMO C

\(|xy| > x^2y^2\)
since both sides are positive square both sides
\((xy)^2 > (xy)^4\)
\((xy)^2((xy)^2-1)<0\)
since \((xy)^2>0\) therefore \((xy)^2-1<0\)
\((xy)^2<1\)
or -1<xy<1
......so finally this is question.

finally you need both x and y to come to conclusion

STATEMENT 1==>ONLY X HENCE INSUFFICIENT.
\(0 < x^2 < 1/4\)
\(-1/2<x<1/2\)

STATEMENT 2 ==>ONLY Y HENCE INSUFFICIENT
\(0 < y^2 < 1/9\)
\(-1/3<y<1/3\)
now combining both clearly \(-1<xy<1\)
hence C

HOPE IT HELPS

Here, it helps to know that numbers greater than 1, when squared, are larger. Numbers between 0 and 1, when squared, are smaller.

Once you establish that, you're just saying:

Statement 1: x^2 = smaller; y^2 = unknown (smaller or large) ==> Don't know if product is larger or smaller because you don't know magnitude
Statement 2: y^2 = smaller; x^2 = unknkown (smaller or larger) ==> Don't know if product is larger or smaller because you don't know magnitude

Statement 1 and 2: x^2 = smaller; y^2 = smaller ==> product is smaller because both numbers are smaller.

Therefore, correct answer is (C).

If (xy)^2 is positive, (xy)^2>(xy)4 or 1> (xy)^2
I and 2 are insufficient because in each statement other value is missing.

By combining
We know that (xy)^2 is positive. So,

(xy)^2< (1/4)*(1/9)
Clearly, 1> (xy)^2
Is my reasoning correct? Need expert help

VeritasPrepKarishma :
Except for z=0 right?

Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. For DS problems, the VA (Variable Approach) method is the quickest and easiest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember that equal numbers of variables and independent equations ensure a solution.

The first step of the VA (Variable Approach) method is to modify the original condition and the question, and then recheck the question.

\(|xy| > x^2 \cdot y^2\)
\(⇔ |xy| > |xy|^2\)
\(⇔ |xy|^2 -|xy| < 0\)
\(⇔ |xy|(|xy|-1) < 0\)
\(⇔ 0 < |xy| < 1\)


Since we have 2 variables (x and y) and 0 equations, C is most likely to be the answer and so we should consider 1) & 2) first.

Conditions 1) & 2)

\(0 < x^2 < 1/4\)
\(⇔ 0 < |x| < 1/2\)

\(0 < y^2 < 1/9\)
\(⇔ 0 < |y| < 1/3\)

Thus \(0 < |xy| < 1/6\).

Since the range of the question includes the range of the conditions, both conditions together are sufficient.

Since this question is a statistics question (one of the key question areas), CMT (Common Mistake Type) 4(A) of the VA (Variable Approach) method tells us that we should also check answers A and B.

Condition 1)
Since we don't know y, the condition 1) is not sufficient.

Condition 2)
Since we don't know x, the condition 2) is not sufficient, either.

Therefore, the answer is C.

Normally, in problems which require 2 or more additional equations, such as those in which the original conditions include 2 variables, or 3 variables and 1 equation, or 4 variables and 2 equations, each of conditions 1) and 2) provide an additional equation. In these problems, the two key possibilities are that C is the answer (with probability 70%), and E is the answer (with probability 25%). Thus, there is only a 5% chance that A, B or D is the answer. This occurs in common mistake types 3 and 4. Since C (both conditions together are sufficient) is the most likely answer, we save time by first checking whether conditions 1) and 2) are sufficient, when taken together. Obviously, there may be cases in which the answer is A, B, D or E, but if conditions 1) and 2) are NOT sufficient when taken together, the answer must be E.

