It is currently 17 Nov 2017, 16:18

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

It is common knowledge that a given word can have various

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 May 2011
Posts: 241

Kudos [?]: 276 [0], given: 8

It is common knowledge that a given word can have various [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Jul 2011, 21:37
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

44% (01:01) correct 56% (01:04) wrong based on 38 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

It is common knowledge that a given word can have various shades of meaning, but how many people are aware that a single word can sometimes be used in completely contradictory ways? For example, the word "cleave" can mean "to adhere" or "to stick together." But just as easily the word "cleave" can mean "to split apart" or "to divide." This proves that words are fundamentally meaningless until they are placed in a sentence.

Which one of the following is an assumption necessary to the author's argument?

Every sentence is meaningful.
Common knowledge is usually wrong.
The possession of two contradictory meanings is equivalent to an absence of meaning.
The word "cleave" is unique in that it can be used in completely contradictory ways.
A word that possesses two shades of meaning is a word that possesses two contradictory meanings.

Kudos [?]: 276 [0], given: 8

1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Feb 2011
Posts: 272

Kudos [?]: 218 [1], given: 13

Concentration: General Management, Social Entrepreneurship
Schools: HBS '14 (A)
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V47
Re: CR - Assumption 700 level [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Jul 2011, 22:35
1
This post received
KUDOS
Every sentence is meaningful. The author is not talking about menanigfulness of sentences. he is saying that words get meaning only when they are placed in a sentence. presumably, words can have meaning even in a meaningless sentence!
Common knowledge is usually wrong.: The author is not saying that. he is ot even arguing against common knowledge (that words have shades of meaning) he is just adding another aspect to it, which is not in common knowledge ( that sometimes words may have contradictory meanings)
The possession of two contradictory meanings is equivalent to an absence of meaning. This option is correct. Author argues that there are words which have contradictory meanings. and then in next sentence says that words are therefore meaningless! he is clearly (and wrongly) equating having two opposing meanings to having no meaning at all!
The word "cleave" is unique in that it can be used in completely contradictory ways. That is not author's assumption - in fact if anything he would assume something opposite of that - since he is using cleave as an example to support a general statement he is making.. his whole argument would fall apart if he would say that cleave is unique!
A word that possesses two shades of meaning is a word that possesses two contradictory meanings. No , auhtor is not assuming that - argument clearly says, 'sometimes' a word can possess.. that doesnt mean that the author is assuming always a word with shades of meaning will have contradictory meanings![/

Kudos [?]: 218 [1], given: 13

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Posts: 445

Kudos [?]: 107 [0], given: 157

Re: CR - Assumption 700 level [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Jul 2011, 21:49
Answer should be C.
The author says that words can have various shades of meanings; words can also have contradictory meanings. For that, an example is given followed by a conclusion that generalizes words into meaningless words.

So the author needs to assume that all words that have contradictory meaning are meaningless.
_________________

If you found the reply to be helpful, give kudos.

Kudos [?]: 107 [0], given: 157

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 14 Feb 2010
Posts: 159

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 8

Location: Banaglore
Re: CR - Assumption 700 level [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Jul 2011, 01:44
bschool83 wrote:
It is common knowledge that a given word can have various shades of meaning, but how many people are aware that a single word can sometimes be used in completely contradictory ways? For example, the word "cleave" can mean "to adhere" or "to stick together." But just as easily the word "cleave" can mean "to split apart" or "to divide." This proves that words are fundamentally meaningless until they are placed in a sentence.

Which one of the following is an assumption necessary to the author's argument?

Every sentence is meaningful.
Common knowledge is usually wrong.
The possession of two contradictory meanings is equivalent to an absence of meaning.
The word "cleave" is unique in that it can be used in completely contradictory ways.
A word that possesses two shades of meaning is a word that possesses two contradictory meanings.



I will go with C. what is the OA?

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 8

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 May 2010
Posts: 285

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 7

GMAT 1: 710 Q47 V40
Re: CR - Assumption 700 level [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Jul 2011, 07:06
C. First he says that there are two different meanings. Then he jumps and says that words with two different meanings are fundamentally meaningless. C bridges that gap.
_________________

If you like my post, consider giving me KUDOS!

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 7

Board of Directors
User avatar
G
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3373

Kudos [?]: 9275 [0], given: 1168

Re: CR - Assumption 700 level [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Aug 2011, 17:16

Kudos [?]: 9275 [0], given: 1168

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Jun 2011
Posts: 139

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 1

Re: CR - Assumption 700 level [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Aug 2011, 21:46
Agree with C..Though A might entice you..But it talks about the entire sentence and not of the word which is used in the sentence..

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 1

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Jan 2011
Posts: 232

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 25

Location: India
GMAT Date: 07-16-2012
GPA: 3.4
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Reviews Badge
Re: CR - Assumption 700 level [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Sep 2011, 05:06
C

the argument states one example as primise, and makes general claim that words are meaningless.
assumption should make one of the primise true. option C explicitly makes the primise true.
_________________

-------Analyze why option A in SC wrong-------

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 25

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 01 Jun 2011
Posts: 172

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 6

Re: CR - Assumption 700 level [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Sep 2011, 02:25
C fro me

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 6

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Jun 2011
Posts: 182

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 21

Re: CR - Same word different meanings [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Sep 2011, 05:46
yup... nice question!! C is my take as well

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 21

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Jun 2011
Posts: 105

Kudos [?]: 65 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - Same word different meanings [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Sep 2011, 06:12
bschool83 wrote:
It is common knowledge that a given word can have various shades of meaning, but how many people are aware that a single word can sometimes be used in completely contradictory ways? For example, the word "cleave" can mean "to adhere" or "to stick together." But just as easily the word "cleave" can mean "to split apart" or "to divide." This proves that words are fundamentally meaningless until they are placed in a sentence.

Which one of the following is an assumption necessary to the author's argument?

Every sentence is meaningful.
Common knowledge is usually wrong.
The possession of two contradictory meanings is equivalent to an absence of meaning.
The word "cleave" is unique in that it can be used in completely contradictory ways.
A word that possesses two shades of meaning is a word that possesses two contradictory meanings.

Kudos [?]: 65 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Jun 2011
Posts: 70

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - Same word different meanings [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Sep 2011, 07:28
+1 for C

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - Same word different meanings   [#permalink] 10 Sep 2011, 07:28
Display posts from previous: Sort by

It is common knowledge that a given word can have various

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.