It is currently 17 Dec 2017, 23:17

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

It is absurd idea that whatever artistic endeavor the

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Director
Director
User avatar
Affiliations: FRM Charter holder
Joined: 02 Dec 2006
Posts: 726

Kudos [?]: 103 [0], given: 4

Schools: Stanford, Chicago Booth, Babson College
It is absurd idea that whatever artistic endeavor the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Mar 2007, 03:07
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

17% (10:49) correct 83% (00:45) wrong based on 7 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

It is absurd idea that whatever artistic endeavor the government refuses to support it does not allow, as one can see by rephrasing the statement to read: No one is allowed to create art without a government subsidy.

The pattern of reasoning in which one of the following is most similar to that in the argument above?

(A) The claim that any driver who is not arrested does not break the law is absurd, as one can see by rewording it: Every driver who breaks the law gets arrested.

(B) The claim that any driver who is not arrested does mot break the law is absurd, as one can see by rewording it: Every driver who gets arrested has broken the law.

(C) The notion that every scientist who is supported by a government grant will be successful is absurd, as one can see by rewording it: No scientist who is successful is so without a government grant.

(D) The notion that every scientist who is supported by a government grant will be successful is absurd, as one can see by rewording it: No scientist lacking governmental support will be successful.

(E) The notion that every scientist who has been supported by a government grant will be successful is absurd, as one can see by rewording it: No scientist is allowed to do research without a government grant.

Kudos [?]: 103 [0], given: 4

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 915

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Mar 2007, 03:33
Wow this one was really tough for me. I will go with D.


X( every scientist )who has been Y (refuses to support/supported by a government grant ) means Z(does not allow/ will be successful ) is absurd, as one can see by rewording it:

No one is allowed to create art without a government subsidy.
non X can do Z with non Y.

No scientist lacking governmental support will be successful.
non X can do Z with non Y

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Jan 2007
Posts: 240

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Mar 2007, 08:43
I'll pick (E) because of the following similarity:

"No scientist is allowed to do research without a government grant."

is similar to

"No one is allowed to create art without a government subsidy. "

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 Feb 2007
Posts: 253

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Mar 2007, 09:05
i think D..(with only 70% certainty)

stimulus:
A-->B
A--->B


D. A-->B
A-->B

E. A-->B
C-->A

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 Feb 2007
Posts: 253

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Mar 2007, 09:08
hmm, might be A too.not sure.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
User avatar
Affiliations: FRM Charter holder
Joined: 02 Dec 2006
Posts: 726

Kudos [?]: 103 [0], given: 4

Schools: Stanford, Chicago Booth, Babson College
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Mar 2007, 22:36
The OA is A.

Kudos [?]: 103 [0], given: 4

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 915

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Mar 2007, 04:58
CookieMonster, could you explain, why A?

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 Feb 2007
Posts: 253

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Mar 2007, 11:47
hsampath wrote:
CookieMonster, could you explain, why A?


Given:

NOT [Support] ---> NOT [Allow]
[Allow] ----> Support

NOT [A] ---> NOT [B]
[B] ----> [A]

Answer A:
NOT [A] ---> NOT [B]
[B] ---> [A]


Answer D:
[A] --> [B]
[B] ---> [A]

(btw: D's conditional reasoning is flawed)




and fyi: not [A] ---> not [B]
is the same thing as:
[B] ---> [A]

hope this helps

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 915

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Mar 2007, 06:47
Thank you.

CookieMonster wrote:
hsampath wrote:
CookieMonster, could you explain, why A?


Given:

NOT [Support] ---> NOT [Allow]
[Allow] ----> Support

NOT [A] ---> NOT [B]
[B] ----> [A]

Answer A:
NOT [A] ---> NOT [B]
[B] ---> [A]


Answer D:
[A] --> [B]
[B] ---> [A]

(btw: D's conditional reasoning is flawed)




and fyi: not [A] ---> not [B]
is the same thing as:
[B] ---> [A]

hope this helps

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 01 Jan 2011
Posts: 1

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

ñêà÷àòü áåñïëàòíî ìóëüòèìåäèéíîå ðóêîâîäñòâî ïî ðåìîíòó è îá [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jan 2011, 16:44
ãàç-2410. óñòðîéñòâî, ýêñïëóàòàöèÿ, òåõíè÷åñêîå îáñëóæèâàíèå îíëàéí

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 04 Oct 2016
Posts: 171

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 11

Location: China
Concentration: Healthcare, Entrepreneurship
WE: Sales (Health Care)
Re: It is absurd idea that whatever artistic endeavor the [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Dec 2016, 18:46
CookieMonster wrote:
hsampath wrote:
CookieMonster, could you explain, why A?


Given:

NOT [Support] ---> NOT [Allow]
[Allow] ----> Support

NOT [A] ---> NOT [B]
[B] ----> [A]

Answer A:
NOT [A] ---> NOT [B]
[B] ---> [A]


Answer D:
[A] --> [B]
[B] ---> [A]

(btw: D's conditional reasoning is flawed)




and fyi: not [A] ---> not [B]
is the same thing as:
[B] ---> [A]

hope this helps

so elaborated reasoning~helps a lot :P
_________________

LSAT CR is driving me mad

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 11

Re: It is absurd idea that whatever artistic endeavor the   [#permalink] 23 Dec 2016, 18:46
Display posts from previous: Sort by

It is absurd idea that whatever artistic endeavor the

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.