9. Inequalities

• Theory
  Inequalities Made Easy!
  Inequalities: Tips and hints
  Arithmetic with Inequalities
  Wavy Line Method Application - Complex Algebraic Inequalities
  Solving Quadratic Inequalities: Graphic Approach
  Inequalities - Quadratic Inequalities
  Graphic approach to problems with inequalities
  Inequalities trick
  INEQUATIONS(Inequalities) Part 1
  INEQUATIONS(Inequalities) Part 2
  
  • Questions
    Inequality and absolute value questions from my collection
    DS Questions
    PS Questions
  
  

  10. Absolute Value

  
  
  • Theory
    Math: Absolute value (Modulus)
    Absolute Value: Tips and hints
    Properties of Absolute Values on the GMAT
    Absolute modulus : A better understanding
    GMAT Question Patterns: Abolute Value
    The Reason Behind Absolute Value Questions on the GMAT
    
    • Questions
      Inequality and absolute value questions from my collection
      The E-GMAT Question Series on ABSOLUTE VALUE
      DS Questions
      PS Questions

For more check Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread

_________________

both x and y should be between -1 and 1 and not equal to -1, 0 and 1.

Stmt 1: insufficient since no info about y is given
Stmt 2: insufficient since no info about x is given

Stmt 1 and 2: sufficient

IMO answer should be "C"

We'll show two approaches:
The first relies on number properties and is a Logical approach.

x^2*y^2 = (xy)^2.
So we're asked when the square of a number (xy)^2 is smaller than its absolute value of a number (xy).
This happens when the square is a fraction.
Written as an equation, |xy| > (xy)^2 when 0 < (xy)^2 < 1.
Looking at our statements, (1) tells us that x^2 is a fraction. Without knowing the value of y^2, this is insufficient.
Similarly, (2) gives us only the range of y^2 and is insufficient.
Combined, we know that 0 < (xy)^2 < 1, exactly what we need.

(C) is our answer.

If this confuses you, then picking numbers is a very easy way to solve the question.
This is an Alternative approach.

(1) Say x^2 = 1/9 and y = 0. Then |xy| = 0 and x^2*y^2 = 0 so the answer is NO.
We'll try to challenge this
Say x^2 = 1/9 and y = 1. Then |xy| = 1/3 and x^2*y^2 = 1/9. Then the answer is YES.
Insufficient.

(2) is entirely symmetrical - we can choose y = 1/16 and x = 0 and then y = 1/16 and x = 1
Insufficient.

Combined:
Let's say x^2 = y^2 = 1/16. Then x and y are 1/4 or -1/4 meaning that |xy| = 1/16 which is definitely larger than (1/16)*(1/16)
So our first numbers give us a YES.
We now need to challenge this by looking for numbers that give a NO.
Trying this out for a few more pairs, we can see that x^2*y^2 is always a fraction and |xy| is always a larger fraction.

Once again, (C) is our answer.

Target question: Is |xy| > x²y² ?

Statement 1: 0 < x² < 1/4
No information about y
Statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: 0 < y² < 1/9
No information about x
Statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statements 1 and 2 combined
Statement 1 tells us that -1/2 < x < 1/2, and x ≠ 0
Statement 2 tells us that -1/3 < y < 1/3, and y ≠ 0
In other words, x and y both have magnitudes that are less than 1.

Notice that, when 0 < x < 1, then x > x²
For example, if x = 1/4, then x² = 1/16
Notice that x > x²

Likewise, if y = 2/7, then y² = 4/49
Notice that y > y²

So, if -1/2 < x < 1/2, and x ≠ 0, then we know that |x| > x²
Likewise, if -1/3 < x < 1/3, and y ≠ 0, then we know that |y| > y²

When we combine both properties, we can conclude that |xy| > x²y²
So, the answer to the target question is YES, it is true that |xy| > x²y²
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, the combined statements are SUFFICIENT

Answer: C

Cheers,
Brent

This actually tripped me up, I ended up way overthinking this problem. Luckily, it isn't actually an issue here because statements 1) & 2) explicitly rule out 0 for x and y. In a more difficult problem I could easily see either case 1 or case 2 being viable and thus changing the answer to E.

Is |xy| > x^2*y^2 ?
The question is asking if the product of 2 numbers is more than the product of the two numbers squared.
What the question is testing is the properties of exponents around -1,0,1

There are 4 cases:
1. If either x,y = 0 then they are equal (Answer = No)
2. If both x,y are between -1, and 1, then the exponent fractions are smaller (Answer = Yes)
3. If both are less or greater than -1 and 1, then the exponent fractions are bigger (Answer = No)
4. If one is bigger and the other is between then it becomes a question of individual values, as product of fractions could cancel out to make them equal, e.g. x=1/2, y=2 so 1/2 * 2 = 1/4 * 4 = 1 (Answer = Yes/No)

(1) 0 < x^2 < 1/4
This means that x^2 is positive (obviously, since it's squared)
x^2 < 1/4
But, taking the square root gives us back the negative side of the inequality...
-1/2 < x < 1/2
We know that x≠0 because the LHS of the original statement was 0 < x^2 and NOT 0 ≤ x^2
We have no info about y so we can't make a determination, insufficient.

