Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

and statement 2 leaves Y with both positive and negative values thus it can be greater or less. (also the square of X is less than X but that doesnt matter if the products can be positive or negative)

if \(xy<0\), clearly \(xy \leq x^2y^2\), no calculations are needed. Inequality in question stem is false

If \(xy>0\), than \(y=1; x=sqrt{3/14}\) or \(y=-1; x=-sqrt{3/14}\). once more no need to calculate this, just note that \(xy<1\). In this case \((xy)^2<xy<1\)

[strike]So, in both cases \(xy<x^2y^2\)[/strike]

Last edited by shalva on 27 Nov 2009, 05:10, edited 1 time in total.

if \(xy<0\), clearly \(xy \leq x^2y^2\), no calculations are needed. Inequality in question stem is false

If \(xy>0\), than \(y=1; x=sqrt{3/14}\) or \(y=-1; x=-sqrt{3/14}\). once more no need to calculate this, just note that \(xy<1\). In this case (xy)^2<xy<1

So, in both cases xy<x^2y^2

(C)

I don't get this, in the blue part, you mentioned that (xy)^2<xy, then your conclusion (the red part) was in both cases xy<x^2y^2.

Anyway, IMO, E is the answer because (xy)^2 = 3/14. If xy<0, clearly that xy<(xy)^2. If xy>0, because (xy)^2 =3/14 <1 => xy>(xy)^2.

if as follows: xy - x^2*y^2 > 0 xy(1- xy) > 0 so, xy>0 or, x>0 or, y>0 and 1-xy > 0 xy<1 Thus no statements are sufficient. Ans. E

What are wrongs with this approach?

Is xy > x^2*y^2?

Is \(xy>x^2*y^2\)? --> is \(0<xy<1\)? (the same way as a>a^2 means 0<a<1)

(1) 14*x^2 = 3. Clearly insufficient, since no info about y. (2) y^2 = 1. Clearly insufficient, since no info about x.

(1)+(2) If \(x\) and \(y\) have the same sign then \(xy=\sqrt{\frac{3}{14}}\) and the answer will be YES but if \(x\) and \(y\) have the opposite signs then \(xy=-\sqrt{\frac{3}{14}}\) and the answer will be NO. Not sufficient.

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

if as follows: xy - x^2*y^2 > 0 xy(1- xy) > 0 so, xy>0 or, x>0 or, y>0 and 1-xy > 0 xy<1 Thus no statements are sufficient. Ans. E

What are wrongs with this approach?

Is xy > x^2*y^2?

Is \(xy>x^2*y^2\)? --> is \(0<xy<1\)? (the same way as a>a^2 means 0<a<1)

(1) 14*x^2 = 3. Clearly insufficient, since no info about y. (2) y^2 = 1. Clearly insufficient, since no info about x.

(1)+(2) If \(x\) and \(y\) have the same sign then \(xy=\sqrt{\frac{3}{14}}\) and the answer will be YES but if \(x\) and \(y\) have the opposite signs then \(xy=-\sqrt{\frac{3}{14}}\) and the answer will be NO. Not sufficient.

Answer: E.

Hi Bunuel,

Can you explain how you got this step? Thanks!

Is xy>x2∗y2? --> is 0<xy<1? (the same way as a>a^2 means 0<a<1)

if as follows: xy - x^2*y^2 > 0 xy(1- xy) > 0 so, xy>0 or, x>0 or, y>0 and 1-xy > 0 xy<1 Thus no statements are sufficient. Ans. E

What are wrongs with this approach?

Is xy > x^2*y^2?

Is \(xy>x^2*y^2\)? --> is \(0<xy<1\)? (the same way as a>a^2 means 0<a<1)

(1) 14*x^2 = 3. Clearly insufficient, since no info about y. (2) y^2 = 1. Clearly insufficient, since no info about x.

(1)+(2) If \(x\) and \(y\) have the same sign then \(xy=\sqrt{\frac{3}{14}}\) and the answer will be YES but if \(x\) and \(y\) have the opposite signs then \(xy=-\sqrt{\frac{3}{14}}\) and the answer will be NO. Not sufficient.

Answer: E.

Hi Bunuel,

Can you explain how you got this step? Thanks!

Is xy>x2∗y2? --> is 0<xy<1? (the same way as a>a^2 means 0<a<1)

Please don't begin new threads for math questions that are already discussed here on GMAT Club. This particular question is already posted here: is-xy-x-2-y-2-1-14-x-2-3-2-y-87269.html I will ask Bunuel to merge the two posts.

You can find a detailed discussion at that link, and if you still have a question, that would be the appropriate place to ask it, once these posts are merged.

Please don't begin new threads for math questions that are already discussed here on GMAT Club. This particular question is already posted here: is-xy-x-2-y-2-1-14-x-2-3-2-y-87269.html I will ask Bunuel to merge the two posts.

You can find a detailed discussion at that link, and if you still have a question, that would be the appropriate place to ask it, once these posts are merged.

There’s something in Pacific North West that you cannot find anywhere else. The atmosphere and scenic nature are next to none, with mountains on one side and ocean on...

This month I got selected by Stanford GSB to be included in “Best & Brightest, Class of 2017” by Poets & Quants. Besides feeling honored for being part of...

Joe Navarro is an ex FBI agent who was a founding member of the FBI’s Behavioural Analysis Program. He was a body language expert who he used his ability to successfully...