It is currently 24 Sep 2017, 18:01

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

It is probably within the reach of human technology to make

Author Message
Intern
Joined: 17 Aug 2005
Posts: 6

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

It is probably within the reach of human technology to make [#permalink]

Show Tags

23 Sep 2005, 09:26
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 4 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

It is probably within the reach of human technology to make the climate of Mars inhabitable. It might be several centuries before people could live there, even with breathing apparatuses, but some of the worldâ€™s great temples and cathedrals took centuries to build. Research efforts now are justified if there is even a chance of making another planet inhabitable. Besides, the intellectual exercise of understanding how the Martian atmosphere might be changed could help in understanding atmospheric changes inadvertently triggered by human activity on Earth.
The main point of the argument is that

(A) it is probably technologically possible for humankind to alter the climate of Mars
(B) it would take several centuries to make Mars even marginally inhabitable
(C) making Mars inhabitable is an effort comparable to building a great temple or cathedral
(D) research efforts aimed at discovering how to change the climate of Mars are justified
(E) efforts to change the climate of Mars could facilitate understanding of the Earthâ€™s climate

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 14 Sep 2005
Posts: 984

Kudos [?]: 209 [0], given: 0

Location: South Korea

Show Tags

23 Sep 2005, 10:37
I guess the main point is (A).

* Main Point
= We can make the climate of Mars inhabitable.

* Anticipated repute = It takes too long.
* Author's answer = Time doesn't matter, and the intellectual exercise will be helpful for us, too.

"besides A" sounds like A is optional, not critical.

Last edited by gamjatang on 23 Sep 2005, 10:49, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 209 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 31 Jul 2005
Posts: 86

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Show Tags

23 Sep 2005, 10:42
should be D based on lines 3 & 4.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Posts: 896

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

23 Sep 2005, 11:01
Between E and d, I pick D and here is why.

A is out because it is explicity stated in the argument that human technology is within the rach to make martian climate inhabitable

B and C are out for the same reason A is out.
E is farfetched because nowhere in the passage is it stated that efforts are presently made to change the climate of Mars. Efforts are only made to see if Martian atmosphere might be changed.

D is moderate and reasonable.

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 17 Aug 2005
Posts: 6

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Show Tags

23 Sep 2005, 11:55
Exactly why can't something that is explicitly stated not be the main point of the argument?

D is OA, but more explanation would be appreciated.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 09 Jul 2005
Posts: 589

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

23 Sep 2005, 13:47
IMO D

According to Research efforts now are justified if there is even a chance of making another planet inhabitable, the main point of this passage must be D. The senteces beofre this are leading you to the main point/statement of the author. After this sentences, the author adds additional information, but nothing relevant for the pourpose is stated.

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1704

Kudos [?]: 457 [0], given: 0

Location: Dhaka

Show Tags

23 Sep 2005, 13:51
I was stuck between D and E.

Probably I would have picke E and got it wrong.
_________________

hey ya......

Kudos [?]: 457 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 09 Sep 2005
Posts: 34

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

24 Sep 2005, 06:58
Well I will put my reasoning in this way.

1. Argument starts with that making Mars inhabitable is probably within the reach of human technology.
2. Comparision between time it will take to make Mars living place and centuries it took to build cathederals
3. Finally research efforts (about point 1) are justified for two reasons:
a)justified if there is even a chance of making another planet inhabitable.
b)Besides, the intellectual exercise of understanding how the Martian atmosphere might be changed could help in understanding atmospheric changes inadvertently triggered by human activity on Earth

Choice A does not talk about the justification part that is the main argument as first statement is acting as an evidence only.
Choice B, after seeing the above analysis can be easily eliminated.
Choice C, is making the comparison between time periods.
Choice D, bingo this talks about the core issue described above.
Choice E, talks about only one of the reason mentioned above.

Hope it helps.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

24 Sep 2005, 06:58
Display posts from previous: Sort by