(2) 0 < y^2 < 1/9
The same idea as above, -1/3 < y < 1/3, y≠0
No information about x, insufficient.

(3)
y≠0, x≠0
This rules out case 1.
-1/3 < y < 1/3
-1/2 < x < 1/2
Both are between -1 and 1 which rules out case 3 and 4, and we're left with only case 2, definite Yes, C is sufficient!

Asked: Is |xy| > x^2*y^2 ?
\(|xy| = \sqrt{x^2*y^2}\)

(1) 0 < x^2 < 1/4
Since there is no information about y
NOT SUFFICIENT

(2) 0 < y^2 < 1/9
Since there is no information about x
NOT SUFFICIENT

(1) + (2)
(1) 0 < x^2 < 1/4
0<|x|<1/2
(2) 0 < y^2 < 1/9
0<|y|<1/3
0<x^2*y^2<1/36<1
0<|xy|<1/6<1

Since x^2*y^2 lies between 0 & 1
\(|xy| = \sqrt{x^2*y^2} > x^2 * y^2\)

IMO C

VeritasKarishma Bunuel
"When is z greater than z^2? When z lies between -1 and 1 or we can say between 0 and 1 "

I think z is greater than z^2 when z lies between 0 and 1.
I am not sure why you said " ..between -1 and 1".
For any values less than 0 and greater than 1 , z^2 is greater than z.

Check the context: z is the absolute value of xy.

When is the absolute value of a variable greater than the square of the absolute value?

When the variable is say 1/2
Also when the variable is -1/2
|-1/2| = 1/2
|-1/2|^2 = 1/4

That is why the first step in the thinking process was the range -1 to 1 (except 0) which was chopped down to 0 to 1 since all we are focussed on is |xy|, not xy.
_________________

Is \(|xy| > |xy|^2\)?

Is \(|xy| - |xy|^2 > 0\)?

Is \(|xy|(1- |xy|) > 0\)?

Is \(1 > |xy| > 0\)?

(1) No information about y; INSUFFICIENT.

(2) No information about x; INSUFFICIENT

(1&2) Taken together, we can conclude 1 > |xy| > 0. SUFFICIENT.

Answer is C.
_________________

Hi Bunuel chetan2u VeritasKarishma GMATBusters nick1816

Can you please tell if my solution is correct?

This is how I solved it.

To check : |xy| > x^2*y^2
Since |xy| >= 0
Therefore, question can be simplified as : Check if x^2*y^2 <= 0

On combining A and B, we see that both x^2 and y^2 are greater than 0. Hence x^2*y^2 will be greater than 0. Hence, both together are suff to answer the question.

Thanks in advance.

No, the solution is not correct.
Say x=3 and y=2
|x*y|=6 and x^2y^2=36.....x^2y^2 is greater
Say x=1/2 and y=1/10
|xy|=1/20 but x^2y^2=1/400..Here |xy| is greater.

So what you have to find is whether x and y are between 1 and -1. As value of fraction between 0 and 1 reduces as we increase power.
_________________

Do not be tempted to number plug on this one. Rather, use your understanding of fractions and how they are affected by exponents.

Is |xy| > x^2*y^2 ?

|xy|^2 > (x^2*y^2)^2?
x^2*y^2 > x^4*y^4?

(1) 0 < x^2 < 1/4
Nothing about y.
Insufficient.

(2) 0 < y^2 < 1/9
Nothing about x.
Insufficient.

Combo:
We know from st1 that x^2 is a fraction between 0 and 1/4 (e.g. 1/5) . This tells us that x^2 > x^4 (since any fraction raised to a progressively higher exponent will be smaller and smaller).

So now we ask:
y^2 > y^4?
St2 tells us that y^2 is a fraction b/w 0 and 1/9...so y^2 > y^4 necessarily.

x^2*y^2 > x^4*y^4 YES

Sufficient.

Answer is C.
_________________

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________