GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 07 Dec 2019, 19:17

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

It is naive to think that historical explanations can be objective

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Current Student
User avatar
V
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 4275
Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
It is naive to think that historical explanations can be objective  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Apr 2015, 08:22
2
10
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

61% (01:44) correct 39% (02:15) wrong based on 383 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Lenore: It is naive to think that historical explanations can be objective. In evaluating evidence, historians are always influenced by their national, political, and class loyalties.

Victor: Still, the very fact that cases of biased thinking have been detected and sources of bias identified shows that there are people who can maintain objectivity.

Victor's response does not succeed as a rebuttal of Lenore's argument because his response

(A) displays the same kind of biased thinking as that against which Lenore's argument it directed

(B) does not address the special case of historians who purposely distort evidence in order to promote their own political objectives

(C) fails to provide examples of cases in which biased thinking has been detected and the source of that bias identified

(D) does not consider sources of bias in historical explanation other than those that are due to national, political, and class loyalties

(E) overlooks the possibility that those who detect and identify bias are themselves biased in some way

_________________
Retired Moderator
avatar
B
Status: On a mountain of skulls, in the castle of pain, I sit on a throne of blood.
Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Posts: 299
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
It is naive to think that historical explanations can be objective  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Apr 2015, 09:57
Lenore: It is naive to think that historical explanations can be objective. In evaluating evidence, historians are always influenced by their national, political, and class loyalties.

Victor: Still, the very fact that cases of biased thinking have been detected and sources of bias identified shows that there are people who can maintain objectivity.

Victor's response does not succeed as a rebuttal of Lenore's argument because his response

(A) displays the same kind of biased thinking as that against which Lenore's argument it directed - Both have their own independent thinking.

(B) does not address the special case of historians who purposely distort evidence in order to promote their own political objectivesIncorrect

(C) fails to provide examples of cases in which biased thinking has been detected and the source of that bias identified --Cases are not required when the argument is glaringly weak

(D) does not consider sources of bias in historical explanation other than those that are due to national, political, and class loyalties He doesnt need to do that.

(E) overlooks the possibility that those who detect and identify bias are themselves biased in some wayCorrect. Its either this or something that tells us that the biases that are caught are just a drop in the ocean
Board of Directors
User avatar
P
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2492
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE: General Management (Transportation)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: It is naive to think that historical explanations can be objective  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jan 2016, 13:31
souvik101990 wrote:
Lenore: It is naive to think that historical explanations can be objective. In evaluating evidence, historians are always influenced by their national, political, and class loyalties.

Victor: Still, the very fact that cases of biased thinking have been detected and sources of bias identified shows that there are people who can maintain objectivity.


Victor's response does not succeed as a rebuttal of Lenore's argument because his response

my ideas were that those who identified those biased sources are actually driven by their own national, political, and class loyalties, thus making them biased as well.

only answer choice E directly states that. other ones do not come even close.

(A) displays the same kind of biased thinking as that against which Lenore's argument it directed
two opposed ideas, so not same kind of thinking.

(B) does not address the special case of historians who purposely distort evidence in order to promote their own political objectives
irrelevant.

(C) fails to provide examples of cases in which biased thinking has been detected and the source of that bias identified
examples are not needed.

(D) does not consider sources of bias in historical explanation other than those that are due to national, political, and class loyalties
irrelevant. biased source is biased, regardless of what are the presumed causes.

(E) overlooks the possibility that those who detect and identify bias are themselves biased in some way
good.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 24 Jul 2014
Posts: 88
Location: India
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: It is naive to think that historical explanations can be objective  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jan 2016, 20:45
Victor adds only one additional point and that is "the evaluating committee who evaluates the biased thinking"
If these individuals are also as biased as the historians , then Victor's point is corrupted
So ans E
_________________
The Mind ~ Muscle Connection
My GMAT Journey is Complete.Going to start the MBA in Information Management from 2016
Good Luck everyone.
Current Student
avatar
B
Joined: 11 Sep 2016
Posts: 63
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Leadership
GMAT 1: 710 Q47 V40
GPA: 3
WE: Sales (Manufacturing)
Re: It is naive to think that historical explanations can be objective  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 May 2017, 10:42
Well victor is actually trying to rebut Lenore's argument that historians' explainations are not objective.
I attempting to do so, Victor says that the very fact that people can detect such bias proves that people are objective. But to be able to successfully rebut Lenore's argument, Victor should have given examples of some historian who detected a bias in the past with objectivity.

In case of (E) even if he did not overlook the possibility of biased thinking by the detectors of bias, thereby acknowledging the bias' bias would that be a strong rebuttal to Lenore's argument?
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 03 Dec 2018
Posts: 169
Re: It is naive to think that historical explanations can be objective  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Mar 2019, 20:34
Why is E correct? How do I eliminate other option choices?
GMAT Club Bot
Re: It is naive to think that historical explanations can be objective   [#permalink] 16 Mar 2019, 20:34
Display posts from previous: Sort by

It is naive to think that historical explanations can be objective

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne